Processed: reassign 590480 to 0.27+dfsg-4 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 590480 0.27+dfsg-4 Bug #590480 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: webcam does not work with gspca driver Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to '0.27+dfsg-4'. Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.32-15. Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' retitle 590480 camstream: Fails to capture from gspca_vc032x driver Bug #590480 [0.27+dfsg-4] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: webcam does not work with gspca driver Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' Changed Bug title to 'camstream: Fails to capture from gspca_vc032x driver' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: webcam does not work with gspca driver' Warning: Unknown package '0.27+dfsg-4' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590480: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590480 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12804021211605.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). # remote status report for #580901 (http://bugs.debian.org/580901) # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15559 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEEDINFO usertags 580901 + status-NEEDINFO Bug#580901: core i3: suspend to disk break multithreading There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-NEEDINFO. # remote status report for #574560 (http://bugs.debian.org/574560) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26664 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 574560 + fixed-upstream Bug #574560 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32: Netbook Philco PHN 10108 doesn't supported by kernel to change LCD brightness level Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 574560 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED Bug#574560: linux-image-2.6.32: Netbook Philco PHN 10108 doesn't supported by kernel to change LCD brightness level There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED. # remote status report for #589690 (http://bugs.debian.org/589690) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29153 # * remote status changed: RESOLVED - REOPENED # * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?) # * reopen upstream tags 589690 - fixed-upstream Bug #589690 [linux-2.6] [drm/i915] oops in i915_irq_emit on 965GM with UMS Removed tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 589690 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED Bug#589690: [drm/i915] oops in i915_irq_emit on 965GM with UMS Usertags were: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED. Usertags are now: . usertags 589690 + status-REOPENED Bug#589690: [drm/i915] oops in i915_irq_emit on 965GM with UMS There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-REOPENED. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 589690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589690 574560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=574560 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12804212472944.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
[bts-link] source package linux-2.6
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #580901 (http://bugs.debian.org/580901) # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15559 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEEDINFO usertags 580901 + status-NEEDINFO # remote status report for #574560 (http://bugs.debian.org/574560) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26664 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 574560 + fixed-upstream usertags 574560 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED # remote status report for #589690 (http://bugs.debian.org/589690) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29153 # * remote status changed: RESOLVED - REOPENED # * remote resolution changed: FIXED - (?) # * reopen upstream tags 589690 - fixed-upstream usertags 589690 - status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED usertags 589690 + status-REOPENED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100729163405.11699.84091.btsl...@merkel.debian.org
Processed: unmerging 579862, found 579862 in 2.6.32-15, tagging 579862
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unmerge 579862 Bug#579862: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: Fatal DMA error in b43 broadcom kernel module Bug#589122: b43-phy0: Controller RESET (DMA error) with BCM4312 and b43 driver Disconnected #579862 from all other report(s). found 579862 2.6.32-15 Bug #579862 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: Fatal DMA error in b43 broadcom kernel module There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-15' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-15' Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-15. tags 579862 - moreinfo Bug #579862 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686: Fatal DMA error in b43 broadcom kernel module Removed tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 579862: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579862 589122: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589122 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128042278417904.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 00:30 +0200, Jan Echternach wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-18 Severity: minor I'm getting this warning for quite a while now, but not on every boot. Stack traces below ide_pci_init_two differ slightly. I've also tried the current experimental kernel, but the warning is still there (although the stack trace is somewhat different). [...] Please report this bug upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org under product 'IO/Storage' component 'IDE', including the stack trace from the experimental kernel. Let us know the bug number or URL so that we can track it. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 590327
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 590327 + upstream moreinfo Bug #590327 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19 Added tag(s) upstream and moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590327 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128042297619525.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#590192: linux-source-2.6.32: RTL8187SE working unstable
