Re: jessie: Problems upgrading openjdk-7-jdk with openjdk-7-source installed
On 28/07/2014 10:41, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 27.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Felix Natter: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: Hello Felix, On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote: hello, I get this: Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u65-2.5.1-2) over (7u55-2.4.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/src.zip', which is also in package openjdk-7-source 7u55-2.4.7-2 This is an RC bug. Could you report it? Done: #756226 the advice was bad, and the bug filing too. The advice is missing an after you checked the bug tracker for existing bugs, and you would have found #755126. And the severity for the newly filed bug is wrong too, there is no functionality bug. Well, just like any other bug report, that is implied... Anyway, it is just a duplicate... Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d60e99.3000...@debian.org
Re: jessie: Problems upgrading openjdk-7-jdk with openjdk-7-source installed
Am 27.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Felix Natter: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: Hello Felix, On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote: hello, I get this: Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u65-2.5.1-2) over (7u55-2.4.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/src.zip', which is also in package openjdk-7-source 7u55-2.4.7-2 This is an RC bug. Could you report it? Done: #756226 the advice was bad, and the bug filing too. The advice is missing an after you checked the bug tracker for existing bugs, and you would have found #755126. And the severity for the newly filed bug is wrong too, there is no functionality bug. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d60cc3.8000...@debian.org
Re: Hello friendly Java people
* Hilko Bengen: I am working on updating carrotsearch-randomizedtesting from 2.0.16 to 2.1.6 right now. The package in NEW and the git repo have been updated. Cheers, -Hilko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/877g2xkbbw@msgid.hilluzination.de
Re: jessie: Problems upgrading openjdk-7-jdk with openjdk-7-source installed
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: On 28/07/2014 10:41, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 27.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Felix Natter: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: Hello Felix, On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote: hello, I get this: Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u65-2.5.1-2) over (7u55-2.4.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/src.zip', which is also in package openjdk-7-source 7u55-2.4.7-2 This is an RC bug. Could you report it? Done: #756226 the advice was bad, and the bug filing too. The advice is missing an after you checked the bug tracker for existing bugs, and you would have found #755126. And the severity for the newly filed bug is wrong too, there is no functionality bug. Just to understand this: Which severity level do I use for package dependency problems? Is the 'important' from #755126 correct? To me, the bug makes the package unusable (but I guess not in the sense of https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer...). Well, just like any other bug report, that is implied... Yes, it was my fault. I'll do better next time! Anyway, it is just a duplicate... Yeah, could be worse ;-) Best Regards, -- Felix Natter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87tx61gzu4@bitburger.home.felix
Re: jessie: Problems upgrading openjdk-7-jdk with openjdk-7-source installed
Am 28.07.2014 um 19:25 schrieb Felix Natter: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: On 28/07/2014 10:41, Matthias Klose wrote: Am 27.07.2014 21:33, schrieb Felix Natter: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org writes: Hello Felix, On 27/07/2014 19:42, Felix Natter wrote: hello, I get this: Preparing to unpack .../openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking openjdk-7-jdk:amd64 (7u65-2.5.1-2) over (7u55-2.4.7-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/openjdk-7-jdk_7u65-2.5.1-2_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/src.zip', which is also in package openjdk-7-source 7u55-2.4.7-2 This is an RC bug. Could you report it? Done: #756226 the advice was bad, and the bug filing too. The advice is missing an after you checked the bug tracker for existing bugs, and you would have found #755126. And the severity for the newly filed bug is wrong too, there is no functionality bug. Just to understand this: Which severity level do I use for package dependency problems? Is the 'important' from #755126 correct? To me, the bug makes the package unusable (but I guess not in the sense of https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer...). this issue was filed with severity normal, then raised to serious (appropriate), and then downgraded by myself to important, because I did value to reach the security updates testing first. this was far more important than installability of the -src package. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d6971d.6050...@debian.org
Re: libspring-security-3.0-java: changing back from ITP to RFP
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:47:15PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: retitle 582181 RFP: libspring-security-3.0-java -- modular Java/J2EE noowner 582181 tag 582181 - pending thanks I packaged that library but in the end I didn't need it in Debian so I never uploaded it. If somebody is interested on it, they can take over the maintenance. The git repository is at alioth, as usual. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/libspring-security-java.git Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: eclipse-cdt 8.4.0-1 (new upstream) - [UPLOADED]
On 07/27/2014 12:17 PM, Jakub Adam wrote: Hi Tony, On 07/26/2014 08:00 PM, tony mancill wrote: the change to set the javac target to 1.7. Is it necessary? yes, the package won't build without that. Since, eclipse-cdt is Arch: all, the package may fail on any architectures that pull in a default-jdk that isn't openjdk-7 (see [1]). eclipse-cdt disables building on the architectures that have only gcj by declaring Build-Depends on default-jdk (= 2:1.6), which is only satisfied where openjdk-6 or higher is the default (this was suggested in #743234 [1]). In sid, there's only default-jdk 2:1.7 and it installs openjdk-7, so there shouldn't be a need to bump up the version in d/control. As an alternative, I could list only the supported architectures in d/control, but that would have to be updated when openjdk-7 becomes available say on kfreebsd. Hi Jakub, Thanks for pointing out the versioned dependency. I think the way you have it setup now is preferable to what I was proposing. I did go ahead and bump the versioned dep on default-jdk to (= 2:1.7), as this will prevent answer the what's the minimum JDK? question explicitly for any back-porters. Let me know if you disagree and I'll upload again. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
