Bug#1069970: marked as done (ITP: libeddsa-java -- implementation of EdDSA in Java)
Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2024 13:00:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1069970: fixed in libeddsa-java 0.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1069970, regarding ITP: libeddsa-java -- implementation of EdDSA in Java to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1069970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069970 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian-Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libeddsa-java Version : 0.3.0 Upstream Contact: str4d * URL : https://github.com/str4d/ed25519-java * License : CC0-1.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : implementation of EdDSA in Java This package is needed as a dependency of libmina-sshd-java and of new upstream versions of jgit. I plan to maintain it in the Debian-Java team and to be its first uploader. This implementation of EdDSA is based on the ref10 implementation in SUPERCOP. There are two internal implementations: - A port of the radix-2^51 operations in ref10 - fast and constant-time, but only useful for Ed25519; - A generic version using BigIntegers for calculation - a bit slower and not constant-time, but compatible with any EdDSA parameter specification. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libeddsa-java Source-Version: 0.3.0-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libeddsa-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1069...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libeddsa-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 21:30:13 +0200 Source: libeddsa-java Binary: libeddsa-java Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.0-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libeddsa-java - implementation of EdDSA in Java Closes: 1069970 Changes: libeddsa-java (0.3.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #1069970) Checksums-Sha1: 84284a5ad908571e862dd7b9c98b268d3d472914 2058 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1.dsc 1aea53588138fce5459521a7055bce07be33b028 5818956 libeddsa-java_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz df9c3e03e19175ead9e0df753b6667dffe36 3008 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz 44ca5db5cc5b1b94991332124bd167d344b33764 58812 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1_all.deb 813f1022aeb8f2b176cfcc74fd5cf1a917b4bdfa 10665 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 6b7da8be89fcce897cb9fe406313162faa41229190a62d167d2355b4ec471399 2058 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1.dsc eb2205360fff2c7fb28f0fa96ca7e812622de33408c6f35e043d0b566ef84647 5818956 libeddsa-java_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz c76df2b16c8dbdc8bde3b767172597b5fac6299a9181a1e94bf2a2303abd0340 3008 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz 25e5ae2cc43f6a249d53a3f723e9f8bec34c7af9f1c32cb6dc019e24ba3d8125 58812 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1_all.deb ef275e14949aa26905791bfe77cbdc98b8349a3629cb462938cc41fdbbdf7d65 10665 libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: a0dcfa36d997ea01d569b0912e6725e5 2058 java optional libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1.dsc 40bf627c1e717925e708265ceaa592d6 5818956 java optional libeddsa-java_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz f8d16a664cb23bd3611db83b04168991 3008 java optional libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz e6c8f52ae13f8fe07fccc429e0aaccfa 58812 java optional libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1_all.deb 5f76e59cd71a6de1ed0c93603a144cb3 10665 java optional libeddsa-java_0.3.0-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEM8soQxPpC9J9y0UjYAMWptwndHYFAmYxSaYACgkQYAMWptwn dHZKqg//VBMxbEByDiuFYqQOZO/EfwohIXbAj2+9O8pXBdFSpyKmXmGjB0BNukMP q2xBGPBd+q4zDucH8IwhGr1mL+KJzT1jBxBtOR1k9OCWKWyKgt+2YnM5UBONLV6F PZnIhKxpaSyA5t6ZlX7vH6wqsEgRsQlqpVaaPJJcokwNgQ3eSNL+7dctut4b6rz1 3UzyYT5KRra907FWnRmVZpgMMw80Zmy+F3WIks7ZyETmqovFoSwJpYOYx07IxAt3 G6AAobYEMtfG+/Qa0AN99KBWZGc/g5Ffg7DSg9rllC662kkg/IWCLbFvRIZ2S0PP UbsbkTLk3dMT5XOW0nu3s2KpH3nb8brJGDi00AFWA6qm0W/DrwvRcYmrI4fHoQIm
Bug#1040181: marked as done (openjdk-8: Please disable tests on zero architectures)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jul 2023 22:39:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1040181: fixed in openjdk-8 8u382~b04-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1040181, regarding openjdk-8: Please disable tests on zero architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1040181: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040181 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: openjdk-8 Version: 8u382~b04-1 Severity: important Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: Thorsten Glaser Zero is slow, OpenJDK has many tests, and on slower ports architectures the build can literally take a month: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=openjdk-8=alpha Please fix this with something like: --- debian/rules.old2023-07-02 21:46:21.815210161 + +++ debian/rules2023-07-02 21:48:21.783102835 + @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ endif with_check = $(if $(findstring nocheck, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),,yes) -ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), armel)) +ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(hotspot_archs))) with_check = disabled running check on $(DEB_HOST_ARCH) endif ifneq (,$(filter $(distrel),precise)) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: openjdk-8 Source-Version: 8u382~b04-2 Done: Thorsten Glaser We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openjdk-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1040...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated openjdk-8 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:17:03 +0200 Source: openjdk-8 Architecture: source Version: 8u382~b04-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Java Maintenance Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser Closes: 1040167 1040181 Changes: openjdk-8 (8u382~b04-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Rewrite codename-based if(n)eqs, so they fail safer (Closes: #1040167) * Maybe fix sparc64 Linux build failure * Do not run check for nōn-Hotspot architectures (Closes: #1040181) Checksums-Sha1: 3d77a63a49d70acb0619bcb01cdcdafdbd0fb159 4562 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.dsc 5113855e6b61388404d92ebd29ed8f77430b7428 183088 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 6df5be61263e00296d4f0a0b7a5de4616ed1e1d068e0ebe9069c032cd312190a 4562 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.dsc 1619ca90373140fb4eb6daaf93e6037b6d9dbe52e2eb633b62005ae4356b1486 183088 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.debian.tar.xz Files: 7284308dc663033b384f4380a998020d 4562 java optional openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.dsc 972d37000c6179da49b317da0a713f67 183088 java optional openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (MirBSD) iQIcBAEBCQAGBQJkofg5AAoJEHa1NLLpkAfgqsQP/2M+GS9P8f9KPLZYHNrNewKE 0zfejocsvX1PMtqNL2agrfnEifjCfeBGHOrsrNYJB96sHCK9FB7dm5JCsjSFrcrR JaK9oWzzKANHWlxPqD9ETWWJ2z1sFdqbuNcA43/3SnKARYHwAO8a58OpOMOfa6lD Y9QO7KuLwY4V1e+NIMgGoSgZrriod0ekET60mid6d7yDonIE41TgpztG7BYn5giO 4rtUTn2tpsdVFXy7uUV3Ba4Mn9t28+rk52Dab8w+zRCjL5ZoRCK4Nod3vb61wVlO KAaiIUFuV/CtIJ2LjNIJYSBRb7c0uNjDuskDrjHIUFlwKe7E2BSQnBfI8R6PdbOO LvPa8YmjNyCItle+RC26p9h6CoLNYgjg7ejr2QN6yuOp6aNmrVr/PxZEQdwj8kYB gBUMdtmIUPS+5WFScvEzacAJp1X2xEZ3R3GIGKO2yBT/72t2Frw7s4i0uh0rQt0P RnljRiVjLpXBockVzCPuYobtb6ATXgAX3FMjjsXaKeIgspnOFVGEvFdsf4m3vPrF i5+4I4bN95FBvd090rwa5ElDxwGhIE4KpNvKR5b+9fwDQCXvVW7EYi6JckguIXFv 1dCsOpoVF2g0powm5bHpXVXvScgDoVOSrPt2PX9Uae407zjAnce7uj+zlv/oReDK cvdOJLtx9ToF0Oht+u9B =QvgM -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#1040167: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jul 2023 22:39:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1040167: fixed in openjdk-8 8u382~b04-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1040167, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1040167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Version: 8u382~b04-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Updating from 8u372-ga-1 which was the previous version in unstable is not possible because openjdk-8-jre-headless_8e382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 However libjpeg8 is not to be found in Debian Expected behaviour: correct dependencies or adding the missing libjpeg8 to Debian? -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (991, 'stable-security'), (991, 'stable'), (990, 'proposed- updates'), (390, 'oldstable-security'), (390, 'oldstable'), (389, 'oldstable- updates'), (380, 'oldoldstable'), (379, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (370, 'oldoldstable'), (95, 'testing'), (94, 'unstable'), (93, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr:en_US Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on: ii ca-certificates-java 20230103 ii java-common 0.74 ii libc6 2.36-9 ii libcups2 2.4.2-3 ii libfontconfig12.14.1-4 ii libfreetype6 2.12.1+dfsg-5 ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:2.1.5-2 ii liblcms2-22.14-2 ii libnss3 2:3.87.1-1 ii libpcsclite1 1.9.9-2 ii libstdc++612.2.0-14 ii libx11-6 2:1.8.4-2+deb12u1 ii libxext6 2:1.3.4-1+b1 ii libxi62:1.8-1+b1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1.1 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.3-1.1 ii util-linux2.38.1-5+b1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests: ii fonts-dejavu-extra2.37-6 pn fonts-indic pn fonts-ipafont-gothic pn fonts-ipafont-mincho pn fonts-wqy-microhei pn fonts-wqy-zenhei ii libnss-mdns 0.15.1-3 -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: openjdk-8 Source-Version: 8u382~b04-2 Done: Thorsten Glaser We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openjdk-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1040...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated openjdk-8 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:17:03 +0200 Source: openjdk-8 Architecture: source Version: 8u382~b04-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Java Maintenance Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser Closes: 1040167 1040181 Changes: openjdk-8 (8u382~b04-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Rewrite codename-based if(n)eqs, so they fail safer (Closes: #1040167) * Maybe fix sparc64 Linux build failure * Do not run check for nōn-Hotspot architectures (Closes: #1040181) Checksums-Sha1: 3d77a63a49d70acb0619bcb01cdcdafdbd0fb159 4562 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.dsc 5113855e6b61388404d92ebd29ed8f77430b7428 183088 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 6df5be61263e00296d4f0a0b7a5de4616ed1e1d068e0ebe9069c032cd312190a 4562 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.dsc 1619ca90373140fb4eb6daaf93e6037b6d9dbe52e2eb633b62005ae4356b1486 183088 openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.debian.tar.xz Files: 7284308dc663033b384f4380a998020d 4562 java optional openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2.dsc 972d37000c6179da49b317da0a713f67 183088 java optional openjdk-8_8u382~b04-2
Processed: ok will do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1040181 + confirmed pending Bug #1040181 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: Please disable tests on zero architectures Added tag(s) pending and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1040181: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040181 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1040167: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian)
Your message dated Sun, 02 Jul 2023 21:49:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1040167: fixed in openjdk-8 8u382~b04-2~binfix1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1040167, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1040167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Version: 8u382~b04-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Updating from 8u372-ga-1 which was the previous version in unstable is not possible because openjdk-8-jre-headless_8e382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 However libjpeg8 is not to be found in Debian Expected behaviour: correct dependencies or adding the missing libjpeg8 to Debian? -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.0 APT prefers stable-security APT policy: (991, 'stable-security'), (991, 'stable'), (990, 'proposed- updates'), (390, 'oldstable-security'), (390, 'oldstable'), (389, 'oldstable- updates'), (380, 'oldoldstable'), (379, 'oldoldstable-updates'), (370, 'oldoldstable'), (95, 'testing'), (94, 'unstable'), (93, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr:en_US Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on: ii ca-certificates-java 20230103 ii java-common 0.74 ii libc6 2.36-9 ii libcups2 2.4.2-3 ii libfontconfig12.14.1-4 ii libfreetype6 2.12.1+dfsg-5 ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:2.1.5-2 ii liblcms2-22.14-2 ii libnss3 2:3.87.1-1 ii libpcsclite1 1.9.9-2 ii libstdc++612.2.0-14 ii libx11-6 2:1.8.4-2+deb12u1 ii libxext6 2:1.3.4-1+b1 ii libxi62:1.8-1+b1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1.1 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.3-1.1 ii util-linux2.38.1-5+b1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.13.dfsg-1 openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests: ii fonts-dejavu-extra2.37-6 pn fonts-indic pn fonts-ipafont-gothic pn fonts-ipafont-mincho pn fonts-wqy-microhei pn fonts-wqy-zenhei ii libnss-mdns 0.15.1-3 -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: openjdk-8 Source-Version: 8u382~b04-2~binfix1 Done: Thorsten Glaser We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openjdk-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1040...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated openjdk-8 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 21:41:14 +0200 Source: openjdk-8 Binary: openjdk-8-dbg openjdk-8-demo openjdk-8-jdk openjdk-8-jdk-headless openjdk-8-jre openjdk-8-jre-headless openjdk-8-jre-zero Architecture: source amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 ppc64el s390x Version: 8u382~b04-2~binfix1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Thorsten Glaser Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser Closes: 1040167 Description: openjdk-8-dbg - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (debugging symbols) openjdk-8-demo - Java runtime based on OpenJDK (demos and examples) openjdk-8-jdk - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK) openjdk-8-jdk-headless - OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK) (headless) openjdk-8-jre - OpenJDK Java runtime, using openjdk-8-jre-headless - OpenJDK Java runtime, using (headless) openjdk-8-jre-zero - Alternative JVM for OpenJDK, using Zero Changes: openjdk-8 (8u382~b04-2~binfix1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Rewrite codename-based if(n)eqs, so they fail safer (Closes: #1040167) * first (fake) upload . This is actually
Processed: severity of 1040167 is serious
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1040167 serious Bug #1040167 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: version 8u382~b04-1 depends on libjpeg8 which is not in Debian Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1040167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040167 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1032981: marked as done (ITP: jtreg7 -- Regression Test Harness for the OpenJDK platform)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:02:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1032981: fixed in jtreg7 7.2+1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1032981, regarding ITP: jtreg7 -- Regression Test Harness for the OpenJDK platform to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1032981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032981 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: jtreg7 Version : 7.1.1+1 Upstream Author : Oracle and/or its affiliates * URL : https://openjdk.org/jtreg/ * License : GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception Programming Lang: Java Description : The Regression Test Harness for the OpenJDK platform: jtreg jtreg is the test harness used by the JDK test framework. This framework is intended primarily for regression tests. It can also be used for unit tests, functional tests, and even simple product tests -- in other words, just about any type of test except a conformance test, which belong in a TCK. This package is required to run OpenJDK regression tests that are part of openjdk packages build. OpenJDK 20 requires jtreg 7. OpenJDK 17 still needs jtreg 6.x. This requires a new source and binary packages. The package will be team-maintained in the Debian Java team. The repository with a packaging draft is available on salsa [1]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/vpa1977/jtreg7 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: jtreg7 Source-Version: 7.2+1-1 Done: Vladimir Petko We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jtreg7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1032...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Vladimir Petko (supplier of updated jtreg7 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 14:28:12 +1200 Source: jtreg7 Binary: jtreg7 Architecture: source all Version: 7.2+1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Vladimir Petko Changed-By: Vladimir Petko Description: jtreg7 - Regression Test Harness for the OpenJDK platform Closes: 1032981 Changes: jtreg7 (7.2+1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. Closes: #1032981. * d/p/add-container-count.patch: drop patch, upstream JUnit is updated. * d/copyright: exclude make/checkstyle. Checksums-Sha1: ff14dabfd5998e108a4ccadbf40ceef103a06fd7 2055 jtreg7_7.2+1-1.dsc d0644d4e2eafb3f24e44cfbd32a586e714e2ae8b 504790 jtreg7_7.2+1.orig.tar.gz f3983a2dfd112e531aeb1ed40375fe1e87fc7e2e 5728 jtreg7_7.2+1-1.debian.tar.xz 594876b502113ec3fe1d406c7654735f4cd3c848 709956 jtreg7_7.2+1-1_all.deb e2ba51a78843e3806a20c43630bc8fcbb999b3bb 13369 jtreg7_7.2+1-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 51eb87379bb8ccfe669261008a085f7236cadf517322de245c4d00076e39205f 2055 jtreg7_7.2+1-1.dsc ee60429db2059c2f7dd70df581643f4eb731782827d6f20757b2c32c7c92a7c8 504790 jtreg7_7.2+1.orig.tar.gz dd1cda64291bc9510abe5eb3bff4681f0a1456caefcfd008dd2adb7b95015f26 5728 jtreg7_7.2+1-1.debian.tar.xz b30539915bab2567c6181d80a644d7f34656767c1bc577f4e127525bf9fc7ab3 709956 jtreg7_7.2+1-1_all.deb 5d5b589248b3073868b2206b2e674d72b3ffd69bee7d7a80c2514a33eaa34c92 13369 jtreg7_7.2+1-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: e12878087834437b8d76e482841a0a5e 2055 java optional jtreg7_7.2+1-1.dsc 0ef8d4df83846fe951546270f4fbcbc7 504790 java optional jtreg7_7.2+1.orig.tar.gz fd424a555a3bac153133eb7ed57e500f 5728 java optional jtreg7_7.2+1-1.debian.tar.xz 319ab5a6a5378451cd18de33346cdf34 709956 java optional jtreg7_7.2+1-1_all.deb b59eb6c172208e97a04195e742a4bbe1 13369 java optional jtreg7_7.2+1-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJEBAEBCAAuFiEE1WVxuIqLuvFAv2PWvX6qYHePpvUFAmSICDIQHGRva29AZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRC9fqpgd4+m9cG2D/9essZ6FG9gfaudYh/1uXhOHRnZSJrlysyP b3GYeOYtSdFdfrCoVgjjoRznmHt6YSepUIQANLS4n2fxv89KNccgMph7qehFjv5k p4xTa4vmD7hB04URAyFjYj2lYi8vHb5eMgkqlczebrcnHKo4O3weKtWSwUYN1uz9
Processed: Re: Bug#1035340: latest openjdk-8-jdk version 8u372-b07 is not available
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 1035340 Bug #1035340 [openjdk-8-jdk] latest openjdk-8-jdk version 8u372-b07 is not available Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1035340: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035340 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1028366: marked as done (ITP: asmtools-java -- Java library for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files)
Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 16:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1028366: fixed in asmtools 7.0-b09-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1028366, regarding ITP: asmtools-java -- Java library for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1028366: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028366 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: libasmtools-java Version : 7.0-b09 Upstream Author : Leonid Kuskov and others * URL : https://github.com/openjdk/asmtools * License : GPL-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java library for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files The AsmTools open source project is used to develop tools for the production of proper and improper Java '.class' files. AsmTools are being opened in order to facilitate a community of Java .class file production for various testing and other OpenJDK development applications. AsmTools consist of a set of (Java class file) assembler/disassemblers: - Jasm/Jdis - an assembler language that provides a Java-like declaration of member signatures, while providing Java VM specification compliant mnemonics for byte-code instructions. Jasm also provides high-level syntax for constructs often found within classfile attributes. Jasm encoded tests are useful for sequencing byte codes in a way that Javac compiled code might not normally sequence byte-codes. - JCod/JDec - an assembler language that provides byte-code containers of class-file constructs. JCod encoded tests are useful for testing the well- formedness of class-files, as well as creating collections within a class-file construct that might be size-bounded by a normal Java compiler. - JCod can also be used to 'fuzz' class files in a methodical way that respects class-file constructs. AsmTools are completely reflexive - Java binary (.class) files may be disassembled into textual representations, which in turn can be assembled back to the same binary file. AsmTools are developed to support the latest class file formats, in lock-step with JDK development. Other open source Java assembler tools and binary classfile frameworks exist. They can be used for the purpose of synthesizing classfiles, however: - they typically are designed to enforce the limits imposed by the VM specification of the class file format. They are not designed to produce classes that violate those limits. - other assembler tools may not necessarily follow strict Java mnemonics as defined in the Java VM spec. - other assembler tools may not stay in lock-step with the current generation of the JDK and VM specifications. - class file libraries are harder to use for simple manipulations of any given class file. Typically, one has to create a program in that framework to parse and modify a class for a specific change to a given class. The AsmTools open source project is part of the Code Tools Project. It exists to promote a community that will improve it, further its development, and use it to develop test suites. We encourage you to browse, download, contribute, and get involved. This package is required to run a number of OpenJDK hotspot tests which currently fail. The package will be team-maintained in the Debian Java team. The repository with a packaging draft is available on salsa[1]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/vpa1977/libasmtools-java --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: asmtools Source-Version: 7.0-b09-1 Done: Vladimir Petko We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of asmtools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1028...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Vladimir Petko (supplier of updated asmtools package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:44:47 +1300 Source: asmtools Binary
Processed: reassign 983690 to java-policy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 983690 java-policy Bug #983690 [java-common] Care for FAQ Bug reassigned from package 'java-common' to 'java-policy'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #983690 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #983690 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 983690: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983690 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 896907 Bug #896907 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: fucking spammers, cont'd
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 819785
Bug #819785 {Done: Guaranty Loans }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in
JRE jars
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #819785 to the same values
previously set
> reopen 896907
Bug #896907 {Done: Guaranty Loans }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should
