Bug#320042: linux-doc-2.6.12: Is there a bug # against kernel-package for this? Is there a workaround?
Package: linux-doc-2.6.12 Version: 2.6.12-2 Followup-For: Bug #320042 Since some other people in the project are trying to force-feed 2.6.12 onto users machines, the inability to install the 2.6.12 docs along with prior docs for comparison is kind of a show-stopper. Are there any workarounds to install the package despite this issue?, otherwise this needs critical or grave priority. As a temporary measure, you may want to manually rebuild the linux-doc package with an older kernel-package. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11jbj3.2.10 Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2.6.12 in volatile?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:29:00AM +0900, Horms wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:09:29PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Horms ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050811 23:46]: On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:56:00AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: The latter, according to volatile policy (... must be autobuildable from the same release...). Is that part of the policy intended preclude providing an update to kernel-package (or any other tool) that might be needed? It would be good to clarify that. Technically, we consider sarge+sarge/security+sarge/volatile as the release we build volatile packages in. However, as build-depending on a newer version is _also_ a packaging change, there needs to be a really good reason for that (as for any packaging change). Thanks for the clarification. Well, the changes are needed since the state of pre-sarge powerpc targets in kernel-packages where inadapted and buggy as hell, so we had to do some post-processing in the post-install. As he new packaging system uses its own post-install, and in order to not have the user-generated packages differ from the official ones, we decided to bring the logic into kernel-package and the kernel source itself. The change is a couple of lines of diff against the rules file, which can easily be backported, which introduces two new subarches which are used by the new kernel packaging. As such, the patch is fully backward compatible, and there is zero risk involved in breakage or something (anyone doubting this is free to look at the code and prove me the contrary :). Another solution I thought of would be to bundle kernel-package inside linux-2.6 (for volatile/sarge) somewhere. Though I am not sure how much surgery would be required to relocate kernel-package. Well, that's obviously worse. Perhaps. It turns out in this case that the change required is quite small. So we could just carry that change inside the linux-2.6 package for volatile, rather than include it in a build-depending update. Though the feeling I got from Svenl, which I agree with, is that the latter is prefered. I have some doubts about the cleanliness of the external patch method and if we can easily divert the rules file from make-kpkg to our own one. I strongly recomend not to go this hacky way just because of some bureaucratic rules preventing us to do the right thing, and patching kernel-package. Let's use common sense over dogma and rigidity, ok ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#323059: kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 323059 kernel-source-2.6.8 Bug#323059: kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command Bug reassigned from package `kernel-source-2.6.8' to `kernel-source-2.6.8'. tag 323059 +pending Bug#323059: kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tag 323059 +patch Bug#323059: kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command Tags were: pending Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#323059: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 323059 Bug#323059: kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command Bug reopened, originator not changed. IMHO this is actually a valid bug while kernel-source-2.6.8 remains in Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. unstable. Lets leave it here as a marker, as a fressh version Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. of this bug seems to be posted about once a week. Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323059: marked as done (kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command)
reopen 323059 IMHO this is actually a valid bug while kernel-source-2.6.8 remains in unstable. Lets leave it here as a marker, as a fressh version of this bug seems to be posted about once a week. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323059: kernel-source-2.6.8 fails at make menuconfig command
reassign 323059 kernel-source-2.6.8 tag 323059 +pending tag 323059 +patch thanks On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 08:22:30AM -0500, Charles Lear wrote: Package: kernel-source Version: 2.6.8 I installed the Deiban testing (Etch) version on 08-13-05 and have not been able to get the kernel-source-2.6.8 to compile. It consistently fails at the 'make menuconfig' command. The only major difference I am aware of between this installation and previous examples is the recent inclusion of the gcc 4.0.1 packages. See output below: # make menuconfig HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep HOSTCC scripts/basic/split-include HOSTCC scripts/basic/docproc SHIPPED scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.h HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/mconf.o scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:91: error: static declaration of 'current_menu' followsnon-static declaration scripts/kconfig/lkc.h:63: error: previous declaration of 'current_menu' was here make[1]: *** [scripts/kconfig/mconf.o] Error 1 make: *** [menuconfig] Error 2 Hi, 2.6.8 does not compile with gcc-4.0. Please try using linux-source-2.6 (2.6.12), or use the attached patch to compile with gcc-3.3. Also, please note that the 2.6.8 is for Sarge, and is earmarked for removal from Unstable. linux-source-2.6 is the way forward. Thanks -- Horms --- a/Makefile 2005-07-29 19:21:51.0 +0900 +++ b/Makefile 2005-07-29 19:22:25.0 +0900 @@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin/bash; \ else echo sh; fi ; fi) -HOSTCC = gcc -HOSTCXX= g++ +HOSTCC = gcc-3.3 +HOSTCXX= g++-3.3 HOSTCFLAGS = -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer HOSTCXXFLAGS = -O2 @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ AS = $(CROSS_COMPILE)as LD = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ld -CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc-3.3 CPP= $(CC) -E AR = $(CROSS_COMPILE)ar NM = $(CROSS_COMPILE)nm
Re: linux-2.6 - patches
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:45:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: - Always build asm-offsets.s in the prepare target. Effected arches: - arm - sparc64 I removed the workaround from trunk but the generated files are now put in the flavour specific package, so this is solved. Bastian -- Lots of people drink from the wrong bottle sometimes. -- Edith Keeler, The City on the Edge of Forever, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#320042: linux-doc-2.6.12: Is there a bug # against kernel-package for this? Is there a workaround?
