Bug#381677: initramfs-tools: Temporary files and initramfs world-readable

2006-08-14 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:43:16AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
 On Sun, 06 Aug 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:

 The generated initramfs is world-readable (as well as the temporary
 files); this leaks cryptographic keys (in password-protected form) to
 all users on the system when the root fs is encrypted (because these
 keys then get copied to the initramfs, at least in the loop-aes
 case).

 i like the initramfs-tools initrd.img to be debuggable as
 user (quick check of their contents).

 also loop-aes is quite a specific use case,
 so i'm not in big favour of setting the umask in general
 to the proposed value as in general there is no gpg key
 in the initramfs.

Let's do it optionally then. New patch attached.

-- 
Lionel
diff --recursive -u initramfs-tools-0.73e/conf/initramfs.conf 
initramfs-tools-0.73e.lionel/conf/initramfs.conf
--- initramfs-tools-0.73e/conf/initramfs.conf   2006-07-20 20:49:22.0 
+0200
+++ initramfs-tools-0.73e.lionel/conf/initramfs.conf2006-08-14 
09:23:23.904512135 +0200
@@ -52,3 +52,12 @@
 
 NFSROOT=auto
 
+#
+# UMASK: 0nnn
+#
+# umask applied for temporary files and initramfs; you will probably
+# want to tighten it if the initramfs contains secrets such as
+# cryptographic keys (e.g. encrypted root).
+#
+UMASK=0022
+
diff --recursive -u initramfs-tools-0.73e/mkinitramfs 
initramfs-tools-0.73e.lionel/mkinitramfs
--- initramfs-tools-0.73e/mkinitramfs   2006-08-13 10:03:36.0 +0200
+++ initramfs-tools-0.73e.lionel/mkinitramfs2006-08-14 09:20:01.766430453 
+0200
@@ -98,6 +98,10 @@
usage
 fi
 
+if [ -n ${UMASK} ]; then
+   umask ${UMASK}
+fi
+
 # And by version we really mean path to kernel modules
 # This is braindead, and exists to preserve the interface with mkinitrd
 if [ ${#} -ne 1 ]; then


Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

2006-08-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:26:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
   ramdisk package list has no support for per-flavour module selection, and 
   you
   have to end up with stuff like the netboot64 list, which has as sole 
   usage to
   add the ibm power hypervisor and virtualization modules, all an ugly mess.
  
  Something to improve. No argument for or against your proposal.
 
 I thought I'd respond to this, not because it's the first case of Sven
 posting incorrect information to this thread, but because it's one of
 the more egrarious.
 
 Quoting debian-installer/build/README:
 
 * 'pkg-lists' has subdirectories for the different image types that list
   udebs that are put on each image. The pkg-lists/*/common files list
   udebs common to all architectures, and the files named by architecture
   (arch.cfg) list udebs specific to an architecture. It is also possible
   to include udebs only on a specific subarchitecture by creating a
   directory for the architecture and putting config files for the
   subarchitecture there (arch/subarch.cfg).
 
 If you take a look at pkg-lists/netboot, you'll find things like:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/pkg-lists/netboot/arml
 ads.cfg  netwinder.cfg  nslu2.cfg
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/pkg-lists/netboot/sparcl
 combined.cfg  sparc32.cfg  sparc64.cfg
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/d-i/installer/build/pkg-lists/netboot/mipsell
 bcm947xx.cfg  cobalt.cfg  r3k-kn02.cfg  r4k-kn04.cfg  sb1-bcm91250a.cfg
 
 In fact, powerpc is the only architecture to use unnecessary hacks like
 netboot64, cdrom64, and netboot-apus.

Ah, if i remember well, it was you (or Colin maybe ?), who suggested me the
netboot64 and cdrom64 as the only solution for that problem. I think since
then that the virtualization modules could be added to the normal
netboot/cdrom powerpc flavours, with the ? optional flag. This was not
existent when those flavours first got created though.

I was going to do that, but as you kicked me out of the d-i team ...

 I'd be very happy if someone who cares about powerpc subarches and can read
 and understand documentation like the above could clean this up (if such a
 person exists).

If even yourself are not able to understand it, and thus gives bogus advice, i
guess you will find nobody.

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#381677: initramfs-tools: Temporary files and initramfs world-readable

2006-08-14 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi all,

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 10:43:16AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
  also loop-aes is quite a specific use case,
  so i'm not in big favour of setting the umask in general
  to the proposed value as in general there is no gpg key
  in the initramfs.
 