not configure assistive technologies
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #896907 to the same values
previously set
> reopen 760982
Bug #760982 {Done: Guaranty Loans } [src:openjdk-8]
openjdk-8 needs time zone data
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #760982 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982
819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785
896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#896907: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:42:28 +0100 with message-id and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #896907, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Version: 8u162-b12-1~deb9u1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The openjdk-8-jre-headless package intentionally excludes user interface related components, but the package mistakenly enables Java assistive technologies which require user interface components. Java assistive technologies should be disabled in the *-headless package so that components do not mistakenly believe assistive technologies might work. The Jenkins jenkins/jenkins:slim image is based on the openjdk:slim image. The OpenJDK slim image packages openjdk-8-jre-headless. The Docker image description says: openjdk:slim This image installs the -headless package of OpenJDK and so is missing many of the UI-related Java libraries and some common packages contained in the default tag. It only contains the minimal packages needed to run Java. Unless you are working in an environment where only the openjdk image will be deployed and you have space constraints, we highly recommend using the default image of this repository. While using Jenkins based on the jenkins/jenkins:slim image, charts and graphs are not drawn because JFreeChart fails to initialize. JFreeChart fails to initialize because Java assistive technologies are enabled, but not installed. Disabling Java assistive technologies allows Jenkins to show charts and graphs when hosted on the jenkins/jenkins:slim image. Refer to https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/657 for the pull request to the Jenkins Docker image which resolves the problem by disabling Java assistive technologies. Refer to https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/pull/189 for the openjdk pull request which resolves the problem by disabling Java assistive technologies. Those two pull requests should be removed once the upstream packaging is corrected to not enable Java assistive technologies when running openjdk-8-jre-headless. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on: ii ca-certificates-java 20170531+nmu1 ii java-common 0.58 ii libc6 2.24-11+deb9u3 ii libcups2 2.2.1-8+deb9u1 ii libfontconfig12.11.0-6.7+b1 ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3.2 ii libgcc1 1:6.3.0-18+deb9u1 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.1-2 ii liblcms2-22.8-4 ii libnss3 2:3.26.2-1.1+deb9u1 ii libpcsclite1 1.8.20-1 ii libstdc++66.3.0-18+deb9u1 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.4-3 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2 ii libxi62:1.7.9-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.3-1 ii util-linux2.29.2-1+deb9u1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests: ii fonts-dejavu-extra2.37-1 pn fonts-indic pn fonts-ipafont-gothic pn fonts-ipafont-mincho pn fonts-wqy-microhei pn fonts-wqy-zenhei ii libnss-mdns 0.10-8 -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- *Avez-vous besoin de financement? Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt pour des besoins professionnels ou personnels? Nous proposons tous les types de prêts aux particuliers ou aux entreprises, quel que soit votre pointage de crédit actuel. Pour plus d'informations, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter par e-mail : guarantycreditlo...@aol.com pour plus d'informations.* *Merci pour votre temps, nous nous réjouissons d'accorder votre crédit en ligne.* *COPYRIGHT 2022 (R).* --- End Message ---
Bug#760982: marked as done (openjdk-8 needs time zone data)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:42:20 +0100 with message-id and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #760982, regarding openjdk-8 needs time zone data to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: 8u40~b04-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid jessie https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2014/08/msg00017.html 5. Implement a java.time.zone.ZoneRulesProvider [3] that reads the TZif2 files installed by the tzdata package in /usr/share/zoneinfo. This would render the tzdata-java package obsolete in the long term. GNU ClassPath has a TZif2 parser [4] that could be used as a starting point. [4] https://github.com/jatovm/classpath/blob/master/gnu/java/util/ZoneInfo.java --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- *Avez-vous besoin de financement? Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt pour des besoins professionnels ou personnels? Nous proposons tous les types de prêts aux particuliers ou aux entreprises, quel que soit votre pointage de crédit actuel. Pour plus d'informations, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter par e-mail : guarantycreditlo...@aol.com pour plus d'informations.* *Merci pour votre temps, nous nous réjouissons d'accorder votre crédit en ligne.* *COPYRIGHT 2022 (R).* --- End Message ---
Bug#819785: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars)
Your message dated Mon, 28 Mar 2022 15:42:28 +0100 with message-id and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #819785, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Version: 8u77-b03-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have just discovered that stepping into JRE classes with a debugger does not allow inspecting variable states, the debugger complains that classes are built without "-g" option. I cannot confirm when this started - I only debug into system classes occasionally. However, for me, absense of this information strongly limits the ability to seriously develop java code with this package. javap -l shows some information but it does not show the variable tables. My best guess is, that classes were compiled with "-g:lines" instead of "-g" or -g:lines,vars" I'm using Netbeans 8.1 debugger. TIA. Chris. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on: ii ca-certificates-java 20160321 ii java-common 0.57 ii libc6 2.22-5 ii libcups2 2.1.3-5 ii libfontconfig12.11.0-6.4 ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3 ii libgcc1 1:5.3.1-13 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.4.2-2 ii liblcms2-22.6-3+b3 ii libnss3 2:3.23-1 ii libpcsclite1 1.8.16-1 ii libstdc++65.3.1-13 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1 ii libxi62:1.7.6-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.9-2 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.2-1+b1 ii multiarch-support 2.22-5 ii util-linux2.27.1-6 ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests: ii fonts-dejavu-extra 2.35-1 pn fonts-indic pn fonts-ipafont-gothic pn fonts-ipafont-mincho ii libnss-mdns0.10-7 pn openjdk-8-jre-jamvm pn ttf-wqy-microhei | ttf-wqy-zenhei -- Configuration Files: /etc/java-8-openjdk/accessibility.properties changed: -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- *Avez-vous besoin de financement? Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt pour des besoins professionnels ou personnels? Nous proposons tous les types de prêts aux particuliers ou aux entreprises, quel que soit votre pointage de crédit actuel. Pour plus d'informations, n'hésitez pas à nous contacter par e-mail : guarantycreditlo...@aol.com pour plus d'informations.* *Merci pour votre temps, nous nous réjouissons d'accorder votre crédit en ligne.* *COPYRIGHT 2022 (R).* --- End Message ---
Processed: fscking spammmers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 760982
Bug #760982 {Done: Guaranty Loans } [src:openjdk-8]
openjdk-8 needs time zone data
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #760982 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: fscking spammmers 2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 819785
Bug #819785 {Done: Guaranty Loans }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in
JRE jars
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #819785 to the same values
previously set
> reopen 896907
Bug #896907 {Done: Guaranty Loans }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should
not configure assistive technologies
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #896907 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785
896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#896907: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:53:06 -0800 with message-id and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #896907, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Version: 8u162-b12-1~deb9u1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The openjdk-8-jre-headless package intentionally excludes user interface related components, but the package mistakenly enables Java assistive technologies which require user interface components. Java assistive technologies should be disabled in the *-headless package so that components do not mistakenly believe assistive technologies might work. The Jenkins jenkins/jenkins:slim image is based on the openjdk:slim image. The OpenJDK slim image packages openjdk-8-jre-headless. The Docker image description says: openjdk:slim This image installs the -headless package of OpenJDK and so is missing many of the UI-related Java libraries and some common packages contained in the default tag. It only contains the minimal packages needed to run Java. Unless you are working in an environment where only the openjdk image will be deployed and you have space constraints, we highly recommend using the default image of this repository. While using Jenkins based on the jenkins/jenkins:slim image, charts and graphs are not drawn because JFreeChart fails to initialize. JFreeChart fails to initialize because Java assistive technologies are enabled, but not installed. Disabling Java assistive technologies allows Jenkins to show charts and graphs when hosted on the jenkins/jenkins:slim image. Refer to https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/657 for the pull request to the Jenkins Docker image which resolves the problem by disabling Java assistive technologies. Refer to https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/pull/189 for the openjdk pull request which resolves the problem by disabling Java assistive technologies. Those two pull requests should be removed once the upstream packaging is corrected to not enable Java assistive technologies when running openjdk-8-jre-headless. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.4 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on: ii ca-certificates-java 20170531+nmu1 ii java-common 0.58 ii libc6 2.24-11+deb9u3 ii libcups2 2.2.1-8+deb9u1 ii libfontconfig12.11.0-6.7+b1 ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3.2 ii libgcc1 1:6.3.0-18+deb9u1 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.1-2 ii liblcms2-22.8-4 ii libnss3 2:3.26.2-1.1+deb9u1 ii libpcsclite1 1.8.20-1 ii libstdc++66.3.0-18+deb9u1 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.4-3 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2 ii libxi62:1.7.9-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.10-1 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.3-1 ii util-linux2.29.2-1+deb9u1 ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests: ii fonts-dejavu-extra2.37-1 pn fonts-indic pn fonts-ipafont-gothic pn fonts-ipafont-mincho pn fonts-wqy-microhei pn fonts-wqy-zenhei ii libnss-mdns 0.10-8 -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- *Vous avez besoin d'un prêt pour votre entreprise, besoin d'un prêt rapide pour régler vos factures, pour un usage personnel ? Notre offre propose des prêts avec un faible taux d'intérêt de 3%. Avez-vous pensé à contracter un prêt ? Vous avez probablement été rejeté par votre banque locale ? Veuillez répondre pour plus d'informations: guarantycreditloanun...@aol.com * --- End Message ---
Bug#819785: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:53:06 -0800 with message-id and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #819785, regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless Version: 8u77-b03-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I have just discovered that stepping into JRE classes with a debugger does not allow inspecting variable states, the debugger complains that classes are built without "-g" option. I cannot confirm when this started - I only debug into system classes occasionally. However, for me, absense of this information strongly limits the ability to seriously develop java code with this package. javap -l shows some information but it does not show the variable tables. My best guess is, that classes were compiled with "-g:lines" instead of "-g" or -g:lines,vars" I'm using Netbeans 8.1 debugger. TIA. Chris. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on: ii ca-certificates-java 20160321 ii java-common 0.57 ii libc6 2.22-5 ii libcups2 2.1.3-5 ii libfontconfig12.11.0-6.4 ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3 ii libgcc1 1:5.3.1-13 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.4.2-2 ii liblcms2-22.6-3+b3 ii libnss3 2:3.23-1 ii libpcsclite1 1.8.16-1 ii libstdc++65.3.1-13 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1 ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1 ii libxi62:1.7.6-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.9-2 ii libxtst6 2:1.2.2-1+b1 ii multiarch-support 2.22-5 ii util-linux2.27.1-6 ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests: ii fonts-dejavu-extra 2.35-1 pn fonts-indic pn fonts-ipafont-gothic pn fonts-ipafont-mincho ii libnss-mdns0.10-7 pn openjdk-8-jre-jamvm pn ttf-wqy-microhei | ttf-wqy-zenhei -- Configuration Files: /etc/java-8-openjdk/accessibility.properties changed: -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- *Vous avez besoin d'un prêt pour votre entreprise, besoin d'un prêt rapide pour régler vos factures, pour un usage personnel ? Notre offre propose des prêts avec un faible taux d'intérêt de 3%. Avez-vous pensé à contracter un prêt ? Vous avez probablement été rejeté par votre banque locale ? Veuillez répondre pour plus d'informations: guarantycreditloanun...@aol.com * --- End Message ---
Bug#760982: marked as done (openjdk-8 needs time zone data)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:53:01 -0800 with message-id and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #760982, regarding openjdk-8 needs time zone data to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: 8u40~b04-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid jessie https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2014/08/msg00017.html 5. Implement a java.time.zone.ZoneRulesProvider [3] that reads the TZif2 files installed by the tzdata package in /usr/share/zoneinfo. This would render the tzdata-java package obsolete in the long term. GNU ClassPath has a TZif2 parser [4] that could be used as a starting point. [4] https://github.com/jatovm/classpath/blob/master/gnu/java/util/ZoneInfo.java --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- *Vous avez besoin d'un prêt pour votre entreprise, besoin d'un prêt rapide pour régler vos factures, pour un usage personnel ? Notre offre propose des prêts avec un faible taux d'intérêt de 3%. Avez-vous pensé à contracter un prêt ? Vous avez probablement été rejeté par votre banque locale ? Veuillez répondre pour plus d'informations: guarantycreditloanun...@aol.com * --- End Message ---
Processed: reopening 760982
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 760982
Bug #760982 {Done: Guaranty Loans } [src:openjdk-8]
openjdk-8 needs time zone data
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #760982 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#760982: marked as done (openjdk-8 needs time zone data)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2022 01:20:47 +0100 with message-id <0d8026bf.avyaaes-buqaacotjggatgaaabtbywbif...@mailjet.com> and subject line Avez-vous besoin d'un prêt? has caused the Debian Bug report #760982, regarding openjdk-8 needs time zone data to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:openjdk-8 Version: 8u40~b04-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid jessie https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2014/08/msg00017.html 5. Implement a java.time.zone.ZoneRulesProvider [3] that reads the TZif2 files installed by the tzdata package in /usr/share/zoneinfo. This would render the tzdata-java package obsolete in the long term. GNU ClassPath has a TZif2 parser [4] that could be used as a starting point. [4] https://github.com/jatovm/classpath/blob/master/gnu/java/util/ZoneInfo.java --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Vous avez des factures impayées ou vous avez besoin d'un prêt urgent ? Ne vous inquiétez plus, nous offrons toutes sortes de prêts à un taux d'intérêt de 3 %. si vous êtes intéressé, répondez-nous maintenant pour plus de détails...guarantycreditloanun...@aol.com--- End Message ---
Bug#1004554: marked as done (ITP: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java -- Java library to embed graphics as vector drawing in a PDF)
Your message dated Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1004554: fixed in libpdfbox-graphics2d-java 0.34-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1004554, regarding ITP: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java -- Java library to embed graphics as vector drawing in a PDF to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1004554: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004554 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java Version : 0.34 Upstream Author : Emmeran Seehuber * URL : https://github.com/rototor/pdfbox-graphics2d/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java library to embed graphics as vector drawing in a PDF Using this library one can use any Graphics2D API based SVG / graph / chart library to embed those graphics as vector drawing in a PDF. In combination with PDFBox PDFRenderer/PageDrawer one can also "rerender" PDF pages and change certain aspects (e.g. change the color mapping and perform an overfill) . The following features are supported: * Drawing any shape using draw...() and fill...() methods from Graphics2D. * Drawing images. The default is to always lossless compress them. One could plugin one's own Image -> PDImageXObject conversion if one wants to encode the images as jpeg. * All BasicStroke attributes. * Paint: - Color. One can specify one's own color mapping implementation to special map the (RGB) colors to PDColor. Beside using CMYK colors one can also use spot colors. - GradientPaint, LinearGradientPaint and RadialGradientPaint. There are some restrictions. - TexturePaint. * Drawing text. By default all text is drawn as vector shapes, so no fonts are embedded. RTL languages are supported. It's possible to use fonts, but this loses some features (especially RTL support) and one must provide the TTF files of the fonts if the default PDF fonts are not enough. The package will be team-maintained in the Debian Java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java Source-Version: 0.34-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libpdfbox-graphics2d-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1004...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libpdfbox-graphics2d-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 21:45:17 +0100 Source: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java Binary: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java Architecture: source all Version: 0.34-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java - Java library to embed graphics as vector drawing in a PDF Closes: 1004554 Changes: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java (0.34-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #1004554) Checksums-Sha1: a8e08b0e6916fce9a0339502b3a9ae214477fe64 2418 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34-1.dsc 13043160388805e856d36be6e2c899e3c909b439 1285989 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34.orig.tar.gz a7715c093a18959833df337726ae810169790be8 5388 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34-1.debian.tar.xz 83418c1a5b509a73852107724cb727e5b11d2860 72952 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34-1_all.deb 5b4bb2620faa3e9de867fab20dbd240f0de4c56c 13721 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 869dea6680154f36b171146736e6fd36ad2a8bc3277f4f6760ccd66118ab0be1 2418 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34-1.dsc 7541763034cc67681b18a7853b139b1eba01887cfdc382ea35838dca17a06a66 1285989 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34.orig.tar.gz 49bfbd9e8017c599229efd7aa547b296061d4f1fddfa6d1a763700d07f77ec62 5388 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0.34-1.debian.tar.xz d6c2e2272b7156b6d19469c78c1582d6cd3946d5f52f7ecd135778ae7e43d384 72952 libpdfbox-graphics2d-java_0
Bug#996727: marked as done (ITP: ciftools-java -- Java library to read and write CIF files)
Your message dated Sat, 04 Dec 2021 19:00:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996727: fixed in ciftools-java 3.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996727, regarding ITP: ciftools-java -- Java library to read and write CIF files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 996727: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996727 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: ciftools-java Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : Sebastian Bittrich * URL : https://github.com/rcsb/ciftools-java * License : Expat Programming Lang: Java Description : Java library to read and write CIF files CIFTools implements reading and writing of CIF files as well as their efficiently encoded counterpart, called BinaryCIF. The idea is to have a robust, type-safe implementation for the handling of CIF files which does not care about the origin of the data: both conventional text-based and binary files should be handled the same way. This library is needed as a dependency for biojava5-live, which is a packaging aim of Debian med team. It will be team-maintained inside the Debian java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: ciftools-java Source-Version: 3.0.0-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ciftools-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 996...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated ciftools-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:14:50 +0200 Source: ciftools-java Binary: libciftools-java Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libciftools-java - Java library to read and write CIF files Closes: 996727 Changes: ciftools-java (3.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #996727) Checksums-Sha1: c98c9e7d2762f3c80f792db232e949551321768e 2141 ciftools-java_3.0.0-1.dsc d2e85b7662c7903c5e572dcfa39a682d8b12c24f 2591258 ciftools-java_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz db11ec6773824f5e32dfc356102e447aaf03e430 4336 ciftools-java_3.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz 37cf4fc7ed211840fe44c6c5f7da5614c5d1fcb3 13583 ciftools-java_3.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo 253806c8670b3e0bd8fc5adff8e5fe12cc88e12e 2079032 libciftools-java_3.0.0-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: 2d85c7e22b932b576e6959c809a8831486a118d957c54c86a2eaa72e75c07069 2141 ciftools-java_3.0.0-1.dsc a150c5a3f2250e886bdbdfd21161be51cc9042696805e7d9bd5b27622e872d4a 2591258 ciftools-java_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz 83605e998c904575021e74b2d74b66ecb79dd3437037164289aff292dfdde32d 4336 ciftools-java_3.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz 0ee8ae442351f0ba26a6acd31d94ddc1fb2fa5290b1f68ff21a7588505153c87 13583 ciftools-java_3.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo 8ac41f7e436375675f8840f0c5445e06fe5df47d4a334a03c79cf4e1a2605d7a 2079032 libciftools-java_3.0.0-1_all.deb Files: 7d72f1cf54e9882362e2cd5cb9601319 2141 java optional ciftools-java_3.0.0-1.dsc 47e173e0e79acd0d74d89742659f5963 2591258 java optional ciftools-java_3.0.0.orig.tar.gz 783fc73229bf578cb34b706290d4b88d 4336 java optional ciftools-java_3.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz 6fc80fae3b3621e99196db2be756bf9a 13583 java optional ciftools-java_3.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo c93ed8b183ab869687c8d7cedef25462 2079032 java optional libciftools-java_3.0.0-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEM8soQxPpC9J9y0UjYAMWptwndHYFAmFxz/IACgkQYAMWptwn dHaNGg//SxPAA0XpDf/Ne+/Z7EKsrwgf7qXN2OMy+Lc2h3elMP1YP2lswu2nuohA p7UbhZ1dy6hT5CwNk3VwuDbZ+P3nAh/NFTNkcDpIdTLlzwDy1bcxd3uUAYoqSyma 5tsioIQBKlSGr3WjerEf61JBSuyuY5jbGR/9LDLsDddeaJVSex5jI6Zy8qyHyaWH IoaUUSu5k1+WenvAB+HTkzr3LuXqn+F5bSvglqVJJSU8pF66PkPeKHTuBsGIU0/v abhPGH7t1uxlYWG5N1QkK12iBc3nMY68/XJsgu/2JWtL4JoEsMy1LPa5nhVsx2F3 DzgjkM+t095y3DtrLrz0sloFs7UL0sH1moc0E6Mr9fmFf+cTbxkjNigMohmlcS9O L42gUUp/CgjyN7Ia/jEmuN9h0zGluh/34IOkgaIR
