Bug#600959: boot warnings too fast to read and not saved in any file nor dmesg
BH == Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes: BH This looks the same as #561764, reported by... you. I see. Anyways here's a little discovery I made. If it is not technologically possible to put such messages in files like dmesg, then at least they could be left on the screen: On one of my computers, the desktop with the detached terminal, the messages are still visible with ShiftPgUp. (In contrast to the laptops, where the farthest as ShiftPgUp reaches is the swap message. I.e., the first few items from /sbin/init to before /etc/rcS.d/S08checkroot.sh are not in any logs nor left on the console still.) Using a pencil from the desktop, I see they were roughly: INIT: version 2.88 starting Using Makefile ... runlevels Starting hotplug... Synthesizing hotplug... Waiting for /dev ... fully pop... And then the swap message, which is the first to be left on the top of other consoles too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87eibi7nuo@jidanni.org
Bug#598323: linux-image-2.6.35.6: Servers reboot on heavy load on DRBD+OCFS2 partition
Hello! Sorry for such big delay - I was ill and then on vacation. I you still have an interest in this problem - I have new results. On 01/10/10 06:49, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 19:10 +0400, Proskurin Kirill wrote: [...] Summary: Kernel: 2.6.36-rc5 SMP x86_64 (from experimental) DRBD-utils-8.3.8(from experimental) OCFS2-1.4.4-3(from testing) ocfs2 is already included in the kernel package and you should use that. OCFS2-1.4.4-3(from testing) - it is a userspace utility like mkfs.ocfs2. Of course I use driver from kernel. While update(aptitude safe-upgrade) first node I get kernel panic. Screenshot in attachment. [...] This panic shows Tainted: G D which means there was a previous oops message. You need to record the first one. Well I not got it twice. I can confirm what on configuration above(all testing + kernel 2.6.36-rc5) I don`t got a reboot. iozone complete successfully without any problems so yes - it is a kernel relaited problem. I retest it on latest 2.6.32 from testing - and got reboot. So... what should I do now? -- Best regards, Proskurin Kirill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc12ff8.3000...@fxclub.org
Bug#600992: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: cannot save or migrate domU with xen kernel 2.6.32-25 and 2.6.32-26
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-25 Severity: important -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-25) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-3) ) #1 SMP Fri Sep 17 22:00:48 UTC 2010 ** Model information sys_vendor: Dell Inc. product_name: PowerEdge 1950 product_version: chassis_vendor: Dell Inc. chassis_version: bios_vendor: Dell Inc. bios_version: 1.2.0 board_vendor: Dell Inc. board_name: 0DT097 board_version: A00 ** Loaded modules: Module Size Used by nf_conntrack_ipv4 9833 4 nf_defrag_ipv4 1139 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state1303 4 nf_conntrack 46311 2 nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_state xt_physdev 1508 8 iptable_filter 2258 1 ip_tables 13899 1 iptable_filter x_tables 12845 3 xt_state,xt_physdev,ip_tables 8021q 17078 0 garp4986 1 8021q bridge 39486 0 stp 1440 2 garp,bridge ib_iser24498 0 rdma_cm20550 1 ib_iser ib_cm 26208 1 rdma_cm iw_cm 6339 1 rdma_cm ib_sa 16103 2 rdma_cm,ib_cm ib_mad 29937 2 ib_cm,ib_sa ib_core40855 6 ib_iser,rdma_cm,ib_cm,iw_cm,ib_sa,ib_mad ib_addr 4389 1 rdma_cm iscsi_tcp 8065 13 libiscsi_tcp 10962 1 iscsi_tcp libiscsi 29270 3 ib_iser,iscsi_tcp,libiscsi_tcp scsi_transport_iscsi24972 4 ib_iser,iscsi_tcp,libiscsi xenfs 9520 1 xen_evtchn 4307 3 loop 11767 4 bnx2x 196348 0 crc32c 2560 5 libcrc32c 1026 1 bnx2x mdio3064 1 bnx2x radeon572673 0 ttm39778 1 radeon drm_kms_helper 20033 1 radeon i5000_edac 7252 0 drm 143121 3 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper edac_core 29261 3 i5000_edac i2c_algo_bit4225 1 radeon snd_pcsp6579 0 i2c_core 15664 4 radeon,drm_kms_helper,drm,i2c_algo_bit i5k_amb 4407 0 rng_core3006 0 dcdbas 5000 0 snd_pcm60551 1 snd_pcsp snd_timer 15582 1 snd_pcm shpchp 26264 0 snd46414 3 snd_pcsp,snd_pcm,snd_timer pci_hotplug21203 1 shpchp soundcore 4598 1 snd snd_page_alloc 6169 1 snd_pcm joydev 8411 0 evdev 7352 4 button 4650 0 psmouse49729 0 serio_raw 3752 0 processor 