 Let's do it optionally then. New patch attached.

 --- initramfs-tools-0.73e/mkinitramfs 2006-08-13 10:03:36.0 +0200
 +++ initramfs-tools-0.73e.lionel/mkinitramfs  2006-08-14 09:20:01.766430453 
 +0200
 @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@
   usage
  fi
  
 +if [ -n ${UMASK} ]; then
 + umask ${UMASK}
 +fi
 +

There is touch $2 in getopt parsing of the -o file option,
which can create the file before the umask setting takes effect.
I think we'd need to move the touch/readlink out of getopt to
after the umask setting, like attached (untested).

cheers,
Max
--- mkinitramfs.orig2006-08-14 13:21:20.0 +0200
+++ mkinitramfs 2006-08-14 13:22:58.0 +0200
@@ -28,8 +28,7 @@
fi
;;
-o)
-   touch $2
-   outfile=$(readlink -f $2)
+   outfile=$2
shift 2
;;
-k)
@@ -95,6 +94,13 @@
fi
 done
 
+if [ -n ${UMASK} ]; then
+   umask ${UMASK}
+fi
+
+touch $outfile
+outfile=$(readlink -f $outfile)
+
 if [ -z ${outfile} ]; then
usage
 fi


Bug#381677: initramfs-tools: Temporary files and initramfs world-readable

2006-08-14 Thread maximilian attems
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:34:28AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
 
 I did not file this bugreport. I agree with the worried bugreporter,
 but am not in the mood for fighting, so if you cannot use my attempts at
 helping you to a deeper understanding of *why* we are worried, then so
 be it.

the bugreporter packs an gpg key into the initrd,
which is not a standard setup!

i'm still waiting for a specific leakage that is happening in
the initrd-tools and initramfs-tools generation in a Debian default
setup. until a specific file is named there is no need for
initramfs-tools to be paranoid.

 
 If you believe yaird does things in a wrong way, then please discuss it
 through bugreports against that package.

i'm subuscribed to yaird bug reports and occisonaly i reply to them
if they aquire attention.


i've removed the patch tag, as the proposed patch is nacked,
so we need for your loop-aes pleasure a specific config dir
for mkinitramfs UMASK setting, other packages may want to
set BUSYBOX=yes there or whatever.

i'll prepare something that way for the next release, once 0.73e has
hit testing.

best regards

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#382985: teergrubes NATted connections due to mangled IPv4 checksums

2006-08-14 Thread Adam Borowski
Package: linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686
Version: 2.6.16-17
Severity: grave

A recently added optimization skips checksums on all packets it
believes are destined for another Xen domain inside the same box.
Too bad, it is sometimes wrong -- an analysis can be found on
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-03/msg00159.html

This had been fixed before -- NETIF_F_NO_CSUM was changed to 0;
however, in the current version of the Xen patch in unstable it is
again enabled, set to NETIF_F_IP_CSUM (ie, IPv4 tcp and udp only) this
time.
Unfortunately, an idiot running nearly only IPv6 can miss this bug,
unknowingly teergrubing other hosts.  I've personally managed to do
this to lists.debian.org, making it keep a number of exim4 processes
trying to deliver mail to my server.  Thus, it was suggested to file
this bug as 'grave'.

IPv4 ICMP, all IPv6 and connections which actually don't leave the
box work fine; same for those which get bridged away to a physical
interface without passing through NAT.

The fix: as in the quoted link, change
  dev-features= NETIF_F_IP_CSUM;
to
  dev-features= 0;

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (202, 'unstable'), (201, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-xen-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 depends on:
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.73c  tools for generating an initramfs
ii  linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-68 2.6.16-17  Linux kernel modules 2.6.16 image

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.16-2-xen-686 recommends:
ii  libc6-xen 2.3.6-19   GNU C Library: Shared libraries [X

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#382013: Bug#382016: installation: kernel 2.6.15 does not work, after upgrading some packages.

2006-08-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:22:11 +0200 Jean-Michel wrote:

 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
  Jean-Michel:
  Could you please provide the content of /etc/kernel-img.conf -
 do_symlinks = yes
 relative_links = yes
 do_bootloader = no
 do_bootfloppy = no
 do_initrd = yes
 link_in_boot = no
 postinst_hook = /sbin/update-grub
 postrm_hook = /sbin/update-grub

No ramdisk =  line there. Ok - then you use the default ramdisk
generator as decided by the kernel packages - currently initramfs-tools.


  and also tell us if you've run some custom ramdisk-building scripts
  yourself, in addition to the stuff done automatically by the kernel
  image postinst routines?