Jakob Bohm writes... Since some other people in the project are trying to force-feed 2.6.12 onto users machines, the inability to install the 2.6.12 docs along with prior docs for comparison is kind of a show-stopper. It's called 'unstable' for a reason. The fact that it is pretty stable most of the time is actually a testament to how much Debian rocks. There are always problems when doing large transitions, even with the additional testing done _before_ the package goes into unstable. Are there any workarounds to install the package despite this issue?, otherwi this needs critical or grave priority. Feel free to upgrade it. -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323173: CAN-2005-245[89]: Two vulnerabilities in the kernel's zlib
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important Tags: security patch There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require backporting to 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Please see http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/linux-2.6.12.y.git;a=commit;h=885605316d76c3fdce23dffe9c59e20539287c6b for descriptions, links and patches. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc5 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323176: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Measured kernel entropy dropped significantly after upgrade
Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 Version: 2.6.12-2 Severity: normal We run munin munin-node on our systems, to provide some form of trend analysis. The before after pictures for kernel entropy on 2.6.12 are odd. The before - was a pretty constant entropy up averaging about 3800 The after is averaging 733 To make it clear - here is the munin graph as of Aug 15th http://www.darach.ie/images/legolas.darach.ie-entropy-week.png -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.81.1 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre8-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#323039: CAN-2005-2098/CAN-2005-2099: keyring related DoS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 323039 +pending Bug#323039: CAN-2005-2098/CAN-2005-2099: keyring related DoS Tags were: patch security Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323039: CAN-2005-2098/CAN-2005-2099: keyring related DoS
tag 323039 +pending thanks These changes are now in SVN. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
last call for test builds of linux-2.6_2.6.12-3
Hi folks This is the last call for testing of the actual candidate for linux-2.6_2.6.12-3. This is a security update. The URI is svn://svn.debian.org/kernel/trunk/kernel/source/linux-2.6. Bastian -- ... bacteriological warfare ... hard to believe we were once foolish enough to play around with that. -- McCoy, The Omega Glory, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#323183: Please remove some linux packages from sid
Package: ftp.debian.org Version: N/A Please remove the following packages from sid: * kernel-image-2.6.8-alpha * kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64 * kernel-image-2.6.8-hppa * kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 * kernel-image-2.6.8-ia64 * kernel-image-2.6.8-m68k * kernel-image-2.6.8-s390 * kernel-image-2.6.8-sparc * kernel-image-2.6.10-alpha * kernel-image-2.6.10-sparc * kernel-image-2.6.11-i386 * kernel-image-2.6.11-s390 * kernel-patch-2.6.8-hppa * kernel-patch-2.6.8-m68k * kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.8 * kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.11 * kernel-source-2.4.24 * kernel-source-2.4.25 * kernel-source-2.4.26 * kernel-source-2.6.8 * kernel-latest-2.6-i386 * kernel-latest-2.6-s390 * kernel-latest-2.6-sparc * fai-kernels (request from Holger Levsen) Bastian -- Star Trek Lives! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.82
tag 311034 + fixed tag 312207 + fixed tag 312213 + fixed tag 315715 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:49:33 +0200 Source: initrd-tools Binary: initrd-tools Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.82 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian kernel team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: initrd-tools - tools to create initrd image for prepackaged Linux kernel Closes: 311034 312207 312213 315715 Changes: initrd-tools (0.1.82) unstable; urgency=low . * Simon Horman - Fix typo in mkinitrd.conf.5 managment-management from A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (closes: #311034) * Maximilian Attems - Mention the team in the mkinitrd header. - Fix module_exists function closes: #312213 - don't include drbd module closes: #312207 both thanks to patch from Andreas Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Dann Frazier - Specify options before arguments to find to avoid some annoying warnings. Patch from Knut Auvor Grythe closes: #315715 * Sven Luther - Let's load ehci before uhci and ohci, since it seems passing control from ohci or uhci to ehci brings some unstabilities. Files: 35851f0606dcbfe3f85e9415623036b9 644 utils optional initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc 2c68819c081417ca235f1295d5d818b1 28338 utils optional initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz 4c388409c9d301143823123034ec20ea 31028 utils optional initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFDAL1G2WTeT3CRQaQRAmo5AJ9VEseS88sTDvG18cetr9Zo3ed33gCXanz2 bYGCdL94BDc97g/zgeMnUw== =pCPE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of initrd-tools_0.1.82_powerpc.changes
initrd-tools_0.1.82_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of initrd-tools 0.1.82
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 311034 + fixed Bug#311034: 'man mkinitrd' typo: managment Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed tag 312207 + fixed Bug#312207: initrd-tools: don't include drbd module in initrd Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 312213 + fixed Bug#312213: initrd-tools: excessive amount of modules included in initrd Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 315715 + fixed Bug#315715: initrd-tools: Arguments to find given in deprecated order, causing warning Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
initrd-tools_0.1.82_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.82.dsc initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.82.tar.gz initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb to pool/main/i/initrd-tools/initrd-tools_0.1.82_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Setting bugs to severity fixed: 311034 312207 312213 315715 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_s390.changes
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322765: marked as done (ieee80211-source: fails to compile because it can't find genksyms)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322680: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 18:32:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 11:32:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from muse.19inch.net [80.1.73.118] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3eKt-0001bQ-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:32:55 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=olwen)
by muse.19inch.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1E3eKn-0001IB-KR; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:32:50 +0100
Received: from daf by olwen with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E3Z41-00073i-24; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dafydd Harries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ieee80211-source: fails to compile because it can't find genksyms
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:07 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ieee80211-source
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Here's a log:
([EMAIL PROTECTED]:~) sudo module-assistant -t build ieee80211
Extracting the package tarball, /usr/src/ieee80211-source.tar.gz
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags *.lst *~ .#*
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/tmp .tmp_versions
for file in *.{c,h} net/*.h; do \
if [ -e $file ]; then \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
fi \
done
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules kdist_clean kdist_config binary-modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make[1]: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags *.lst *~ .#*
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/tmp .tmp_versions
for file in *.{c,h} net/*.h; do \
if [ -e $file ]; then \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
fi \
done
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/gcc-4.0
for templ in ; do \
cp $templ `echo $templ | sed -e 's/_KVERS_/2.6.12-1-686/g'` ; \
done
for templ in `ls debian/*.modules.in` ; do \
test -e ${templ%.modules.in}.backup || cp ${templ%.modules.in}
${templ%.modules.in}.backup 2/dev/null || true; \
sed -e 's/##KVERS##/2.6.12-1-686/g ;s/#KVERS#/2.6.12-1-686/g ;
s/_KVERS_/2.6.12-1-686/g ; s/##KDREV##/2.6.12-2/g ; s/#KDREV#/2.6.12-2/g ;
s/_KDREV_/2.6.12-2/g' $templ ${templ%.modules.in}; \
done
