Bug#951674: [Debichem-devel] Building Kalzium with OpenBabel: bad CMake module
Hello,
On 2020-07-26 10:23, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 08:31:12AM +0300, mer...@debian.org wrote:
>> On 2020-07-19 00:31, John Scott wrote:
>>> See the bug hunting at [1]: it seems that even in OpenBabel 3.1.1,
>>> the CMake module probably wrongfully hardcodes a path and makes it not work
>>> on
>>> Debian.
>>
>> Indeed, there seems to be a problem with paths in OpenBabel CMake
>> modules. OpenBabel3Config.cmake seems suspicious: ${OpenBabel3_DIR} does
>> not seem to be set anywhere, and the following paths too get incorrect
>> values:
>>
>> * OpenBabel3_INCLUDE_DIRS: should be /usr/include/openbabel3
>> * OpenBabel3_EXPORTS_FILE: should be
>> /usr/lib//cmake/openbabel3/OpenBabel3_EXPORTS.cmake
>> * OpenBabel3_LIBRARIES (maybe?)
>>
>> Not sure if this issue is relevant outside Debian, hence the upstream
>> confusion. I would suggest patching OpenBabel CMake modules in Debian. I
>> volunteer to do that if no one comes up with a better solution.
>
> Without having looked at the problem in detail, it sounds like it's
> worth filing an issue in OpenBabel upstream as well, or is there one
> already?
Good idea. I have filed the issue in OpenBabel upstream [1], as well as
Debian BTS [2].
[1] https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/966405
Best,
Andrius
Processed: libopenbabel-dev: CMake files do not reflect installation paths
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264 Bug #966405 [libopenbabel-dev] libopenbabel-dev: CMake files do not reflect installation paths Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/openbabel/openbabel/issues/2264'. > block 951674 by -1 Bug #951674 [kalzium] kalzium: molecular editor is not available Bug #954412 [kalzium] kalzium: Fail to use molecular editor button,please fix this bug.Thanks team 951674 was blocked by: 961836 951674 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 951674: 966405 954412 was blocked by: 961836 954412 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 954412: 966405 -- 951674: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951674 954412: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=954412 966405: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
kproperty is marked for autoremoval from testing
kproperty 3.2.0-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2020-08-22 It is affected by these RC bugs: 957410: kproperty: ftbfs with GCC-10
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 18:27:37 CEST, Hillel Lubman ha scritto: > Seriously, without anything constructive to contribute to the discussion, > such > comments aren't useful to anyone. This list shouldn't be a place for > flamewars. Seriously, avoid spilling petrol with your obviousness, then. -- Marco Valli
Re: Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:48:32 +0200 Marco Valli wrote: > but since Sid is not a rolling release the debian kde > team can avoid to works with m*r*ns. Seriously, without anything constructive to contribute to the discussion, such comments aren't useful to anyone. This list shouldn't be a place for flamewars. Debian unstable / testing are used as semi-rolling distros by a lot of users. So packages which are out of date means far from ideal situation. Lack of resources can cause it, but it's not a norm. Outdated Plasma is just another incentive for people not to use Debian, so it's surely something those who care about Debian should try to avoid. Shmerl.
Bug#966381: kate has no mode for graphviz files
Package: kate
Version: 4:20.04.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
kate has no mode for graphviz/dot files.
Here is an example of a gv file:
digraph test {
1 [shape=box] // invtriangle ou triangle ou house ou trapezium ou diamond
1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5;
2 -> 4;
1 -> 3 [style = "dotted"];
2 -> 5;
}
Here is a URL https://www.graphviz.org/pdf/dotguide.pdf.