 I do not know what is a«custom ramdisk-building scripts».
 I just know I had had an issue when I switched from 2.6.12 to 2.6.15
 some months ago, and I believe to remember that some line related to
 *ram* was to be added or modified in some configuration file.

If unaware of it, then probably - and hopefully - you don't :-)


  Also, do you have lilo installed? Do you use it, or do you use GRUB
  or another bootloader?

 Yes, I use lilo. Grub is also installed.

This may be the cause for the trouble, then:

the default ramdisk generator for Debian, initramfs-tools, until
recently (and perhaps still?) did not handle lilo correctly.


 When I installed kernel 2.6.16 (today), grub configuration file was
 automatically updated, but I had to update (by hand) /etc/lilo.conf,
 and then run lilo (as root).
 I use lilo, because I know how to add a kernel and modify option in
 lilo. I do not use grub, because I do not know grub configuration,
 and lilo works fine till now.

It should be no crime to run lilo. But it is arguable more fragile than
GRUB, and for most standard setups, GRUB is handled almost
automatically these days.


 - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm


pgp1XYgbnmtQ5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#382013: Bug#382016: installation: kernel 2.6.15 does not work, after upgrading some packages.

2006-08-14 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
reassign 382016 initramfs-tools
thanks

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 18:17:05 +0200 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

 On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:35:43 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
 
  reassign 382016 initrd-tools
 
  ah there is the requested info sorry for not having connected your
  mails. that is an initrd-tools failure no idea why the initrd.img
  for 2.6.15 was generated with initrd-tools.
  
  yes initrd-tools is known _broken_. you'd better use initramfs-tools

Please elaborate: Why is this bug so certainly related to initrd-tools
and not initramfs-tools?


On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:22:11 +0200 Jean-Michel wrote:

 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :

  Also, do you have lilo installed? Do you use it, or do you use GRUB
  or another bootloader?

 Yes, I use lilo. Grub is also installed.
 When I installed kernel 2.6.16 (today), grub configuration file was
 automatically updated, but I had to update (by hand) /etc/lilo.conf,
 and then run lilo (as root).

I suspect this to be another case of initramfs-tools dealing improperly
with lilo installations.


Regards, Jonas


-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm


pgpnQRSWcMdvq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: Re: Bug#382013: Bug#382016: installation: kernel 2.6.15 does not work, after upgrading some packages.

2006-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 382016 initramfs-tools
Bug#382016: installation: kernel 2.6.15 does not work, after upgrading some 
packages.
Bug reassigned from package `initrd-tools' to `initramfs-tools'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linux-2.6_2.6.17-6_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2006-08-14 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-all-m68k_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-all-m68k_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-all_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-all_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-amiga_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-amiga_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.17-2_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.17-2_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.17-2-amiga_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.17-2-amiga_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
linux-image-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb


Override entries for your package:
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-all-m68k_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-all_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-amiga_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.17-2_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional devel
linux-image-2.6.17-2-amiga_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional admin
linux-image-2.6.17-2-mac_2.6.17-6_m68k.deb - optional admin



Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#382985: teergrubes NATted connections due to mangled IPv4 checksums

2006-08-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 382985 important
Bug#382985: teergrubes NATted connections due to mangled IPv4 checksums
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

 tags 382985 wontfix
Bug#382985: teergrubes NATted connections due to mangled IPv4 checksums
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#382985: teergrubes NATted connections due to mangled IPv4 checksums

2006-08-14 Thread Bastian Blank
severity 382985 important
tags 382985 wontfix
thanks

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 04:16:06PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
 A recently added optimization skips checksums on all packets it
 believes are destined for another Xen domain inside the same box.
 Too bad, it is sometimes wrong -- an analysis can be found on
 http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-03/msg00159.html

I hope this is fixed upstream.

 Unfortunately, an idiot running nearly only IPv6 can miss this bug,
 unknowingly teergrubing other hosts.  I've personally managed to do
 this to lists.debian.org, making it keep a number of exim4 processes
 trying to deliver mail to my server.  Thus, it was suggested to file
 this bug as 'grave'.

No, it is not. And it will not be fixed for 2.6.16.