36069 0 acpi_processor 5087 1 processor,[permanent] ext3 106118 2 jbd36877 1 ext3 mbcache 5050 1 ext3 dm_mod 53562 26 usb_storage39529 0 usbhid 33148 0 hid62793 1 usbhid sg 18728 0 ses 5128 0 sr_mod 12602 0 enclosure 5471 1 ses cdrom 29415 1 sr_mod sd_mod 29697 10 crc_t10dif 1276 1 sd_mod ata_generic 2983 0 uhci_hcd 18457 0 ata_piix 21092 0 libata133328 2 ata_generic,ata_piix ehci_hcd 30879 0 megaraid_sas 29020 3 bnx2 57257 0 scsi_mod 121861 11 ib_iser,iscsi_tcp,libiscsi,scsi_transport_iscsi,usb_storage,sg,ses,sr_mod,sd_mod,libata,megaraid_sas thermal11674 0 thermal_sys11942 2 processor,thermal usbcore 121698 5 usb_storage,usbhid,uhci_hcd,ehci_hcd nls_base6377 1 usbcore -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.36 Debian configuration management sy ii initramfs-tools 0.98.4 tools for generating an initramfs ii linux-base2.6.32-25 Linux image base package ii module-init-tools 3.12-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 recommends: ii firmware-linux-free 2.6.32-25 Binary firmware for various driver Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 suggests: ii grub 0.97-63GRand Unified Bootloader (dummy pa pn linux-doc-2.6.32 none (no description available) Versions of packages
Bug#600992: further logs
Hello there, with versions above 2.6.32-23 of xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (we tried *-25 and *-26) we found the following bug: We cannot suspend any domU machine so migration and save are broken, because they both use the suspension. On /var/log/xen/xend.log I have: [2010-10-21 09:42:54 1847] INFO (XendDomain:1206) Domain vpn2.localadvert.it (10) unpaused. [2010-10-21 09:44:43 1847] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:124) [xc_save]: /usr/lib/xen-4.0/bin/xc_save 5 4 0 0 1 [2010-10-21 09:44:43 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) xc_save: failed to get the suspend evtchn port [2010-10-21 09:44:43 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) [2010-10-21 09:44:43 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Had 0 unexplained entries in p2m table [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 1 0%^H^H^H^H 5%^H^H^H^H 10%^H^H^H^H 15%^H^H^H^H 20%^H^H^H^H 25%^H^H^H^H 30%^H^H^H^H 35%^H^H^H^H 40%^H^H^H^H 45%^H^H^H^H 50%^H^H^H^H 55%^H^H^H^H 60%^H^H^H^H 65%^H^H^H^H 70%^H^H^H^H 75%^H^H^H^H 80%^H^H^H^H 85%^H^H^H^H 90%^H^H^H^H 95%^M 1: sent 258645, skipped 2539, delta 12610ms, dom0 36%, target 1%, sent 672Mb/s, dirtied 6Mb/s 2659 pages [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 2 0%^H^H^H^H 25%^H^H^H^H 93%^M 2: sent 2638, skipped 21, delta 131ms, dom0 32%, target 0%, sent 659Mb/s, dirtied 28Mb/s 112 pages [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 3 0%^M 3: sent 112, skipped 0, delta 3ms, dom0 100%, target 0%, sent 1223Mb/s, dirtied 0Mb/s 0 pages [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 4 0%^M 4: sent 0, skipped 0, Start last iteration [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:394) suspend [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:127) In saveInputHandler suspend [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:129) Suspending 4 ... [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:519) XendDomainInfo.shutdown(suspend) [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1891) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2010-10-21 09:44:55 1847] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1891) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch and the suspend hangs there, the correct output should be: [2010-10-22 08:58:13 1869] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:124) [xc_save]: /usr/lib/xen-4.0/bin/xc_save 4 1 0 0 1 [2010-10-22 08:58:13 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) xc_save: failed to get the suspend evtchn port [2010-10-22 08:58:13 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) [2010-10-22 08:58:13 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Had 0 unexplained entries in p2m table [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 1 0%^H^H^H^H 6%^H^H^H^H 12%^H^H^H^H 18%^H^H^H^H 24%^H^H^H^H 29%^H^H^H^H 35%^H^H^H^H 40%^H^H^H^H 46%^H^H^H^H 52%^H^H^H^H 57%^H^H^H^H 63%^H^H^H^H 68%^H^H^H^H 74%^H^H^H^H 79%^H^H^H^H 85%^H^H^H^H 90%^H^H^H^H 95%^M 1: sent 64474, skipped 102, delta 3231ms, dom0 37%, target 0%, sent 653Mb/s, dirtied 1Mb/s 152 pages [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 