Bug#586491: marked as done (Broken symlinks created for package if /usr/src is a symlink)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2010 11:47:01 +0200
with message-id 20100620094701.ga15...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
and subject line Re: Bug#586491: Broken symlinks created for package if 
/usr/src is a symlink
has caused the Debian Bug report #586491,
regarding Broken symlinks created for package if /usr/src is a symlink
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
586491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586491
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---


Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common
Version: 2.6.32-15

If /usr/src is symlinked to a different location, the symlinks within the 
package for 'Kbuild' and 'scripts' end up being broken since ../.. traverses 
from the actual location.


This is likely a problem for all the versions of this package, as well as 
other versions of the kernel.


Evan


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:16:40PM -0500, Evan Harris wrote:
 If /usr/src is symlinked to a different location, the symlinks within the 
 package for 'Kbuild' and 'scripts' end up being broken since ../.. 
 traverses from the actual location.

This behaviour is mandated by the policy, §10.5.

Bastian

-- 
Sometimes a man will tell his bartender things he'll never tell his doctor.
-- Dr. Phillip Boyce, The Menagerie (The Cage),
   stardate unknown.

---End Message---


Bug#586536: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486: Header-errors while compiling a kernel-module

2010-06-20 Thread Udo Hennig
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486
Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-486
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.1  4.1.2-25The GNU C compiler
ii  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-c 2.6.26-22lenny1 Common header files for Linux 2.6.
ii  linux-kbuild-2.6.26  2.6.26-3Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.

linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

Hello,

i by a network card (ZX346q from Znyx http://www.znyx.com) and installed in my 
computer.

I donwloaded the driver fom 
http://www.znyx.com/support/drivers/drivers/linux/x86/v2_2_23gcc3/ZNYXnb.linux.tgz
 

I install the linux-header with

srv:/usr/src# apt-get install linux-header-2.6.26-2-486
srv:/usr/src# ln -s linux-header-2.6.26-2-486 linux

I change to the driver dirctory and start the compiling with

srv:/usr/src/znyx346q/ZNYXnb# make module

Then i see errors in header files. Wath is wrong here ?


In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:17,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h: In function ‘printk_needs_cpu’:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:220: error: parameter name omitted
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h:24,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info.h:5,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:47,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:8,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h: At top level:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:112: error: ‘CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT’ 
undeclared here (not in a function)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:112: error: requested alignment is not a 
constant
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h:24,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info.h:5,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:47,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:8,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:155:1: warning: cache_line_size 
redefined
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:7,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/cache.h:64:1: warning: this is the location of the 
previous definition
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h: In function ‘load_cr3’:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:187: error: ‘CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSETUL’ 
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:187: error: (Each undeclared identifier 
is reported only once
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:187: error: for each function it appears 
in.)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h: At top level:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:236: error: requested alignment is not a 
constant
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info.h:5,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:47,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:8,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h: In function ‘current_thread_info’:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h:66: error: ‘THREAD_SIZE’ undeclared 
(first use in this function)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h: In function ‘stack_thread_info’:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h:74: error: ‘THREAD_SIZE’ undeclared 
(first use in this function)
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/elf.h:7,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/module.h:14,
 from 

Processed: tagging 585790

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 tags 585790 + pending
Bug #585790 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood] linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Oops 
in mv_cesa
Added tag(s) pending.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
585790: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585790
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12770406909273.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#585790: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Oops in mv_cesa

2010-06-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior sebast...@breakpoint.cc [2010-06-16 12:19]:
 I had the following patches on top:
 750052dd2400cd09e0864d75b63c2c0bf605056f crypto: mv_cesa - Add sha1 and 
 hmac(sha1) async hash drivers
 0c5c6c4bae8fe9ae3d86b44c332eb1267df1ec99 crypto: mv_cesa - Support processing 
 of data from previous requests
 f0d03deaad05d9cc99cd2ee0475c9ecd726c19ae crypto: mv_cesa - Make the copy-back 
 of data optional
 a58094ac5f95d6969e5c52ff096d2fd2864542af crypto: mv_cesa - Execute some code 
 via function pointers rathr than direct calls
 7a5f691ef03f4c01d2703b5ec4ddd4c17e645dec crypto: mv_cesa - Rename a variable 
 to a more suitable name
 3b61a90502481045f56c1c41a2af35ee48ca8b80 crypto: mv_cesa - Enqueue generic 
 async requests
 15d4dd3594221f11a7730fcf2d5f9942b96cdd7e crypto: mv_cesa - Fix situations 
 where the src sglist spans more data than the request asks for
 f565e67ec1b8f4a95d21550f9b879fe86b4132e0 crypto: mv_cesa - Fix situation 
 where the dest sglist is organized differently than the source sglist
 6bc6fcd609080461682c5cc0a1e3bf4345d6419d crypto: mv_cesa - Remove compiler 
 warning in mv_cesa driver
 0328ac267564089d9cedfb568f936d30a6debd21 crypto: mv_cesa - Invoke the user 
 callback from a softirq context
 
 The patches until 0328ac267 to 15d4dd3 are probably required.

All of these changes seem pretty self-contained, so I'd like to go
ahead and apply all of them to Debian's 2.6.32 package.  Do you see
any problems with this?

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620132622.ge4...@jirafa.cyrius.com



Bug#586554: initramfs-tools fails to upgrade from 0.96.1 to 0.97

2010-06-20 Thread drb
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.94.4
Severity: important

Unpacking replacement initramfs-tools ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up initramfs-tools (0.97) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/initramfs-tools/update-
initramfs.conf ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf ...
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.34-0.slh.9-sidux-amd64
update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.34-0.slh.9-sidux-amd64
dpkg: error processing initramfs-tools (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 initramfs-tools
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

This problem has been noteed with at least two other people using my (sidux)
distro



-- Package-specific info:
-- /proc/cmdline
root=UUID=91ed1f3b-835d-49ff-a27f-43d315cc9da3 ro quiet vga=791

