Processed: Forwarded
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 896098 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393307 Bug #896098 [krita] krita: Krita's Python scripting not working Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=393307'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 896098: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896098 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Re: okular "cannot find latex executable"
inkbottle ha scritto: > On Thursday, April 19, 2018 3:22:26 PM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > Meyer wrote: >> El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018 16:38:37 -03 Luigi Toscano escribió: >>> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer ha scritto: El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018 12:31:28 -03 inkbottle escribió: > However the resulting Okular behavior is far from satisfactory: > The inline note shows only the latex code: in order to see the result > of > it, one has to first double click the inline note, and then to click on > "render latex code"; which is far from providing an immediate and > intuitive view of the formulas. > > However, again, that could be use to compensate that poppler's utf8 > related > bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65956 > > Provided one possibly modify > https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/2aa006fa87240a89ff8446744ccd9f86a48c > 8d > d0/ ui/latexrenderer.cpp through the addition of latex packages to > render > desired fonts; > not sure it is so easy, but is is probably easier than fixing a 5 years > old > poppler's bug. Maybe suggesting this to upstream? >>> >>> It would not fix the bug anyway: you don't want to strictly depend on a >>> (huge deployment of) latex for this. >> >> Indeed, this is true. > > So it boils done to a functionality: not very useful, not working very well, > and enabling it could clutter the system. > > Which lead to a very straightforward bug reporting course of action: doing > noting. I like it. > > What I don't like it is when someone reads what I didn't write. I didn't say that that adding an optional dependency on latex is a problem. I wrote that this is not *the* solution, because most of the deployments don't, won't and can't have latex. -- Luigi
Bug#896098: krita: Krita's Python scripting not working
19.04.2018 21:56, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer пишет: Oh, please do reply to the bug report! This has been sent to me in private! On 19 April 2018 at 14:16, Sunderland93wrote: It needs libpython3.6m.so, which is contained in libpython3.6-dev. Without it Python scripting is not available in Tools > Scripting menu, and error is Loading Python plugin "" false () () () Could not create /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython3.6m.so "Cannot load Python library" On 19.04.2018 20:33, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: El jue., 19 de abr. de 2018 10:15, Sunderland93 escribió: Package: krita Version: 1:4.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Krita's Python scripting not working in this version. It needs libpython3-dev package, which must added into dependency's (or Recommends section), just like in Ubuntu Why would it need a development package for runtime use?
Bug#896098: krita: Krita's Python scripting not working
On 19 April 2018 at 13:33, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyerwrote: [snip] > Why would it need a development package for runtime use? User just checked: the app is looking for the unversioned .so instead of the versioned one. This is a bug in the app I''m afraid. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Re: okular "cannot find latex executable"
On Thursday, April 19, 2018 3:22:26 PM CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018 16:38:37 -03 Luigi Toscano escribió: > > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer ha scritto: > > > El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018 12:31:28 -03 inkbottle escribió: > > >> However the resulting Okular behavior is far from satisfactory: > > >> The inline note shows only the latex code: in order to see the result > > >> of > > >> it, one has to first double click the inline note, and then to click on > > >> "render latex code"; which is far from providing an immediate and > > >> intuitive view of the formulas. > > >> > > >> However, again, that could be use to compensate that poppler's utf8 > > >> related > > >> bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65956 > > >> > > >> Provided one possibly modify > > >> https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/2aa006fa87240a89ff8446744ccd9f86a48c > > >> 8d > > >> d0/ ui/latexrenderer.cpp through the addition of latex packages to > > >> render > > >> desired fonts; > > >> not sure it is so easy, but is is probably easier than fixing a 5 years > > >> old > > >> poppler's bug. > > > > > > Maybe suggesting this to upstream? > > > > It would not fix the bug anyway: you don't want to strictly depend on a > > (huge deployment of) latex for this. > > Indeed, this is true. So it boils done to a functionality: not very useful, not working very well, and enabling it could clutter the system. Which lead to a very straightforward bug reporting course of action: doing noting. I like it.
Bug#896098: krita: Krita's Python scripting not working
El jue., 19 de abr. de 2018 10:15, Sunderland93escribió: > Package: krita > Version: 1:4.0.1+dfsg-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > Krita's Python scripting not working in this version. It needs > libpython3-dev package, > which must added into dependency's (or Recommends section), just like in > Ubuntu Why would it need a development package for runtime use?