tags 590192 moreinfo thanks On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:45:49PM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: Package: linux-source-2.6.32 Version: all Severity: normal Tags: upstream The RTL8187SE is working bad on 2.6.32. I can get IP in some times. I don't know how to make tests to send more informations now. Do you want to suggest any tests to generate more informations? Thanks in advance. The driver is from the staging section of the Linux drivers, i.e. for drivers which do not yet match the quality standards of the rest of the kernel. See http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/linux-staging-update.html for a description. There have been quite a few bugfixes since 2.6.32, though. Please test the 2.6.35-rc6 kernel package from experimental and tell us whether the problem persists. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100729172404.ga2...@galadriel.inutil.org
Processed: Re: linux-source-2.6.32: RTL8187SE working unstable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 590192 moreinfo Bug #590192 [linux-source-2.6.32] linux-source-2.6.32: RTL8187SE working unstable Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590192: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590192 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128042426230900.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Found it again
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 515754 1:1.2.2-2 Bug #515754 [nfs-common] nfs-common: Mounting with sec=krb5p fails with access denied by server while mounting Bug Marked as found in versions nfs-utils/1:1.2.2-2. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 515754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515754 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128042430231260.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#588770: initramfs-tools: modules=dep in initramfs.conf breaks suspend-to-disk
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010, Matthias Berndt wrote: Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.97.2 Severity: normal Tags: sid Hi, i just noticed using modules=dep instead of modules=most breaks suspend-to-disk for me. My swap partition lies on a PATA disk while my root file system lies on a SATA disk, so the needed PATA drivers aren't loaded and thus the device file for the swap partition doesn't exist. Perhaps there should be a resume hook script that checks for this condition? this isn't as trivial as said. the sys walking code is nicely abstracted in a function the ugly^Wdiverse root parsing code not. so it should do that and then one can add aboves. this is clearly wishlist as MODULES=dep is not default. not a priority for squeeze, thanks for the report. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100728180705.gc16...@stro.at
Processed: severity of 588770 is wishlist
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 588770 wishlist Bug #588770 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: modules=dep in initramfs.conf breaks suspend-to-disk Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 588770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12804315232668.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: bug 590661 is forwarded to http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1554
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 590661 http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1554 Bug #590661 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: openswan ipsec packets do not reach openvz instances Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1554'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590661 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12804315272713.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 590889 with 561203
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 590889 with 561203 Bug #590889 [libqtcore4] libqtcore4: has a hardcoded sleep in thread creation on hppa, should be removed before release Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 590889: 561203 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590889: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590889 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12804430928966.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#590327: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 06:02:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Let us know the bug number or URL so that we can track it. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16481 -- Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010073715.ga6...@goneko.de
Processed: bug 590327 is forwarded to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16481
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 590327 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16481 Bug #590327 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Unbalanced enable for IRQ 19 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16481'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 590327: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590327 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128045143828715.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
On 29.07.2010 03:01, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 02:16:32AM +0200]:
On 29.07.2010 01:37, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 01:13:01AM +0200]:
for testing purposes, I installed the upstart binary as /sbin/upstart and
created a symlink /sbin/init → /sbin/upstart
This causes a boot failure, due to this check in /usr/share/initramfs-
tools/init
# Check init bootarg
if [ -n ${init} ] [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
echo Target filesystem doesn't have ${init}.
init=
fi
To quote Mithrandir (from irc):
Mithrandir -x follows symlinks
Mithrandir but that means it'll look for symlinks in the initramfs, so
the
check is buggy.
You shouldn't use an absolut symlink here, use a relative one instead.
See Debian policy 10.5 for details.
Well, changing it to /sbin/init - upstart did indeed work for this
particular
case. But I still get the problem when the link is absolute, as is specified
by
the policy for symlinks not in the same directory.
To be a bit more specific what I was doing:
I tested the new systemd init system, which installs the binary in
/bin/systemd
(note the /bin).
This isn't an existing + available Debian package yet, right?
It's in experimental currently.
Why is it installing itself to /bin/systemd? Is it supposed to be
executed by non-root users as well?