-- /proc/filesystems
cramfs
ext3
vfat
fuseblk

-- lsmod
Module  Size  Used by
vboxnetadp  4593  0 
vboxnetflt 13810  0 
vboxdrv  1741768  2 vboxnetadp,vboxnetflt
powernow_k811764  1 
cpufreq_ondemand7981  1 
cpufreq_stats   2968  0 
freq_table  2355  3 powernow_k8,cpufreq_ondemand,cpufreq_stats
cpufreq_conservative 9092  0 
cpufreq_powersave926  0 
cpufreq_performance  930  0 
ppdev   5934  0 
lp  9761  0 
kvm_amd34542  0 
kvm   183428  1 kvm_amd
af_packet  19162  2 
fuse   58584  1 
nls_utf81224  3 
nls_cp437   5825  3 
vfat9852  3 
fat48438  1 vfat
snd_hda_codec_realtek   266078  1 
snd_hda_intel  21330  2 
snd_hda_codec  73946  2 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel
snd_hwdep   5852  1 snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm_oss37251  0 
snd_mixer_oss  14443  1 snd_pcm_oss
snd_pcm68835  3 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_pcm_oss
snd_seq_dummy   1335  0 
snd_seq_oss26808  0 
snd_seq_midi4656  0 
snd_rawmidi17748  1 snd_seq_midi
snd_seq_midi_event  5212  2 snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi
snd_seq47805  6 
snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_seq_midi_event
snd_timer  18149  2 snd_pcm,snd_seq
snd_seq_device  5013  5 
snd_seq_dummy,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq_midi,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq
snd52547  16 
snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_pcm_oss,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_seq_oss,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device
usblp  10539  0 
soundcore   5583  1 snd
nvidia  10916536  38 
snd_page_alloc  6833  2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm
i2c_nforce2 5416  0 
pcspkr  1755  0 
k8temp  3243  0 
psmouse52374  0 
edac_core  33536  0 
rtc_cmos8926  0 
edac_mce_amd7057  0 
evdev   8468  6 
rtc_core   13125  1 rtc_cmos
i2c_core   17614  2 nvidia,i2c_nforce2
serio_raw   4016  0 
parport_pc 30844  1 
rtc_lib 1841  1 rtc_core
parport27939  3 ppdev,lp,parport_pc
button  4610  0 
processor  23822  1 powernow_k8
ext3  124342  22 
jbd46903  1 ext3
mbcache 5586  1 ext3
sg 21016  0 
sr_mod 13891  0 
cdrom  34068  1 sr_mod
sd_mod 29512  30 
ohci_hcd   23081  0 
ata_generic 2975  0 
pata_acpi   3248  0 
firewire_ohci  22678  0 
ehci_hcd   36834  0 
ssb45807  1 ohci_hcd
pata_amd   10876  0 
firewire_core  43855  1 firewire_ohci
crc_itu_t   1299  1 firewire_core
floppy 56506  0 
usbcore   144245  4 usblp,ohci_hcd,ehci_hcd
nls_base6641  5 nls_utf8,nls_cp437,vfat,fat,usbcore
thermal11783  0 
sata_nv21663  26 
mmc_core   53435  1 ssb
pcmcia 35362  1 ssb
pcmcia_core12964  1 pcmcia
forcedeth  52579  0 
libata155315  4 ata_generic,pata_acpi,pata_amd,sata_nv
scsi_mod  137899  4 sg,sr_mod,sd_mod,libata

-- /etc/kernel-img.conf
# Kernel Image management overrides
# See kernel-img.conf(5) for details
do_symlinks = Yes
postinst_hook = /usr/sbin/update-grub
postrm_hook = /usr/sbin/update-grub
do_bootloader = no
do_initrd = Yes
relative_links = Yes

-- /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf
MODULES=most
BUSYBOX=y
KEYMAP=n
COMPRESS=gzip

Bug#586536: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486: Header-errors while compiling a kernel-module)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:41:39 +0100
with message-id 1277041299.14011.874.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#586536: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486: Header-errors 
while compiling a kernel-module
has caused the Debian Bug report #586536,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486: Header-errors while compiling a 
kernel-module
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
586536: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486
Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-486
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 depends on:
ii  gcc-4.1  4.1.2-25The GNU C compiler
ii  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-c 2.6.26-22lenny1 Common header files for Linux 2.6.
ii  linux-kbuild-2.6.26  2.6.26-3Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.

linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed

Hello,

i by a network card (ZX346q from Znyx http://www.znyx.com) and installed in my 
computer.

I donwloaded the driver fom 
http://www.znyx.com/support/drivers/drivers/linux/x86/v2_2_23gcc3/ZNYXnb.linux.tgz
 

I install the linux-header with

srv:/usr/src# apt-get install linux-header-2.6.26-2-486
srv:/usr/src# ln -s linux-header-2.6.26-2-486 linux

I change to the driver dirctory and start the compiling with

srv:/usr/src/znyx346q/ZNYXnb# make module

Then i see errors in header files. Wath is wrong here ?


In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:17,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h: In function ‘printk_needs_cpu’:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:220: error: parameter name omitted
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h:24,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info.h:5,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:47,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:8,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h: At top level:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:112: error: ‘CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT’ 
undeclared here (not in a function)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:112: error: requested alignment is not a 
constant
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info_64.h:24,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info.h:5,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:47,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/spinlock.h:49,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/seqlock.h:29,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:8,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:155:1: warning: cache_line_size 
redefined
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/time.h:7,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/skbuff.h:19,
 from ./include/pdk_buf.h:38,
 from hal.c:58:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/cache.h:64:1: warning: this is the location of the 
previous definition
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h: In function ‘load_cr3’:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:187: error: ‘CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSETUL’ 
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:187: error: (Each undeclared identifier 
is reported only once
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:187: error: for each function it appears 
in.)
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h: At top level:
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/processor.h:236: error: requested alignment is not a 
constant
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/asm/thread_info.h:5,
 from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:47,
 from 

Bug#586557: linux-2.6 - btrfs module consideres device names stable

2010-06-20 Thread Bastian Blank
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-1
Severity: important
Forwarded: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16259

btrfs uses a in-kernel uuid to device translation. This leads to a DoS
in case of changed device names, which can happen all the time.

| device fsid 6746742515f05f59-7702ee31ff5c53ac devid 1 transid 130 /dev/sde
| open /dev/sdd failed

| # file -s /dev/sde
| /dev/sde: BTRFS Filesystem sectorsize 4096, nodesize 4096, leafsize 4096)
| # file -s /dev/sdd
| /dev/sdd: x86 boot sector; partition 1: ID=0x83, starthead 1, startsector 63, 
625137282 sectors, extended partition table (last)\011, code offset 0x0

Bastian

-- 
War is never imperative.
-- McCoy, Balance of Terror, stardate 1709.2



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620152227.ga20...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org



Bug#586558: linux-2.6 - btrfs misses checks in acl set code

2010-06-20 Thread Bastian Blank
Source: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: serious
Tags: security

The current btrfs code does not check if the user is allowed to change
ACLs. This was fixed in mainline with
2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf.

Bastian

-- 
Too much of anything, even love, isn't necessarily a good thing.
-- Kirk, The Trouble with Tribbles, stardate 4525.6



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620153310.ga20...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org



Processed: tagging 586494

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 586494 moreinfo
Bug #586494 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't 
work with  2.6.26
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
586494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586494
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127704998524302.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#584259: initramfs-tools: breaks software suspend (hibernation)

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 19:06 +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
 Hi!
 
 The problem can be traced to module hid_cherry. If it exists in the
 initrd, the resume works, otherwise it doesn't.

This seems to indicate that hid_cherry doesn't fully reinitialise the
device on resume.  This would be a kernel bug, so I'm reassigning it.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#586558: [PATCH] Btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl

2010-06-20 Thread Bastian Blank
This was commit 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf.