Bug#988531: marked as done (ITP: libpf4j-update-java -- update mechanism for Java modular applications)
Your message dated Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:00:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#988531: fixed in libpf4j-update-java 2.3.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #988531, regarding ITP: libpf4j-update-java -- update mechanism for Java modular applications to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 988531: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988531 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian-java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libpf4j-update-java Version : 2.3.0 Upstream Author : Decebal Suiu * URL : https://pf4j.org * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : update mechanism for Java modular applications This package allows one to inspect repositories to check the availability of updates for Java plugins. The available updates can then be installed, updated or uninstalled using the classes in this package. Plugins are containers for extension points (defining where, in the application, custom code may be called), for extensions (which implement extension points) and for optional life-cycle methods to start, load and stop extensions. This package will be team-maintained inside the Debian-java team. Right now it is needed as a dependency of nextflow. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libpf4j-update-java Source-Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libpf4j-update-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 988...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libpf4j-update-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 09:07:40 +0200 Source: libpf4j-update-java Binary: libpf4j-update-java Architecture: source all Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libpf4j-update-java - update mechanism for Java modular applications Closes: 988531 Changes: libpf4j-update-java (2.3.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #988531) Checksums-Sha1: d9fa786a79a0bb256593fae34fd9324587e8e40a 2292 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1.dsc 88a36d90b2325ebe0805c204e2f2d50f38d79993 21860 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 45c36e6957f24198cbcb114ace3721ceede24a09 3036 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 939aaa6d507b609584c10a5d3bb3a835fb47a5f8 25460 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1_all.deb 958152a23cb7910ec6e90bf0700bc8fd044d0ce0 14074 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: a31f14d6ef7b42d51b0f27a65646c81ad8a09df3b2e646ad4f0443b02186519b 2292 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1.dsc 4d944ed32714246d9c66a41233d3a362313b7a83434276e4bf7e574cbefe1f50 21860 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz c64e6aed939840061cf185dd49b8bbf3095a5c84e746cc8af07b6577084f797a 3036 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 62fd130df5139075f23f6ba56affe4d70f31217ebf026b6fc462eb75710d276c 25460 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1_all.deb c05cab75593479d34bf818d5f5791cc4e4eafce43294467f4e066d3d2d12f2ec 14074 libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 5f2ed61988e9e8a8e3ae7eb22f494b79 2292 java optional libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1.dsc 101522154aa22c37aa08a26b82111748 21860 java optional libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 03516dc26695d51132df417dfbbd11c7 3036 java optional libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 0408101e6a3977b320e98af024b18912 25460 java optional libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1_all.deb 2c8f1d7b9ca76dda2843cb6972c45baf 14074 java optional libpf4j-update-java_2.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEM8soQxPpC9J9y0UjYAMWptwndHYFAmCjcwwACgkQYAMWptwn dHZ1/g//U5j3540ccQ0Vy2x8JNZTr42bXOLW2mUk7Vu769cj9XQZfgmmaYOyDFvR GYl3HHf5oTifOQfCmmwviycJGMQy4OW6ofyFcim/y8hQcurw5bdkdcNvAt8hZqt0
Bug#988879: marked as done (ITP: grengine -- engine for running and embedding Groovy in a Java virtual machine)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2021 07:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#988879: fixed in grengine 3.0.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #988879, regarding ITP: grengine -- engine for running and embedding Groovy in a Java virtual machine to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 988879: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988879 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian-java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: grengine Version : 3.0.0 Upstream Author : Alain Stalder * URL : https://www.artecat.ch/grengine * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : engine for running and embedding Groovy in a Java virtual machine Grengine allows one to run Groovy code in a Java VM, in a way that is quick, highly configurable and thread-safe. When the default behavior does not suit the users' needs, classes can be overridden to change the way the framework behaves. Even without writing new classes, there are ways to configure the engine quite a lot. This package will be team-maintained inside the Debian-java team. Right now it is needed as a dependency of nextflow. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: grengine Source-Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of grengine, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 988...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated grengine package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 21:16:48 +0200 Source: grengine Binary: libgrengine-java Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libgrengine-java - engine for running and embedding Groovy in a Java virtual machine Closes: 988879 Changes: grengine (3.0.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #988879) Checksums-Sha1: 685a639fd68772622a56756f37258855e5f148b0 2223 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1.dsc 383b085b42ecc89ddb71d7c63c0cee60c6c0c866 64516 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 4dfabea531f99acfbcb90a7d5d38b37e4a278122 12712 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz ed4cebee3af581e409fb423be10b2847ac019484 13288 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo 92efa15b667934d6c6a1c3e1eeef3f1ec6a6f934 94404 libgrengine-java_3.0.0+dfsg-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: adea4f0665fd26beb8f7cd1ab446075ceb9e81a7e085ec82abeefaa9b98799a4 2223 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1.dsc 35fccb0e8cf8ffb51747990202368a214e993b5bd6b290dcbdd53a0aae819324 64516 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 30e0da6ab679debdfb4ef23a0a0ccdd5a44cb3c695395454278d0c07275a2599 12712 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 8dd34f958390ac9f2054750d7cc1e008bf56de40622086e5b888577f6647b138 13288 grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo 19c188eda4db5c03813670e38fd8d6a45324f23aeb37d724916067ea45c5c9c1 94404 libgrengine-java_3.0.0+dfsg-1_all.deb Files: a1406f50ee2dc6458b59f6b743da55d1 2223 java optional grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1.dsc 65fb3d62e3fee39d84a287d6a6ac0a66 64516 java optional grengine_3.0.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz e21faf7f764732750b327ddb26d56d5d 12712 java optional grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 09146b0b969b609800bcd490cdba21af 13288 java optional grengine_3.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo 5b8b6093f78757d1f2ce891d832c700a 94404 java optional libgrengine-java_3.0.0+dfsg-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEM8soQxPpC9J9y0UjYAMWptwndHYFAmCtUMwACgkQYAMWptwn dHapbg//erIYJl7HC263j0ufkEsoI6ffVR0itheiHXhLMVFiWaXDQWRk4bjVZ0z3 ggQF6mfDUNi+Poh5jzTZw/y6XfxuqEdVsmLQfzS6D691YSL/2cuWpBMyQdHl4P+E BhRXK1lIPUxaRyWWSFOza7JUoX8WuO8BQbBo8UPGcPHJqTQw88djVFPaCfbJsZSH G2NkQ/Nz6J3CkOiFExk+O7ZY21nNr4vik5P4BxRTLLOEGf1TIWi4N9rsh8qIfqgg vSBSKkfbhg7gxTZ8DzlqKPCDoEAqPfyKWE54o1o375Y52b4wdEnUZk6UpSoASFCs F4x4bxPybJlYGNahksCkYcVqSUvhyybP5Y7L72jJkn2ql4EtjqMTL8HuWN1hYM8K 3zFsSQwYFQDxVEJK
Bug#988279: marked as done (ITP: libpf4j-java -- framework to turn monolithic Java applications into modular ones)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:10:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#988279: fixed in libpf4j-java 3.6.0+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #988279, regarding ITP: libpf4j-java -- framework to turn monolithic Java applications into modular ones to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 988279: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=988279 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian-java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libpf4j-java Version : 3.6.0 Upstream Author : Decebal Suiu * URL : https://pf4j.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : framework to turn monolithic Java applications into modular ones PF4J is a lightweight framework which helps one to build a modular application by defining plugins, which are containers for extension points (defining where, in the application, custom code may be called), for extensions (which implement extension points) and for optional lifecycle methods to start, load and stop extensions. A plugin is similar to modules in other programming languages. This package will be team-maintained inside the Debian-java team. Right now it is needed as a dependency of nextflow. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libpf4j-java Source-Version: 3.6.0+dfsg-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libpf4j-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 988...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libpf4j-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:13:39 +0200 Source: libpf4j-java Binary: libpf4j-java Architecture: source all Version: 3.6.0+dfsg-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libpf4j-java - framework to turn monolithic Java applications into modular ones Closes: 988279 Changes: libpf4j-java (3.6.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #988279) Checksums-Sha1: 044c0ecc628004395a28db8c20828518ac8b1343 2284 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1.dsc 7c75777de335f2fd30a424d1c27998ea2742f1d0 89380 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 38dd8ddb7d4045c042cab2e4c4c18439e405ca65 7820 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz b4785258b6a348f9aae688725b9a9259245729f1 123940 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1_all.deb 34ba9b2750ccfd622f77ce22d4c5a17d8042aafc 14142 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 9773163c44bd6327bf3dee62de60cb4b7a7474e511c403f6f27d1f753130cd0f 2284 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1.dsc 534f812049466c3e02916eb1e85dd57c25406f922f78ea07193a5cee50e9e1ae 89380 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz bc93a7e65647f28f5476394d4da90134435e8399874843748a9c438266fc23fc 7820 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 9f4ed32b99a65d7dc652bc4aaa3a6e12f649fa51efa953656045b6144a0ea567 123940 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1_all.deb d679281137ebe4414c88b9e9f53b4ba2bf8d587d8c53c1f71982861b23f91770 14142 libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 680e4f61fd7061effb48167778df2538 2284 java optional libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1.dsc 41468224713f8f64f8c31e685f5c4ffd 89380 java optional libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 95e34d59c50fec6242f3f893d08099d6 7820 java optional libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz f91d2f70d29d2e72e3a0f56dbb81a85f 123940 java optional libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1_all.deb 4692c4d7073945f80cdcbf0d0a934143 14142 java optional libpf4j-java_3.6.0+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEM8soQxPpC9J9y0UjYAMWptwndHYFAmCaNpAACgkQYAMWptwn dHZs6Q//XwnOFTYKB7vstNQ+eHj2m4sZNvKrtaG3rcoAbvMvuAiwzI+Nfp+JcDJt BIutc6RK8/IgQTw6UVBCgz9GPpOHf10H/7YEOPWKlca8Oth6bApuncaEd05goB+j ZtFSZ/Ae7Uwdw+FsD5PfJgaKJIArsmGxUjCADwUZVoK6eixuv85HJqXOBvh15okR p4yairjS/bdEIGnB1XE6bCtJwnCVNXMvsmzXdeJnV/5MN6NsdhM72iiLthb9JQ1p B88ZK4Gb8cIGr7uhNqpCWgh+EiuKC
Processed: cloning 822348, reassign -1 to openjdk-11-jre-headless ..., reassign -2 to openjdk-15-jre-headless ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 822348 -1 -2 -3 -4
Bug #822348 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-8-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Bug 822348 cloned as bugs 989971-989974
> reassign -1 openjdk-11-jre-headless 11.0.12+4-1
Bug #989971 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-8-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8-jre-headless' to
'openjdk-11-jre-headless'.
No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u91-b14-2.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-2.
Bug #989971 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-11-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1.
> retitle -1 openjdk-11-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before
> deregistering binfmt
Bug #989971 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-11-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Changed Bug title to 'openjdk-11-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file
before deregistering binfmt' from 'openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for
wrong file before deregistering binfmt'.
> reassign -2 openjdk-15-jre-headless 15.0.3+3-1
Bug #989972 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-8-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8-jre-headless' to
'openjdk-15-jre-headless'.
No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u91-b14-2.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-2.
Bug #989972 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-15-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Marked as found in versions openjdk-15/15.0.3+3-1.
> retitle -2 openjdk-15-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before
> deregistering binfmt
Bug #989972 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-15-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Changed Bug title to 'openjdk-15-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file
before deregistering binfmt' from 'openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for
wrong file before deregistering binfmt'.
> reassign -3 openjdk-16-jre-headless 16.0.1+9-1
Bug #989973 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-8-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8-jre-headless' to
'openjdk-16-jre-headless'.
No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u91-b14-2.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-2.
Bug #989973 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-16-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Marked as found in versions openjdk-16/16.0.1+9-1.
> retitle -3 openjdk-16-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before
> deregistering binfmt
Bug #989973 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-16-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Changed Bug title to 'openjdk-16-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file
before deregistering binfmt' from 'openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for
wrong file before deregistering binfmt'.
> reassign -4 openjdk-17-jre-headless 17~24-1
Bug #989974 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-8-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8-jre-headless' to
'openjdk-17-jre-headless'.
No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u91-b14-2.
No longer marked as fixed in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-2.
Bug #989974 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-17-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Marked as found in versions openjdk-17/17~24-1.
> retitle -4 openjdk-17-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before
> deregistering binfmt
Bug #989974 {Done: Thorsten Glaser } [openjdk-17-jre-headless]
openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt
Changed Bug title to 'openjdk-17-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file
before deregistering binfmt' from 'openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for
wrong file before deregistering binfmt'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
822348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822348
989971: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989971
989972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989972
989973: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989973
989974: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989974
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#906111: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime)
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#906111: fixed in openjdk-8 8u292-b10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #906111,
regarding openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
906111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjdk-8-jre
Version: 8u181-b13-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Package openjdk-8-jre has Provides:
java2-runtime, java5-runtime, java6-runtime, java7-runtime,
java8-runtime
It is missing "java-runtime". As result, some other packages that
depend on java-runtime will force installation of JRE 7 (too old)
or JRE 10 (too new, some tools still do not support it) and having JRE
8 will not satisfy their dependencies.
Other JRE versions in debian have "java-runtime" in their Provides:.
Package openjdk-7-jre Provides:
java-runtime, java2-runtime, java5-runtime, java6-runtime,
java7-runtime
Package openjdk-10-jre Provides:
java-runtime, java10-runtime, java2-runtime, java5-runtime,
java6-runtime, java7-runtime, java8-runtime, java9-runtime
Please add java-runtime to "Provides" section in the control file.
Equivalent ..-jdk packages do not suffer from this problem (JDK 7,8 and
10 provide "java-jdk")
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre depends on:
ii libasound2 1.1.6-1
ii libatk-wrapper-java-jni 0.33.3-21
ii libc62.27-5
ii libgif7 5.1.4-3
ii libgl1 1.0.0+git20180308-4
ii libgl1-mesa-glx 18.1.5-1
ii libglib2.0-0 2.56.1-2
ii libgtk-3-0 3.22.30-2
ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.2-2+b1
ii libpng16-16 1.6.34-2
ii libpulse012.0-1
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.5-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1+b2
ii libxinerama1 2:1.1.3-1+b3
ii libxrandr2 2:1.5.1-1
ii openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u181-b13-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1
Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre recommends:
pn fonts-dejavu-extra
Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre suggests:
pn icedtea-8-plugin
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openjdk-8
Source-Version: 8u292-b10-2
Done: Thorsten Glaser
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openjdk-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 906...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated openjdk-8 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:23:01 +0200
Source: openjdk-8
Architecture: source
Version: 8u292-b10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Java Maintenance
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser
Closes: 822348 863199 906111
Changes:
openjdk-8 (8u292-b10-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix regression in /etc/java-8-openjdk/accessibility.properties
* Drop Suggests nōnexistent icedtea-8-plugin
* Fix binfmts error with patch from bug (Closes: #822348)
* Create /usr/share/man/man1 if it doesn’t exist, for crippled
container images (Closes: #863199)
* Provide java-runtime{,-headless} (Closes: #906111)
* Mark openjdk-8-doc as M-A:foreign
* Update “It was downloaded from” in d/copyright (cf. #970517)
Checksums-Sha1:
59fe4d38d084fa4c74f45a420e80c5e425b4e850 4778 openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.dsc
105eddac95a638fa091f0a9b227cb9e057051665 216612
openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
b75342dff79d49e113d4baf30355cd2c2e0400e1129c2692bf8455eb
Bug#863199: marked as done (error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp)
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#863199: fixed in openjdk-8 8u292-b10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #863199,
regarding error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
863199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless
Version: 8u131-b11-2
Severity: Important
When setting up a gitlab-ci docker image based on the official
debian:stretch-slim image, it seems I cannot install Java:
Setting up openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 (8u131-b11-2) ...
update-alternatives: using
/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/rmid to provide /usr/bin/rmid
(rmid) in auto mode
update-alternatives: error: error creating symbolic link
'/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
I tried first installing openjdk-8-jdk-headless, here is the complete
build log:
https://gitlab.com/eighthave/ci-images-base/builds/16952420
Then default-jdk-headless:
https://gitlab.com/eighthave/ci-images-base/builds/16953365
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openjdk-8
Source-Version: 8u292-b10-2
Done: Thorsten Glaser
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openjdk-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 863...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated openjdk-8 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:23:01 +0200
Source: openjdk-8
Architecture: source
Version: 8u292-b10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Java Maintenance
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser
Closes: 822348 863199 906111
Changes:
openjdk-8 (8u292-b10-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix regression in /etc/java-8-openjdk/accessibility.properties
* Drop Suggests nōnexistent icedtea-8-plugin
* Fix binfmts error with patch from bug (Closes: #822348)
* Create /usr/share/man/man1 if it doesn’t exist, for crippled
container images (Closes: #863199)
* Provide java-runtime{,-headless} (Closes: #906111)
* Mark openjdk-8-doc as M-A:foreign
* Update “It was downloaded from” in d/copyright (cf. #970517)
Checksums-Sha1:
59fe4d38d084fa4c74f45a420e80c5e425b4e850 4778 openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.dsc
105eddac95a638fa091f0a9b227cb9e057051665 216612
openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
b75342dff79d49e113d4baf30355cd2c2e0400e1129c2692bf8455eb552a64d9 4778
openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.dsc
3fbda384526fb4dd6aaa5048f548467989f07d5621757bb2f1448ac78a7c942f 216612
openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
7f0aae682677864f2a8a7afb5763043b 4778 java optional openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.dsc
8ceedfa8dfd8f6fbe58239687312 216612 java optional
openjdk-8_8u292-b10-2.debian.tar.xz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (MirBSD)
Comment: ☃ ЦΤℱ—８ ☕☂☄
iQIcBAEBCQAGBQJgyQzzAAoJEHa1NLLpkAfgPlAQAIw/YTXzez2Dja3/yIkxGTXh
qLAyN8riMzqadaRLYxiZJfCd09OWHP+a9YBVdTsbM+lrxMY5tJ8Ljb9lXfURXbGs
yus7ZLg/y7TIoMAx0nsGdQYFgCvK2lYX0tpRuv1yp1tT9Q/keSV6f0QQa8i04Ia2
D0KyG9BDoF8gQtiBOITTkGWzWRJOWZ1VGE/tJ6jh04r0X06p+quBhQr6oZ+SdKcc
0b5ucz0VwHhmkWo2EbJDXweL7jQNbcUrzMhOdiCipL4lFQt0QuwfyfEwXqbXJZen
89qk+eMQkhUJY8LsdI59zfa+hFUW0ccA2JCN3Qkd/S1Rt46UjV+O6lz+GbEUxfb4
HMUnWfqCguUplQDymSCkGR1YXVf4mxHMJCfZkn0Ch///0e/bHGu5Mw8inwBJjCAS
zYZ+feNx2frTUB/bP05ekNp3kU0i2dAXXicXjNH/QFavIx9jX0Z5xvTQmgVHTOSi
ReDjg455mOrvDkTEleWIHwZTePbGOKP/L9Zt6ecJg3caAQqE7qR3TQ/7DpvsYFzQ
gUwekUD5cmFOueEx3v84h8YoIco1vEqYjaYydCn9WAv90MMEe1YFCXtQpqGX701m
mYjjviZqcqOhaexiSQ+FRJl4SSm1mfZaA/6P/Z+gM+C119FQ0z9b1ZSbXDdnrGXI
wGsoX+RzfKKQxgh8e3Hd
=Kyvq
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#822348: marked as done (openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt)
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#822348: fixed in openjdk-8 8u292-b10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #822348,
regarding openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before
deregistering binfmt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
822348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjdk-8-jre-headless
Version: 8u91-b14-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The prerm is looking for /var/lib/binfmts/@basename@ (e.g., openjdk-8) but the
files under /var/lib/binfmts are named after the binfmt being registered, not
the package.