2 0%^M 2: sent 152, skipped 0, delta 5ms, dom0 60%, target 0%, sent 996Mb/s, dirtied 0Mb/s 0 pages [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 3 0%^M 3: sent 0, skipped 0, Start last iteration [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:394) suspend [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:127) In saveInputHandler suspend [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:129) Suspending 1 ... [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:519) XendDomainInfo.shutdown(suspend) [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1891) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1891) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendDomainInfo:2088) Domain has shutdown: name=migrating-ldap.localadvert.it id=1 reason=suspend. [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:135) Domain 1 suspended. [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) SUSPEND shinfo 0002e58d [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) delta 34ms, dom0 76%, target 5%, sent 0Mb/s, dirtied 137Mb/s 143 pages [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:144) Written done [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Saving memory pages: iter 4 0%^M 4: sent 143, skipped 0, delta 2ms, dom0 100%, target 0%, sent 2342Mb/s, dirtied 2342Mb/s 143 pages [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Total pages sent= 64769 (0.99x) [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) (of which 0 were fixups) [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) All memory is saved [2010-10-22 08:58:16 1869] INFO (XendCheckpoint:423) Save exit rc=0 reverting to 2.6.32-23 made the suspension work again cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Bug#600992: further logs
Thanks, I was just about to send you a rant about the lack of content in the bug ;-) On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 09:54 +0200, Tecnici wrote: Hello there, with versions above 2.6.32-23 of xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (we tried *-25 and *-26) we found the following bug: Does the problem occur with -25/-26 when it is used in the dom0 or the domU or both? Do you get any output on the domU console corresponding with the migration attempt? (perhaps increase log level with echo 9 /proc/sysrq-trigger before the suspend attempt) We cannot suspend any domU machine so migration and save are broken, because they both use the suspension. On /var/log/xen/xend.log I have: [snip, thanks] reverting to 2.6.32-23 made the suspension work again I didn't think much changed xen-wise between these two intervals but I will check. I assume that the versions of xen-hypervisor* and xen-utils* have not changed? Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Angelcorpse - Reap The Whirlwind * lilo hereby declares OPN a virtual pain in the ass :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1287737570.11851.5667.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com
Processed: reassign 600939 to linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 600939 linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Bug #600939 [virtualbox-ose-dkms] virtualbox-ose-dkms: modules not built properly on kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-5 Bug reassigned from package 'virtualbox-ose-dkms' to 'linux-image-2.6.32-5-686'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions virtualbox-ose/3.2.8-dfsg-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 600939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128774320723595.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: forcibly merging 599054 600939
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 599054 600939 Bug#599054: After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable Bug#600939: virtualbox-ose-dkms: modules not built properly on kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-5 Forcibly Merged 599054 600939. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 599054: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599054 600939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128774320723607.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#577747: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 - same bug, different HW