From 2f26afba46f0ebf155cf9be746496a0304a5b7cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shi Weihua sh...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 00:50:32 +
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: should add a permission check for setfacl

On btrfs, do the following
--
# su user1
# cd btrfs-part/
# touch aaa
# getfacl aaa
  # file: aaa
  # owner: user1
  # group: user1
  user::rw-
  group::rw-
  other::r--
# su user2
# cd btrfs-part/
# setfacl -m u::rwx aaa
# getfacl aaa
  # file: aaa
  # owner: user1
  # group: user1
  user::rwx   - successed to setfacl
  group::rw-
  other::r--
--
but we should prohibit it that user2 changing user1's acl.
In fact, on ext3 and other fs, a message occurs:
  setfacl: aaa: Operation not permitted

This patch fixed it.
Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua sh...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com
---
 fs/btrfs/acl.c |3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
index 6ef7b26..6b4d0cc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
@@ -160,6 +160,9 @@ static int btrfs_xattr_acl_set(struct dentry *dentry, const 
char *name,
int ret;
struct posix_acl *acl = NULL;
 
+   if (!is_owner_or_cap(dentry-d_inode))
+   return -EPERM;
+
if (value) {
acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(value, size);
if (acl == NULL) {
-- 
1.7.1



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620163021.ga21...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org



Processed: tagging 585677

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 585677 moreinfo
Bug #585677 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-486: impossible to mount 
partitions (except /)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
585677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585677
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12770519036494.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#586568: dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, STDIN line 10. Logical sector size is zero.

2010-06-20 Thread pitamila
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libuuid-perl  0.02-3+b1  Perl extension for using UUID inte
ii  udev  147-4  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii  util-linux2.16.1-4   Miscellaneous system utilities

linux-base recommends no packages.

linux-base suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  linux-base/disk-id-manual-boot-loader:
  linux-base/disk-id-manual:
  linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan-no-relabel: true
* linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan: true
* linux-base/disk-id-convert-auto: true


here is my partition table as shown by parted.

Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End SizeType  File system Flags
 1  32.3kB  200GB   200GB   primary   ntfsboot
 2  200GB   240GB   40.0GB  primary   ext3
 3  240GB   1000GB  760GB   extended  lba
 5  240GB   248GB   8000MB  logical   linux-swap(v1)
 6  248GB   446GB   198GB   logical   ext3

I don't understand the Logical sector size is zero. message
before
dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, 
STDIN line 
10.

Any advise using dosfslabel on my system to diagnose more precisely the problem 
is
welcome.

I hope it's not because of any missusing of partition.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620163112.6605.11718.report...@ketch



Processed: tagging 586401

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 tags 586401 + pending
Bug #586401 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: Please remove NEWS.Debian.gz
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #586401 to the same tags previously set

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
586401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586401
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127705363620448.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 586401

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 tags 586401 + pending
Bug #586401 [linux-libc-dev] linux-libc-dev: Please remove NEWS.Debian.gz
Added tag(s) pending.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
586401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586401
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127705363420425.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#509077: initramfs-tools: support alternate DHCP port and DHCP vendor-class-identifier

2010-06-20 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Michael Prokop wrote:

 * Vagrant Cascadian vagrant+debianb...@freegeek.org [Mit Dez 17, 2008 at 
 07:01:51 -0800]:
 
  please consider the attached patch, which adds boot prompt parameters for 
  two
  of ipconfig's commandline options in the configure_networking function:
 
- using an alternate DHCP port (dhcpport=NNN, ipconfig -p NNN)
- specifying the vendor-class-identifier (dhcpvci=XXX, ipconfig -i XXX)
 
  supporting these options gives additional flexibility in distinguishing thin
  clients from conventional workstations in a mixed network.
 
 Sorry that no one took care of your bugreport for so long, Vagrant.
 Patch looks fine to me.
 
 maks, any objections against inclusion of the patches?

I had been dragging that patch as I do not like to add to many
bootparams that are outside of documented upstream linux-2.6 handling
and thus initramfs-tools specific. waited to see if a second voice
would raise..

I do not see so much the point of setting ipconfig vendor class id.
why would that be needed for booting?

the alternate DHCP port looks indeed more interesting, but no idea
how common that is in the wild? and if there is not a place in the
ip= monster bootparam?

thanks

-- 
maks



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100619164316.gc24...@stro.at



Bug#582776: initramfs-tools: pointless generation of an initrd for initrd-free custom kernels

2010-06-20 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010, Michael Prokop wrote:

 How about giving people the chance to disable generation of initrds
 through e.g. /etc/default/initramfs-tools?
 

well that would assume that you want *none* anywhere, which is often
not the case as you may very well have a mixed setup.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100619150627.gb24...@stro.at



Bug#586576: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: apt-get/dpkg postinst update-initramfs fails for 2.6.32-5-686 but works on cmdline

2010-06-20 Thread Mark Hedges
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal


update-initramfs fails for the dpkg task, but works from command line:

maggie:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
Setting up linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (2.6.32-15) ...
Running depmod.
Running update-initramfs.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
initrd.img(/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
) points to /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686
 (/boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686) -- doing nothing at 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 400.
vmlinuz(/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
) points to /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686
 (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686) -- doing nothing at 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.32-5-686.postinst line 400.
Running update-grub.
/usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: cannot find a device for / (is /dev mounted?).
User postinst hook script [update-grub] exited with value 1
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-2.6-686:
 linux-image-2.6-686 depends on linux-image-2.6.32-5-686; however:
  Package linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6-686 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
 linux-image-2.6-686
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

maggie:~# update-initramfs -k 2.6.32-5-686 -u
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686

maggie:~# 

Thanks.  --mark--


-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-15) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc 
version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-1) ) #1 SMP Tue Jun 1 04:59:47 UTC 2010

** Command line:
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 root=/dev/mapper/sda7_crypt ro 
root=/dev/mapper/sda7_crypt ro heartbeat=300 rootdelay=4 quiet

