Bug#608250: acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq module: No such device
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-29 Severity: normal File: acpi-cpufreq -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-29) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Fri Dec 10 17:41:50 UTC 2010 ** Command line: placeholder root=UUID=f1e032e1-68ed-43e6-a768-daa873eb3c36 ro quiet ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: [373200.836087] EXT3 FS on dm-13, internal journal [373200.836097] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [377015.023850] alloc irq_desc for 1229 on node -1 [377015.023855] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377015.129468] alloc irq_desc for 1228 on node -1 [377015.129471] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377015.295991] device vif9.0 entered promiscuous mode [377015.299647] eth0: port 5(vif9.0) entering forwarding state [377015.338767] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [377016.885679] blkback: ring-ref 8, event-channel 8, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [377016.885722] alloc irq_desc for 1227 on node -1 [377016.885724] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377016.896440] blkback: ring-ref 9, event-channel 9, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [377016.896462] alloc irq_desc for 1226 on node -1 [377016.896464] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377016.911982] alloc irq_desc for 1225 on node -1 [377016.911984] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377025.736571] vif9.0: no IPv6 routers present [525729.219810] i2c /dev entries driver [525774.669073] it87: Found IT8718F chip at 0x290, revision 8 [525774.669093] it87: in3 is VCC (+5V) [525774.669096] it87: in7 is VCCH (+5V Stand-By) [525774.669145] ACPI: I/O resource it87 [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region ECRE [0x290-0x2af] [525774.669220] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver [527406.708237] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [527406.708239] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [527406.708241] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [527406.708243] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [541357.950257] eth0: port 2(vif1.0) entering disabled state [541357.962390] eth0: port 2(vif1.0) entering disabled state [541359.125074] device vif10.0 entered promiscuous mode [541359.126899] eth0: port 2(vif10.0) entering forwarding state [541359.139298] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [541359.141699] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [541359.141703] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [541361.697214] blkback: ring-ref 8, event-channel 18, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [541361.705457] blkback: ring-ref 9, event-channel 19, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [541361.722241] blkback: ring-ref 770, event-channel 21, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [541369.548563] vif10.0: no IPv6 routers present [571686.217879] hrtimer: interrupt took 197648593 ns ** Model information sys_vendor: System manufacturer product_name: System Product Name product_version: System Version chassis_vendor: Chassis Manufacture chassis_version: Chassis Version bios_vendor: American Megatrends Inc. bios_version: 0303 board_vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. board_name: P7H55-M LX board_version: X.0x ** Loaded modules: Module Size Used by msr 2211 0 cpufreq_powersave902 0 cpufreq_conservative 5162 0 cpufreq_userspace 1992 0 cpufreq_stats 2659 0 hwmon_vid 1828 0 ipt_LOG 4518 0 nf_conntrack_ipv4 9833 2 nf_defrag_ipv4 1139 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state1303 2 nf_conntrack 46519 2 nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_state xt_physdev 1508 4 iptable_filter 2258 1 ip_tables 13899 1 iptable_filter x_tables 12845 4 ipt_LOG,xt_state,xt_physdev,ip_tables bridge 39662 0 stp 1440 1 bridge xen_evtchn 4339 5 xenfs 9600 1 dm_snapshot18481 5 loop 11799 0 raid1 18431 1 md_mod 73792 2 raid1 snd_pcm60551 0 snd_timer 15582 1 snd_pcm snd46446 2 snd_pcm,snd_timer soundcore 4598 1 snd snd_page_alloc 6249 1 snd_pcm i915 255064 0 drm_kms_helper 20065 1 i915 psmouse49777 0 i2c_i8017830 0 asus_atk01107686 0 pcspkr 1699 0 drm 143361 2 i915,drm_kms_helper serio_raw 3752 0 evdev 7352 2 i2c_algo_bit4225 1 i915 i2c_core 15712 5 i915,drm_kms_helper,i2c_i801,drm,i2c_algo_bit video
Bug#608250: Just a precision...
My CPU is an intel core i3 540, and the speedstep option is activated in the bios.