Le Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:26:52 +0200, Jan Schermer zvira...@zviratko.net a écrit : Update: It's not in SSH/crypto but a network problem I tried netcat over network and the file also got corrupted (5x OK, 1x corrupt, 1GB file - former swap file, so half random data and half zeroes). There are ~10 bytes corrupted in the middle of the file, very close together (on one page in vbindiff) - so probably one packet/fragment/frame. I also have tcpdump record of the whole connection - but nothing apparently fishy there. Right now I'm testing without netfilter enabled and so far so good (also had to reboot so it might have fixed itself). Memtest done without a problem via memtester on 75% of memory, proper memtest86 will be done tonight. Any suggestions where to go next? I'm thinking of making a 1GB plaintext file so that the corruption will be readable and searchable in a data stream and I can inspect the corrupted packets - but what to look for? Hello Jan, I'm observing this bug every day I resume my pc from hibernation, then running some big network transfer ; I notice that because, using SSH as network transport, it detects any data corruption. Once the SSH transfert failed, the subsequent ones works … until next hibernation / resume cycle ! I'm not sure whether it appears on a normal boot. Fred. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022124431.1312c...@prem6s
Processed: tagging 600939
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 600939 + wontfix Bug #600939 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-686] virtualbox-ose-dkms: modules not built properly on kernel upgrade to 2.6.32-5 Bug #599054 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-686] After kernel upgrading vbox is no more usable Added tag(s) wontfix. Added tag(s) wontfix. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 600939: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600939 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12877461105419.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#600992: further logs
Thanks for the quick response :) Il 22/10/2010 10:52, Ian Campbell ha scritto: Thanks, I was just about to send you a rant about the lack of content in the bug ;-) my bad, first time using bugreport :) I posted again shortly after with the lacking logs ;) On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 09:54 +0200, Tecnici wrote: Hello there, with versions above 2.6.32-23 of xen-linux-system-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (we tried *-25 and *-26) we found the following bug: Does the problem occur with -25/-26 when it is used in the dom0 or the domU or both? We only use paravirtualized guests so I guess we can say both since we use the same kernel for dom0 and domU Do you get any output on the domU console corresponding with the migration attempt? (perhaps increase log level with echo 9 /proc/sysrq-trigger before the suspend attempt) we just tried and the domU gave this output on its console: [ 151.45] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [xenwatch:12] [ 151.45] Modules linked in: ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mod raid1 md_mod xen_netfront xen_blkfront [ 151.45] CPU 0: [ 151.45] Modules linked in: ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mod raid1 md_mod xen_netfront xen_blkfront [ 151.45] Pid: 12, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 [ 151.45] RIP: e030:[810686d5] [810686d5] lock_hrtimer_base+0xa/0x3c [ 151.45] RSP: e02b:88003fe11d70 EFLAGS: 0246 [ 151.45] RAX: 880002a40680 RBX: RCX: 0006 [ 151.45] RDX: 88003db31c50 RSI: 88003fe11da0 RDI: 880002a47820 [ 151.45] RBP: 880002a47820 R08: R09: [ 151.45] R10: 88003db2e050 R11: 8122b649 R12: 88003fe11da0 [ 151.45] R13: 0002 R14: 88003db31ca0 R15: 88003fe11df0 [ 151.45] FS: 7f6840bc96e0() GS:880003557000() knlGS: [ 151.45] CS: e033 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b [ 151.45] CR2: 7fc98d3e7000 CR3: 3eef3000 CR4: 0660 [ 151.45] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 151.45] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 151.45] Call Trace: [ 151.45] [8106875b] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x16/0x43 [ 151.45] [8122b649] ? serial8250_suspend+0x0/0x48 [ 151.45] [81068794] ? hrtimer_cancel+0xc/0x16 [ 151.45] [a0009147] ? netfront_suspend+0x19/0x1d [xen_netfront] [ 151.45] [811f569b] ? xenbus_dev_suspend+0x1f/0x3b [ 151.45] [81233872] ? dpm_suspend_start+0x359/0x45b [ 151.45] [811f2ca0] ? shutdown_handler+0x15f/0x25c [ 151.45] [8130b475] ? mutex_lock+0xd/0x31 [ 151.45] [811f47ad] ? xenwatch_thread+0x117/0x14a [ 151.45] [81065afe] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e [ 151.45] [811f4696] ? xenwatch_thread+0x0/0x14a [ 151.45] [81065831] ? kthread+0x79/0x81 [ 151.45] [81012baa] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20 [ 151.45] [81011d61] ? int_ret_from_sys_call+0x7/0x1b [ 151.45] [8101251d] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6 [ 151.45] [81012ba0] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 We cannot suspend any domU machine so migration and save are broken, because they both use the suspension. On /var/log/xen/xend.log I have: [snip, thanks] reverting to 2.6.32-23 made the suspension work again I didn't think much changed xen-wise between these two intervals but I will check. I assume that the versions of xen-hypervisor* and xen-utils* have not changed? Ian. You assume right :) we only upgraded the kernel cheers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc184c8.3020...@advert.it
Bug#600992: further logs
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 14:34 +0200, Tecnici wrote: Do you get any output on the domU console corresponding with the migration attempt? (perhaps increase log level with echo 9 /proc/sysrq-trigger before the suspend attempt) we just tried and the domU gave this output on its console: [ 151.45] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [xenwatch:12] [ 151.45] Modules linked in: ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mod raid1 md_mod xen_netfront xen_blkfront [ 151.45] CPU 0: [ 151.45] Modules linked in: ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mod raid1 md_mod xen_netfront xen_blkfront [ 151.45] Pid: 12, comm: xenwatch Not tainted 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 [ 151.45] RIP: e030:[810686d5] [810686d5] lock_hrtimer_base+0xa/0x3c [ 151.45] RSP: e02b:88003fe11d70 EFLAGS: 0246 [ 151.45] RAX: 880002a40680 RBX: RCX: 0006 [ 151.45] RDX: 88003db31c50 RSI: 88003fe11da0 RDI: 880002a47820 [ 151.45] RBP: 880002a47820 R08: R09: [ 151.45] R10: 88003db2e050 R11: 8122b649 R12: 88003fe11da0 [ 151.45] R13: 0002 R14: 88003db31ca0 R15: 88003fe11df0 [ 151.45] FS: 7f6840bc96e0() GS:880003557000() knlGS: [ 151.45] CS: e033 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b [ 151.45] CR2: 7fc98d3e7000 CR3: 3eef3000 CR4: 0660 [ 151.45] DR0: DR1: DR2: [ 151.45] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 [ 151.45] Call Trace: [ 151.45] [8106875b] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x16/0x43 [ 151.45] [8122b649] ? serial8250_suspend+0x0/0x48 [ 151.45] [81068794] ? hrtimer_cancel+0xc/0x16 [ 151.45] [a0009147] ? netfront_suspend+0x19/0x1d [xen_netfront] [ 151.45] [811f569b] ? xenbus_dev_suspend+0x1f/0x3b [ 151.45] [81233872] ? dpm_suspend_start+0x359/0x45b [ 151.45] [811f2ca0] ? shutdown_handler+0x15f/0x25c [ 151.45] [8130b475] ? mutex_lock+0xd/0x31 [ 151.45] [811f47ad] ? xenwatch_thread+0x117/0x14a [ 151.45] [81065afe] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e [ 151.45] [811f4696] ? xenwatch_thread+0x0/0x14a [ 151.45] [81065831] ? kthread+0x79/0x81 [ 151.45] [81012baa] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20 [ 151.45] [81011d61] ? int_ret_from_sys_call+0x7/0x1b [ 151.45] [8101251d] ? retint_restore_args+0x5/0x6 [ 151.45] [81012ba0] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 This stack trace is familiar, the netfront smartpoll feature is buggy and so was disabled (this part is in the Debian kernel) but initial attempts to allow it to be disabled were a bit buggy (the Debian kernel is missing these fixes). I'll pull in the additional patches: fad2197bcb570350cb03c4ed789015baf0f86c81 xen/netfront: unconditionally initialize smartpoll hrtimer 00abe504c5cf268b73c45232aba56949af628349 xen/netfront: Fix another potential race condition cb09635065163a933d0d00d077ddd9f0c0a908a1 Fix one race condition for netfront smartpoll logic Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Novembre - Zenith abuse me. I'm so lame I sent a bug report to debian-devel-changes -- Seen on #Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1287751740.11851.6146.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com
Bug#597658: Wouldn't it be better solved the /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf?