** Not tainted

** Kernel log:
[ 3476.620206] ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: restoring config space at offset 0x1 (was 
0x2900106, writing 0x2900102)
[ 3476.628066] ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3476.636067] ehci_hcd :00:1d.7: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3476.636130] pci :00:1e.0: restoring config space at offset 0x1 (was 
0x15, writing 0x17)
[ 3476.636352] ahci :00:1f.2: restoring config space at offset 0x1 (was 
0x2b7, writing 0x2b00407)
[ 3476.636651] iwl3945 :03:00.0: restoring config space at offset 0x1 (was 
0x100106, writing 0x100506)
[ 3476.652092] firewire_ohci :05:00.1: restoring config space at offset 0x3 
(was 0x80, writing 0x804000)
[ 3476.652106] firewire_ohci :05:00.1: restoring config space at offset 0x1 
(was 0x210, writing 0x216)
[ 3476.668090] sdhci-pci :05:00.2: restoring config space at offset 0x3 
(was 0x80, writing 0x804000)
[ 3476.668102] sdhci-pci :05:00.2: restoring config space at offset 0x1 
(was 0x210, writing 0x216)
[ 3476.728268] i915 :00:02.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3476.728307] i915 :00:02.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3476.728312] i915 :00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 3476.872255] e1000e :00:19.0: PCI INT A - GSI 20 (level, low) - IRQ 20
[ 3476.872263] e1000e :00:19.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 3476.872273] e1000e :00:19.0: wake-up capability disabled by ACPI
[ 3476.872281] e1000e :00:19.0: PME# disabled
[ 3476.872357] e1000e :00:19.0: irq 26 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 3477.186129] uhci_hcd :00:1a.0: PCI INT A - GSI 20 (level, low) - IRQ 20
[ 3477.186142] uhci_hcd :00:1a.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 3477.186176] usb usb3: root hub lost power or was reset
[ 3477.186425] uhci_hcd :00:1a.1: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3477.186648] uhci_hcd :00:1a.1: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3477.186658] uhci_hcd :00:1a.1: PCI INT B - GSI 21 (level, low) - IRQ 21
[ 3477.186674] uhci_hcd :00:1a.1: setting latency timer to 64
[ 3477.186714] usb usb4: root hub lost power or was reset
[ 3477.186915] ehci_hcd :00:1a.7: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3477.187118] ehci_hcd :00:1a.7: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3477.187133] ehci_hcd :00:1a.7: PCI INT C - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 22
[ 3477.187148] ehci_hcd :00:1a.7: setting latency timer to 64
[ 3477.187167] HDA Intel :00:1b.0: PCI INT B - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 
17
[ 3477.187183] HDA Intel :00:1b.0: setting latency timer to 64
[ 3477.187462] uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3477.187690] uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
[ 3477.187700] uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, 

Bug#584259: initramfs-tools: breaks software suspend (hibernation)

2010-06-20 Thread Willi Mann
Am 2010-06-20 18:10, schrieb Ben Hutchings:
 On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 19:06 +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
 Hi!

 The problem can be traced to module hid_cherry. If it exists in the
 initrd, the resume works, otherwise it doesn't.
 
 This seems to indicate that hid_cherry doesn't fully reinitialise the
 device on resume.  This would be a kernel bug, so I'm reassigning it.

I've now tested 2.6.34 from experimental. It works without hid_cherry in
the initrd. So the bug only applies to the testing/unstable kernel.

WM



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c1e54c9.70...@wm1.at



Bug#586576: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: apt-get/dpkg postinst update-initramfs fails for 2.6.32-5-686 but works on cmdline

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 10:40 -0700, Mark Hedges wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.32-15
 Severity: normal
 
 
 update-initramfs fails for the dpkg task, but works from command line:

Read more carefully.  It's grub that failed.  I'm reassigning this
accordingly.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: reassign 586576 to src:grub

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 586576 src:grub
Bug #586576 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: apt-get/dpkg postinst 
update-initramfs fails for 2.6.32-5-686 but works on cmdline
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:grub'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-15.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
586576: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586576
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127705778325277.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#586491: closed by Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org (Re: Bug#586491: Broken symlinks created for package if /usr/src is a symlink)

2010-06-20 Thread Evan Harris


The issue is not fixed by simply quoting policy and taking no action to 
correct the problem.


10.5 specifies that In general, symbolic links within a top-level directory 
should be relative.


It should be fairly easy to make a symlink that does work on the target 
system if it takes into account the actual location of the dir/file. 
Granted, that will make the symlink have to be dynamically created at 
installation, but that will neither break policy nor create broken links.


In addition, the in general and should both suggest that 10.5 is a 
general guideline, and does not preclude exceptions if the result would 
otherwise be a broken package installation, as it is in this case.


Evan


On Sun, 20 Jun 2010, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:


This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common package:

#586491: Broken symlinks created for package if /usr/src is a symlink

It has been closed by Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Bastian Blank 
wa...@debian.org by
replying to this email.


--
586491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586491
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.64.1006201307510.14...@kinison.puremagic.com



looking for gfs2/lenny users

2010-06-20 Thread dann frazier
The kernel in proposed-updates (2.6.26-23) includes a couple of
security fixes for the gfs2 filesystem. I've performed some smoke
testing in a VM, but I'm looking for users who might have actual
(non-production) clusters to do some pre-release testing.

-- 
dann frazier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620192335.gg32...@lackof.org



Processed: tagging 505609

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 tags 505609 + pending
Bug #505609 [linux-2.6] Unbootable after kernel upgrade: Lilo can't load kernel
Bug #535331 [linux-2.6] lilo not run after install/upgrade
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #505609 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #535331 to the same tags previously set

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
505609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12770636212271.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#509077: initramfs-tools: support alternate DHCP port and DHCP vendor-class-identifier

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 18:43 +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
 On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Michael Prokop wrote:
 
  * Vagrant Cascadian vagrant+debianb...@freegeek.org [Mit Dez 17, 2008 at 
  07:01:51 -0800]:
  
   please consider the attached patch, which adds boot prompt parameters for 
   two
   of ipconfig's commandline options in the configure_networking function:
  
 - using an alternate DHCP port (dhcpport=NNN, ipconfig -p NNN)
 - specifying the vendor-class-identifier (dhcpvci=XXX, ipconfig -i XXX)
  
   supporting these options gives additional flexibility in distinguishing 
   thin
   clients from conventional workstations in a mixed network.
  
  Sorry that no one took care of your bugreport for so long, Vagrant.
  Patch looks fine to me.
  
  maks, any objections against inclusion of the patches?
 
 I had been dragging that patch as I do not like to add to many
 bootparams that are outside of documented upstream linux-2.6 handling
 and thus initramfs-tools specific. waited to see if a second voice
 would raise..
 
 I do not see so much the point of setting ipconfig vendor class id.
 why would that be needed for booting?

It would be used for selecting the boot image.

 the alternate DHCP port looks indeed more interesting, but no idea
 how common that is in the wild? and if there is not a place in the
 ip= monster bootparam?

Using an alternate DHCP port sounds pretty crazy.

Another possibility is to configure the switch(es) to put the thin
clients on a separate VLAN.  But I suppose people also want to use cheap
switches with no VLAN support.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#585677: linux-image-2.6.32-5-486: impossible to mount partitions (except /)

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:47 +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
 2010/6/14 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk:
  We'll need to see a more complete kernel log.  Either use netconsole to
  capture the output, or send a photograph of the screen.
 
 
 I have rebooted on the failed kernel, plug an USB key and copy the
 dmesg and kernel.log files. I hope it helps. Do you need other data?
 
 I will update the system to see if change happens.