The abstract grammar is page 34.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/3 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE,
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=fr_FR:fr:en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages kate depends on:
ii kate5-data 4:20.04.1-1
ii kio 5.70.1-1
ii ktexteditor-katepart 5.70.1-1
ii libc62.31-2
ii libkf5bookmarks5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5completion55.70.0-1
ii libkf5configcore55.70.0-1
ii libkf5configgui5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5configwidgets5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5coreaddons55.70.0-1
ii libkf5crash5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5dbusaddons55.70.0-1
ii libkf5guiaddons5 5.70.0-2
ii libkf5i18n5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5iconthemes55.70.0-1
ii libkf5jobwidgets55.70.0-1
ii libkf5kiocore5 5.70.1-1
ii libkf5kiofilewidgets55.70.1-1
ii libkf5kiowidgets55.70.1-1
ii libkf5newstuff5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5parts5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5plasma55.70.1-1
ii libkf5service-bin5.70.0-1
ii libkf5service5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5syntaxhighlighting55.70.0-1
ii libkf5texteditor55.70.1-1
ii libkf5textwidgets5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5threadweaver5 5.70.0-2
ii libkf5wallet-bin 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5wallet55.70.0-1
ii libkf5widgetsaddons5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5windowsystem5 5.70.0-1
ii libkf5xmlgui55.70.0-1+b1
ii libqt5core5a 5.14.2+dfsg-4
ii libqt5dbus5 5.14.2+dfsg-4
ii libqt5gui5 5.14.2+dfsg-4
ii libqt5sql5 5.14.2+dfsg-4
ii libqt5widgets5 5.14.2+dfsg-4
ii libqt5xml5 5.14.2+dfsg-4
ii libstdc++6 10.2.0-3
ii plasma-framework 5.70.1-1
ii qml-module-org-kde-kquickcontrolsaddons 5.70.0-1
ii qml-module-qtquick-layouts 5.14.2+dfsg-3
ii qml-module-qtquick2 5.14.2+dfsg-3
Versions of packages kate recommends:
ii sonnet-plugins 5.70.0-1
Versions of packages kate suggests:
pn darcs
ii exuberant-ctags 1:5.9~svn20110310-13
ii git 1:2.28.0~rc2-1
ii khelpcenter 4:20.04.2-1
ii konsole-kpart4:20.04.2-1
ii mercurial5.4.1-2
ii subversion 1.14.0-1
-- no debconf information
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
Il 27/07/20 11:53, Marco Valli ha scritto: In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 10:19:41 CEST, luca.pedrielli ha scritto: Thanks Marco for another great comment. Lol, I have to assume you've never heard of the novacula Occami. regards Thanks twice. -- Saluti, Luca Pedrielli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 12:53:05 CEST, Norbert Preining ha scritto: > You are aware that you are scratching on the door of a CoC warning? Continue > calling other people morons and within short time this will be your last > post here. Take it easy, dude, the ml come and go... -- Marco Valli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
Hi! Marco Valli - 27.07.20, 12:48:32 CEST: > In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 12:06:45 CEST, Luc Castermans ha > scritto: > > Is there a simple explanation of the status of KDE in Debian? > > Scarcity of manpower, but since Sid is not a rolling release the > debian kde team can avoid to works with m*r*ns. Norbert *and* Marco, please stop. Ask yourself whether what you do here does anything to improve the situation. And if not, please stop. Thank you, -- Martin
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
You are aware that you are scratching on the door of a CoC warning? Continue calling other people morons and within short time this will be your last post here.
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 12:06:45 CEST, Luc Castermans ha scritto: > Is there a simple explanation of the status of KDE in Debian? Scarcity of manpower, but since Sid is not a rolling release the debian kde team can avoid to works with m*r*ns. regards -- Marco Valli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 12:35:23 CEST, Norbert Preining ha scritto: > Showing off pseudo-education, Showing off real-stupidity > how great. Do you think you are the only one > with a background in classical education? No. -- Marco Valli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
Showing off pseudo-education, how great. Do you think you are the only one with a background in classical education?
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
So now I learned about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor Is there a simple explanation of the status of KDE in Debian? Op ma 27 jul. 2020 om 11:54 schreef Marco Valli : > In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 10:22:06 CEST, Norbert Preining ha scritto: > > Lines up well with the rest of his comments! > > I don't like wasting words unnecessarily! > > -- > Marco Valli > > > -- Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 10:22:06 CEST, Norbert Preining ha scritto: > Lines up well with the rest of his comments! I don't like wasting words unnecessarily! -- Marco Valli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data lunedì 27 luglio 2020 10:19:41 CEST, luca.pedrielli ha scritto: > Thanks Marco for another great comment. Lol, I have to assume you've never heard of the novacula Occami. regards -- Marco Valli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
> Thanks Marco for another great comment. Lines up well with the rest of his comments! Norbert -- PREINING Norbert https://www.preining.info Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide + TU Wien + JAIST + TeX Live + Debian Dev GPG: 0x860CDC13 fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
Il 27/07/20 09:46, Marco Valli ha scritto: In data martedì 21 luglio 2020 21:03:15 CEST, hai scritto: I certainly use Sid as a rolling release, and many other people do the same. Many people would like to experience the reliability, maturity, and democratic governance of Debian while having updated packages, and sid offers that for them. In particular, KDE Plasma improves dramatically each release and I certainly can't stand using old versions of Plasma full of already-fixed bugs, and I expect other Plasma users feel the same. I also use sid but i don't break the balls to the guys of the debian kde team if it's not updated enough. regards Thanks Marco for another great comment. -- Saluti, Luca Pedrielli
Re: Status of Plasma 5.18/5.19?
In data martedì 21 luglio 2020 21:03:15 CEST, hai scritto: > I certainly use Sid as a rolling release, and many other people do the > same. Many people would like to experience the reliability, maturity, and > democratic governance of Debian while having updated packages, and sid > offers that for them. In particular, KDE Plasma improves dramatically each > release and I certainly can't stand using old versions of Plasma full of > already-fixed bugs, and I expect other Plasma users feel the same. I also use sid but i don't break the balls to the guys of the debian kde team if it's not updated enough. regards -- Marco Valli