Indeed. The idea is, that systemd is also started by regular users and helps
track their user session (replacement/extension for e.g. gnome-session)
So I moved /sbin/init from upstart to /sbin/upstart and made
/sbin/init a symlink so I could easily test both systems. Using a relative
symlink for /sbin/upstart does work, but an absolute symlink /sbin/init -
/bin/systemd does not.
So I'm reopening the bug report and retitling appropriately.
If systemd really uses /bin for a reason we could use something like
the following in initramfs-tools' init:
# Check init bootarg
if [ -n ${init} ] ; then
# Work around absolute symlinks
initsymlinktarget=${init}
if [ -d ${rootmnt} ] [ -h ${rootmnt}${init} ] ; then
case $(readlink ${rootmnt}${init}) in /*)
initsymlinktarget=$(chroot ${rootmnt} readlink ${init})
;;
esac
fi
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x
${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget} ] ; then
echo Target filesystem doesn't have ${init}.
init=
fi
fi
Does not work. For one, I guess this check
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget} ] ;
should be using .
Even after fixing that, we run into the same problem, later again, at:
# No init on rootmount
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
panic No init found. Try passing init= bootarg.
fi
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Fri Jul 30, 2010 at 03:53:03AM +0200]:
On 29.07.2010 03:01, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 02:16:32AM +0200]:
Why is it installing itself to /bin/systemd? Is it supposed to be
executed by non-root users as well?
Indeed. The idea is, that systemd is also started by regular users and helps
track their user session (replacement/extension for e.g. gnome-session)
Ok.
So I moved /sbin/init from upstart to /sbin/upstart and made
/sbin/init a symlink so I could easily test both systems. Using a relative
symlink for /sbin/upstart does work, but an absolute symlink /sbin/init -
/bin/systemd does not.
So I'm reopening the bug report and retitling appropriately.
If systemd really uses /bin for a reason we could use something like
the following in initramfs-tools' init:
# Check init bootarg
if [ -n ${init} ] ; then
# Work around absolute symlinks
initsymlinktarget=${init}
if [ -d ${rootmnt} ] [ -h ${rootmnt}${init} ] ; then
case $(readlink ${rootmnt}${init}) in /*)
initsymlinktarget=$(chroot ${rootmnt} readlink ${init})
;;
esac
fi
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x
${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget} ] ; then
echo Target filesystem doesn't have ${init}.
init=
fi
fi
Does not work. For one, I guess this check
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget} ] ;
should be using .
Even after fixing that, we run into the same problem, later again, at:
# No init on rootmount
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
panic No init found. Try passing init= bootarg.
fi
You have to drop the old No init on rootmount stuff of course, so
just replace the No init on rootmount part with above code.
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
On 30.07.2010 03:57, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Fri Jul 30, 2010 at 03:53:03AM +0200]:
On 29.07.2010 03:01, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Thu Jul 29, 2010 at 02:16:32AM +0200]:
Why is it installing itself to /bin/systemd? Is it supposed to be
executed by non-root users as well?
Indeed. The idea is, that systemd is also started by regular users and helps
track their user session (replacement/extension for e.g. gnome-session)
Ok.
So I moved /sbin/init from upstart to /sbin/upstart and made
/sbin/init a symlink so I could easily test both systems. Using a relative
symlink for /sbin/upstart does work, but an absolute symlink /sbin/init -
/bin/systemd does not.
So I'm reopening the bug report and retitling appropriately.
If systemd really uses /bin for a reason we could use something like
the following in initramfs-tools' init:
# Check init bootarg
if [ -n ${init} ] ; then
# Work around absolute symlinks
initsymlinktarget=${init}
if [ -d ${rootmnt} ] [ -h ${rootmnt}${init} ] ; then
case $(readlink ${rootmnt}${init}) in /*)
initsymlinktarget=$(chroot ${rootmnt} readlink ${init})
;;
esac
fi
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x
${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget} ] ; then
echo Target filesystem doesn't have ${init}.
init=
fi
fi
Does not work. For one, I guess this check
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget} ]
;
should be using .