Wouldn't it be better, to put the module in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf, instead of disabling it completely? So those who are able to use it, can still load it and do not have to build their own kernel. This module lowers the CPU usage of kcryptd from 90% to 25% on my machine, when writing to disk. So it would be great to have it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022124150.gd7...@umbach-racing.de
Bug#600992: further logs
Thanks again Ian, should you need more logs and/or tests please let us know I understand that this problem may be related to the lost of connectivity problems we had in bugs 597865, 596635, 598057. As we escaped from *-23 kernel to solve these we met this other problem also related to netfront smartpoll not being disabled anyway we'll keep the *-23 kernel for the time being till the additional patches will be merged with the debian kernel regards Il 22/10/2010 14:49, Ian Campbell ha scritto: This stack trace is familiar, the netfront smartpoll feature is buggy and so was disabled (this part is in the Debian kernel) but initial attempts to allow it to be disabled were a bit buggy (the Debian kernel is missing these fixes). I'll pull in the additional patches: fad2197bcb570350cb03c4ed789015baf0f86c81 xen/netfront: unconditionally initialize smartpoll hrtimer 00abe504c5cf268b73c45232aba56949af628349 xen/netfront: Fix another potential race condition cb09635065163a933d0d00d077ddd9f0c0a908a1 Fix one race condition for netfront smartpoll logic Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc1943b.6030...@advert.it
Bug#601017: e1000e fails dhcp during netinst boot
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-26 Booting the netinst (or PXE) image on a Panasonic Toughbook CF-19m4 fails to get a DHCP address. If you run these commands: # modprobe -r e1000e # modprobe e1000e you can retry automatic configuration a few times and eventually get an address. lspci says the network card is: 8086:10ea Intel Corporation 82577LM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 06) I found this upstream bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15944 which lead to this mailing list: http://marc.info/?t=12735390277r=1w=3 which lead to this patch: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=627c8a041f7aaaea93c766f69bd61d952a277586 After taking a look at the 2.6.32 linux source, it does not look like it would apply cleanly. Hope this helps! Tony -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc198e7.7050...@awtrey.com
Bug#600992: further logs
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:40 +0200, Tecnici wrote: Thanks again Ian, should you need more logs and/or tests please let us know I understand that this problem may be related to the lost of connectivity problems we had in bugs 597865, 596635, 598057. As we escaped from *-23 kernel to solve these we met this other problem also related to netfront smartpoll not being disabled pretty much. the patch which added the option to disable smartpoll was not complete and left some things uninitialised which were subsequently relied on. anyway we'll keep the *-23 kernel for the time being till the additional patches will be merged with the debian kernel regards Il 22/10/2010 14:49, Ian Campbell ha scritto: This stack trace is familiar, the netfront smartpoll feature is buggy and so was disabled (this part is in the Debian kernel) but initial attempts to allow it to be disabled were a bit buggy (the Debian kernel is missing these fixes). I'll pull in the additional patches: fad2197bcb570350cb03c4ed789015baf0f86c81 xen/netfront: unconditionally initialize smartpoll hrtimer 00abe504c5cf268b73c45232aba56949af628349 xen/netfront: Fix another potential race condition cb09635065163a933d0d00d077ddd9f0c0a908a1 Fix one race condition for netfront smartpoll logic Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Emperor - The Eruption Birds and bees have as much to do with the facts of life as black nightgowns do with keeping warm. -- Hester Mundis, Powermom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1287756133.11851.6240.ca...@zakaz.uk.xensource.com
Bug#600939: I am not clear on why this is marked won't fix.