export DH_OPTIONS='-pieee80211-modules-2.6.12-1-686'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
# Build the module
/usr/bin/make -C driver KSRC=/usr/src/linux KVER=2.6.12-1-686
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux M=/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver
MODVERDIR=/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver modules
/bin/sh: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686/scripts/gcc-version.sh: No such
file or directory
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'
CC [M] /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/ieee80211_module.o
/bin/sh: scripts/genksyms/genksyms: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/ieee80211_module.o] Error 1
Bug#322680: marked as done (iee80211-source fails to build due to missing scripts/gcc-version.sh)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322680: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 07:44:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 00:44:49 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from h062040143110.swe.cm.kabsi.at (janus.kmp.or.at) [62.40.143.110]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3UDg-0006re-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:44:49 -0700
Received: from ragnarok.kmp.or.at (ragnarok-vpn.kmp.or.at [10.1.0.6])
by janus.kmp.or.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7C7ibmq010844
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:44:40 +0200
Received: from klaus by ragnarok.kmp.or.at with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E3UDV-0001pi-Mg; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:44:37 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Klaus Maria Pfeiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ieee80211-source: doesn't compile
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:44:37 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-kmporat-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-kmporat-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-kmporat-MailScanner-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ieee80211-source
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
compiling ieee80211-source ends up in an error:
ragnarok:/usr/src/modules/ieee80211# fakeroot debian/rules binary-modules
KSRC=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686 KVERS=2.6.12-1-686
/usr/bin/gcc-4.0
for templ in ; do \
cp $templ `echo $templ | sed -e 's/_KVERS_/2.6.12-1-686/g'` ; \
done
for templ in `ls debian/*.modules.in` ; do \
test -e ${templ%.modules.in}.backup || cp ${templ%.modules.in}
${templ%.modules.in}.backup 2/dev/null || true; \
sed -e 's/##KVERS##/2.6.12-1-686/g ;s/#KVERS#/2.6.12-1-686/g ;
s/_KVERS_/2.6.12-1-686/g ; s/##KDREV##//g ; s/#KDREV#//g ; s/_KDREV_//g'
$templ ${templ%.modules.in}; \
done
export DH_OPTIONS='-pieee80211-modules-2.6.12-1-686'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
# Build the module
/usr/bin/make -C driver
KSRC=/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
KVER=2.6.12-1-686
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686
M=/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver
MODVERDIR=/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver modules
/bin/sh:
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686/scripts/gcc-version.sh:
No such file or directory
make[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'
CC [M] /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/ieee80211_module.o
/bin/sh: scripts/genksyms/genksyms: No such file or
directory
make[3]: *** [/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/ieee80211_module.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
make: *** [binary-modules] Error 2
ragnarok:/usr/src/modules/ieee80211#
same with module-assistant -l 2.6.12-1-686 a-i ieee80211.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages ieee80211-source depends on:
ii debhelper 4.9.5 helper programs for debian/rules
ii module-assistant 0.9.8 tool to make module package creati
ieee80211-source recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 322680-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:37 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:37 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4ioq-0003dp-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#322680: fixed in
Bug#322610: marked as done (include/asm-ppc/setup.h includes mk68k header files which aren't in the package)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322610: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2005 18:34:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 11:34:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from simons.xs4all.nl (fire.luon.net) [80.126.201.244] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3HsY-0006o1-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:34:10 -0700 Received: from spring.luon.net (t-27-64.athome.tue.nl [131.155.228.64]) by fire.luon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2444EFE85; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:34:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by spring.luon.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A0C933C63; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:33:58 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: include/asm-ppc/setup.h includes mk68k header files which aren't in the package X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:33:57 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc Version: 2.6.12-2 Severity: normal Hi, include/asm-ppc/setup.h does #include asm-m68k/setup.h. Which isn't available. Causing external modules to fail Sjoerd -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii linux-headers-2.6.12-12.6.12-2 Common architecture-specific heade linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 322610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003dl-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#322610: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to
Bug#321885: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.12: Please enable CONFIG_PALINFO as built-in for IA64)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321885: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2005 00:01:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 17:01:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from lemon.gelato.unsw.edu.au [203.143.174.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E1v4g-0004iW-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:01:02 -0700 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55990 helo=lemon.gelato.unsw.edu.au) by lemon.gelato.unsw.edu.au with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E1v45-000765-Ex; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:00:25 +1000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary9178075162061927014== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ian Wienand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux-source-2.6.12: Please enable CONFIG_PALINFO as built-in for IA64 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:00:25 +1000 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on lemon.gelato.unsw.edu.au); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===9178075162061927014== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: linux-source-2.6.12 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, As mentioned in http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/linux-ia64/0508/14811.html CONFIG_PALINFO isn't built-in to Debian kernels. This causes important developer applications such as pfmon, that should just work, to fail. I believe it would be best to enable it by default, as per attached. Thanks! -i [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: ia64 Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --===9178075162061927014== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=palinfo.diff --- debian/arch/ia64/config 2005-08-08 09:02:26.0 +1000 +++ debian-new/arch/ia64/config 2005-08-08 09:01:25.0 +1000 @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ CONFIG_COMPAT=y CONFIG_IA64_MCA_RECOVERY=m CONFIG_PERFMON=y -CONFIG_IA64_PALINFO=m +CONFIG_IA64_PALINFO=y CONFIG_ACPI_DEALLOCATE_IRQ=y CONFIG_EFI_VARS=m CONFIG_EFI_PCDP=y --===9178075162061927014==-- --- Received: (at 321885-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003dh-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321885: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc
Bug#321867: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6-k7: mention not exactly latest)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321867: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 21:08:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 14:08:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E1sNx-0001uE-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 14:08:45 -0700 Received: from tc218-187-20-166.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.20.166]:1272 helo=jidanni1) by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 #0) id 1E1sNw-0007kr-CD by authid jidanni with plain for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:38:45 +0530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please Subject: kernel-image-2.6-k7: mention not exactly latest X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:57:21 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kernel-image-2.6-k7 Version: 101 Severity: minor As far as I know, this isn't exactly true: Description: ... This package will always depend on the latest 2.6 kernel image available for AMD Duron/Athlon. Because in pool/main/k and pool/main/l I was able to find newer kernel images. So maybe add more remarks. I'm not sure what to say. --- Received: (at 321867-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003df-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321867: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to
Bug#322409: marked as done (linux-source-2.6.12: Permission denied)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322409: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 14:29:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 07:29:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailfe02.tele2.fr (swip.net) [212.247.154.44] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E2raM-0001JC-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 07:29:39 -0700 X-T2-Posting-ID: WiVWjBLUzApqRSJ6HjW2DwHYtIkfdnpfJm1ZTTtKVuc= Received: from [83.177.209.130] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by mailfe02.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with ESMTP id 427708200; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:29:06 +0200 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 59508701A2; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:30 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bin Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux-source-2.6.12: Permission denied X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:28:29 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-source-2.6.12 Version: 2.6.12-2 Severity: minor Can't build module as user (No problem as root). A user has not permission to read many files in /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12. Best regards, Bin -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.20050810 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.12 depends on: ii binutils 2.16.1-2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina ii bzip2 1.0.2-8high-quality block-sorting file co ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities Versions of packages linux-source-2.6.12 recommends: ii gcc 4:4.0.1-3 The GNU C compiler ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Development Librari ii make 3.80-10The GNU version of the make util -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 322409-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003dj-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#322409: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb
Bug#321167: marked as done (linux-image: say the difference vs. kernel-image)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321167: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2005 22:00:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 03 15:00:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E0RIF-Bc-00; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 15:00:55 -0700 Received: from tc218-187-25-246.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.25.246]:32866 helo=jidanni1) by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.52 #0) id 1E0RI7-000Nnu-GB by authid jidanni with plain for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:30:52 +0530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please Subject: linux-image: say the difference vs. kernel-image X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 04:36:16 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 Severity: wishlist Please in the Description of all the linux-*-2.6 packages, e.g., linux-doc-2.6.12 linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686 linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 linux-patch-debian-2.6.12 linux-tree-2.6.12 i.e., packages residing in pool/main/l/linux-2.6/, say how they differ from the kernel-* packages, e.g., kernel-image-2.6.* so the user knows before starting any downloads. Perhaps also in the kernel-* Descriptions, mention the difference vs. linux-* too. --- Received: (at 321167-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003db-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321167: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to
Bug#321236: marked as done (Should not kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 compiled with CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER ?)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321236: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 10:02:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 03:02:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from freebox.crans.org (ultra-adsl) [82.225.39.54] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E0cYd-0003z3-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 03:02:35 -0700 Received: by ultra-adsl (Postfix, from userid 1522) id 854F716F59; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Should not kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 compiled with CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER ? X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:02:20 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 Version: 2.6.8-15 Severity: wishlist kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 is compiled without CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER contrary to other architectures (at least 686 and k7). Is it possible to add this option ? -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: sparc (sparc64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-sparc64 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6.8-2-sparc64 depends on: ii initrd-tools 0.1.81.1 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre1-2 tools for managing Linux kernel mo -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 321236-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003dd-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321236: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to
Bug#322612: marked as done (Various scripts/binaries missing from scripts directory)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#322612: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2005 18:47:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 11:47:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from simons.xs4all.nl (fire.luon.net) [80.126.201.244] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E3I5J-0002Gr-00; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:47:22 -0700 Received: from spring.luon.net (t-27-64.athome.tue.nl [131.155.228.64]) by fire.luon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CADDFE85; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:47:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by spring.luon.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3302A33C63; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:47:12 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: genksyms script missing X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 20:47:12 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc Version: 2.6.12-2 Severity: normal Hi, It seems that the genksyms script is missing. It used to be available in kernel-build-2.6.11-powerpc, but is no longer in linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc Sjoerd -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii linux-headers-2.6.12-12.6.12-2 Common architecture-specific heade linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 322612-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 17:38:19 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 10:38:19 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4ioq-0003dn-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#322612: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: linux-2.6 Source-Version: 2.6.12-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to
Bug#322765: marked as done (ieee80211-source: fails to compile because it can't find genksyms)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322765: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 18:32:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 11:32:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from muse.19inch.net [80.1.73.118] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E3eKt-0001bQ-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:32:55 -0700
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=olwen)
by muse.19inch.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1E3eKn-0001IB-KR; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 19:32:50 +0100
Received: from daf by olwen with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E3Z41-00073i-24; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dafydd Harries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ieee80211-source: fails to compile because it can't find genksyms