Even after fixing that, we run into the same problem, later again, at:
# No init on rootmount
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
panic No init found. Try passing init= bootarg.
fi
You have to drop the old No init on rootmount stuff of course, so
just replace the No init on rootmount part with above code.
I think this check is required if # Search for valid init does not find a
valid init?
Besides, I noticed that if no valid init is found, I get a kernel panic, but I
assume I should get a rescue shell.
I also noticed, that initsymlinktarget is set (ie. we run and expensive chroot
call), even if I pass init=/bin/systemd on the kernel command line.
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
On 30.07.2010 04:15, Michael Biebl wrote:
Besides, I noticed that if no valid init is found, I get a kernel panic, but I
assume I should get a rescue shell.
I guess this might be due to the following:
# Search for valid init
if [ -z ${init} ] ; then
for init in /sbin/init /etc/init /bin/init /bin/sh; do
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
continue
fi
break
done
fi
Upstart stores its configuration files in /etc/init/. This means, the loop above
exits at /etc/init, and the init variable is set to the /etc/init directory.
Is there a good resp. historical reason to search for init in /etc (or /bin
ftm)?
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Fri Jul 30, 2010 at 04:26:16AM +0200]:
On 30.07.2010 04:15, Michael Biebl wrote:
Besides, I noticed that if no valid init is found, I get a kernel panic,
but I
assume I should get a rescue shell.
I guess this might be due to the following:
# Search for valid init
if [ -z ${init} ] ; then
for init in /sbin/init /etc/init /bin/init /bin/sh; do
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
continue
fi
break
done
fi
Upstart stores its configuration files in /etc/init/.
D'oh.
This means, the loop above exits at /etc/init, and the init
variable is set to the /etc/init directory. Is there a good resp.
historical reason to search for init in /etc (or /bin ftm)?
The kernel uses /sbin/init, /etc/init, /bin/init and /bin/sh
for its run_init_process().
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#590744: Fails to boot if /sbin/init is a symlink
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [Fri Jul 30, 2010 at 04:15:44AM +0200]:
On 30.07.2010 03:57, Michael Prokop wrote:
Does not work. For one, I guess this check
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ] || [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${initsymlinktarget}
] ;
should be using .
Even after fixing that, we run into the same problem, later again, at:
# No init on rootmount
if [ ! -x ${rootmnt}${init} ]; then
panic No init found. Try passing init= bootarg.
fi
You have to drop the old No init on rootmount stuff of course, so
just replace the No init on rootmount part with above code.
[...]
I also noticed, that initsymlinktarget is set (ie. we run and expensive chroot
call), even if I pass init=/bin/systemd on the kernel command line.
No, initsymlinktarget is set to $init, but evaluated only if
${rootmnt}${init} is a symlink.
Can you please give the following snapshot version a try:
http://people.debian.org/~mika/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.97.3~1.gbp8d572e_all.deb
(sha1sum and gpg-signed sha1sum in the same directory) and report
back whether this works for all the situations you expect to work?
regards,
-mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#585625: Switch to i915/KMS lefts console unusable
Hi Ben and others, On 2010年07月27日 18:25, Ben Hutchings wrote: Since we applied all the DRM changes from Linux 2.6.33 in 2.6.32-10, you could start bisecting with this command: git bisect v2.6.33 v2.6.32 drivers/gpu/drm/i915 I never did bisect before. I have been trying my first time. It has been compiling and compiling and compiling and compiling kernel on my laptop. I relized I have limited time to get together with our people in DebCamp and DebConfr. I am not sure if this is a bester way to do it and saves time? And should I also test 2.6.35-rc5 vanilla kernel to see if I can reproduce this problem still? I suggest you test a 2.6.35-rc6 kernel package from experimental. Let me report this test first. It doesn't work and had problem the screen is blank. Hope this helpful, -Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c526756.6060...@debian.org