I am not clear on why this is marked won't fix - is the upgrade path that I found that proper way to do it? e.g. Whenever the dkms build doesn't work due to kernel changes, uninstall virtualbox-ose-dkms, and then reinstall it, so it picks up the new changes? -- Jon Daley http://jon.limedaley.com ~~ For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. -- Harrison's Postulate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1010221119500.21...@orange.limedaley.com
Bug#600939: I am not clear on why this is marked won't fix.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:21:26AM -0400, Jon Daley wrote: I am not clear on why this is marked won't fix - is the upgrade path that I found that proper way to do it? No-one has explained exactly what change affects VirtualBox, so there is no way we can revert it. And we are not going to make an ABI bump. e.g. Whenever the dkms build doesn't work due to kernel changes, uninstall virtualbox-ose-dkms, and then reinstall it, so it picks up the new changes? Or use 'dkms build' to force a rebuild. (I'm not sure exactly how to do that.) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022180829.gf13...@decadent.org.uk
Bug#600939: I am not clear on why this is marked won't fix.
Ok, thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.00.1010221420300.21...@orange.limedaley.com
Bug#600155: [50/66] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
This was fixed in mainline by the interface change made in commit
f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249.
After walking the multicast list to set up the hash filter, this
function will walk off the end of the list when filling the
exact-match entries. This was fixed in mainline by the interface
change made in commit f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249.
Reported-by: spama...@hispeed.ch
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15355
Reported-by: Jason Heeris jason.hee...@gmail.com
Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/600155
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de
---
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -992,6 +992,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
adrp = (u16 *)dmi-dmi_addr;
iowrite16(adrp[0], ioaddr + MID_1L + 8*i);
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022183600.659840...@clark.site
Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
--
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
This was fixed in mainline by the interface change made in commit
f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249.
After walking the multicast list to set up the hash filter, this
function will walk off the end of the list when filling the
exact-match entries. This was fixed in mainline by the interface
change made in commit f9dcbcc9e338d08c0f7de7eba4eaafbbb7f81249.
Reported-by: spama...@hispeed.ch
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15355
Reported-by: Jason Heeris jason.hee...@gmail.com
Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/600155
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de
---
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
adrp = (u16 *)dmi-dmi_addr;
iowrite16(adrp[0], ioaddr + MID_1L + 8*i);
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022184033.486292...@clark.site
Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
Any reason for the dmi in the above line? As far as I can see it is a
nop.
adrp = (u16 *)dmi-dmi_addr;
iowrite16(adrp[0], ioaddr + MID_1L + 8*i);
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc1e257.4070...@fastmail.fm
Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
Any reason for the dmi in the above line? As far as I can see it is a
nop.
Look closer at the for loop please.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022192350.ga10...@suse.de
Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
On 22/10/2010 20:23, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
Any reason for the dmi in the above line? As far as I can see it is a
nop.
Look closer at the for loop please.
Maybe I'm missing something but:
for (i = 0, dmi ; (i ...
The dmi here still doesn't seem to do anything?