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:07 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ieee80211-source
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Here's a log:
([EMAIL PROTECTED]:~) sudo module-assistant -t build ieee80211
Extracting the package tarball, /usr/src/ieee80211-source.tar.gz
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags *.lst *~ .#*
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/tmp .tmp_versions
for file in *.{c,h} net/*.h; do \
if [ -e $file ]; then \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
fi \
done
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules kdist_clean kdist_config binary-modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-arch-stamp build-indep-stamp configure-stamp
rm -rf modules
/usr/bin/make clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211'
make[1]: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)
/usr/bin/make -C driver clean
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
rm -f *.mod.c *.mod *.o *.ko .*.cmd .*.flags *.lst *~ .#*
rm -rf /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/tmp .tmp_versions
for file in *.{c,h} net/*.h; do \
if [ -e $file ]; then \
sed -i -e s:\ *$::g -e s:\t*$::g $file; \
fi \
done
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
dh_clean
/usr/bin/gcc-4.0
for templ in ; do \
cp $templ `echo $templ | sed -e 's/_KVERS_/2.6.12-1-686/g'` ; \
done
for templ in `ls debian/*.modules.in` ; do \
test -e ${templ%.modules.in}.backup || cp ${templ%.modules.in}
${templ%.modules.in}.backup 2/dev/null || true; \
sed -e 's/##KVERS##/2.6.12-1-686/g ;s/#KVERS#/2.6.12-1-686/g ;
s/_KVERS_/2.6.12-1-686/g ; s/##KDREV##/2.6.12-2/g ; s/#KDREV#/2.6.12-2/g ;
s/_KDREV_/2.6.12-2/g' $templ ${templ%.modules.in}; \
done
export DH_OPTIONS='-pieee80211-modules-2.6.12-1-686'
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
# Build the module
/usr/bin/make -C driver KSRC=/usr/src/linux KVER=2.6.12-1-686
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver'
/usr/bin/make -C /usr/src/linux M=/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver
MODVERDIR=/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver modules
/bin/sh: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686/scripts/gcc-version.sh: No such
file or directory
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686'
CC [M] /usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/ieee80211_module.o
/bin/sh: scripts/genksyms/genksyms: No such file or directory
make[4]: *** [/usr/src/modules/ieee80211/driver/ieee80211_module.o] Error 1
Bug#323039: marked as done (CAN-2005-2098/CAN-2005-2099: keyring related DoS)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:32:16 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323039: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.12-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 11:14:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 04:14:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ip0.serverflex.de (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4GRw-0006YN-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 04:14:44 -0700 Received: from dsl-084-059-167-023.arcor-ip.net ([84.59.167.23] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1E4GRs-iH-Qv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:14:41 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4GSK-0001SU-1o; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:15:08 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CAN-2005-2098/CAN-2005-2099: keyring related DoS X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:15:07 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.59.167.23 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important Tags: security patch Hi, two keyring related DoS vulnerabilities have been fixed in 2.6.13-rc6 (CAN-2005-209[89]). I'm copying the relevant changelog portions with git commit ids: Cheers, Moritz commit 94efe72f762e2c147d8146d637d5ece5614c8d94 Author: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Aug 4 13:07:07 2005 -0700 [PATCH] Destruction of failed keyring oopses The attached patch makes sure that a keyring that failed to instantiate properly is destroyed without oopsing [CAN-2005-2099]. The problem occurs in three stages: (1) The key allocator initialises the type-specific data to all zeroes. In the case of a keyring, this will become a link in the keyring name list when the keyring is instantiated. (2) If a user (any user) attempts to add a keyring with anything other than an empty payload, the keyring instantiation function will fail with an error and won't add the keyring to the name list. (3) The keyring's destructor then sees that the keyring has a description (name) and tries to remove the keyring from the name list, which oopses because the link pointers are both zero. This bug permits any user to take down a box trivially. Signed-Off-By: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] commit bcf945d36fa0598f41ac4ad46a9dc43135460263 Author: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu Aug 4 13:07:06 2005 -0700 [PATCH] Error during attempt to join key management session can leave semaphore pinned The attached patch prevents an error during the key session joining operation from hanging future joins in the D state [CAN-2005-2098]. The problem is that the error handling path for the KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING operation has one error path that doesn't release the session management semaphore. Further attempts to get the semaphore will then sleep for ever in the D state. This can happen in four situations, all involving an attempt to allocate a new session keyring: (1) ENOMEM. (2) The users key quota being reached. (3) A keyring name that is an empty string. (4) A keyring name that is too long. Any user may attempt this operation, and so any user can cause the problem to occur. Signed-Off-By: David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
linux-2.6 override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-3.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-s390_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-image-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-s390x_2.6.12-3_s390.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-3_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 321167 321236 321867 321885 322409 322610 322612 322680 322765 323039 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_powerpc.changes
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_powerpc.changes is NEW
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb (new) linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb optional devel Architecture-specific header files for Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines. linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb (new) linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb optional devel Architecture-specific header files for Linux kernel 2.6.12 on powerpc64-class machines This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for Linux kernel 2.6.12 on powerpc64-class machines, generally used for building out-of-tree kernel modules. These files are going to be installed into /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64, and can be used for building modules that load into the kernel provided by the linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64 package. . This packages is produced using an updated kernel packaging system and replaces older kernel-headers packages linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb (new) linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc64-class machines This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines. linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb (new) linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on powerpc64-class machines This package provides the binary image and pre-built loadable modules for Linux kernel 2.6.12 on powerpc64-class machines. . This packages is produced using an updated kernel packaging system and replaces older kernel-image packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb (new) linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb optional base Linux kernel image on powerpc64-class machines This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel on powerpc64-class machines. linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-3_powerpc.deb Changes: linux-2.6 (2.6.12-3) unstable; urgency=low . * Added reference to old kernel-* package names to make transition a little more obvious to end users. A Dan Jacobson special. (Simon Horman) Closes: #321167 . * By the time this makes it into the archive, it will be handling kernel-image-2.6-* packages. (Simon Horman) Closes: #321867 . * Link palinfo statically on ia64. (dann frazier) (Closes: #321885) . * [hppa] : - Add hppa arch specific
Bug#298000: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: airo driver fail to work with AIRONET Wireless Communications PC4800 (rev 01) [PCI 14b9:0350]