This means that users which have upgraded from openjdk-7 to openjdk-8 will
always see a warning message about openjdk-7 already having registered the
binfmt when a new openjdk-8 update is installed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless depends on:
ii ca-certificates-java 20160321
ii java-common 0.57
ii libc6 2.22-7
ii libcups2 2.1.3-5
ii libfontconfig12.11.0-6.4
ii libfreetype6 2.6.3-3+b1
ii libgcc1 1:5.3.1-15
ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.4.2-2
ii liblcms2-22.7-1
ii libnss3 2:3.23-2
ii libpcsclite1 1.8.16-1
ii libstdc++65.3.1-15
ii libx11-6 2:1.6.3-1
ii libxext6 2:1.3.3-1
ii libxi62:1.7.6-1
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.9-2
ii libxtst6 2:1.2.2-1+b1
ii multiarch-support 2.22-7
ii util-linux2.28-1
ii zlib1g1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1
openjdk-8-jre-headless recommends no packages.
Versions of packages openjdk-8-jre-headless suggests:
ii fonts-dejavu-extra 2.35-1
pn fonts-indic
pn fonts-ipafont-gothic
pn fonts-ipafont-mincho
ii libnss-mdns0.10-7
pn openjdk-8-jre-jamvm
pn ttf-wqy-microhei | ttf-wqy-zenhei
-- no debconf information
=== modified file 'debian/JB-jre-headless.prerm.in'
--- debian/JB-jre-headless.prerm.in 2014-05-29 08:50:43 +
+++ debian/JB-jre-headless.prerm.in 2016-04-23 17:39:15 +
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
if which update-binfmts >/dev/null; then
# try to remove and ignore the error
- if [ -e /var/lib/binfmts/@basename@ ]; then
+ if [ -e /var/lib/binfmts/jar ]; then
update-binfmts --package @basename@ \
--remove jar /usr/bin/jexec || true
fi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openjdk-8
Source-Version: 8u292-b10-2
Done: Thorsten Glaser
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openjdk-8, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 822...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Glaser (supplier of updated openjdk-8 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:23:01 +0200
Source: openjdk-8
Architecture: source
Version: 8u292-b10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Java Maintenance
Changed-By: Thorsten Glaser
Closes: 822348 863199 906111
Changes:
openjdk-8 (8u292-b10-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix regression in /etc/java-8-openjdk/accessibility.properties
* Drop Suggests nōnexistent icedtea-8-plugin
* Fix binfmts error with patch from bug (Closes: #822348)
* Create /usr/share/man/man1 if it doesn’t exist, for crippled
container images (Closes: #863199)
* Provide java-runtime{,-headless} (Closes: #906111)
* Mark openjdk-8-doc as M-A:foreign
* Update “It was downloaded from” in d/copyright (cf. #970
Processed: oops
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 989736 = wontfix Bug #989736 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: keep out of testing and stable Added tag(s) wontfix; removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 989736: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989736 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: more openjdk-8 bug maintenance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # this is here for keeps > tags 989736 moreinfo Bug #989736 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: keep out of testing and stable Added tag(s) moreinfo. > outlook 989736 This package is required for JVM language bootstrapping in > unstable, and used to prepare security updates for stretch LTS and jessie > ELTS. Furher use is not officially supported by Debian, but provided as a > convenience for end users by the maintainer. Outlook recorded from message bug 989736 message > # 11 seems to contain the requested debugging info > severity 819785 normal Bug #819785 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > tags 819785 + help Bug #819785 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars Added tag(s) help. > # this is only a workaround for crazily broken systems > severity 863199 normal Bug #863199 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > tags 863199 = pending Bug #863199 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] error creating symbolic link '/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp Added tag(s) pending. > # applied > tags 822348 + pending Bug #822348 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file before deregistering binfmt Added tag(s) pending. > # this is something I'd like to have but must be fixed in 11 first > reassign 834053 openjdk-11 Bug #834053 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font size Bug reassigned from package 'src:openjdk-8' to 'openjdk-11'. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1 and openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #834053 to the same values previously set > affects 834053 openjdk-8 Bug #834053 [openjdk-11] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font size Added indication that 834053 affects openjdk-8 > # fix this in 11 first if possible at all or close there > reassign 907541 openjdk-11 Bug #907541 [openjdk-8] [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8' to 'openjdk-11'. No longer marked as found in versions 8u181-b13-1, openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1, and openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #907541 to the same values previously set > # need reproducer, assistive things work fine for me > tags 896907 = moreinfo unreproducible Bug #896907 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should not configure assistive technologies Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > # applied > tags 906111 + pending Bug #906111 [openjdk-8-jre] openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime Added tag(s) pending. > # still relevant? seems to work fine... > tags 760982 = moreinfo Bug #760982 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8 needs time zone data Added tag(s) moreinfo; removed tag(s) bullseye, buster, stretch, jessie, and sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982 819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785 822348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822348 834053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834053 863199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863199 896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907 906111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906111 907541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907541 989736: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989736 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): this is also pending inquiry
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 760982
> reopen 760982
Bug #760982 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8 needs time zone data
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u275-b01-1+rm.
> outlook 760982 https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2021/06/msg8.html
Outlook recorded from message bug 760982 message
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
760982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760982
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: ca-certificates-java: postinst fails under qemu-aarch64-static ⇒ is a qemu issue
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 920562 qemu-user-static Bug #920562 [src:openjdk-8] ca-certificates-java: postinst fails under qemu-aarch64-static 2.11.1(Debian 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.9) with uncaught target signal 6 Bug reassigned from package 'src:openjdk-8' to 'qemu-user-static'. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u181-b13-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #920562 to the same values previously set > forcemerge 986022 920562 Bug #986022 [qemu-user-static] qemu-user-static: Alpha targets fail to run Java properly (Too small maximum heap) Bug #920562 [qemu-user-static] ca-certificates-java: postinst fails under qemu-aarch64-static 2.11.1(Debian 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.9) with uncaught target signal 6 Removed indication that 920562 affects src:ca-certificates-java Marked as found in versions qemu/1:5.2+dfsg-9. Merged 920562 986022 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 920562: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920562 986022: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986022 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 907541 + confirmed upstream Bug #907541 [openjdk-8] [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed. > found 907541 openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1 Bug #907541 [openjdk-8] [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails Marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1. > found 907541 openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1 Bug #907541 [openjdk-8] [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails Marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 907541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907541 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 859138 src:openjdk-11 Bug #859138 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The BROWSE action is not supported on the current platform! Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-8-jre-headless' to 'src:openjdk-11'. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u121-b13-4. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #859138 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 859138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859138 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font size
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 834053 + confirmed upstream Bug #834053 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font size Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed. > found 834053 openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1 Bug #834053 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font size Marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1. > found 834053 openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1 Bug #834053 [src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font size Marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.12+4-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 834053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834053 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 819785 8u292-b10-1 Bug #819785 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars Marked as found in versions openjdk-8/8u292-b10-1. > tags 819785 + upstream Bug #819785 [openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in JRE jars Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: reopening bugs from reintroducing openjdk-8
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 819785
Bug #819785 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in
JRE jars
Unarchived Bug 819785
> unarchive 822348
Bug #822348 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file
before deregistering binfmt
Unarchived Bug 822348
> unarchive 834053
Bug #834053 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font
size
Unarchived Bug 834053
> unarchive 859138
Bug #859138 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The BROWSE
action is not supported on the current platform!
Unarchived Bug 859138
> unarchive 896907
Bug #896907 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should
not configure assistive technologies
Unarchived Bug 896907
> unarchive 907541
Bug #907541 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8] [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails
Unarchived Bug 907541
> unarchive 863199
Bug #863199 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] error creating symbolic link
'/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp
Unarchived Bug 863199
> unarchive 906111
Bug #906111 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre] openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime
Unarchived Bug 906111
> reopen 819785
Bug #819785 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Debug information missing in
JRE jars
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 822348
Bug #822348 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: prerm checks for wrong file
before deregistering binfmt
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 834053
Bug #834053 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[src:openjdk-8] openjdk-8: java.awt.Font#deriveFont(int style) corrupts font
size
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 859138
Bug #859138 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The BROWSE
action is not supported on the current platform!
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 896907
Bug #896907 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] openjdk-8-jre-headless: Headless JRE package should
not configure assistive technologies
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 907541
Bug #907541 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8] [openjdk-8] Bind to a multicast address fails
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 863199
Bug #863199 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre-headless] error creating symbolic link
'/usr/share/man/man1/rmid.1.gz.dpkg-tmp
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> reopen 906111
Bug #906111 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[openjdk-8-jre] openjdk-8-jre: Package should Provide: java-runtime
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 8u212-b01-1+rm.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
819785: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819785
822348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822348
834053: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834053
859138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859138
863199: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863199
896907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896907
906111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906111
907541: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907541
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#974879: marked as done (ITP: intervalstorej -- Java implementation of the Nested Containment List data structure)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Nov 2020 22:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#974879: fixed in intervalstorej 1.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #974879, regarding ITP: intervalstorej -- Java implementation of the Nested Containment List data structure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 974879: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974879 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: intervalstorej Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Mungo Carstairs, Barton Group * URL : https://github.com/bartongroup/IntervalStoreJ/ * License : BSD-3-clause Programming Lang: Java Description : Java implementation of the Nested Containment List data structure NCList provides efficient lookup of intervals overlapping a given range in time O(M log N) where N is the number of intervals stored, and M the number of overlaps found. IntervalStore: - is parameterised by ; - so can store any Java type that implements IntervalI, that is, has methods getBegin() and getEnd() (where begin <= end); - extends java.util.AbstractCollection; - may be referred to as Collection in code; - exposes methods for add, contains, remove, iterator, size etc; - has a 'bulk load' constructor, and methods to add or remove entries, while retaining lookup efficiency; - optimises storage and search of sparsely nested intervals by storing non-nested intervals separately; - incorporates NCList to store any properly nested intervals. This package is needed as a dependency of jalview, which is currently updated as we have a quite old version of it in Debian. jalview now relies on it. It will be maintained inside the Debian Java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: intervalstorej Source-Version: 1.2+dfsg-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of intervalstorej, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 974...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated intervalstorej package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 23:06:45 +0100 Source: intervalstorej Binary: libintervalstorej-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.2+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libintervalstorej-java - Java implementation of the Nested Containment List data structure Closes: 974879 Changes: intervalstorej (1.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #974879) Checksums-Sha1: 9fc486cffdf6bbbd7e1967fee4762d0540178610 2270 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1.dsc 83f6a5b70d4ebe90785e9da477d05a0bb3b3300b 1577692 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 311a298b4aa39d60ef84345a93919a61ad58f015 4080 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 65687ed7f6c19e7cefee61c8974520cf36a820f0 9685 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo ff7991a09f1f52923e99d4adef816790dc74ed26 25384 libintervalstorej-java_1.2+dfsg-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: a1141c5c4107c7fd536e25973fc5240d75b9fff97dbd3b148d40de655fc69ce5 2270 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1.dsc 07b2f89cb8d523a4b8beee1d75ec728bee4f38e542f5b2a2769d95728626ef4f 1577692 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 6557863ef22ca5f0d7b095eb89474c63f2faf934bbaf8d83397baeda6c97c4c9 4080 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 3fa89b8061450fdede4266462435c9b263837f2ff9338d515693181135be9b55 9685 intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo 76f59381309d8d3ff864e3831dc37760af5e52b05e5fd1b347f51b935ecdd831 25384 libintervalstorej-java_1.2+dfsg-1_all.deb Files: f57fd03f796d57396aec75adf75e8f47 2270 java optional intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1.dsc c781a2b877c652e701ded1830cc70ac0 1577692 java optional intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg.orig.tar.xz df078b1fd6c1c281c185e515cb4e916f 4080 java optional intervalstorej_1.2+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 124686423a132de1104c27bd0033db9f 9685 java optio
Bug#966299: marked as done (ITP: libapfloat-java -- high performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library for Java)
Your message dated Mon, 09 Nov 2020 23:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966299: fixed in libapfloat-java 1.9.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #966299, regarding ITP: libapfloat-java -- high performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library for Java to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 966299: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966299 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libapfloat-java Version : 1.9.1 Upstream Author : Mikko Tommila * URL : http://www.apfloat.org/apfloat_java * License : LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang: Java Description : high performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library for Java Apfloat is a high performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library. You can perform calculations with a precision of millions of digits with it. It's as simple to use as Java's BigDecimal or BigInteger classes, but performs a lot better with extreme precision numbers (more than a few hundred digits). Also, a full suite of mathematical functions for arbitrary precision numbers are available: all those existing in java.lang.Math and more. This package is needed as a dependency of snpeff, which the Debian Med team would like to package. I am personnally aiming at this. It will be maintained in the Debian Java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libapfloat-java Source-Version: 1.9.1-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libapfloat-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 966...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libapfloat-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 10:06:10 +0200 Source: libapfloat-java Binary: libapfloat-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.9.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libapfloat-java - high performance arbitrary precision arithmetic library for Java Closes: 966299 Changes: libapfloat-java (1.9.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #966299). Checksums-Sha1: fdd26e15d312b29aa13e7213b667b59d4754e0ce 2283 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1.dsc f585e927710d3d98479b6ee423c4e2972814254b 710630 libapfloat-java_1.9.1.orig.tar.gz 01dd900e5d59e2e05f058604f8118a49f90b31c1 5748 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1.debian.tar.xz 24c7eb38bc4e43947c503758661c6a48d2100781 599832 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1_all.deb cf161bac9a2a1ddd6ab9515cfee73c5a11fc2fcb 12913 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: f0356545db7c5296dd82da995846cd7bce3599d31e1eff8ba7391dbbdc8d91c2 2283 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1.dsc dd775d25fd0f56e9afe2fed6a7982750541e9a1f7be74c541129f11c84c5d76c 710630 libapfloat-java_1.9.1.orig.tar.gz 250b0233a9ead6961d0bf89c69c24aaefc104ec9af082d8a9c00a850121cf4a1 5748 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1.debian.tar.xz 1b1370559fb20fbf5cb7d4c9ab911712f8ca7dddfd3723396dd1334ca18179ae 599832 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1_all.deb e057558b1ac0adb4c4d8439809e1117f4222b022ff5f21222449ab863e94afb8 12913 libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: f58b7fb9d44ee6421da0f48c7f70dba0 2283 java optional libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1.dsc 07eec9a161b0506e824a96189af92d47 710630 java optional libapfloat-java_1.9.1.orig.tar.gz 16de711405c364b1e74993652ba994f9 5748 java optional libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1.debian.tar.xz e4fdae60157f312119b027214655de8d 599832 java optional libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1_all.deb 2f503e9212587f55d9f6775490cf780f 12913 java optional libapfloat-java_1.9.1-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEE8fAHMgoDVUHwpmPKV4oElNHGRtEFAl+ptaERHHRpbGxlQGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQV4oElNHGRtEvvA/+PYzOSRQPE+Fl74oLUetVApzI9sS8ITzZ Gag4Rktfojq0cn4Z+iRoB1Im/aLfV93kR6Ccn+RgnOojS8Kt9M5ghkudPxWjCYME ww49KrN/xZL+CdChDY+jhFF52wYcSy6qhHSd9qfQ6shr5JuebMA+9pWjforhMLTT
Bug#969186: marked as done (ITP: libreflections-java -- Java runtime metadata analysis library)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Oct 2020 21:10:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969186: fixed in libreflections-java 0.9.12+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #969186, regarding ITP: libreflections-java -- Java runtime metadata analysis library to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 969186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969186 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libreflections-java Version : 0.9.12 Upstream Author : ronmamo * URL : https://github.com/ronmamo/reflections * License : WTFPL Programming Lang: Java Description : Java runtime metadata analysis library Reflections scans a classpath, indexes the metadata, allows one to query it on runtime and may save and collect that information for many modules within a project. Using Reflections one can query metadata such as: - get all subtypes of some type; - get all types/members annotated with some annotation; - get all resources matching a regular expression; - get all methods with specific signature including parameters, parameter annotations and return type. This package is needed as a predependency of igv, which the Debian med team would like to package out of non-free. I am personnally aiming at this. The package will be maintained in the Debian Java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libreflections-java Source-Version: 0.9.12+dfsg-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libreflections-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 969...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libreflections-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:25:11 +0200 Source: libreflections-java Binary: libreflections-java Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.12+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libreflections-java - Java runtime metadata analysis library Closes: 969186 Changes: libreflections-java (0.9.12+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #969186) Checksums-Sha1: c0a44d0ee09ad0e02d5b33432bc9e88fe86f7ce4 2259 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1.dsc 026ba49d333d38d4dc31db675a646c5c8d401c29 39596 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg.orig.tar.xz c751f1351b01db36491448b80ace3154e6bf157d 2944 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 90e834c0e7498b9629288426011eef659cb773a8 101008 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1_all.deb 1803a33d5ecb17ba16f3177a59b344d0c7bee823 11448 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: e622e65b78c32308b7ebef4c1f6e0a045f06ebbcc064684afb4a6e33f9ec434b 2259 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1.dsc 3ae953395a47c519bee9aca17368aff6afea1e0f4231b09d185004943b2ba9ee 39596 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 9a270b51c88bd753708414f0b9e067dca95690b77229f33e5588ed179a4d60b5 2944 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz cbcee1ee837966a6b7e066c8232218cef056a081010922d0bf1846b571acab42 101008 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1_all.deb 8ca39fa4581fdef682fec4335b9ca3d6cc1b78961607597816b37e32e45ca0ea 11448 libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: d6c183a5ab821c0782c05602897a7a5c 2259 java optional libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1.dsc 32557aa0c8cc15cb93030636102c385b 39596 java optional libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 87dc8e22503ab8eefe37ab28baacb324 2944 java optional libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz 7ae87da91a97d13a73bdce58aa223911 101008 java optional libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1_all.deb 96c365caf42f3b074e5beb3c3921dec7 11448 java optional libreflections-java_0.9.12+dfsg-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCAAvFiEE8fAHMgoDVUHwpmPKV4oElNHGRtEFAl9cbvIRHHRpbGxlQGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQV4oElNHGRtELhg