Please try booting with 'break=premount' added to the kernel parameters.
When the boot process stops you should get an '(initramfs)' prompt.  At
the prompt, please run 'blkid' and send the output.  Feel free to
abbreviate the UUIDs if you copy the output by hand.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#586494: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 23:39 -0400, trouble daemon wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
 Severity: important
 
 I am using a pair of Dell PowerEdg 4200's that have been working with
 debian since 2002 or so, 100% perfectly. However, since testing out
 Lenny with a 2.6.26 kernel, it seems that both systems panic in an
 unbootable fashion with 2.6.26. On one (this) machine, I even removed
 the megaraid card, with the same scsi related crashing/panic.

Wow, that log shows some serious trouble.

My guess is that something has gone wrong with interrupt routing.  Can
you try adding 'acpi=noirq' to the kernel parameters?

 I have tried a recompile of 2.6.26 with the old aic7xxx module instead
 of the new one, but it doesn't seem to make a differece.
 
 This following 2 dmesg dumps are from a serial console that I recorded
 earlier and put on pastebin (permanent paste):
   - 2.6.26 kernel that panics (latest unmodified debian kernel):
 http://pastebin.ca/1886636
   - 2.6.18 kernel that works (latest unmodified debian kernel):
 http://pastebin.ca/1886641
[...]

If my first suggestion doesn't work, can you also try a more recent
kernel version such as 2.6.32 (currently in testing) and 2.6.34
(currently in experimental)?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#574555: BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/11-b43/2018/0x00000101

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:40 +0200, Arne Nordmark wrote:
 My problem seems related to those in Ubuntu report #55 
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/55. If I 
 unload the 3c59x module, I can no longer reproduce this problem, and 
 wireless is stable. With the 3c59x module loaded, b43 wireless is 
 essentially unusable, since the machine will reliably lock up.

I've attached two patches which together may fix this problem, but they
involve quite major changes to the driver.  I do not have any hardware
of this type which I could use to test them.

Please could you follow the instructions at
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s-common-official
to build a package with these changes included, then test whether these
changes fix the problem for you and keep the wired network card working.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
From 9d21ef35e8ad9b51362533134518932a3a7b5f0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:09:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] 3c59x: Specify window explicitly for access to windowed registers

Currently much of the code assumes that a specific window has been
selected, while a few functions save and restore the window.  This
makes it impossible to introduce fine-grained locking.

Make those assumptions explicit by introducing wrapper functions
to set the window and read/write a register.  Use these everywhere
except vortex_interrupt(), vortex_start_xmit() and vortex_rx().
These set the window just once, or not at all in the case of
vortex_rx() as it should always be called from vortex_interrupt().

Cache the current window in struct vortex_private to avoid
unnecessary hardware writes.
---
 drivers/net/3c59x.c |  289 +--
 1 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
index 975e25b..95f6919 100644
--- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
@@ -435,7 +435,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, vortex_pci_tbl);
First the windows.  There are eight register windows, with the command
and status registers available in each.
*/
-#define EL3WINDOW(win_num) iowrite16(SelectWindow + (win_num), ioaddr + EL3_CMD)
 #define EL3_CMD 0x0e
 #define EL3_STATUS 0x0e
 
@@ -647,8 +646,35 @@ struct vortex_private {
 	u16 io_size;		/* Size of PCI region (for release_region) */
 	spinlock_t lock;	/* Serialise access to device  its vortex_private */
 	struct mii_if_info mii;/* MII lib hooks/info */
+	int window;	/* Register window */
 };
 
+static void window_set(struct vortex_private *vp, int window)
+{
+	if (window != vp-window) {
+		iowrite16(SelectWindow + window, vp-ioaddr + EL3_CMD);
+		vp-window = window;
+	}
+}
+
+#define DEFINE_WINDOW_IO(size)		\
+static u ## size			\
+window_read ## size(struct vortex_private *vp, int window, int addr)	\
+{	\
+	window_set(vp, window);		\
+	return ioread ## size(vp-ioaddr + addr);			\
+}	\
+static void\
+window_write ## size(struct vortex_private *vp, u ## size value,	\
+		 int window, int addr)\
+{	\
+	window_set(vp, window);		\
+	iowrite ## size(value, vp-ioaddr + addr);			\
+}
+DEFINE_WINDOW_IO(8)
+DEFINE_WINDOW_IO(16)
+DEFINE_WINDOW_IO(32)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
 #define DEVICE_PCI(dev) (((dev)-bus == pci_bus_type) ? to_pci_dev((dev)) : NULL)
 #else
@@ -711,7 +737,7 @@ static int vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev, void __iomem *ioaddr, int irq,
 static int vortex_up(struct net_device *dev);
 static void vortex_down(struct net_device *dev, int final);
 static int vortex_open(struct net_device *dev);
-static void mdio_sync(void __iomem *ioaddr, int bits);
+static void mdio_sync(struct vortex_private *vp, int bits);
 static int mdio_read(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int location);
 static void mdio_write(struct net_device *vp, int phy_id, int location, int value);
 static void vortex_timer(unsigned long arg);
@@ -1119,6 +1145,7 @@ static int __devinit vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev,
 	vp-has_nway = (vci-drv_flags  HAS_NWAY) ? 1 : 0;
 	vp-io_size = vci-io_size;
 	vp-card_idx = card_idx;
+	vp-window = -1;
 
 	/* module list only for Compaq device */
 	if (gendev == NULL) {
@@ -1205,7 +1232,6 @@ static int __devinit vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev,
 	vp-mii.force_media = vp-full_duplex;
 	vp-options = option;
 	/* Read the station address from the EEPROM. */
-	EL3WINDOW(0);
 	{
 		int base;
 
@@ -1218,14 +1244,15 @@ static int __devinit vortex_probe1(struct device *gendev,
 
 		for (i = 0; i  0x40; i++) {
 			int timer;
-			iowrite16(base + i, ioaddr + Wn0EepromCmd);
+			window_write16(vp, base + i, 0, Wn0EepromCmd);
 			/* Pause for at least 162 us. for the read to take place. */
 			for (timer = 10; timer = 0; timer--) {
 udelay(162);
-if ((ioread16(ioaddr + Wn0EepromCmd)  0x8000) == 0)
+if 

Processed: reassign 584259 to linux-2.6

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 584259 linux-2.6 2.6.33-1~experimental.5
Bug #584259 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: breaks software suspend 
(hibernation)
Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions initramfs-tools/0.95.1.
Bug #584259 [linux-2.6] initramfs-tools: breaks software suspend (hibernation)
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version 
'2.6.33-1~experimental.5' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.33-1~experimental.5'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.33-1~experimental.5.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
584259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1277070331708.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 574555

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 574555 patch moreinfo
Bug #574555 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64: 2.6.32 kernel oops: Pid: 
1700, comm: irq/21-b43 Not tainted 2.6.32-3-amd64
Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
574555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574555
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.1277070332778.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#586568: marked as done (dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, STDIN line 10. Logical sector size is zero.)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:11:05 +0100
with message-id 1277053865.14011.900.ca...@localhost
and subject line Re: Bug#586568: dosfslabel failed: 256 at 
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, STDIN line 10. Logical 
sector size is zero.
has caused the Debian Bug report #586568,
regarding dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 
1059, STDIN line 10. Logical sector size is zero.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
586568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-base
Version: 2.6.32-15
Severity: normal



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-base depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.32 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libapt-pkg-perl   0.1.24 Perl interface to libapt-pkg
ii  libuuid-perl  0.02-3+b1  Perl extension for using UUID inte
ii  udev  147-4  /dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii  util-linux2.16.1-4   Miscellaneous system utilities

linux-base recommends no packages.

linux-base suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  linux-base/disk-id-manual-boot-loader:
  linux-base/disk-id-manual:
  linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan-no-relabel: true
* linux-base/disk-id-convert-plan: true
* linux-base/disk-id-convert-auto: true


here is my partition table as shown by parted.

Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos

Number  Start   End SizeType  File system Flags
 1  32.3kB  200GB   200GB   primary   ntfsboot
 2  200GB   240GB   40.0GB  primary   ext3
 3  240GB   1000GB  760GB   extended  lba
 5  240GB   248GB   8000MB  logical   linux-swap(v1)
 6  248GB   446GB   198GB   logical   ext3

I don't understand the Logical sector size is zero. message
before
dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, 
STDIN line 
10.

Any advise using dosfslabel on my system to diagnose more precisely the problem 
is
welcome.

I hope it's not because of any missusing of partition.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 18:31 +0200, pitamila wrote:
[...]
 here is my partition table as shown by parted.
 
 Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
 Partition Table: msdos
 
 Number  Start   End SizeType  File system Flags
  1  32.3kB  200GB   200GB   primary   ntfsboot
  2  200GB   240GB   40.0GB  primary   ext3
  3  240GB   1000GB  760GB   extended  lba
  5  240GB   248GB   8000MB  logical   linux-swap(v1)
  6  248GB   446GB   198GB   logical   ext3
 
 I don't understand the Logical sector size is zero. message
 before
 dosfslabel failed: 256 at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-base.postinst line 1059, 
 STDIN line 
 10.
 
 Any advise using dosfslabel on my system to diagnose more precisely the 
 problem is
 welcome.
 
 I hope it's not because of any missusing of partition.

You have a line in /etc/fstab that refers to a disk or partition with
filesystem type 'vfat' or 'msdos', while the disk/partition actually
uses some other type.  You should remove or correct this line, then run
'dpkg --configure --pending' to retry the upgrade.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---


Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:44 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 01:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
  On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 18:23 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
   forwarded 575924 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14347
   thanks
   
   On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:05:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 23:05 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:28:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  The more serious error messages suggest memory  corruption.  Have
  you tested the RAM with memtest86+ yet?
 
 Yes, I've just run a pretty long test with memtest86+ and there was
 no error reported.

OK, so we can be fairly sure this is a kernel bug.  Please report this
at https://bugzilla.kernel.org.  It is hard to know where the bug
may be, but try submitting it under product 'Memory Management',
component 'Slab Allocator'.  Let us know the bug number so we can
track it.
   
   The above bug report looks similar, so I just added comments and dmesgs
   there.
   Maybe the bug should be retitled ?
  
  I'm not convinced that these are the same bug.  Let's see what the
  response is.
 
 There was no response so far and, since boot failures still happen from
 time to time (once a week or so), I may open a new bug upstream...

Please do.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#586494: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 17:47 -0400, trouble daemon wrote:
 Ben,
 
  My guess is that something has gone wrong with interrupt routing.  Can
  you try adding 'acpi=noirq' to the kernel parameters?
 
 Okay, I tied acpi=noirq with the stock lenny 2.6.26 kernel, and it
 looks like the same exact problem still. I can capture a dmesg for
 that as well if you want though, but I didn't have the connected
 serial machine up at the time.

Another option that may be worth trying is 'noapic'.

  If my first suggestion doesn't work, can you also try a more recent
  kernel version such as 2.6.32 (currently in testing) and 2.6.34
  (currently in experimental)?
 
 Ok, I am currently compiling the 2.6.32 debianized kernel with the
 config from the lenny package. I tried to manually install the .deb,
 but there were too many dependency differences in it to pull in, so I
 opted to just recompile.
[...]

You need to get the corresponding linux-base package from testing or
experimental, but the other dependencies should be satisfiable in lenny.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#586494: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26

2010-06-20 Thread trouble daemon
Ben,

 My guess is that something has gone wrong with interrupt routing.  Can
 you try adding 'acpi=noirq' to the kernel parameters?

Okay, I tied acpi=noirq with the stock lenny 2.6.26 kernel, and it
looks like the same exact problem still. I can capture a dmesg for
that as well if you want though, but I didn't have the connected
serial machine up at the time.

 If my first suggestion doesn't work, can you also try a more recent
 kernel version such as 2.6.32 (currently in testing) and 2.6.34
 (currently in experimental)?

Ok, I am currently compiling the 2.6.32 debianized kernel with the
config from the lenny package. I tried to manually install the .deb,
but there were too many dependency differences in it to pull in, so I
opted to just recompile. It will take a few hours, so rather than
email you back after I try it, I will try 2.6.32 with stock config
with and without acpi=noirq, the 2.6.34 from experimental with and
without noirq, and a vanilla set of kernels hand tuned to the exact
hardware the system has, and then get back to you. Unless I hear back
from you sooner of course.


Dan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim-ydgvait9juengdx_mjxxczl0ynf6dtnv5...@mail.gmail.com



Processing of linux-2.6_2.6.26-24_amd64.changes

2010-06-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
  linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
  linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oqsfq-0003x6...@ries.debian.org



Bug#586494: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Dell PowerEdge 4200's don't work with 2.6.26

2010-06-20 Thread trouble daemon
 Ok, I am currently compiling the 2.6.32 debianized kernel with the
 config from the lenny package.

Ooops, small correction. What I meant to say was that I am compiling
the 2.6.32 source from squeeze using the squeeze config in the .deb,
not the lenny config. ie: it should end up effectively a squeeze
(testing) kernel.

My apologies.


Dan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinbc8fbfmttvmdl4gbpq8po80q4ihhem4tr5...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#520468: Incorporate fixes for WUSB54GS support from 2.6.33

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 00:55 +0100, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
 As I told you I would, I tested WUSB54GS support on the kernels
 shipped by Debian: 2.6.32 (2.6.32-15) from Squeeze and 2.6.34
 (2.6.34-1~experimental.2) from sid. Unfortunately, none of them
 worked. :(
 
 I'm attaching the output at syslog with network-manager and with an
 /etc/network/interfaces file (and no n-m installed).
 
 
 Perhaps there's some patch missing that I didn't point out... I'm
 sorry but I can't tell what can it be now.
 
 
 I'm using the vanilla 2.6.33-rc1 kernel again, which works.