I just upgraded the kernel on the machine in question to the kernel found at URL:ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb, and the airo driver worked there too. :) Please consider upgrading the kernel in debian/stable (sarge) to a newer kernel where where this airo driver work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322004: kernel-source-2.6.8: Fails to compile on a X86_64 platform
Hello, On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:34:39PM +0200, Manolo DÃaz wrote: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:81: Error: Macro with this name was already defined arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S:100: Error: Macro with this name was already defined make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.o] Error 1 I just recompiled kernel-image-2.6.8-amd64-2.6.8 (all flaovours) in a cleanroom sarge chroot, using kernel-source-2.6.18 2.6.8-16 from sarge, and it succeeded as expected. what are the exact versions of binutils gcc libc6 which lead to your compilation failure? did you use a fresh extracted tarball, and wich command did you use to build? do you have a genuine pure64 installation or did you mix in packages from the old experimental gcc-3.4 branch? does the /usr/bin/gcc symlink point to gcc-3.3 and did you use gcc-3.3 or gcc-3.4 to compile the kernel image? Did you try to compile from a fresh extracted source tarball? I cannot reproduce this problem with sarge versions of the toolchain, thus I need more info. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
linux-2.6_2.6.12-3_powerpc.changes REJECTED
Broken === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285017: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 05:44:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 09 21:44:59 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx05.gis.net [208.218.130.13] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CcdaN-Wd-00; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:44:59 -0800 Received: from arf ([207.7.194.180]) by mx05.gis.net; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:55 -0500 Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CcdaF-mE-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:50 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 Version: 2.4.27-6 Severity: normal I upgraded from 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686_2.4.27-2_i386.deb' to 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686_2.4.27-6_i386.deb', after which my 56K external modem now tops off at about 1.5K a second, down from it's old 5.5K. When I downgrade to v2, the modem can do 5.5K again. I tested this twice (with no other changes) to make sure. Sure enough, downgrading the kernel seems to fix the modem, and upgrading it slows it down. If it matters, the modem's connected to '/dev/ttyS0'. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.74 tools to create initrd image for p ii modutils 2.4.26-1.1 Linux module utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 285017-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 20:30:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 13:30:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4lb8-lt-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:30:18 -0700 Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190]) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3BF5C011 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4lb2-0006TL-Hx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200 From: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, A. Costa wrote: On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:05:13 +0200 Maximilian Attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any update on the matter? did the mentioned upload solve your problem? Sorry I can't tell you -- treachery most foul! -- I upgraded to kernel v2.6.x a while back, and don't currently have any v2.4.27 setup to test the
Processed: Reassign #322723
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 322723 linux-2.6 Bug#322723: dhcp-client-udeb: 'id route add' fails w/ Network is unreachable Bug reassigned from package `dhcp-client-udeb' to `linux-2.6'. retitle 322723 D-I: 'id route add' fails w/ Network is unreachable Bug#322723: dhcp-client-udeb: 'id route add' fails w/ Network is unreachable Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_powerpc.changes
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.diff.gz to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.diff.gz linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.12-4.dsc linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-image-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-image-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-tree-2.6.12_2.6.12-4_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6 override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): kernel-image-2.6-s390_2.6.12-4_s390.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. kernel-image-2.6-s390x_2.6.12-4_s390.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_powerpc.changes is NEW
kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb (new) linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb optional devel Architecture-specific header files for Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines. linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb (new) linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb optional devel Architecture-specific header files for Linux kernel 2.6.12 on powerpc64-class machines This package provides the architecture-specific kernel header files for Linux kernel 2.6.12 on powerpc64-class machines, generally used for building out-of-tree kernel modules. These files are going to be installed into /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64, and can be used for building modules that load into the kernel provided by the linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64 package. . This packages is produced using an updated kernel packaging system and replaces older kernel-headers packages linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb (new) linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb optional base Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc64-class machines This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines. linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb (new) linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb optional base Linux kernel 2.6.12 image on powerpc64-class machines This package provides the binary image and pre-built loadable modules for Linux kernel 2.6.12 on powerpc64-class machines. . This packages is produced using an updated kernel packaging system and replaces older kernel-image packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb (new) linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb optional base Linux kernel image on powerpc64-class machines This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel on powerpc64-class machines. linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb Changes: linux-2.6 (2.6.12-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Supply correct subarch values for the powerpc images. Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Bug#323289: The sk98lin driver does not work with the Intel 88e8050 Chip
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-i386 Version: 2.6.8-16 When I try to do a modprobe sk98lin on a system with Debian stable (Sarge) that is equipped with an Intel 88e8050 LAN Chip, I get an error messages saying 'no such device'. I have tried this same system using another operating system and I had no problem accessing the device. Mark Allyn
Bug#323289: Possible solution
There is a sk98lin driver available from syskonnect.com that is offered with a GPL license. I have verified that this driver does work for the Intel 88e8050 Chip. Mark
linux-2.6_2.6.12-4_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power3_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-power4_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.12-1_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-powerpc_2.6.12-4_powerpc.deb Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem building kernel package
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Alex Samad wrote: apt-get source kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp no longer supported. will be removed from archive soon. cd kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11 dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b -us -uc and then I get a cpio: /usr/src/space0/kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11/debian /tmp-headers/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.11-9/./lib/Makefile not created: newer or same age version exists cpio: /usr/src/space0/kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11/debian /tmp-headers/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.11-9/./lib/Kconfig not created: newer or same age version exists cpio: /usr/src/space0/kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11/debian /tmp-headers/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.11-9/arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets. s not created: newer or same age version exists 0 blocks ln: `./scripts': cannot overwrite directory make[2]: *** [real_stamp_headers] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/space0/kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11' make[1]: *** [stamp-headers] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/space0/kernel-image-2.6.11-amd64-2.6.11/kernel-source-2.6.11' make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2 I used to use the make-kpkg, but I have been unsuccessful building a amd64 on a i386 machine so I thought I would look at the process used in making kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp not sure about current state of cross compiling. try linux-2.6? -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323176: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Measured kernel entropy dropped significantly after upgrade)
Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:13:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#323176: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Measured kernel entropy dropped significantly after upgrade has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 08:43:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 01:43:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from host82-1-216-202.not-set-yet.ntli.net (gimli.darach.ie) [82.1.216.202] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4aZ0-0002Qe-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 01:43:23 -0700 Received: from legolas.darach.ie ([172.16.1.23]) by gimli.darach.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E4aYu-0006bN-5n; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:43:18 +0100 Received: from root by legolas.darach.ie with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4aYt-0007m1-Vd; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:43:15 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Higgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 09:43:15 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 172.16.1.23 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Measured kernel entropy dropped significantly after upgrade X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on gimli.darach.ie) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 Version: 2.6.12-2 Severity: normal We run munin munin-node on our systems, to provide some form of trend analysis. The before after pictures for kernel entropy on 2.6.12 are odd. The before - was a pretty constant entropy up averaging about 3800 The after is averaging 733 To make it clear - here is the munin graph as of Aug 15th http://www.darach.ie/images/legolas.darach.ie-entropy-week.png -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.81.1 tools to create initrd image for p ii module-init-tools 3.2-pre8-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 323176-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 23:13:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 16:13:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4o8l-kz-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:13:11 -0700 Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190]) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BA75C011 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:12:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4o8g-00088p-46 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:13:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 01:13:06 +0200 From: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#323176: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: Measured kernel entropy dropped significantly after upgrade Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Chris Higgins wrote: We run munin munin-node on our systems, to provide some form of trend
Re: kernel panic
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, pan yawen wrote: Hi all, My scsi hard disk on debian 3.0 throws errors about end_quest: i/o errors . I logged in as root and ran e2fsck command to fix the bad sectors. After that command, I got reiserfs_read_super can not find reiserfs on sd (8:1), Kernel panic VFS, fs can not be mounted on the boot. that sounds as that your root fs is gone or wrongly configured in your boot loader does it have also the initrd line? I tried boot from bootdisk and did not fix the problem. Is reformatting the hard disk only way to solve the problem? Please help. I do not want lose the customized configuration on this debian box. :( if you care about your data you shouldn't use reiserfs in the first place. it's not a reliable fs. only latest version tries some error checking. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298000: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686: airo driver fail to work with AIRONET Wireless Communications PC4800 (rev 01) [PCI 14b9:0350]
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 20:22 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: I just upgraded the kernel on the machine in question to the kernel found at URL:ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-2_i386.deb, and the airo driver worked there too. :) Please consider upgrading the kernel in debian/stable (sarge) to a newer kernel where where this airo driver work. Its unlikely that sarge will ever get a kernel based on 2.6.8. However, we plan to make newer kernels available on volatile.debian.net at some point. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.4.27-10: isofs driver ignore some parameters with mount
Hi folks,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
Hello Debian,
Kernel 2.4.27-10
With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters after
iocharset=,map=,session= are ignored.
Sample:
mount -t isofs -o uid=100,iocharset=koi8-r,gid=100 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom
gid=100 - was ignored
I look in source and find that problem. I make two patch, simply and full
(what addeded some functionality - ignore wrong mount parameters)
Thanks,
I will try and get the simple version of this patch into the next
Sarge update.
I have also CCed Marcelo and the LKML for their consideration,
as this problem still seems to be present in the lastest 2.4 tree.
--
Horms
simply patch:
===
--- kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-05-19 13:29:39.0
+0300
+++ kernel-source/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-11 11:55:12.0 +0300
@@ -340,13 +340,13 @@
else if (!strcmp(value,acorn)) popt-map = 'a';
else return 0;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 99) return 0;
popt-session=ivalue+1;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt, 0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 660*512) return 0;
===
Neither sbsector or session parameters are part of the options string used
in Alexander's example, so how come this patch can make any difference?
Usage of sbsector or session parameters could explain the above patch
making a difference because the buggy, always true (unsigned long) ivalue 0
comparison invokes return 0, but that is not the case.
The code after the popt-iocharset = value; does not make any sense.
It seems that the *value = 0 assignment can screw up the rest of the
string, isnt that the real issue?
#ifdef CONFIG_JOLIET
if (!strcmp(this_char,iocharset) value) {
popt-iocharset = value;
while (*value *value != ',')
value++;
if (value == popt-iocharset)
return 0;
*value = 0;
} else
#endif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 322935 + patch Bug#322935: linux-tree-2.6.12: please consider building a meta packages linux-tree-2.6 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#322935: patch
tags 322935 + patch thanks I'm not sure if we want to do this or not, but here's a patch that should do it. Index: control.tree.in === --- control.tree.in (revision 3898) +++ control.tree.in (working copy) @@ -23,3 +23,13 @@ . The package serves no purpose outside of the Debian build and archive infrastructure. + +Package: linux-tree-2.6 +Architecture: all +Section: devel +Priority: optional +Depends: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ +Description: Latest Linux kernel source tree for building Debian kernel images + Install this meta package if you would like to have the latest version of the + Debian Linux kernel source installed on your system each time you + dist-upgrade. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323318: Array element has incomplete type
Package: kernel-headers-2.4.27-2 Version: 2.4.27-10 Severity: serious hostap-modules-i386 fails to build because a kernel header has an array type with an incomplete element type: /tmp/buildd/hostap-modules-i386-0.3.7/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386/include/asm/processor.h:75: error: array type has incomplete element type -- Matt signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#323318: Array element has incomplete type
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 323318 kernel-source-2.4.27 Bug#323318: Array element has incomplete type Bug reassigned from package `kernel-headers-2.4.27-2' to `kernel-source-2.4.27'. merge 323318 320256 Bug#320256: kernel-image-2.4.27-2-k6: FTBFS on its intended target Bug#323318: Array element has incomplete type Merged 320256 323318. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#285017: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 285017 Bug#285017: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#285017: marked as done (kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem)