Bug#969176: marked as done (ITP: libdsiutils-java -- Java library of statistical and text data handling tools)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#969176: fixed in libdsiutils-java 2.6.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #969176, regarding ITP: libdsiutils-java -- Java library of statistical and text data handling tools to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 969176: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969176 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libdsiutils-java Version : 2.6.6 Upstream Author : Sebastiano Vigna * URL : http://dsiutils.di.unimi.it * License : LGPL-3 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java library of statistical and text data handling tools The library contains: - Implementations of pseudorandom number generators; - BitVector and its implementations -- a high-performance but flexible set of bit vector classes; - A it.unimi.dsi.compression package containing codecs for several types of encodings; - ProgressLogger, a flexible logger with statistics marking the progress of the classes that are used and that require hours of computation; - ObjectParser, a class making it easy to specify complex objects on the command line; - MutableString, an alternative to the immutable Java String class; - The I/O package, containing fast version of several classes existing in java.io, many useful classes to read easily text data (e.g., FileLinesCollection), bit streams, classes providing large-size memory mapping such as ByteBufferInputStream, and OfflineIterable -- the easy & fast way to store large sequences of objects on disk and iterate on them; - The it.unimi.dsi.util package, containing pseudorandom number generators, tries, immutable prefix maps, Bloom filters, a very comfortable Properties class and more; - The it.unimi.dsi.stat package, containing a lightweight class for computing basic statistics and an arbitrary-precision implementation of the Jackknife method; - Lots of utility methods in Util; - Big versions of I/O and utility classes in it.unimi.dsi.big.io and it.unimi.dsi.big.util; - The BulletParser, used to parse HTML and XML. This package is needed as a predependency of igv, which the Debian med team would like to package out of non-free. I am personnally aiming at this. The package will be maintained in the Debian Java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libdsiutils-java Source-Version: 2.6.6-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libdsiutils-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 969...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated libdsiutils-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 17:58:01 +0200 Source: libdsiutils-java Binary: libdsiutils-java Architecture: source all Version: 2.6.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libdsiutils-java - Java library of statistical and text data handling tools Closes: 969176 Changes: libdsiutils-java (2.6.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #969176) Checksums-Sha1: 1acb2ec7d457701e406ad47a63492284b7877a63 2304 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6-1.dsc c7b9efe7f723f65ad315b61b70af40bf3e7ced95 478584 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6.orig.tar.gz b83122b2d8c541102411fc043e2adab8ea4d840b 3980 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6-1.debian.tar.xz c816e20cd8156e3e9ba70cf836b158c8ee32d41a 429356 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6-1_all.deb 137f6e690a6e41cd5c59ca8615b9eea98d487a5f 9983 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 1887ca0695416abf6c29a3a85ed21c66cfc9af9b2fdde1c3651a02dfc1ac17ae 2304 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6-1.dsc f7590d1c397ebb708ba9a3085d74600769540b4ae14b42bc3ac6821f31074056 478584 libdsiutils-java_2.6.6.orig.ta
Bug#966192: marked as done (ITP: libcharts4j-java -- free, lightweight charts and graphs Java API)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966192: fixed in charts4j 1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #966192, regarding ITP: libcharts4j-java -- free, lightweight charts and graphs Java API to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 966192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966192 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Java team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-java@lists.debian.org * Package name: libcharts4j-java Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Julien Chastang * URL : https://github.com/julienchastang/charts4j * License : MIT Programming Lang: Java Description : free, lightweight charts and graphs Java API charts4j enables developers to programmatically create the charts available in the Google Chart API through a straightforward and intuitive Java API. This package is needed as a dependency of snpeff, which the Debian med team would like to package. I am personnally aiming at this. The package will be maintained in the Debian Java team. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: charts4j Source-Version: 1.3-1 Done: Pierre Gruet We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of charts4j, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 966...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Pierre Gruet (supplier of updated charts4j package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 23:13:19 +0200 Source: charts4j Binary: libcharts4j-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Pierre Gruet Description: libcharts4j-java - free, lightweight charts and graphs Java API Closes: 966192 Changes: charts4j (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #966192) Checksums-Sha1: e40999b9accc944eff19606ebdf7582f686ae630 1981 charts4j_1.3-1.dsc a632ce79ea7bcbe4791dc68bf875c8a3e281951e 569104 charts4j_1.3.orig.tar.xz 4429136367c6dbfc7f273f77e8c7bbc566dc3d58 2692 charts4j_1.3-1.debian.tar.xz 620a9be2b093d00d8d36b88c0787261d674cb294 11227 charts4j_1.3-1_amd64.buildinfo adf4558b7878d0da60eb98edd1ac91eb634a3c49 161780 libcharts4j-java_1.3-1_all.deb Checksums-Sha256: f30244b5f0a03c6b7f9417975b221f6e63e4aa569fad5c488e0ba9690afae6a1 1981 charts4j_1.3-1.dsc 42cb60860b88836f3fe05bd488c8d46637e70ea026d55ca52bb2057e870f956c 569104 charts4j_1.3.orig.tar.xz 388296f61d8791cc3bf9a1b5e1fa5392428e71dc877644ed2ff1bf30c8692d00 2692 charts4j_1.3-1.debian.tar.xz af07e6dd834c9fc7e33a7280db65c03a49ee6c463bc718d35648451d52a414f7 11227 charts4j_1.3-1_amd64.buildinfo 76771a46a5ea862cbe5f03787d1307c85d5e41bd20ae066294f977121de43079 161780 libcharts4j-java_1.3-1_all.deb Files: 867ce0aafcd1286846300e845e92b6c2 1981 java optional charts4j_1.3-1.dsc 18da0bce32c0d05752719322ec1ce3c0 569104 java optional charts4j_1.3.orig.tar.xz 68c6b26699bd708afadf87fa9ead7753 2692 java optional charts4j_1.3-1.debian.tar.xz defce48906df5c84dae28c79bffc3071 11227 java optional charts4j_1.3-1_amd64.buildinfo b8e54b1b09f9705c33e103d376d0d128 161780 java optional libcharts4j-java_1.3-1_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEuM5N4hCA3PkD4WxA9RPEGeS50KwFAl8coUgACgkQ9RPEGeS5 0KwROg//YCPUqNIl67H37JLIRcZU6yyJDEZB4ot1xwFdCe6Gd57V7P9YNV6cHesa sUUe/iJwAiJhAjI1Z+xeBv1Ba6QT5cFSIHfixJVtQZmMebXvIGc4JyX1sj0sncpU tDwad/dSX/Jm8MNBGknKEfFWSPSXB5Hk8DotLkQ9o8TiMdK1Umf9YSRnd7uNbui9 W46IZEVN0oTPu9tGoQJPi5ZiDeistD18W+au/ehr/QIFZXBaOXJemxxNCdnz/dXF pp2RP/seAz8daOTHUqKD5Uhi+vWOI/KwOoYRl2fZhA2UnApC4UbDp7jcLkdUTeI0 PdJurgMjrpaoUBGbiac83EGtAyhF1or80pELoBQpiIp2Kl98wF5yoiWaoyKWrWGU S/hwQppGkTHlLoO9KjEhneP50nY85A2te4Krk73S2kbBdAQEVa/cDWRNoNRPIQ+G 2l8VXqmU5GknZ2dBYrXciug3JviszJ22is26PlID3EF44S+1f0iTK2EQa8kBAtH2 eLzs298sRf5grp6v+WdFcsppXy2ZUHp9jns/iLBFTREXIHktchGMumR2IdnMUpiS sltgW7U4YndJs099PJGzCIiyC5LhnPlvShs0z01XiepFaFuii/TDsfpd0BeC/ijM JJEsFv7DINRcBTIw1zKa5DCtRBOMMGsypcNHkiAwLOtcXtLLKcQ= =AMzF
Bug#966303: marked as done (java-policy: Please specify the reference more precisely)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:19:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966303: fixed in java-policy 0.57 has caused the Debian Bug report #966303, regarding java-policy: Please specify the reference more precisely to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 966303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966303 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: java-common Version: 0.56 Severity: normal in chapter 2.3 (Java programms) are references to the Debian Policy. Because of changen some chapters, it is not easy understandable what this shoud refere. Can someone specify the references more precisely? Kind regards Mechtilde -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (400, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: 5.6.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: java-policy Source-Version: 0.57 Done: Emmanuel Bourg We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-policy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 966...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Emmanuel Bourg (supplier of updated java-policy package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:04:58 +0200 Source: java-policy Architecture: source Version: 0.57 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg Closes: 966303 Changes: java-policy (0.57) unstable; urgency=medium . * Updated the references to the Debian Policy (Closes: #966303) * Removed the references to GCJ * Redirect the discussions and bug reports to the java-policy package * Switched the URLs to https * Standards-Version updated to 4.5.0 * Switch to debhelper level 13 Checksums-Sha1: 990d046b57e91342aba8bbf3178841b1f008940e 1707 java-policy_0.57.dsc 99b5a50c0eea569ba457276c46f9ce32f7a4b034 20176 java-policy_0.57.tar.xz 1c6b9ff0733c14f7b6d57b7b0ea6b60b0ffced55 6037 java-policy_0.57_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: 387755d22391619ff6b658073c11cdd3436e5c7b4b0b35e1a54c373e83fd2e69 1707 java-policy_0.57.dsc 440088616c54bfff4a223e2e253ce9afaeb0293fd88dc1048a32f26811d0fb16 20176 java-policy_0.57.tar.xz 1817201188c94b0c7fcb35ff4a956e1c88cdb4c7dc2dbe45c18e7a250a3e3052 6037 java-policy_0.57_source.buildinfo Files: aa777a3ca0679a6bf5da9c6dca745628 1707 java optional java-policy_0.57.dsc 4260d9ca67b58b6520bf4f4fab412e32 20176 java optional java-policy_0.57.tar.xz e3b54dad29d84a1ae24a809a957850d3 6037 java optional java-policy_0.57_source.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEEuM5N4hCA3PkD4WxA9RPEGeS50KwFAl8ew24SHGVib3VyZ0Bh cGFjaGUub3JnAAoJEPUTxBnkudCsMD0P/A9NffvgmmbjpPqbvVEGJpzJGWXPEfgj LJyv4YZBKPKuxyZVuJbS+hC6V8IymfmwuaPViPiT7ZkLBbpOq/kg+MVLgwkVF90a IDijluAUE2n1ARgOXsoCDHxV//nMZvQvRbby+MrZlrWwgeAtSU0GwzuPPiHms6RG JguuIhOuOKenVh6f6wFMPZTrxJ892MKlPRHMOdrq0o444aZwyU6l8ptfvRoqJZj8 Fj+2c0cLop+W9aSmViNccj5j8n4hOxSnRrfLzhK4nXr27NIHrKebHCNVhwppm0lG N58y0loUqfLoN8vhWW989uNixqG9RmxeRq6ldgWlihCPh/TDzkhYn+PUeQYzX1fs KF+s/5rtfHtDdg1Xy4t4m4R9UrHxHXL0TzTJATanHslS3JpG6p2JO5TScRU6eY8t F7HrysdDdkQkW6QnY1YCRwBkBHvmSlN3LPVkgf2BtM96JXzJdirjemCCM4tenuRI dfeC8CygC4rUNqBuP5+un1KwJCnuRNdMJF/nkLEUnVh0aX5S0NN0yqDFqwKHTvNK BUYlvU7Pyoa7JQuu5YWW8TJ0jLxaXJf4X5aMSyR6GfmpWLPwnSxq535zZWugRbr9 ptXZ4Gmaa2UbYnqDwOOES3RvCQxh0C4daBlD2D9zhnUXgnBCx66HZZYGslllvql8 N7XWwZ3kIlmd =mvBT -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Processed: Bug#966303 marked as pending in java-policy
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #966303 [java-policy] java-policy: Please specify the reference more precisely Added tag(s) pending. -- 966303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966303 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 966303 java-policy Bug #966303 [java-common] Java-common: Please specify the reference more precisely Bug reassigned from package 'java-common' to 'java-policy'. No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.56. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #966303 to the same values previously set > retitle 966303 java-policy: Please specify the reference more precisely Bug #966303 [java-policy] Java-common: Please specify the reference more precisely Changed Bug title to 'java-policy: Please specify the reference more precisely' from 'Java-common: Please specify the reference more precisely'. > reassign 966298 java-policy Bug #966298 [java-common] java-common: depredcated description of compiler package -dev Bug reassigned from package 'java-common' to 'java-policy'. No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.56. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #966298 to the same values previously set > retitle 966298 java-policy: depredcated description of compiler package > -dev Bug #966298 [java-policy] java-common: depredcated description of compiler package -dev Changed Bug title to 'java-policy: depredcated description of compiler package -dev' from 'java-common: depredcated description of compiler package -dev'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 966298: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966298 966303: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966303 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 946688 java-policy Bug #946688 [java-common] hyperlink to bugs.debian.org/java-common is incorrect in https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch1.en.html#s-bugs Bug reassigned from package 'java-common' to 'java-policy'. No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.72. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #946688 to the same values previously set > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 946688: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946688 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: tagging 730133
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 730133 + pending Bug #730133 [src:java-common] java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 730133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730133 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14234959008765.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: closing 699757
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: close 699757 Bug #699757 [default-jdk] Java 6 support ending, Java 7 not in squeeze Marked Bug as done thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 699757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699757 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14234910738839.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 770579
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 770579 + pending Bug #770579 [java-common] java-common: Please remove me from uploaders Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 770579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770579 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.142349158011553.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#770769 closed by Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org (Re: Bug#770769: RM: tomcat6 -- NBS; (most) binaries no longer built from src:tomcat6 as of 6.0.41-3)
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the ftp.debian.org package: #770769: RM: tomcat6 -- NBS; (most) binaries no longer built from src:tomcat6 as of 6.0.41-3 It has been closed by Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org. Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org by replying to this email. -- 770769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770769 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:02:03 +0100 Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: tomcat-maven-plugin and jspwiki no longer depend on tomcat6 in sid. And the remaining packages depending on tomcat6 have been fixed, too, so auto-cruft cleanup has happened. Nothing more to do here as src:tomcat6 will keep building some libraries. Andreas---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Starting with tomcat6-6.0.41-3, the following binary packages are no longer built from src:tomcat6: tomcat6 tomcat6-admin tomcat6-common tomcat6-docs tomcat6-extras tomcat6-user libtomcat6-java libservlet2.4-java Please remove any of these old binary packages from sid. For questions, please direct follow-ups to debian-java@lists.debian.org (set in the Reply-To:). Thank you, tony mancill ---End Message---
Bug#770769: Acknowledgement (RM: tomcat6 -- NBS; (most) binaries no longer built from src:tomcat6 as of 6.0.41-3)
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian FTP Master ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 770...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- 770769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770769 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.770769.b.141677864425557@bugs.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 730133
Bug #730133 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org} [src:java-common]
java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre
Unarchived Bug 730133
reopen 730133
Bug #730133 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org} [src:java-common]
java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions java-common/0.50.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
730133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140542728031190.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 656599
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # unable to reproduce this bug, can this bug be closed? tags 656599 + unreproducible Bug #656599 [default-jdk] default-jdk: Java JDK not installable on squeeze Added tag(s) unreproducible. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 656599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656599 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139943342531163.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 699757
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # tagging this bug wontfix - see java-package tags 699757 + wontfix Bug #699757 [default-jdk] Java 6 support ending, Java 7 not in squeeze Added tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 699757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699757 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139943375332395.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#747179: marked as done (java-common: set default-jdk to openjdk-7 for mips64el)
Your message dated Wed, 07 May 2014 03:49:40 + with message-id e1whsru-00074b...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#747179: fixed in java-common 0.52 has caused the Debian Bug report #747179, regarding java-common: set default-jdk to openjdk-7 for mips64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 747179: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747179 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.51 user: debian-m...@lists.debian.org usertags: mips-patch Now, I make openjdk-7 workable on mips64el. Please set the default jdk to openjdk-7 on mips64el. -- Yunqiang Su ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.52 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 747...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 11:10:05 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.52 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 747179 Changes: java-common (0.52) unstable; urgency=medium . * Team upload. * Use OpenJDK 7 on mips64el (Closes: #747179) * Prepared the default values for Java 8 * Use 'set -e' instead of '#!/bin/sh -e' in debian/java-common.postrm * Switch to debhelper level 9 * debian/control: - Standards-Version updated to 3.9.5 (no changes) - Use a canonical URL for the Vcs-Svn field - Added the Homepage field Checksums-Sha1: 8dd03afaceed6dfff8c7fc602fe84e665c7e6940 2085 java-common_0.52.dsc c118d1dd015e1a5842809e62e3da366bc959f372 47380 java-common_0.52.tar.xz 4748f36c70be9156b87c599ff7601336c32634fb 135708 java-common_0.52_all.deb c5023ea4024094a940841fe98e5d152f3de7de5f 8810 default-jdk-doc_0.52_all.deb b8c1f3951047c6a85aa43ca990d9745f8d97b04c 968 default-jre_1.7-52_amd64.deb c7689059f487c158796960d2b5ea2a4330794f4d 9072 default-jre-headless_1.7-52_amd64.deb 5c36420e2e530ca183be7e1722a0564634718f75 962 default-jdk_1.7-52_amd64.deb fcd8748d1e113d7edb28a6ec006b6f2f223396b6 1110 gcj-native-helper_1.7-52_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 348d6709b0d7ed5f4a944dc59f3cbf896f622b328d0c0bc4c2578980753b376d 2085 java-common_0.52.dsc 1118793faa2f41b9424c7014558713cdea0a401b3e2d904925fc20cf68464143 47380 java-common_0.52.tar.xz 2cbe526a6d7d09f573d4d49eaf51273bde584d2b27b50e33dfeb8c839a14a267 135708 java-common_0.52_all.deb 1e2c203f23b2b9d95a23362a4e08a8f0733ad44140af32d85828d3d91903461f 8810 default-jdk-doc_0.52_all.deb daec4527a9c25e499c9e827883c5d937dbd0cf0a468a8539b604b525d01703b5 968 default-jre_1.7-52_amd64.deb 269cfb6cbd4c7bf2452e1480224f70332d0bc282e31423d831032994607deb6e 9072 default-jre-headless_1.7-52_amd64.deb f39fb9d94b67de25688acfd35ea9cfac6b2da81093d65a9e6abb509da8a12eaa 962 default-jdk_1.7-52_amd64.deb c58cbe7ff6683854d57f8ca63208d8e9407e36ba667402bee88d9db613657ccc 1110 gcj-native-helper_1.7-52_amd64.deb Files: 89ca905ceac2f9ca754b7a7217c03929 135708 java optional java-common_0.52_all.deb c758f3d9c9417b4f00771581ef225a53 8810 doc optional default-jdk-doc_0.52_all.deb 3b49d4889b6e7317f45b31391046a7f5 968 java optional default-jre_1.7-52_amd64.deb d4de5cc1c8e16a6393941ea5c65847cf 9072 java optional default-jre-headless_1.7-52_amd64.deb b0202250fd1a98015aa2baaa8c91a6b6 962 java optional
Processed: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;submitter=bugs.debian.nospam%40zorglub.s.bawue.de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: submitter 414305 ! Bug #414305 [cdbs] cdbs: simple-patchsys reverses patches too early Bug #494254 [cdbs] cdbs: please clean before unpatch (revert bug #387103) Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' submitter 325742 ! Bug #325742 [java-common] java-common: [Policy] Add need to compile with least possible version. Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' submitter 291015 ! Bug #291015 [mime-support] mime-support: run‐mailcap to understand URL notation and start sensible-browser if required. Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' submitter 414865 ! Bug #414865 [deborphan] orphaner: please add option to find unused orphaned packages using the information provided by popcon-largest-unused Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' submitter 272054 ! Bug #272054 [libgtk2.0-doc] gtk tutorial uses GTK_CALENDAR_WEEK_START_MONDAY which isn't supported in the API anymore Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' submitter 368434 ! Bug #368434 [gnome-terminal] gnome-terminal: Add keyboard shortcuts for opening tab with specific profile Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' submitter 423303 ! Bug #423303 [jpilot] jpilot: -a option should consider time of appointment, not time of alarm. Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@zorglub.s.bawue.de' -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 272054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=272054 291015: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=291015 325742: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=325742 368434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368434 414305: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414305 414865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=414865 423303: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423303 494254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494254 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139253478723878.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#732282: marked as done (stop building java for sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:22:03 +0100 with message-id 52ece6eb.5080...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#732282: stop building java for sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any has caused the Debian Bug report #732282, regarding stop building java for sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 732282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732282 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.50 Severity: serious Tags: jessie, sid openjdk-7 currently ftbfs on sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any. So please either remove the default-* packages on these archs, or fall back to gcj. - the hotspot port for linux sparc isn't maintained anymore by upstream. If a porter is interested, maybe investigate how to build the zero vm on these architectures. - s390 needs an update of the s390 debian specific patch. Not working on this myself. - the debian kfreebsd patches need an update. I don't think it's feasible to burden the openjdk maintainers or the security team with patch maintenance. I understand that the bsd support is found upstream in openjdk-8, so maybe try that again for the next upstream version. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2013-12-16 11:34, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: java-common Version: 0.50 Severity: serious Tags: jessie, sid openjdk-7 currently ftbfs on sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any. So please either remove the default-* packages on these archs, or fall back to gcj. - the hotspot port for linux sparc isn't maintained anymore by upstream. If a porter is interested, maybe investigate how to build the zero vm on these architectures. - s390 needs an update of the s390 debian specific patch. Not working on this myself. - the debian kfreebsd patches need an update. I don't think it's feasible to burden the openjdk maintainers or the security team with patch maintenance. I understand that the bsd support is found upstream in openjdk-8, so maybe try that again for the next upstream version. Uploaded java-common/0.51 with the relevant changes, but forgot to add a Closes for this bug. In other news, icedtea-web needs to drop its icedtea-6-plugin package and OpenJDK-7 needs to migrate to testing. Once that happens we are ready to remove OpenJDK-6 from testing (and gcc-4.4, which is only blocked by OpenJDK-7). ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#729227: marked as done (out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html)
Your message dated Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:58:41 +0100 with message-id 529721e1.7050...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#729227: out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html has caused the Debian Bug report #729227, regarding out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 729227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Control: submitter -1 tom.jo...@bccx.com On 2013-11-10 12:44, Tom Jones wrote: Dear Torsten, Niels, and Javier, Any chance you could update [1] for Debian 7 (wheezy)? Currently it only goes up to Debian 6 (squeeze). Also, if you are going to use codenames, it is nice to users to also have the version number number, eg Debian 6.0 (squeeze). Thanks in advance, Tom Jones. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html Hi Tom, Thanks for the report. I have submitted this as a bug against java-common[1], since I don't have the time to deal with it right now. But we will hopefully get it updated soon. ~Niels [1] java-common have a copy of the FAQ, which also have the same problem. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 25/11/2013 17:54, Tom Jones wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:11:34PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: It should be fixed soon: taffit in a few hours (four at most), http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ should also be OK Thanks for this. Done! S---End Message---
Processed: severity of 730133 is minor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 730133 minor
Bug #730133 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org} [src:java-common]
java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
730133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13855715136729.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#730133: marked as done (java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre)
Your message dated Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:21:01 +
with message-id e1vkf13-yb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#730133: fixed in java-common 0.50
has caused the Debian Bug report #730133,
regarding java-common: policy vs lintian: needless-dependency-on-jre
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
730133: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Version: 0.49
Severity: serious
Justification: the java policy diff'd below is a must, so a serious bug on
lintian
While looking at #681763, I found a conflict between policy and lintian:
java-common 0.35 removed a must, that libraries must depend on the jre.