Bastian

-- 
Military secrets are the most fleeting of all.
-- Spock, The Enterprise Incident, stardate 5027.4


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linux-latest-2.6_1_powerpc.changes is NEW

2006-08-14 Thread Debian Installer
(new) kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux 2.6 image on power3 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux 2.6 image on power3 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux 2.6 image on SMP power4/G5 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux 2.6 image on power4/G5 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
Linux 2.6 image on powerpc-smp-class - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
Linux 2.6 image on powerpc-class - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux image on power3 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-power3_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux image on power3 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux image on power4/G5 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-power4_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
linux image on power4/G5 - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
Linux image on powerpc-smp-class - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb extra admin
Linux image on powerpc-class - transition package
 This package is for transition only.
(new) linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on powerpc-miboot-class
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc-miboot-class machines.
(new) linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on powerpc-smp-class
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc-smp-class machines.
(new) linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on powerpc64-class
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines.
(new) linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on powerpc-class
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc-class machines.
(new) linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on powerpc64-class
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc64-class machines.
(new) linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional devel
Header files for Linux 2.6 on powerpc-class
 This package depends on the architecture-specific header files for the
 latest Linux kernel 2.6 on powerpc-class machines.
(new) linux-image-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc-miboot-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 powerpc-miboot-class machines.
(new) linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc-smp-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 powerpc-smp-class machines.
(new) linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc64-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 powerpc64-class machines.
(new) linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 powerpc-class machines.
(new) linux-image-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc64-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 powerpc64-class machines.
(new) linux-image-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel 2.6 image on powerpc-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel 2.6 on
 powerpc-class machines.
(new) linux-image-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel image on powerpc-miboot-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel on
 powerpc-miboot-class machines.
(new) linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb optional admin
Linux kernel image on powerpc-smp-class
 This package depends on the latest binary image for Linux kernel on
 powerpc-smp-class machines.
(new) 

Processing of linux-latest-2.6_1_powerpc.changes

2006-08-14 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-latest-2.6_1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-latest-2.6_1.dsc
  linux-latest-2.6_1.tar.gz
  linux-image-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc-miboot_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-image-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  linux-headers-2.6-vserver-powerpc64_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-powerpc_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-powerpc-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power3_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power3_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power3-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power3-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power4_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power4_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-power4-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb
  kernel-image-2.6-power4-smp_2.6.17+1_powerpc.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

2006-08-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:53:48PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
 Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Is it an aggregation with the image linked into the binary?
 
 It doesn't matter for Debian's purposes.
 
 While the GPL permits shipping a GPL'd program merely aggregated
 alongside a non-free program, we don't ship the nonfree part no matter
 what, so it hardly matters to us whether it's also a GPL violation.
 
 Thomas

 stop abusing debian-kernel, this thread is pointless.
 either you contribute as already pointed out by Md and fs
 or you may want start whining at other places.

It was complained that valid bugs of the sort there is non-free
software here and here and here were being closed summarily.

Was this accurate?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#380576: Bug #380576 still present in linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7

2006-08-14 Thread Jonathan H. Wheaton





This bug is still present in linux-image-2.6.17-2-k7.

I had to turn off kern.debug logging until this is resolved to keep my filesystem from filling up.






Bug#382602: Requested info, mdadm version and --examine output

2006-08-14 Thread Daniel Dickinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

mdadm version is 1.9.0-4sarge1

Output of mdadm --examine --scan is,

ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=3
UUID=183e8bbf:4b7a95cd:f5b4be0c:3fe0c682
devices=/dev/hdc1,/dev/hdb1,/dev/hda1 ARRAY /dev/md1 level=raid5
num-devices=3 UUID=0af4edaf:67c1c536:8d111240:0b2f60df
devices=/dev/hdc2,/dev/hdb2,/dev/hda2 ARRAY /dev/md2 level=raid5
num-devices=3 UUID=a517772e:59d7a08b:f67e2445:7ee06cba
devices=/dev/hdc3,/dev/hdb3,/dev/hda3 ARRAY /dev/md3 level=raid5
num-devices=3 UUID=f8f3383d:a194a482:404f0376:651fdbf2
devices=/dev/hdc4,/dev/hdb4,/dev/hda4

- -- 
GnuPG Key Fingerprint 86 F5 81 A5 D4 2E 1F 1C  http://gnupg.org
And that's my crabbing done for the day.  Got it out of the way early, 
now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or 
strangle cute bunnies or something.   -- Michael Devore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE4UishvWBpdQuHxwRAkRXAJ4r4R6ujdeQQ1OWBRivFwaZQyw2HQCffrwj
59/q9GcKo9GEgHlCorMLcf8=
=CgYk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-