reopen 285017 thanks Hi Maximilian, its still a bug in the 2.4.27 package. It may or may not be fixable. And the patch may or may not be appropriate for Sarge. My current preference for handling problems like this, is firstly to encourage the user to use a more up to date kernel. Secondly downgrading feature requests (which this isn't) to wishlist. And lastly ascertianing what if a fix exists, and if so either adding it to SVN or marking the bug as +wontfix accordingly. +wontfix is also my prefered option for bugs that we think are too hard. While I don't like clutter in the BTS, I think closing bugs just opens the door for duplicates to be subsequently filed, and I'm not sure that helps anyone. On a related note, your work cleaning out bugs for 2.6.10, 11 and other soon to be removed from the archive kernels is excellent. I am really pleased about the way that is going. Its something that has needed to be done for a while. -- Horms On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:33:07PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:12 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 05:44:59 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 09 21:44:59 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx05.gis.net [208.218.130.13] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CcdaN-Wd-00; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:44:59 -0800 Received: from arf ([207.7.194.180]) by mx05.gis.net; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:55 -0500 Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CcdaF-mE-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686: upgrading from v2 to v6 slows down my modem X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 00:44:50 -0500 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: A Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 Version: 2.4.27-6 Severity: normal I upgraded from 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686_2.4.27-2_i386.deb' to 'kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686_2.4.27-6_i386.deb', after which my 56K external modem now tops off at about 1.5K a second, down from it's old 5.5K. When I downgrade to v2, the modem can do 5.5K again. I tested this twice (with no other changes) to make sure. Sure enough, downgrading the kernel seems to fix the modem, and upgrading it slows it down. If it matters, the modem's connected to '/dev/ttyS0'. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C) Versions of packages kernel-image-2.4.27-1-686 depends on: ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities ii fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities ii initrd-tools 0.1.74 tools to create initrd image for p ii modutils 2.4.26-1.1 Linux module utilities -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 285017-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 20:30:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 13:30:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E4lb8-lt-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:30:18 -0700 Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190]) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3BF5C011 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:30:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E4lb2-0006TL-Hx for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 15 Aug
Bug#323318: Array element has incomplete type
reassign 323318 kernel-source-2.4.27 merge 323318 320256 thanks On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:22:39AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: Package: kernel-headers-2.4.27-2 Version: 2.4.27-10 Severity: serious hostap-modules-i386 fails to build because a kernel header has an array type with an incomplete element type: /tmp/buildd/hostap-modules-i386-0.3.7/kernel-headers-2.4.27-2-386/include/asm/processor.h:75: error: array type has incomplete element type Hi, I believe that this is a duplcate of #320256. Please use gcc-3.3 to compile 2.4.27. Thanks -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: kernel 2.4.27-10: isofs driver ignore some parameters with mount
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:11:21PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi folks,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 05:29:36PM +0900, Horms wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:44:17AM +0300, Alexander Pytlev wrote:
Hello Debian,
Kernel 2.4.27-10
With mount isofs filesystem, any mount parameters after
iocharset=,map=,session= are ignored.
Sample:
mount -t isofs -o uid=100,iocharset=koi8-r,gid=100 /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom
gid=100 - was ignored
I look in source and find that problem. I make two patch, simply and full
(what addeded some functionality - ignore wrong mount parameters)
Thanks,
I will try and get the simple version of this patch into the next
Sarge update.
I have also CCed Marcelo and the LKML for their consideration,
as this problem still seems to be present in the lastest 2.4 tree.
--
Horms
simply patch:
===
--- kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-05-19
13:29:39.0 +0300
+++ kernel-source/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-11 11:55:12.0 +0300
@@ -340,13 +340,13 @@
else if (!strcmp(value,acorn)) popt-map = 'a';
else return 0;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,session) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt,
0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 99) return 0;
popt-session=ivalue+1;
}
- if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
+ else if (!strcmp(this_char,sbsector) value) {
char * vpnt = value;
unsigned int ivalue = simple_strtoul(vpnt, vpnt,
0);
if(ivalue 0 || ivalue 660*512) return 0;
===
Neither sbsector or session parameters are part of the options string
used
in Alexander's example, so how come this patch can make any difference?
Usage of sbsector or session parameters could explain the above patch
making a difference because the buggy, always true (unsigned long) ivalue
0
comparison invokes return 0, but that is not the case.
The code after the popt-iocharset = value; does not make any sense.
It seems that the *value = 0 assignment can screw up the rest of the
string, isnt that the real issue?
#ifdef CONFIG_JOLIET
if (!strcmp(this_char,iocharset) value) {
popt-iocharset = value;
while (*value *value != ',')
value++;
if (value == popt-iocharset)
return 0;
*value = 0;
} else
#endif
Sorry about that, while the patch above does seem to be
a valid clean up, on further examination I agree that it
does not address the problem at hand, and that the problem seems
to lie in the *value assignment as you suggest. I wonder
if advancing this_char to the character aftter value, if
non-NULL would resolve this problem. I'll do some testing,
but in the mean time, here is what I have in mind:
--- a/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-16 14:22:27.0 +0900
+++ b/fs/isofs/inode.c 2005-08-16 14:27:55.0 +0900
@@ -329,7 +329,10 @@
value++;
if (value == popt-iocharset)
return 0;
- *value = 0;
+ if (*value) {
+ this_char = value + 1;
+ *value = 0;
+ }
} else
#endif
if (!strcmp(this_char,map) value) {
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323173: CAN-2005-245[89]: Two vulnerabilities in the kernel's zlib
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 07:53:03PM +0900, Horms wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:24:51AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important Tags: security patch There are another two vulnerabilities fixed in 2.6.12.5, that might require backporting to 2.6.8 and 2.4.27. Please see http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/linux-2.6.12.y.git;a=commit;h=885605316d76c3fdce23dffe9c59e20539287c6b for descriptions, links and patches. I have added this to linux-2.6 (except the bit that updates the kernel version). For the record: sys_set_mempolicy-mode-check.patch 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem x86_64-srat-dual-core-amd.patch 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem x86_64-fix-smpboot-timing-problem.patch 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem linux-zlib-fixes.patch (CAN-2005-2458, CAN-2005-2459) 2.6.8: Added as linux-zlib-fixes.dpatch 2.4.27: Added as 182_linux-zlib-fixes.diff zisofs.patch 2.6.8: Added as zisofs.dpatch Added as 183_zisofs.diff This smells like something that averts an overrun to me key-session-join.patch: CAN-2005-2098 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem failed-keyring-oops.patch: CAN-2005-2099 2.6.8: Does not appear to have this problem 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem module-per-cpu-alignment-fix.patch 2.6.8: added as module-per-cpu-alignment-fix.dpatch 2.4.27: Does not appear to have this problem I will try to get to 2.4.27 tomorrow. Done :) -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