lintian 2.4.4 added a warning that libraries should not do that.
java-common 0.49 re-adds a must directive to do it.
lintian (2.4.4):
+Tag: needless-dependency-on-jre
+Severity: normal
+Certainty: possible
+Info: The package appear to be a Java library and depending on one
+ or more JRE/JDK packages. As of 05 Apr 2010, the Java Policy no
+ longer mandates that Java libraries depend on Java Runtimes.
+ .
+ If there is a valid reason for this dependency, please override
+ the tag.
+Ref: http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/java-common/news/20100405T221415Z.html,
+ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=227587
java-common (0.49):
+Libraries must; depend on the needed runtime environment (d-jre;
and/or d-jre-h; if need a GUI or not).
Cheers,
Steve
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Source-Version: 0.50
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 730...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:55:24 +0100
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.50
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
Description:
default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
(documentation)
default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless)
gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages
java-common - Base of all Java packages
Closes: 730133
Changes:
java-common (0.50) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Remove the 'Libraries must depend on the needed runtime environment'
from the policy. It was wrong and conflicting with lintian.
(Closes: #730133)
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5.
* Add myself among the uploaders
.
[ Damien Raude-Morvan ]
* Promote openjdk-7 as default-java on kfreebsd-{i386,amd64}.
Checksums-Sha1:
5e9386467b5484dcb2c9621603fe4a57a246f38d 1408 java-common_0.50.dsc
4b8734ccb36247f198200400751ad4686f44cde2 53274 java-common_0.50.tar.gz
02d37afd134dc793b76f99a86fe53661f2c2f986 134874 java-common_0.50_all.deb
14a7c7293cad3cb08f297cf4eed4f899ddd36edf 8324 default-jdk-doc_0.50_all.deb
c99fcd79aee5c4f691f2b80120032927234e150a 898 default-jre_1.7-50_amd64.deb
6fda9e5c4de6ad641f83b7a7f2d06ab57daaf1d5 8600
default-jre-headless_1.7-50_amd64.deb
ef9532c64ba67147cc66dc4c4488826113563ce0 894 default-jdk_1.7-50_amd64.deb
a2df7384e58fff4e56865f1222f312b634893160 1040
gcj-native-helper_1.7-50_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
e6ecd09cf5f1ca2ca9a550b7e632f0313265e610e9ad39077f7fa604120199ae 1408
java-common_0.50.dsc
f44d224063b888c7891331097314d9c73e980b3ee3c90015f5dafffe53362f02 53274
java-common_0.50.tar.gz
c9a56cbcb1652e3bf259fdccaaa15e13e366f6b2ffbe35295c075e425c8fbf46 134874
java-common_0.50_all.deb
cdc73bd0aa7253fdff23c9b0a66630f8043485b7252b1dc15d678bd1b4666744 8324
default-jdk-doc_0.50_all.deb
Processed: Re: out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html
Processing control commands: submitter -1 tom.jo...@bccx.com Bug #729227 [java-common] out of date http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch-browser-java.html Changed Bug submitter to 'tom.jo...@bccx.com' from 'Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net' -- 729227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b.1384096287536.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed (with 1 errors): remove /usr/lib/jni from java.library.path ?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 676618 important Bug #676618 [java-common] java-common: Update java policy for multiarch glue lib (-jni package) Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' user 676618 multiarch-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. usertags 676618 multiarch User is ma...@debian.org There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: multiarch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676618 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13837478587866.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#551300: marked as done (java-common: policy mandates java?-runtime even for headless packages)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:55:00 +0200 with message-id cag50ze84ktpfu7vzcmk2eybfuuth-1ctkduff3446ohrww-...@mail.gmail.com and subject line java-common: policy mandates java?-runtime even for headless packages has caused the Debian Bug report #551300, regarding java-common: policy mandates java?-runtime even for headless packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 551300: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551300 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.33 Severity: normal The Debian Java Policy, which is present in this package, states (§2.3): Programs must depend on java-virtual-machine and the needed runtime environment (java1-runtime and/or java2-runtime). (Similar text is present in §2.1 and §2.2.) This is problematic, because this pulls in a huge number of dependencies that are unneeded for packages that run headless. For openjdk-6, which is the default runtime on amd64, this involves the installation of the entirety of GTK and its associated libraries, which are not needed on machines that have neither a monitor nor an X server, such as servers. Please fix the policy so that it does not mandate the installation of a full JRE when a headless JRE would suffice. This is priority normal because it requires every Java program or library to depend on lots of code that has no place on a server. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash java-common depends on no packages. java-common recommends no packages. Versions of packages java-common suggests: ii default-jre 1.6-33 Standard Java or Java compatible R ii equivs2.0.7-0.1 Circumvent Debian package dependen -- no debconf information -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Sylvestre has updated / cleaned up the policy which now say : Programs must depend on the needed runtime environment (default-jre and/or default-jre-headless if need a GUI or not). So this issue could be closed. Regards, -- Damien ---End Message---
Bug#687841: marked as done (java-common: [Policy] please explicitly state copyright and license in Java Policy)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Aug 2013 16:33:25 +
with message-id e1v6nin-ld...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#687841: fixed in java-common 0.49
has caused the Debian Bug report #687841,
regarding java-common: [Policy] please explicitly state copyright and license
in Java Policy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
687841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: java-common
Version: 0.47
Severity: wishlist
Hello java-common maintainers!
It is my understanding that the Debian policy for Java [1] is
currently part of the java-common package, and thus licensed
under the GNU GPL v2 or later, as documented in the debian/copyright
file [2].
Very good, this is important, especially in light of the future
plan to integrate it into the (general) Debian Policy Manual [3].
On the other hand, the copyright and licensing status of the
Debian policy for Java is not very clear, when this document
is viewed online from the Debian website [1].
Please include a clear Copyright Notice section (immediately
after the Abstract section) in order to explicitly state
the copyright and license for the document.
Examples are the Debian Policy Manual itself [3] and the Debian
Python Policy [4].
Thanks for your time.
Bye.
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/index.html
[2]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/j/java-common/current/copyright
[3] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
[4] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Source-Version: 0.49
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 687...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:18:05 +0200
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.49
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org
Description:
default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
(documentation)
default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless)
gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages
java-common - Base of all Java packages
Closes: 687841
Changes:
java-common (0.49) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Sylvestre Ledru ]
* Team upload.
* Finalize the upload to switch to OpenJDK 7.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg0.html
* Fix empty-binary-package on gcj-native-helper, default-jre default-jdk
* Remove local variables in the changelog
* Update of the Debian Java FAQ (was starting to become obsolete)
* Update of the Java policy:
- Recommend default-jre default-jre-headless for Java libraries
- Create a section Building Java packages
- Promote default-jdk
- Advice to use javahelper
- Recommend maven-debian-helper
- Remove some deprecated references to java-runtime{1,2}
- Minor improvements
- State the license of the policy (Closes: #687841)
.
[ tony mancill ]
* Upload to unstable to make openjdk-7 the default on architectures
where it is supported.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4.
* Update Vcs-Svn URL.
.
[ Matthias Klose ]
* Don't blindly update to OpenJDK7 on architectures where it is not
supported or not even built.
* Provide a /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk makefile fragment for
supported java architectures and versions.
Checksums-Sha1:
c7e782a865fb8020714e0b5c3958768cddc90201 1368 java-common_0.49.dsc
Bug#698164: marked as done (mandate unique package names in Debian Java policy)
Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:18:14 +0100 with message-id 51162266.1030...@zorglub.s.bawue.de and subject line Re: Bug#698164: Info received (Bug#698164: mandate unique package names in Debian Java policy) has caused the Debian Bug report #698164, regarding mandate unique package names in Debian Java policy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 698164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698164 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Severity: important Version: 0.47 I just had a read over the policy http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/java-policy/ One thing not mentioned is the use of namespaces/package names in Java The vast majority of projects use unique namespaces, specifically, using a registered domain name as a package name. A few projects exist without following this convention, and sooner or later somebody may try to package one of them. According to the Java Language Specification, using a domain name is a suggested convention and not a mandatory obligation. Nonetheless, in an environment such as Debian where we have to keep many different packages concurrently on a single system, I would contend that we should mandate the use of this suggestion http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-6.html#d5e6504 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- After nobody has reacted anymore on this bug and everybody who did before was against it, closing.---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#553619: debian-policy: include java policy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 553619 java-common Bug #553619 [debian-policy] debian-policy: include java policy Bug reassigned from package 'debian-policy' to 'java-common'. No longer marked as found in versions debian-policy/3.8.3.0. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #553619 to the same values previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 553619: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553619 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134404483210341.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 676621 patch Bug #676621 [java-common] java-common: Java glue lib is a module: no SONAME Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676621 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13392476426574.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#676618: java-common: Update java policy for multiarch glue lib (-jni package)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 676618 patch Bug #676618 [java-common] java-common: Update java policy for multiarch glue lib (-jni package) Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676618 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133914907810365.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#644043: marked as done (default-jre-headless: Slightly misleading long description)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:31:00 +0100 with message-id 4f4a4224.6000...@debian.org and subject line Re: default-jre-headless: Slightly misleading long description has caused the Debian Bug report #644043, regarding default-jre-headless: Slightly misleading long description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 644043: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644043 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: default-jre-headless Version: 1:1.6-40 Severity: minor Hi Long description states, that on amd64, that package will draw openjdk-6-jre-headless as dependency. This is true, but it is also true for i386, powerpc, armel and number of other architectures. I believe that long description was created when dependency for amd64 was openjdk and something different (gcj?) fo all other architectures, and was not updated since. As dependency may change on each architecture (that happened before, as changelog states), I suggest to remove following fragment from long description: which is openjdk-6-jre-headless for amd64 Stating that this package will draw as dependency recommended Java for user's architecture should be enough. Best regards Mirosław Zalewski -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages default-jre-headless depends on: ii java-common 0.40 ii openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b23~pre7-1 default-jre-headless recommends no packages. Versions of packages default-jre-headless suggests: ii default-jre 1:1.6-40 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- kfreebsd and the Hurd still use gcj; the package description is always created at package build time, so it's kept up to date even if the default changes. ---End Message---
Bug#654029: marked as done (Updating the java-common Uploaders list)
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:54:18 + with message-id e1s1fuq-0001ol...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#654029: fixed in java-common 0.47 has caused the Debian Bug report #654029, regarding Updating the java-common Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 654029: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654029 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.46 Severity: minor User: m...@qa.debian.org Usertags: mia-teammaint Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de has not been working on the java-common package for quite some time. We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close that part of the file. (If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please step in as a new maintainer.) Thanks. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.47 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-doc_0.47_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.47_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-47_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-47_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-47_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-47_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-47_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-47_amd64.deb gcj-native-helper_1.6-47_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/gcj-native-helper_1.6-47_amd64.deb java-common_0.47.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.47.dsc java-common_0.47.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.47.tar.gz java-common_0.47_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.47_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 654...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:19:30 +0100 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.47 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 654029 660604 Changes: java-common (0.47) unstable; urgency=low . * Add creation and removal of /etc/.java (common to different OpenJDK versions) in java-common maintainer scripts. Closes: #660604. * Remove Michael from the uploaders list. Closes: #654029. Checksums-Sha1: bf3b8dc28bbb771dcb2fd337025ec20972d43cb2 1395 java-common_0.47.dsc a98ea45ec7418ca0447d4cf84b8d673d306e3f2d 53086 java-common_0.47.tar.gz 199e49d4436263367d2454cdd7135887b97ae728 66102 java-common_0.47_all.deb 9b406a78a383eb53d35028200ad6cce4517c48b7 7860 default-jdk-doc_0.47_all.deb b5a07ab33a9403f6fb96d19beff6e8ca7aa0b879 836 default-jre_1.6-47_amd64.deb 8462d419731e860fcd7964be447d77202571280f 8112 default-jre-headless_1.6-47_amd64.deb 24fbb46a5d9ce8b99ed0f8b3628de41e570a5a5f 834 default-jdk_1.6-47_amd64.deb e58ffe4c536cfbc91d49f8b7e1195f4d358dceff 978 gcj-native-helper_1.6-47_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 00ccd44017f3a8d6d5c8f37e38f993657057b5ec1c3f04efc90ed5104ace1776 1395 java-common_0.47.dsc e3a111a48f2fc07ecd19ba739390f623d97b91acbbdadf0c71d7cfc7b4c48d1e 53086 java-common_0.47.tar.gz 1ffa881343b2c0d8b57f1c678b729d1c188fe0dfe7b0105dc1704b5f4e3bcfd9 66102 java-common_0.47_all.deb c4fca142ee449b08b68e8b115582743b190c185e9faf4d91bacaa27fa2e2ebaa 7860 default-jdk-doc_0.47_all.deb 818973c7eceba175fb3cbc94931187f9b3025f4db36835d796b79d2e738e81f3 836 default-jre_1.6-47_amd64
Bug#650928: marked as done (java-common: A very recent (Dec 2011) change somewhere in java hosed various aspects of java)
Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:04:41 + with message-id e1rbihd-0007ub...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#650928: fixed in openjdk-6 6b24~pre2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #650928, regarding java-common: A very recent (Dec 2011) change somewhere in java hosed various aspects of java to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 650928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.45 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Symptoms (end-user point of view) : 1) no more communication between LibreOffice an Zotero (3.0beta2) or Zotero Standalone (ditto). A look at Zotero site suggested to switch to OpenJDK (I also have sun's, as current default), which led to : 2) one cannot switch java installations with update-alternatives-java : root@eee-ec:/home/charpent# update-java-alternatives --list java-1.6.0-openjdk-i386 1061 /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk-i386 java-6-sun 63 /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun root@eee-ec:/home/charpent# update-java-alternatives --set java-1.6.0-openjdk-i386 update-alternatives: erreur: pas d'alternatives pour -javaplugin.so. update-alternatives: erreur: pas d'alternatives pour -javaplugin.so. root@eee-ec:/home/charpent# update-java-alternatives --set java-6-sun update-alternatives: erreur: pas d'alternatives pour -javaplugin.so. == Leads to a hosed LibreOffice/zotero subsystem (major funcionality for me...). I seriously considered reportig this bug as critical (since it beaks unrelated software), but settled to important (renders the package unusable for most uses, but I cannot prove it is effectively unusable for *all* purposes... *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? regular (frequent) updates to a debian wheezy system * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? See above for symptoms. Tried to reinstall openJDK : no change to symptoms. Did *not* try to reinstall sun Java6 packages, which are no longer available in Wheezy. * What was the outcome of this action? No modification of symptoms ; no possibility to switch java installations. * What outcome did you expect instead? At least to be able to switch existing java implementations... *** End of the template - remove these lines *** -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash java-common depends on no packages. java-common recommends no packages. Versions of packages java-common suggests: ii default-jre none ii equivs 2.0.9 -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: openjdk-6 Source-Version: 6b24~pre2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of openjdk-6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: icedtea-6-jre-cacao_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/icedtea-6-jre-cacao_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb icedtea-6-jre-jamvm_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/icedtea-6-jre-jamvm_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-dbg_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-dbg_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-demo_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-demo_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-doc_6b24~pre2-1_all.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-doc_6b24~pre2-1_all.deb openjdk-6-jdk_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jdk_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-headless_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-jre-lib_6b24~pre2-1_all.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-lib_6b24~pre2-1_all.deb openjdk-6-jre-zero_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre-zero_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-jre_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-jre_6b24~pre2-1_amd64.deb openjdk-6-source_6b24~pre2-1_all.deb to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6-source_6b24~pre2-1_all.deb openjdk-6_6b24~pre2-1.diff.gz to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6_6b24~pre2-1.diff.gz openjdk-6_6b24~pre2-1.dsc to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6_6b24~pre2-1.dsc openjdk-6_6b24~pre2.orig.tar.gz to main/o/openjdk-6/openjdk-6_6b24~pre2.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug
Processed: Re: Bug#650928: java-common: A very recent (Dec 2011) change somewhere in java hosed various aspects of java
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 650928 openjdk-6-jre-headless Bug #650928 [java-common] java-common: A very recent (Dec 2011) change somewhere in java hosed various aspects of java Bug reassigned from package 'java-common' to 'openjdk-6-jre-headless'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.45. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 650928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132299867110974.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#650928: java-common: A very recent (Dec 2011) change somewhere in java hosed various aspects of java
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 650928 java-common Bug #650928 [openjdk-6-jre-headless] java-common: A very recent (Dec 2011) change somewhere in java hosed various aspects of java Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-6-jre-headless' to 'java-common'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 650928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650928 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13230032751616.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 641880 with 647014
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 641880 with 647014 Bug #641880 [default-jdk] Please create default-jdk-source Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 641880: 647014 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13198963124550.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#617803: marked as done ([java-common] Java FAQ should be updated with information about the status of Java in Squeeze)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:47:29 + with message-id e1qxhmh-0003om...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#617803: fixed in java-common 0.41 has caused the Debian Bug report #617803, regarding [java-common] Java FAQ should be updated with information about the status of Java in Squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 617803: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617803 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.40 Severity: normal Hi, I think §3.1 in ch-debian-java-squeeze.html should be updated to reflect the status of Java in Squeeze, because it actually states that The information in this chapter is probably out of date as Squeeze is not yet released and changes rapidly. Thanks, -- Cristian Greco GPG key ID: 0xCF4D32E4 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.41 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb java-common_0.41.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41.dsc java-common_0.41.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41.tar.gz java-common_0.41_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 617...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:30:55 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.41 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 617803 631140 638361 Changes: java-common (0.41) unstable; urgency=low . * Bumped Standards-Versions to 3.9.1 - no changes required. * Removed DMUA - no longer required. . [ Sylvestre Ledru ] * Under mips, openjdk should be proposed instead of gcj (Closes: #631140) Revert of the change introduced in version 0.39 * Remove outdated information about java in Squeeze (Closes: #617803) . [ Matthias Klose ] * Default to openjdk-6 on s390x. Closes: #638361. * Default to openjdk-6 on armhf. Checksums-Sha1: 1b75cc01224fe439f48fc5cfd99563b505c6277d 1172 java-common_0.41.dsc ec66a3134e82505cc0f0a3454cb3a47172fc3304 52569 java-common_0.41.tar.gz 58a4330d811affe1b5f77c482f1e2c2f66ac1f80 65472 java-common_0.41_all.deb 12818f97bd7e868930955fb56ff07817985a4357 7514 default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb 75ce053f3c18bca38ebc6fc7caea6df9aa8d97f8 830 default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb 62822d77b025c57858d7c372fefa0bcd33c0a96a 7736 default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb 88875fa07e7442f64a9945ea25b927ef14c37339 826 default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb 85d6215c2995e0aa1b3da9e9d5d6a99843a2b857 982 gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 44eeb9d50e869531b4467200f7b3f3b70ff5271baf5e6bf7b871cf44f53d4035 1172 java-common_0.41.dsc 212cdd20abd37beb7cba63b9727fd6de17faaf552c7b7f6be7187aa140ffc9d5 52569 java-common_0.41.tar.gz 49b1447b57df5c46cf155c430c1fcd6beb15e046f961e3a6ce2546796d035c00 65472
Bug#631140: marked as done (default-jdk: Openjdk should be favorite over gcj under mips)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:47:29 + with message-id e1qxhmh-0003os...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#631140: fixed in java-common 0.41 has caused the Debian Bug report #631140, regarding default-jdk: Openjdk should be favorite over gcj under mips to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 631140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631140 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: default-jdk Version: 1:1.6-40 Severity: normal Hello, For now, default-jdk, under mips, recommends gcj. It causes some FTBFS on some applications using Java/JNI. For example: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=scilabarch=mipsver=5.3.2-2stamp=1308590805 I will directly fix that into the SVN. Sylvestre -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages default-jdk depends on: ii default-jre 1:1.6-40 Standard Java or Java compatible R ii openjdk-6-jdk 6b18-1.8.7-5 OpenJDK Development Kit (JDK) default-jdk recommends no packages. default-jdk suggests no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.41 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb java-common_0.41.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41.dsc java-common_0.41.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41.tar.gz java-common_0.41_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 631...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:30:55 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.41 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 617803 631140 638361 Changes: java-common (0.41) unstable; urgency=low . * Bumped Standards-Versions to 3.9.1 - no changes required. * Removed DMUA - no longer required. . [ Sylvestre Ledru ] * Under mips, openjdk should be proposed instead of gcj (Closes: #631140) Revert of the change introduced in version 0.39 * Remove outdated information about java in Squeeze (Closes: #617803) . [ Matthias Klose ] * Default to openjdk-6 on s390x. Closes: #638361. * Default to openjdk-6 on armhf. Checksums-Sha1: 1b75cc01224fe439f48fc5cfd99563b505c6277d 1172 java-common_0.41.dsc ec66a3134e82505cc0f0a3454cb3a47172fc3304 52569 java-common_0.41.tar.gz 58a4330d811affe1b5f77c482f1e2c2f66ac1f80 65472 java-common_0.41_all.deb 12818f97bd7e868930955fb56ff07817985a4357 7514 default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb 75ce053f3c18bca38ebc6fc7caea6df9aa8d97f8 830 default-jre_1.6
Bug#638361: marked as done (please default to openjdk on s390x)
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:47:29 + with message-id e1qxhmh-0003ox...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#638361: fixed in java-common 0.41 has caused the Debian Bug report #638361, regarding please default to openjdk on s390x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 638361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638361 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.40 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org Usertags: s390x openjdk is now available on s390x, so it would be nice if java-common can default to it. The patch below should do the job. Thanks in advance. --- java-common-0.40/debian/rules 2010-08-23 20:13:05.0 + +++ java-common-0.40/debian/rules 2011-08-16 14:51:02.0 + @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ dversion = 1:1.5-$(jrel) jvmdir = java-gcj -ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha amd64 armel i386 ia64 lpia mipsel powerpc powerpcspe s390 sparc sh4)) +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha amd64 armel i386 ia64 lpia mipsel powerpc powerpcspe s390 s390x sparc sh4)) p_jre= openjdk-6-jre p_jhl= openjdk-6-jre-headless p_jdk= openjdk-6-jdk -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unreleased APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: s390x Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-s390x (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.41 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.41_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-41_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-41_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-41_amd64.deb gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/gcj-native-helper_1.6-41_amd64.deb java-common_0.41.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41.dsc java-common_0.41.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41.tar.gz java-common_0.41_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.41_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 638...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Matthias Klose d...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:30:55 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.41 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Matthias Klose d...@debian.org Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 617803 631140 638361 Changes: java-common (0.41) unstable; urgency=low . * Bumped Standards-Versions to 3.9.1 - no changes required. * Removed DMUA - no longer required. . [ Sylvestre Ledru ] * Under mips, openjdk should be proposed instead of gcj (Closes: #631140) Revert of the change introduced in version 0.39 * Remove outdated information about java in Squeeze (Closes: #617803) . [ Matthias Klose ] * Default to openjdk-6 on s390x. Closes: #638361. * Default to openjdk-6 on armhf. Checksums-Sha1: 1b75cc01224fe439f48fc5cfd99563b505c6277d 1172 java-common_0.41.dsc ec66a3134e82505cc0f0a3454cb3a47172fc3304 52569 java-common_0.41.tar.gz 58a4330d811affe1b5f77c482f1e2c2f66ac1f80 65472
Bug#588943: Info received (hard interdependency (between -java and -jni packages))
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 588...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- 588943: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588943 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.588943.b588943.128508210425914.acki...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#593627: marked as done (java-common: please use openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe)
Your message dated Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:17:41 + with message-id e1onltf-0006az...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#593627: fixed in java-common 0.40 has caused the Debian Bug report #593627, regarding java-common: please use openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 593627: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593627 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.39 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch sid User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc Usertags: powerpcspe openjdk is built and seems to work :) Sebastian From acf94f0bb47b151b9fde8b07948b5194dd3d81de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:30:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] User openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bige...@linutronix.de --- debian/rules |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index cbe5bb1..3a4d810 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ provides = java java2 java5 dversion = 1.5-$(jrel) jvmdir = java-gcj -ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha amd64 armel i386 ia64 lpia mipsel powerpc s390 sparc sh4)) +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha amd64 armel i386 ia64 lpia mipsel powerpc powerpcspe s390 sparc sh4)) p_jre= openjdk-6-jre p_jhl= openjdk-6-jre-headless p_jdk= openjdk-6-jdk -- 1.5.6.5 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.40 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-doc_0.40_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.40_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-40_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-40_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-40_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-40_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-40_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-40_amd64.deb gcj-native-helper_1.6-40_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/gcj-native-helper_1.6-40_amd64.deb java-common_0.40.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.40.dsc java-common_0.40.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.40.tar.gz java-common_0.40_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.40_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 593...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:01:54 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.40 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 593627 Changes: java-common (0.40) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Niels Thykier ] * Make openjdk-6 default on powerpcspe (Closes: #593627). - Thanks to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior. . [ Torsten Werner ] * Add an epoch to the arch any packages because we downgrade them from 1.6-* to 1.5-* on mips. - This fixes the last upload on this architecture. - Set urgency to medium. Checksums-Sha1: 7cc3d3c047b5d7a50503929c88537661869a355f 1195 java-common_0.40.dsc 14edf311b6e6223c63dd476df53a37797e769fb2 52479 java-common_0.40.tar.gz d4c43a9549292c62bd5ea3c31ed664029c8e5417 64290 java-common_0.40_all.deb b6b7d066a5b5330388f4ff86f6471ad8f0f750fc 7364 default-jdk-doc_0.40_all.deb
Processed: Re: Bug#593627: java-common: please use openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 593627 + pending Bug #593627 [java-common] java-common: please use openjdk as default jdk on powerpcspe Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 593627: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593627 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128248975129181.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: notfound 166370 in 0.16, notfound 348398 in java-common/0.23, notfound 158984 in 0.14 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 166370 0.16 Bug #166370 [java-common] java-common: Virtual packages jar and javadoc There is no source info for the package 'java-common' at version '0.16' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.16' Bug No longer marked as found in versions 0.16. notfound 348398 java-common/0.23 Bug #348398 [java-common] java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs Bug No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.23. notfound 158984 0.14 Bug #158984 [java-common] policy proposal: java2 alternative There is no source info for the package 'java-common' at version '0.14' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.14' Bug No longer marked as found in versions 0.14. notfound 365408 java-common/0.24 Bug #365408 [java-common] [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk Bug No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.24. notfound 365408 java-common/0.33 Bug #365408 [java-common] [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk Bug No longer marked as found in versions java-common/0.33. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 365408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365408 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128193927910249.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#158984: marked as done (policy proposal: java2 alternative)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:24:02 +0200 with message-id 4c68d982.6080...@thykier.net and subject line policy proposal: java2 alternative - Rejected has caused the Debian Bug report #158984, regarding policy proposal: java2 alternative to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 158984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158984 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.14 Ola Lundqvist o...@debian.org writes: As the policy maintainer I would like you to file this as a bug to java-common too. It helps me to remember it. Done. Going into minimal snipping mode due to that. On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 11:54:08AM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to install the Blackdown VM to make it work, but I still want other java programs to use Kaffe because it's free. Pointing the java alternative to Kaffe will break the package, though ... True. But if you already have installed the non-free version why use the free one? Do you think it is better/faster or? I want to avoid running non-free software as much as possible. As I said my only reason for installing java2-runtime was so I could sponsor a package. That does not mean I want to run it all the time due to Java daemon processes (which work with kaffe)! I guess at least some users are in a similar situation: they have java2 installed because something they can't avoid needs it, but want to use it only when absolutely necessary. It's the same with, say, acroread and xpdf: I normally use the latter with all documents, and only if it can't render a document correctly, resort to the non-free alternative. That was the political side. There is also technical reason: My freenet-unstable package is in main. I expect most of its users run it with kaffe. So to test it better, I want to use that, too, not some less-used alternative. So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of java2-runtime must also provide a java2 alternative. Packages depending on java2-runtime can use this to be sure to get a java2-compliant environment. This allows for different defaults for java1 and java2 environments. What do other people think about this solution? The same could apply to java2-compiler and javac2, but I'm not sure if that is too useful (what *are* the differences between java1-compiler and java2-compiler, exactly?). Well the java2* do not break as much. I have not find much other differences. -- Robbe ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I am closing this policy change proposal; it is marked as wontfix and there has been no interest in reviving it. Should you believe that this proposal is still relevant, please do not hesitate to reopen this bug. ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkxo2YEACgkQVCqoiq1YlqxkXQCg5hWU8VbEsogz4k1DpzzjlkYM smsAn04Tlt7tLfJBbAtWSIX47bAlukB4 =Bnhp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#166370: marked as done (java-common: Virtual packages jar and javadoc)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:25:33 +0200
with message-id 4c68d9dd.8010...@thykier.net
and subject line java-common: Virtual packages jar and javadoc
has caused the Debian Bug report #166370,
regarding java-common: Virtual packages jar and javadoc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
166370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=166370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: java-common
Version: 0.16
Severity: wishlist
I think the java policy should, in addition to specifying the use of
java-virtual-machine, java-compler and java{1,}-runtime, also recommend
the use of the virtual packages jar and javadoc to ensure a package
that provides the alternatives /usr/bin/jar and /usr/bin/javadoc is
installed.
Without such virtual packages, a build-dependancy on java-compiler and
java1-runtime does not ensure the existance of either of those programs
(for example, they can be satisfied by jikes-classpath and classpath).
Debian policy says there has to be consensus on any virtual package that
is intended to be used by many packages of from different sources, so I
think java-policy and the java- is the place to decide on these.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux ivanhoe.blckknght.org 2.4.19-local #1 Mon Sep 9 00:10:27 EDT =
2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3D
- -- no debconf information
--
Steven Barker st...@blckknght.org
Swap read error. You lose your mind.
Get my GnuPG public key at: http://www.blckknght.org/publickey.asc
Fingerprint: 272A 3EC8 52CE F22B F745 775E 5292 F743 EBD5 936B
pgpAvMnWQ11WY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
I am closing this policy change proposal; it is marked as wontfix and a
conflicting policy change has been accepted.
Should you believe that this proposal is still relevant and superior to
the conflicting policy change, please do not hesitate to reopen this bug.