Re: okular "cannot find latex executable"
El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018 16:38:37 -03 Luigi Toscano escribió: > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer ha scritto: > > El miércoles, 18 de abril de 2018 12:31:28 -03 inkbottle escribió: > >> However the resulting Okular behavior is far from satisfactory: > >> The inline note shows only the latex code: in order to see the result of > >> it, one has to first double click the inline note, and then to click on > >> "render latex code"; which is far from providing an immediate and > >> intuitive view of the formulas. > >> > >> However, again, that could be use to compensate that poppler's utf8 > >> related > >> bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65956 > >> > >> Provided one possibly modify > >> https://github.com/KDE/okular/blob/2aa006fa87240a89ff8446744ccd9f86a48c8d > >> d0/ ui/latexrenderer.cpp through the addition of latex packages to render > >> desired fonts; > >> not sure it is so easy, but is is probably easier than fixing a 5 years > >> old > >> poppler's bug. > > > > Maybe suggesting this to upstream? > > It would not fix the bug anyway: you don't want to strictly depend on a > (huge deployment of) latex for this. Indeed, this is true. -- ¿Qué vamos a hacer esta noche Cerebro? -Lo mismo que todas las noches Pinky... ¡¡¡tratar de conquistar el mundo!!! Pinky y Cerebro. Narf. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#896098: krita: Krita's Python scripting not working
Package: krita Version: 1:4.0.1+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Krita's Python scripting not working in this version. It needs libpython3-dev package, which must added into dependency's (or Recommends section), just like in Ubuntu -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages krita depends on: ii kio 5.44.0-2 ii krita-data 1:4.0.1+dfsg-1 ii libboost-system1.62.0 1.62.0+dfsg-5+b1 ii libc6 2.27-3 ii libexiv2-14 0.25-3.1 ii libfftw3-double3 3.3.7-1+b1 ii libgcc1 1:8-20180414-1 ii libgif7 5.1.4-2 ii libgsl23 2.4+dfsg-6 ii libgslcblas0 2.4+dfsg-6 ii libilmbase23 2.2.1-2 ii libjpeg62-turbo 1:1.5.2-2+b1 ii libkf5archive5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5completion5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5configcore5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5configgui5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5coreaddons5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5crash5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5guiaddons5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5i18n5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5itemviews5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5kiocore5 5.44.0-2 ii libkf5widgetsaddons5 5.44.0-1 ii libkf5windowsystem5 5.44.0-1 ii liblcms2-2 2.9-1 ii libopencolorio1v5 1.1.0~dfsg0-1 ii libopenexr23 2.2.1-4 ii libpng16-16 1.6.34-1 ii libpoppler-qt5-1 0.62.0-2 ii libpython3.6 3.6.5-3 ii libqt5concurrent5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5core5a 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5dbus5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5gui5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5multimedia5 5.10.1-2 ii libqt5network5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5printsupport5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5qml5 5.10.1-4 ii libqt5quick5 5.10.1-4 ii libqt5quickwidgets5 5.10.1-4 ii libqt5svg5 5.10.1-2 ii libqt5widgets5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libqt5x11extras5 5.10.1-2 ii libqt5xml5 5.10.1+dfsg-5 ii libraw16 0.18.8-2 ii libstdc++6 8-20180414-1 ii libtiff5 4.0.9-5 ii libx11-6 2:1.6.5-1 ii libxcb1 1.13-1 ii libxi6 2:1.7.9-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 Versions of packages krita recommends: ii python3-pyqt5 5.10.1+dfsg-1 ii python3-sip 4.19.8+dfsg-1 ii qml-module-qtmultimedia 5.10.1-2 Versions of packages krita suggests: ii colord 1.3.3-2 ii ffmpeg 7:3.4.2-2 pn krita-l10n -- no debconf information
Re: peruse_1.2+dfsg-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
> > >[ Pino Toscano ] >* Move the appdata, and desktop files from peruse-common to peruse: they > need to stay together with the executable they refer to, otherwise the > installation with AppStream is broken, and just installing > peruse-common > creates broken menu entries > - add proper breaks/replaces for this > This I definitely need to learn. * Do not include debian-qt-kde.mk in rules, since the dh sequencer is > used > directly. > Ditto. Do we have proper doc for this? * Remove unused build dependencies: kdoctools-dev, libkf5newstuff-dev, > and > libkf5plasma-dev. >* Remove the unused ${shlibs:Depends} substvar in peruse-common. >* Tighten the peruse-common dependency in peruse. And I should have noted this last three, specially the last two.