Thanks,
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc1e610.4050...@fastmail.fm
Bug#601040: /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32: installed as dangling symlink
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Version: 2.6.32-1 Severity: normal Hi, The symlink, /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 was installed as a dangling symlink, because on my system /usr/src/ is not on the same filesystem as /usr/lib/, $ realpath /usr/src /fs/dc/usr-src $ realpath /usr/lib /usr/lib Here is how the symlinks command reports it, dangling: /fs/dc/usr-src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 - ../lib/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Please install as an absolute symlink, eg, # ln -s /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Thanks, Jeffrey Sheinberg -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-486 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-kbuild-2.6.32 depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-6+squeeze1 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib linux-kbuild-2.6.32 recommends no packages. linux-kbuild-2.6.32 suggests no packages. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022201740.3992.89539.report...@l1.bsrd.net
Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:29 +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 20:23, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
Any reason for the dmi in the above line? As far as I can see it is a
nop.
Look closer at the for loop please.
Maybe I'm missing something but:
for (i = 0, dmi ; (i ...
The dmi here still doesn't seem to do anything?
It doesn't, but it doesn't do any harm either. The loop has been
rewritten in mainline.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#600155: [11/17] r6040: Fix multicast list iteration when hash filter is used
On 22/10/2010 22:18, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 20:29 +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 20:23, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:13:27PM +0100, Jack Stone wrote:
On 22/10/2010 19:39, Greg KH wrote:
drivers/net/r6040.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/drivers/net/r6040.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r6040.c
@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ static void r6040_multicast_list(struct
iowrite16(hash_table[3], ioaddr + MAR3);
}
/* Multicast Address 1~4 case */
+ dmi = dev-mc_list;
for (i = 0, dmi; (i dev-mc_count) (i MCAST_MAX); i++) {
Any reason for the dmi in the above line? As far as I can see it is a
nop.
Look closer at the for loop please.
Maybe I'm missing something but:
for (i = 0, dmi ; (i ...
The dmi here still doesn't seem to do anything?
It doesn't, but it doesn't do any harm either. The loop has been
rewritten in mainline.
Agreed, it causes no problems, but it seems like it was intended to be
the dmi init, i.e.
for (i = 0, dmi = dev-mc_list; ...
I suppose it doesn't really matter but either removing the dmi in the
for loop or moving the dmi init in there would make more sense to me.
I really should learn to explain myself fully. Sorry for taking up
your time.
Thanks,
Jack
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc200c3.8000...@fastmail.fm
Bug#601040: marked as done (/usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32: installed as dangling symlink)
Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:27:18 +0100 with message-id 1287782838.20865.257.ca...@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#601040: /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32: installed as dangling symlink has caused the Debian Bug report #601040, regarding /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32: installed as dangling symlink to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 601040: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601040 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Version: 2.6.32-1 Severity: normal Hi, The symlink, /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 was installed as a dangling symlink, because on my system /usr/src/ is not on the same filesystem as /usr/lib/, $ realpath /usr/src /fs/dc/usr-src $ realpath /usr/lib /usr/lib Here is how the symlinks command reports it, dangling: /fs/dc/usr-src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 - ../lib/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Please install as an absolute symlink, eg, # ln -s /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Thanks, Jeffrey Sheinberg -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-486 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages linux-kbuild-2.6.32 depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-6+squeeze1 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib linux-kbuild-2.6.32 recommends no packages. linux-kbuild-2.6.32 suggests no packages. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 16:17 -0400, Jeffrey Sheinberg wrote: Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Version: 2.6.32-1 Severity: normal Hi, The symlink, /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 was installed as a dangling symlink, because on my system /usr/src/ is not on the same filesystem as /usr/lib/, $ realpath /usr/src /fs/dc/usr-src $ realpath /usr/lib /usr/lib This is not a supported configuration. You should bind-mount /fs/dc/usr-src to /usr/src instead of using a symlink. Here is how the symlinks command reports it, dangling: /fs/dc/usr-src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 - ../lib/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Please install as an absolute symlink, eg, # ln -s /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 /usr/src/linux-kbuild-2.6.32 Debian policy §10.5 says we should use a relative link here. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Processed: tagging 600660
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 600660 + pending Bug #600660 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Please revert patch for USB54Gs wireless device Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 600660: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600660 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128778333723130.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