Or possibly this bug fix is bad for that device:

debian/patches/bugfix/all/rndis_host-Poll-status-channel-before-control-channel.patch

Could you try reverting that in either of the Debian kernel packages?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#576635: Acknowledgement (Unable to access an encrypted root partition after a failed resume)

2010-06-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
  I finally got around to looking at the image I took.

  The encryption seems to be perfectly fine: there's a LUKS header in
the block device, and I can open it up using cryptsetup.

  The trouble seems to be that it's not recognized as a physical LVM
volume.  Comparing it to a working physical volume, I notice that the
working volume starts off with 0x200 NULs, then LABELONE followed by
LVM2 001, 32 random alphanumeric characters, and then some binary data,
followed by lots of NULs.  At 0x1004, the working volume contains the
string  LVM2 x[5A%r0N* followed by a bit more binary data; at 0x1200,
there's what appears to be a volume group configuration.

  On the broken volume, LABELONE and the first occurrence of LVM2 001
are missing.  However, I do see LVM2 x[5A%r0N* at 0x1004 and what
appears to be volume group configuration at 0x1200.

  My hunch is that the physical volume's information is still present,
but the magic strings that LVM uses to recognize it as a physical volume
have gone missing.  It almost looks like the first 4096 (0x1000) bytes
of the partition were overwritten with garbage.  I might be able to
recover everything if I can just create a correct PV header at the front
of the device.  Is there any documentation on what the format of a PV
header is?  I couldn't find anything online.

  Also, any suggestions about how to identify the culprit that was
responsible for the overwrite?  The first few lines of the hexdump are:

  ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ||
*
0020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ||
*
0040  08 00 00 00 04 00 00 00  e1 7a 54 3f f6 28 5c 3f  |.zT?.(\?|
0050  80 30 4f f5 ae 7f 00 00  10 00 00 00 04 00 00 00  |.0O.|
0060  9a 99 59 3f ae 47 61 3f  80 30 4f f5 ae 7f 00 00  |..Y?.Ga?.0O.|
0070  20 00 00 00 04 00 00 00  c1 ca 61 3f c3 f5 68 3f  | .a?..h?|
0080  80 30 4f f5 ae 7f 00 00  30 00 00 00 08 00 00 00  |.0O.0...|
0090  b8 1e 65 3f 83 c0 6a 3f  90 30 4f f5 ae 7f 00 00  |..e?..j?.0O.|
00a0  40 00 00 00 08 00 00 00  a8 c6 6b 3f d7 a3 70 3f  |@.k?..p?|

  It repeats like that for several pages.

  I did find some references to the --restorefile option to pvcreate;
it sounds like I could maybe recover the physical volume using that
option, assuming that the metadata I extracted from the volume is
correct.  I've saved the first megabyte of the unencrypted device in
its broken state for future reference, in case it's useful for
diagnosing what happened.

  Daniel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100620213433.ga20...@emurlahn.burrows.local



Processed: Re: Bug#576635: Acknowledgement (Unable to access an encrypted root partition after a failed resume)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 576635 linux-2.6
Bug #576635 {Done: Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org} 
[linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64] Unable to access an encrypted root partition after 
a failed resume
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64'
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64' to 'linux-2.6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-9.
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions 2.6.32-15.
 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
576635: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576635
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.127707342922450.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#584906: nfs-kernel-server: nfs stop working suddenly

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 10:30 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
 A Dimarts 08 Juny 2010, Ben Hutchings va escriure:
  On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 15:34 +0200, Leopold Palomo wrote:
   Package: nfs-kernel-server
   Version: 1:1.1.2-6lenny1
   Severity: important
  
   In this server nfs have been working perfectly one year and half.
   However, lately we have have some serious issues with the nfs. Simply,
   the service stop and the _only_ way to repair the service is restarting
   the service.
  
   In the logs the only reference that we have is:
  
   orion mountd[4905]: couldn't open /var/lib/nfs/etab
  
   It's a bit annoying because our little network depends on that service.
 
  Do you have any idea why /var/lib/nfs/etab might be deleted or made
  unreadable?  
 
 no ... the filesystem is consistent and when it works, works normally. I have 
 not seen no important messages referring to nfs. Some idea to get information 
 about this?

If you install inotify-tools you can then use
'inotifywait -m /var/lib/nfs' to monitor changes in this directory.  (It
should be possible to get a timestamp for every change, but this feature
seems to be broken.)  The other option is to use auditd.  This should be
able to give you more detail, but would be more complex to set up.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#584881: Lockups under heavy disk IO; md (RAID) resync/check implicated

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 10:53 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
 Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem
 Version: 2.6.26-21lenny4
 
 I keep getting soft lockups; the symptoms appear to be that user
 processes become deadlocked when they try to access the disk, but the
 kernel doesn't notice that anything is wrong.
[...]

We really need to see the kernel messages reporting soft-lockup.

Note that your disk configuration is unusual and probably not
well-tested by others.  It is unlikely that anyone in the kernel team
will be able to debug this as I don't think any of us have particular
expertise in this area.  If you have the opportunity, it would be
helpful if you could test a newer kernel version.  This would give us a
clue as to whether the bug has subsequently been fixed upstream, and if
not then it would be the basis for an upstream bug report.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: tagging 584259, tagging 503310, tagging 583082, tagging 583390, closing 582906

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 584259 - moreinfo
Bug #584259 [linux-2.6] initramfs-tools: breaks software suspend (hibernation)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
 tags 503310 - moreinfo
Bug #503310 [nfs-common] mount.nfs: np-1b:/vol/dev_src failed, security flavor 
not supported
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
 tags 583082 - moreinfo
Bug #583082 [linux-2.6] kernel: khubd crash
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
 tags 583390 - sid
Bug #583390 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Hangs with ata frozen on 
boot
Removed tag(s) sid.
 # submitter said it could be closed
 close 582906
Bug#582906: 2.6.32-5-686: iwl3945_request_scan( ) - kernel NULL pointer 
dereference
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Sedat Dilek 
sedat.di...@googlemail.com

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
582906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582906
583390: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583390
503310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503310
583082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583082
584259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12770758057126.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#551101: still exists

2010-06-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 13:27 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
 I am running 2.6.32 and am faced by exactly this problem on
 a machine I cannot just reboot:
 
   % ps aux | egrep -c '\D\.+vgdisplay'
   37821
 
 lsof or strace on existing processes don't show anything, but strace
 on a new vgdisplay process shows that it blocks on opening
 /dev/cdrom, which seems to be defective.

Was this a version before or after the libata transition?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: tagging 580149

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 580149 - moreinfo
Bug #580149 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: usb - sata  Sense not 
available
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
580149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12770760888595.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



linux-2.6_2.6.26-24_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-06-20 Thread Archive Administrator


Notes:
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.


Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb


Override entries for your package:
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc - source devel
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb - optional doc
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional devel
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb - optional doc
linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - optional admin
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb - optional devel
linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb - optional devel
linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb - optional devel
linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb - optional devel
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb - extra admin

Announcing to debian-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 505609 511892 583139 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oqwce-0003od...@ries.debian.org



Bug#505609: marked as done (Unbootable after kernel upgrade: Lilo can't load kernel)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:53:10 +
with message-id e1oqwce-0003oj...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#505609: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #505609,
regarding Unbootable after kernel upgrade: Lilo can't load kernel
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
505609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-10
Severity: critical

I've did an upgrade on 2008-11-09, on a new installed system, upgrading kernel 
2.6.26-09 to 2.6.26.10. Apt was also upgraded.
I've seen nothing strange during upgrade and in the apt and dpkg logs. The 
system is entirely on LVM partitions.

When reboting I obtain this message from Lilo:
Loading LinuxEBDA is big; kernel setup stack overlaps LILO second stage.
and the computer halt.


regards
-- 
Xavier
xav...@alternatif.org


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.26-24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 505...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
dann frazier da...@debian.org (supplier of updated linux-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the 

Bug#535331: marked as done (lilo not run after install/upgrade)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:53:10 +
with message-id e1oqwce-0003oj...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#505609: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #505609,
regarding lilo not run after install/upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
505609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686
Version: 2.6.26-17

Hello,

after installing linux image the lilo is not being called, which results
into system not being bootable after upgrade. I've tried without
kernel-img.conf also with it, containing do_bootloader = Yes, nothing
helped.

If lilo isn't supported (oh, please, no), it should be mentioned
somewhere... 
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Save the whales. Collect the whole set.


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.26-24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 505...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
dann frazier da...@debian.org (supplier of updated linux-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their 

Bug#583139: marked as done (linux-2.6: no DHCP offers on r8169)

2010-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:53:10 +
with message-id e1oqwce-0003os...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#583139: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.26-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #583139,
regarding linux-2.6: no DHCP offers on r8169
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583139: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583139
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-22lenny1
Severity: important

Hi,

I get no DHCP offers on the r8169 device since the upgrade to 2.6.26-22lenny1.

Reverting to 2.6.26-22 does not fix the problem.

Reverting to 2.6.26-21lenny4 *does* fix the problem.

Please contact me for more info.

Alex


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.26-24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.26-24.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-all_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-openvz_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-vserver_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common-xen_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-common_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-vserver-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-libc-dev_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-manual-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-modules-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-patch-debian-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-source-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-support-2.6.26-2_2.6.26-24_all.deb
linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/linux-tree-2.6.26_2.6.26-24_all.deb
xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb
  to main/l/linux-2.6/xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64_2.6.26-24_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 583...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
dann frazier da...@debian.org (supplier of updated linux-2.6 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that 

Bug#574510: #574510: statd running as root after remove/install

2010-06-20 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: nfs-common
Followup-For: Bug #574510

this patch partially addresses the issue by ensuring that the files are owned
by statd no matter what version is installed, even if a previous version was
installed.

--- nfs-common.postinst.orig2010-06-20 18:29:11.0 -0700
+++ nfs-common.postinst 2010-06-20 18:28:44.0 -0700
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /home/statd
 fi
fi
-   if [ $2 =  ] || dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:1.0.7-16; then
chown statd /var/lib/nfs/sm \
/var/lib/nfs/sm.bak \
/var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs \
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@
 if [ -f /var/lib/nfs/state ]; then
chown statd /var/lib/nfs/state
 fi
-   fi

if [ $2 !=  ] || dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:1.1.0-14; then
if dpkg-statoverride --list /sbin/mount.nfs /dev/null 21; then

it looks like the comparison with an empty $2 argument works for an initial
install, but not when a package was removed and later re-installed, as postinst
will be called with the previously installed version as an argument. other
parts of the postinst may be affected by similar uses of tests against $2.

live well,
  vagrant



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100621020413.go9...@claws.fglan



Bug#509077: initramfs-tools: support alternate DHCP port and DHCP vendor-class-identifier

2010-06-20 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 06:43:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
 On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Michael Prokop wrote:
  * Vagrant Cascadian vagrant+debianb...@freegeek.org [Mit Dez 17, 2008 at 
  07:01:51 -0800]:
  
   please consider the attached patch, which adds boot prompt parameters for 
   two
   of ipconfig's commandline options in the configure_networking function:
  
 - using an alternate DHCP port (dhcpport=NNN, ipconfig -p NNN)
 - specifying the vendor-class-identifier (dhcpvci=XXX, ipconfig -i XXX)
  
   supporting these options gives additional flexibility in distinguishing 
   thin
   clients from conventional workstations in a mixed network.
  
  Sorry that no one took care of your bugreport for so long, Vagrant.
  Patch looks fine to me.
  
  maks, any objections against inclusion of the patches?
 
 I had been dragging that patch as I do not like to add to many
 bootparams that are outside of documented upstream linux-2.6 handling
 and thus initramfs-tools specific. waited to see if a second voice
 would raise..

understandable.

perhaps it would be better to rewrite in such a way that ipconfig could be
passed arbitrary arguments? of course, if it ever switched away from ipconfig
to some other dhcp client, it'd be nice to not have to change syntax or
configuration names...
 
 I do not see so much the point of setting ipconfig vendor class id.
 why would that be needed for booting?

in order to distinguish a machine that's doing network boot for
debian-installer, LTSP or PXE. for example, in each case, you might want to
hand it a different dhcp filename option. pxe should get pxelinux.0, d-i gets a
preseeding URL, and ltsp could get a configuration file...

 the alternate DHCP port looks indeed more interesting, but no idea
 how common that is in the wild? 

i don't know that it's incredibly common, but is not infrequently asked for in
LTSP environments, though there are other alternatives using dnsmasq's dhcp
proxy support now, so it's maybe less important.

 and if there is not a place in the ip= monster bootparam?

don't believe so.

live well,
  vagrant



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100621021141.gp9...@claws.fglan



Bug#541073: 152d:2338 JMicron USA Technology Corp. JM20337 Hi-Speed USB to SATA PATA Combo Bridge

2010-06-20 Thread jidanni
zh do I take it correctly you connect your converter to a VIA Chip card?
zh Did you try to connect it to a motherboard USB?
All I now is I first turn on the AC power, put in the CDROM disk, then
attach USB.
zh (Maybe ata/66/100 cable, I suppose your drive is not udma/133)
They are CD/DVD players.
zh (Take a look at the 580149 bug report)

All I know is both
05e3:0701 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB 2.0 IDE Adapter
152d:2338 JMicron Technology Corp. / JMicron USA Technology Corp. JM20337 
Hi-Speed USB to SATA  PATA Combo Bridge
work using
# mount -t iso9660 /dev/sr1 /mnt/usb/cdrom/
when scsi 4:0:0:0: CD-ROM PHILIPS DVDR1648P1 P1.2 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
is attached, on (lshw):
description: Notebook
product: 1834NV1
vendor: IBM
version: ThinkPad R50e

Maybe next month when I go back to where I have the other device, I will
try adjusting the master/slave jumper and see if it helps.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4ptuivi@jidanni.org