Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

2023-08-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Vladimir Petko wrote:

>As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to.

20230620~deb12u1 is in bookworm-p-u which you could enable to get that
kind of fixes for stable earlier; it’ll otherwise be in the next point
release.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH
Am Dickobskreuz 10, D-53121 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Telephon +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +49 228 54881-235
HRB AG Bonn 5168 • USt-ID (VAT): DE122264941
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Stefan Barth, Kai Ebenrett, Boris Esser, Alexander Steeg


/⁀\ The UTF-8 Ribbon
╲ ╱ Campaign against  Mit dem tarent-Newsletter nichts mehr verpassen:
 ╳  HTML eMail! Also, https://www.tarent.de/newsletter
╱ ╲ header encryption!




Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

2023-08-10 Thread Dan Mick
How would that work for a pbuilder base image of bookworm?  Would I need a
hook script to set up the unstable repo and install the package?

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023, 9:03 PM Vladimir Petko 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to.
> Updating to 20230710 is also safe as the July security release version
> contains ca-certificates-java trigger in the postinstall script.
>
> Best Regards,
>  Vladimir.
>
> [1]
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-certificates-java-20230620-source-into-unstable/
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:30 PM Dan Mick  wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email.
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129
> >
> > is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see
> > that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that
> > means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but I think it
> > warrants a backport.
> >
> > Can you advise?
> >
>
>


Re: Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

2023-08-10 Thread Vladimir Petko
Hi,

As far as I know, the bug was fixed in [1] which is safe to update to.
Updating to 20230710 is also safe as the July security release version
contains ca-certificates-java trigger in the postinstall script.

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

[1] 
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1436785/accepted-ca-certificates-java-20230620-source-into-unstable/


On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 3:30 PM Dan Mick  wrote:
>
> Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129
>
> is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see
> that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that
> means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but I think it
> warrants a backport.
>
> Can you advise?
>



Can someone tell me if this bug is in the proper state?

2023-08-10 Thread Dan Mick

Hi guys; sorry for the out-of-band email.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030129

is affecting a number of projects on bookworm, ceph among them; I see 
that it's been tagged 'bookworm-ignore' and I worry that maybe that 
means no one is considering a backport to bookworm, but I think it 
warrants a backport.


Can you advise?