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEAREIAAYFAkxo2dwACgkQVCqoiq1YlqwdWwCg684/ZHJ/n6bmmnhuS1uSk5wC
XY0AnjZ2WnHDdtB2mZQqebAGe+SgswZm
=pSuQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
Bug#348398: marked as done (java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:27:08 +0200 with message-id 4c68da3c.7060...@thykier.net and subject line java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs has caused the Debian Bug report #348398, regarding java-common: should suggest using java-package instead of equivs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 348398: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348398 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.23 Severity: wishlist Currently, java-common suggests using equivs to create dummy java packages. It should probably suggest using java-package instead. As far as I understand, it is the preferred way of installing non-free java on Debian nowadays. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I am closing this bug which is marked wontfix. It is no longer possible for us to suggest java-package as it has been removed. ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkxo2jsACgkQVCqoiq1YlqxV+QCg4aoa9D4CwwRgsFjMuFmI2EV1 iJkAn1UGJ8OKkWgDEtc1ocAtvd8yZB50 =CumF -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#354026: marked as done (Debian Java Policy needs to be updated regarding java*-runtime usage)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:30:02 +0200 with message-id 4c68daea.3060...@thykier.net and subject line java-package: generated package should provide java1-runtime has caused the Debian Bug report #354026, regarding Debian Java Policy needs to be updated regarding java*-runtime usage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 354026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354026 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-package Version: 0.27 Severity: important The packages generated by the make-jpkg tool do not provide the virtual package java1-runtime. However, several packages depend on java1-runtime only (and not java-runtime or java2-runtime). Some examples from my sarge packages list: jflex 1.3.5-7 libdom1-java 0.19990107-6 libjdepend-java 2.9-1 libjzlib-java 1.0.5-1.1 Actually, I think those are all... I cannot find any information on the Debian Java FAQ, but the Debian policy for Java states that the preferred virtual package name is java1-runtime. The discussion on the mailing list (http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2005/04/msg00032.html) said that it will soon be fixed in experimental but the newest version on the mirrors is 0.27 and the packages it generates still do not provide java1-runtime. I suggest adding java1-runtime to the Provides: line in the shell scripts. That is, unless you consider the Java2 runtimes to be packages that do not implement the methods from Java 1.1 that have been deprecated in Java 2. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages java-package depends on: ii coreutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities ii debhelper 4.2.32 helper programs for debian/rules ii fakeroot1.2.10 Gives a fake root environment ii unzip 5.52-1sarge3 De-archiver for .zip files -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I am closing this bug, which is marked wontfix and there has not been any interest in reviving it. If you believe this request is still valid or/and useful, do not hesitate to reply to this bug. ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkxo2uoACgkQVCqoiq1YlqxbHwCdG3V+y6A53Zj+eBBj4JQ3ns1G Es0AnA5XaFQuqzis+M1dMIf5+EXn+NsB =rAjL -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#365408: marked as done ([POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:36:14 +0200 with message-id 4c68dc5e.1090...@thykier.net and subject line [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create, classpath-jre/jdk, and java-jre/jdk has caused the Debian Bug report #365408, regarding [POLICY-PROPOSAL] Drop java*-runtime/compiler, create classpath-jre/jdk and java-jre/jdk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 365408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365408 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package: java-common version: 0.24 Hi all, One of the result of our discussions in Oldenburg (devjam) and in Bruxelles (FOSDEM) is about the use of the virtual packages. One of our reflexion was the number in the java*-runtime and java*-compiler was not useful anymore. First, nobody uses Java 1 and the state of GNU Classpath is far better then Java 1. For some informations, you can go to the draft: http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Draft I'd like to reach a consensus about the attached patch before sending other proposals. If you read the wiki, you'll notice I added a line with *later* so I know where I have to re-start the futur proposals. Note that I added a paragraph from a proposal from Stefan Gybas, modified by Ben Burton (see Bug#227587). Even if they did not really get a consensus, I think, with the change of the virtual packages to classpath-jre, classpath-jdk, java-jre and java-jdk, the proposal of Stefan is good to integrate in our policy. I also integrated another proposal from Stefan Gybas, seconded by Ben Burton (see Bug#227594). There was a consensus about it so I don't think we need further discussion about this. With this proposal, we can close: - - this bug ;-) ; - - #227587 (integrate the java libs dependency); - - #227594 (integrate the removal of 'binfmt_misc'); - - #158984 (no more java 2 something); - - #354026 (no more java*-runtime); - - #166370 (because we have *-jdk and not *-compiler); I attached a patch so it'd be easier to read. Thanks for your comments or for seconding the proposal, - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEU8ju4vzFZu62tMIRAlqPAJ0bi7Cv/BTQ8WTw1TCrqRpEXVrCRQCfUFxH x4KgDEiCjdpFukjpoDqpXkc= =qDAF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Index: policy.xml === --- policy.xml (revision 2101) +++ policy.xml (working copy) @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ !ENTITY must emphasismust/emphasis !ENTITY may emphasismay/emphasis !ENTITY should emphasisshould/emphasis -!ENTITY jvm emphasisjava-virtual-machine/emphasis -!ENTITY j1r emphasisjava1-runtime/emphasis -!ENTITY j2r emphasisjava2-runtime/emphasis -!ENTITY jc emphasisjava-compiler/emphasis -!ENTITY j2c emphasisjava2-compiler/emphasis +!ENTITY jjre emphasisjava-jre/emphasis +!ENTITY jjdk emphasisjava-jdk/emphasis +!ENTITY cjre emphasisclasspath-jre/emphasis +!ENTITY cjdk emphasisclasspath-jdk/emphasis +!ENTITY djava emaildebian-java@lists.debian.org/email ] book @@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ edition$Revision:$ $Date:$/edition authorgroup author - surnameLundqvist/surname - firstnameOla/firstname + surnameVandyck/surname + firstnameArnaud/firstname authorblurb para - emailo...@debian.org/email + emailav...@debian.org/email /para para The current author of the java policy. @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ /authorblurb /author author + surnameLundqvist/surname + firstnameOla/firstname + authorblurb + para + emailo...@debian.org/email + /para + /authorblurb + /author + author surnameBortzmeyer/surname firstnameStephane/firstname authorblurb @@ -45,7 +54,7 @@ authorblurb para Most issues of the java policy have been discussed on the - emaildebian-java@lists.debian.org/email mailinglist. + djava; mailinglist. /para /authorblurb /author @@ -83,7 +92,7 @@ Feel free to report comments, suggestions and/or disagreements to the java-common package (emailjava-com...@packages.debian.org/email) or the Debian Java mailing list - emaildebian-java@lists.debian.org/email. Change requests should + djava;. Change requests should be sent as a bug to the java-common package. /para @@ -93,8 +102,8 @@ titlePolicy/title para - Virtual packages are created: jc;, j2c;, - jvm;, j1r
Bug#577164: marked as done (java-common: Add to FAQ: How to link javadocs for libraries)
Your message dated Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:04:54 + with message-id e1otdis-0005hv...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#577164: fixed in java-common 0.37 has caused the Debian Bug report #577164, regarding java-common: Add to FAQ: How to link javadocs for libraries to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 577164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577164 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.34 Severity: wishlist I don't have the text for this FAQ entry, but at least I got from Niels that his package libfreemarker is a good example. The idea is to have an FAQ item related to this text in section 2.4 of policy: Java library packages should compile the javadoc API of the library. The API must link against the javadoc API of the libraries it depends on. This includes the core java classes, which are provided by default-jdk-doc. The API must be registered with doc-base and must be installed in /usr/share/doc/package/api/ or /usr/share/doc/package/api-component/. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash java-common depends on no packages. java-common recommends no packages. Versions of packages java-common suggests: ii default-jre 1.6-34 Standard Java or Java compatible R ii equivs2.0.8 Circumvent Debian package dependen -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.37 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-doc_0.37_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.37_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-37_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-37_amd64.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-37_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-37_amd64.deb default-jre_1.6-37_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-37_amd64.deb gcj-native-helper_1.6-37_amd64.deb to main/j/java-common/gcj-native-helper_1.6-37_amd64.deb java-common_0.37.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.37.dsc java-common_0.37.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.37.tar.gz java-common_0.37_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.37_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 577...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:07:15 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc gcj-native-helper Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 0.37 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless) gcj-native-helper - Standard helper tools for creating gcj native packages java-common - Base of all Java packages Closes: 577164 Changes: java-common (0.37) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated and synced the Java FAQ. - contains a example of how to link with system javadocs. (Closes: #577164) * Renamed default-jdk-builddep to gcj-native-helper. * Removed useless install files and moved the override files to a location where dh_lintian finds them. * Removed some unused overrides. * Updated current list of maintainers in d/copyright (based on current list of Uploaders). Checksums-Sha1: 6b2c758d8d299a9503e9b826ea90fd0f7b47b4c5 1195 java-common_0.37.dsc
Processed: limit source to java-common, tagging 577164
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #java-common (0.37) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Updated and synced the Java FAQ. #- contains a example of how to link with system javadocs. #(Closes: #577164) # limit source java-common Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'java-common' Limit currently set to 'source':'java-common' tags 577164 + pending Bug #577164 [java-common] java-common: Add to FAQ: How to link javadocs for libraries Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 577164: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577164 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127376267312853.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: limit source to java-common, tagging 395372, tagging 227594
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #java-common (0.36) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Policy Changes: #- Removed section Java Compilers. #- Retired the virtual packages java-virtual-machine, java-compiler # and java2-compiler #- Relax program installation locations (Closes: #395372) #- Specified installation location for private program jars. #- Removed mention of binfmt_misc in favor of jarwrapper. # (Closes: #227594) # limit source java-common Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'java-common' Limit currently set to 'source':'java-common' tags 395372 + pending Bug #395372 [java-common] java-common: [policy] relax or expand the binaries in /usr/bin restriction (2.3) Added tag(s) pending. tags 227594 + pending Bug #227594 [java-common] [PROPOSAL] Remove binfmt_misc, specify JARs for programs Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127165808615722.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#227594: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] Remove binfmt_misc, specify JARs for programs)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 +
with message-id e1o3leg-0004lg...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#227594: fixed in java-common 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #227594,
regarding [PROPOSAL] Remove binfmt_misc, specify JARs for programs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
227594: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=227594
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: java-common
Version: 0.22
Severity: wishlist
I propose to change the following paragraphs in section 2.3 of the
Debian Java policy
Programs must have executable(s) in /usr/bin and be executable. They
can be Java classes (using binfmt_misc) or wrappers. In any case, they
must run without specific environment variables (see Policy 10.9), for
instance CLASSPATH. They must respect the Policy rules for executables
(for instance a manual page per executable, see Policy 13.1).
If they have their own auxiliary classes, they must be in a jar file
in /usr/share/java. The name of the jar should folow the same naming
conventions as for libraries.
to:
Applications must provide one or more executable wrapper script(s) in
/usr/bin. They must run without specific environment variables (see
Policy 10.9), for instance JAVA_HOME or CLASSPATH. They must respect the
Policy rules for executables (for instance a manual page per executable,
see Policy 13.1).
Additional classes in the package must be packaged in one or more JARs
which can be put into /usr/share/java (if they are intended to be used
by other programs) or into a private directory in /usr/share/package.
Reasons:
binfmt_misc isn't configured to run Java classes on a standard Debian
installation to the application would simply not work. It's also
impossible to define a class path in this case.
Current practice for applications is to put library JARs into
/usr/share/java and private JARs (e.g. startup classes) into to private
directory.
Stefan
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Source-Version: 0.36
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
java-common_0.36.dsc
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.dsc
java-common_0.36.tar.gz
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.tar.gz
java-common_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 227...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated java-common package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:05:16 +0200
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc default-jdk-builddep
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Description:
default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
default-jdk-builddep - Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies
default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
(documentation)
default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless)
java-common - Base of all Java packages
Closes: 227594 395372 563070 576632 577482
Changes:
java-common (0.36) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Correct a ${jdk} that should have been a ${jre} in the decription
of default-jre. Thanks to Yoshino Yoshihito for spotting it.
(Closes: #576632)
* Removed Stefan Gybas from Uploaders (no upload since
Bug#395372: marked as done (java-common: [policy] relax or expand the binaries in /usr/bin restriction (2.3))
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 + with message-id e1o3leg-0004lm...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#395372: fixed in java-common 0.36 has caused the Debian Bug report #395372, regarding java-common: [policy] relax or expand the binaries in /usr/bin restriction (2.3) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 395372: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395372 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.25 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, Java policy section 2.3. states: Programs must have executable(s) in /usr/bin and be executable. I am packaging a java game (actually, a java game-related package). If my package was not a java package, I would install binaries into /usr/games, which is consistent with related packages. FHS 2.3 Chapter 4 defines /usr/games as optional, and the preferred location for games and educational binaries. I believe the clause in the Java policy is intended to ensure that a user has a binary available in $PATH and isn't required to call java -jar some/evil/path. I therefore request that the clause is expanded to include /usr/games where this is appropriate. Patch attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information add /usr/games as a valid location for a java package's binary, where appropriate. Jon Dowland j...@alcopop.org Thu Oct 26 17:27:19 BST 2006 --- policy.xml~ 2005-06-11 12:31:25.0 +0100 +++ policy.xml 2006-10-26 17:26:21.0 +0100 @@ -190,7 +190,9 @@ para Programs must; have executable(s) in - filename/usr/bin/filename and be executable. They can be Java + filename/usr/bin/filename + or filename/usr/games/filename (where appropriate) + and be executable. They can be Java classes (using binfmt_misc) or wrappers. In any case, they must; run without specific environment variables (see ulink url=http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s10.9;Policy signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: java-common Source-Version: 0.36 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb java-common_0.36.dsc to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.dsc java-common_0.36.tar.gz to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.tar.gz java-common_0.36_all.deb to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 395...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated java-common package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:05:16 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-doc default-jdk-builddep Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.36 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Description: default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit default-jdk-builddep - Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit (documentation) default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime default-jre-headless - Standard Java
Bug#577482: marked as done (java-common: Please add sh4 to openjdk-6 support)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 +
with message-id e1o3leg-0004lb...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#577482: fixed in java-common 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #577482,
regarding java-common: Please add sh4 to openjdk-6 support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
577482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577482
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Version: 0.35
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@superh.org
Usertags: sh4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstablea=sh4
sh4 supports opendk-6. But sh4 is not in architecture list of openjdk-6.
# openjdk becomes FTBFS for #575346 now.
Could you add add sh4 to openjdk-6 support list?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
java-common-sh4.patch
Description: application/octetstream
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Source-Version: 0.36
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
java-common_0.36.dsc
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.dsc
java-common_0.36.tar.gz
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.tar.gz
java-common_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 577...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated java-common package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:05:16 +0200
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc default-jdk-builddep
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Description:
default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
default-jdk-builddep - Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies
default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
(documentation)
default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless)
java-common - Base of all Java packages
Closes: 227594 395372 563070 576632 577482
Changes:
java-common (0.36) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Correct a ${jdk} that should have been a ${jre} in the decription
of default-jre. Thanks to Yoshino Yoshihito for spotting it.
(Closes: #576632)
* Removed Stefan Gybas from Uploaders (no upload since 2003); thanks
for your work.
* Applied patch from Thierry Basque that fixes the --list
argument for update-java-alternatives. (Closes: #563070)
* Updated the off-line copy of the Debian Java FAQ.
* Added sh4 to the list of architectures that support openjdk-6.
(Closes: #577482)
* Removed useless commands from debian/rules and removed B-D on
dpsyco-devel.
* Policy Changes:
- Removed section Java Compilers.
- Retired the virtual packages java-virtual-machine, java-compiler
and java2-compiler
- Relax program installation locations (Closes: #395372)
- Specified installation location for private program jars.
- Removed mention of binfmt_misc in favor of jarwrapper.
(Closes: #227594)
Checksums-Sha1:
00134ec4c0927812b1d1208382dece40c00c79e5 1198 java-common_0.36.dsc
fe7d014b967a6b63a2fa7c7c0c07b8822ba9c462 50566 java-common_0.36.tar.gz
Bug#563070: marked as done (java-common: update-java-alternatives --list jname fails, w. patch.)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 +
with message-id e1o3leg-0004lr...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#563070: fixed in java-common 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #563070,
regarding java-common: update-java-alternatives --list jname fails, w.
patch.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
563070: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563070
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: java-common
Version: 0.30
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
# update-java-alternatives -v --jre --list java-gcj
listing java alternatives:
awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj.jinfo' for
reading (No such file or directory)
java-gcj /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj
egrep: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj.jinfo: No such file or directory
# ls -1AFS /usr/lib/jvm/
java-1.5.0-gcj-4.3-1.5.0.0/
java-6-sun-1.6.0.12/
.java-6-sun.jinfo
.java-gcj.jinfo
java-gcj@
java-6-sun@
Patch is a trivial fix + cleaner pattern-delete syntax for alias.
Regards,
Thierry
--- update-java-alternatives.orig 2008-04-26 18:16:46.0 -0400
+++ update-java-alternatives 2009-12-30 08:37:09.0 -0500
@@ -117,9 +117,9 @@
do_list()
{
vecho listing java alternatives:
-for i in $top/${jname:-*}.jinfo; do
- alias=$(basename ${i%*.jinfo})
- alias=${alias#.*}
+for i in ${jinfo:-$top/*.jinfo}; do
+ alias=$(basename ${i%.jinfo})
+ alias=${alias#.}
prio=$(awk -F= '/priority=/ {print $2}' $i)
echo $alias $prio $top/$alias
[ -n $verbose ] egrep $which $i
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Source-Version: 0.36
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
java-common_0.36.dsc
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.dsc
java-common_0.36.tar.gz
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.tar.gz
java-common_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 563...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated java-common package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:05:16 +0200
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc default-jdk-builddep
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Description:
default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
default-jdk-builddep - Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies
default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
(documentation)
default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless)
java-common - Base of all Java packages
Closes: 227594 395372 563070 576632 577482
Changes:
java-common (0.36) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Correct a ${jdk} that should have been a ${jre} in the decription
of default-jre. Thanks to Yoshino Yoshihito for spotting it.
(Closes: #576632)
* Removed Stefan Gybas from Uploaders (no upload since 2003); thanks
for your work.
* Applied patch from Thierry Basque that fixes the --list
argument for update-java-alternatives. (Closes: #563070)
* Updated the off-line copy of the Debian Java FAQ.
* Added sh4 to the list of architectures that support openjdk-6.
(Closes: #577482)
* Removed useless commands from debian/rules and removed B-D on
dpsyco-devel.
* Policy Changes:
- Removed section Java Compilers.
- Retired
Bug#576632: marked as done (Description of default-jre points to a jdk package)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:17:12 +
with message-id e1o3leg-0004lw...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#576632: fixed in java-common 0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #576632,
regarding Description of default-jre points to a jdk package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
576632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
A default-jre binary package depends on *-jre package.
However the description says it points to a ${jdk} package.
An attached patch fixes this problem.
Thanks,
--
YOSHINO Yoshihito yy.y.ja...@gmail.com
--- java-common-0.34.orig/debian/control 2009-12-11 14:20:16.0 +0900
+++ java-common-0.34/debian/control 2010-04-06 11:44:12.0 +0900
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
Description: Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
This package points to the Java runtime, or Java compatible
runtime recommended for the ${jre:arch} architecture,
- which is ${jdk} for ${jre:arch}.
+ which is ${jre} for ${jre:arch}.
Package: default-jre-headless
Architecture: any
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: java-common
Source-Version: 0.36
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
java-common, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-builddep_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk-doc_0.36_all.deb
default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jdk_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre-headless_1.6-36_i386.deb
default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
to main/j/java-common/default-jre_1.6-36_i386.deb
java-common_0.36.dsc
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.dsc
java-common_0.36.tar.gz
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36.tar.gz
java-common_0.36_all.deb
to main/j/java-common/java-common_0.36_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 576...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated java-common package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:05:16 +0200
Source: java-common
Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk
default-jdk-doc default-jdk-builddep
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.36
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Mailing List debian-java@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Description:
default-jdk - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
default-jdk-builddep - Standard Java or Java compatible build dependencies
default-jdk-doc - Standard Java or Java compatible Development Kit
(documentation)
default-jre - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime
default-jre-headless - Standard Java or Java compatible Runtime (headless)
java-common - Base of all Java packages
Closes: 227594 395372 563070 576632 577482
Changes:
java-common (0.36) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Correct a ${jdk} that should have been a ${jre} in the decription
of default-jre. Thanks to Yoshino Yoshihito for spotting it.
(Closes: #576632)
* Removed Stefan Gybas from Uploaders (no upload since 2003); thanks
for your work.
* Applied patch from Thierry Basque that fixes the --list
argument for update-java-alternatives. (Closes: #563070)
* Updated the off-line copy of the Debian Java FAQ.
* Added sh4 to the list of architectures that support openjdk-6.
(Closes: #577482)
* Removed useless commands from debian/rules and removed B-D on
dpsyco-devel.
* Policy Changes:
- Removed section Java Compilers.
- Retired the virtual packages java-virtual-machine, java-compiler
and java2-compiler
- Relax program installation locations (Closes: #395372)
- Specified installation location for private program jars.
- Removed mention of binfmt_misc in favor of jarwrapper.
(Closes: #227594)
Checksums-Sha1:
00134ec4c0927812b1d1208382dece40c00c79e5 1198 java
Processed: limit source to java-common, tagging 577482
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: #java-common (0.36) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * Added sh4 to the list of architectures that support openjdk-6. #(Closes: #577482) # limit source java-common Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'java-common' Limit currently set to 'source':'java-common' tags 577482 + pending Bug #577482 [src:java-common] java-common: Please add sh4 to openjdk-6 support Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127107647032504.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 577482 with 575346
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 577482 with 575346 Bug #577482 [src:java-common] java-common: Please add sh4 to openjdk-6 support Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 577482: 575346 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12710766401940.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#544680: marked as done ([java-common] update-java-alternatives --plugin -s java-6-sun fails to update iceweasel-javaplugin.so alternative)
Your message dated Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:51:35 +0200 with message-id 4bc33377.2000...@thykier.net and subject line Re: [java-common] update-java-alternatives --plugin -s java-6-sun, fails to update iceweasel-javaplugin.so alternative has caused the Debian Bug report #544680, regarding [java-common] update-java-alternatives --plugin -s java-6-sun fails to update iceweasel-javaplugin.so alternative to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 544680: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544680 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: java-common Version: 0.33 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- [12:19] ~ = sudo update-java-alternatives --plugin -s java-6-sun burek Using '/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so' to provide 'mozilla-javaplugin.so'. [12:19] ~ = ls -la /etc/alternatives/*-javaplugin.so burek lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2009-05-06 17:13 /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2009-05-06 17:13 /etc/alternatives/iceape-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2009-05-06 17:13 /etc/alternatives/iceweasel-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 2007-09-11 17:12 /etc/alternatives/midbrowser-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/lib/libgcjwebplugin.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 49 2009-09-02 12:19 /etc/alternatives/mozilla-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/lib/amd64/libnpjp2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 57 2009-05-06 17:13 /etc/alternatives/xulrunner-javaplugin.so - /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/lib/amd64/gcjwebplugin.so Since iceweasel doesn't use mozilla-javaplugin.so but iceweasel-javaplugin.so, update-java-alternatives --plugin is rather useless. Regards, Zoran --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 Debian Release: squeeze/sid 990 testing security.debian.org 990 testing ftp.hr.debian.org 600 stable security.debian.org 600 stable ftp.hr.debian.org 600 stable deb.opera.com 500 kernel-dists-trunk kernel-archive.buildserver.net 500 kernel-dists-sid kernel-archive.buildserver.net 50 unstableftp.hr.debian.org 50 unstabledebian-multimedia.org 40 experimentalftp.hr.debian.org --- Package information. --- Package's Depends field is empty. Package's Recommends field is empty. Suggests (Version) | Installed ==-+-=== default-jre| equivs | ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Thanks for the bug report and sorry for the long responds time. I am unable to reproduce it with iceweasel 3.5.8-1 and sun-java6-plugin 6-16-1. Updating mozilla-javaplugin.so caused my iceweasel to recommend that I restarted iceweasel because it noticed that the java plugin had changed. Furthermore my system does not have any other of those java plugins that was listed in the original report. I presume that the Mozilla maintainers decided to use only a single plugin now. So I assume this has been fixed in the mean time, which is also why I am closing this bug. ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ---End Message---