Bug#608250: acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq module: No such device
Hi, thanks for your report. I get the same behavior: overlord3:~$ sudo modprobe acpi-cpufreq FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq (/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-xen-amd64/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): No such device overlord3:~$ dpkg-query -W linux-image-$(uname -r) linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-29 Does this work if you boot the same machine without xen? -Timo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84r5d1q7rg@sauna.l.org
Processed: severity of 608240 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 608240 important Bug #608240 [linux-image-2.6.26-2-r5k-cobalt] linux-image-2.6.26-2-r5k-cobalt: USB subsystem crashes causing EXT3 buffer I/O error and data loss on MIPS system Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608240: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608240 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129361457526827.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#596468: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Keyspan USA-49WG USB-Serial 4th Port Doesn't Work
On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX kernel from experimental? The kernel is available from packages.debian.org. If the error can still be reproduced, we should report it upstream. Unfortunately, 2.6.37-rc7-amd64 has an even greater problem, which prevents me from testing it. The error I am now encountering seems to be the one discussed here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23012 Let me know what you'd like me to do next (though I won't be able to do any more testing until Jan 1 at the earliest, due to holiday plans). Thanks. -- Steaphan Greene sgre...@cs.binghamton.edu Lecturer, Computer Science, Binghamton University GPG public key: http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~sgreene/gpg.key.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1af799.9010...@cs.binghamton.edu
Bug#608250: marked as done (acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq module: No such device)
Your message dated Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:07:22 + with message-id 1293631642.2928.115.ca...@localhost and subject line Re: Bug#608250: acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq module: No such device has caused the Debian Bug report #608250, regarding acpi-cpufreq: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq module: No such device to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 608250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608250 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-29 Severity: normal File: acpi-cpufreq -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-29) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Fri Dec 10 17:41:50 UTC 2010 ** Command line: placeholder root=UUID=f1e032e1-68ed-43e6-a768-daa873eb3c36 ro quiet ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: [373200.836087] EXT3 FS on dm-13, internal journal [373200.836097] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [377015.023850] alloc irq_desc for 1229 on node -1 [377015.023855] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377015.129468] alloc irq_desc for 1228 on node -1 [377015.129471] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377015.295991] device vif9.0 entered promiscuous mode [377015.299647] eth0: port 5(vif9.0) entering forwarding state [377015.338767] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [377016.885679] blkback: ring-ref 8, event-channel 8, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [377016.885722] alloc irq_desc for 1227 on node -1 [377016.885724] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377016.896440] blkback: ring-ref 9, event-channel 9, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [377016.896462] alloc irq_desc for 1226 on node -1 [377016.896464] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377016.911982] alloc irq_desc for 1225 on node -1 [377016.911984] alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 [377025.736571] vif9.0: no IPv6 routers present [525729.219810] i2c /dev entries driver [525774.669073] it87: Found IT8718F chip at 0x290, revision 8 [525774.669093] it87: in3 is VCC (+5V) [525774.669096] it87: in7 is VCCH (+5V Stand-By) [525774.669145] ACPI: I/O resource it87 [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region ECRE [0x290-0x2af] [525774.669220] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use it instead of the native driver [527406.708237] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [527406.708239] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [527406.708241] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [527406.708243] coretemp: Unknown CPU model 25 [541357.950257] eth0: port 2(vif1.0) entering disabled state [541357.962390] eth0: port 2(vif1.0) entering disabled state [541359.125074] device vif10.0 entered promiscuous mode [541359.126899] eth0: port 2(vif10.0) entering forwarding state [541359.139298] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [541359.141699] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [541359.141703] physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore. [541361.697214] blkback: ring-ref 8, event-channel 18, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [541361.705457] blkback: ring-ref 9, event-channel 19, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [541361.722241] blkback: ring-ref 770, event-channel 21, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) [541369.548563] vif10.0: no IPv6 routers present [571686.217879] hrtimer: interrupt took 197648593 ns ** Model information sys_vendor: System manufacturer product_name: System Product Name product_version: System Version chassis_vendor: Chassis Manufacture chassis_version: Chassis Version bios_vendor: American Megatrends Inc. bios_version: 0303 board_vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. board_name: P7H55-M LX board_version: X.0x ** Loaded modules: Module Size Used by msr 2211 0 cpufreq_powersave902 0 cpufreq_conservative 5162 0 cpufreq_userspace 1992 0 cpufreq_stats 2659 0 hwmon_vid 1828 0 ipt_LOG 4518 0 nf_conntrack_ipv4 9833 2 nf_defrag_ipv4 1139 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state1303 2 nf_conntrack 46519 2 nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_state xt_physdev 1508 4 iptable_filter 2258 1 ip_tables 13899 1 iptable_filter x_tables 12845 4 ipt_LOG,xt_state,xt_physdev,ip_tables bridge
Bug#596468: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Keyspan USA-49WG USB-Serial 4th Port Doesn't Work
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 03:55 -0500, Steaphan Greene wrote: On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX kernel from experimental? The kernel is available from packages.debian.org. If the error can still be reproduced, we should report it upstream. Unfortunately, 2.6.37-rc7-amd64 has an even greater problem, which prevents me from testing it. The error I am now encountering seems to be the one discussed here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23012 [...] That was fixed in 2.6.37-rc5. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#608250: To Ben Hutchings
Even in dom0 ? How could i control my CPU speed then ?
Bug#607879: System hangs up with mmap.c:873!
ok, does it happen if you boot the livecd under qemu? I just tested it. Booting the DVD ISO in qemu took more than 20 minutes to get to a console prompt. My usual setting is Debian Live on a USB flash drive with a live-rw persistency partition. This setup boots from the USB flash drive in around 50 seconds on my machine. Starting up KDE did not finish in the qemu test (I stopped it after 40 minutes). Shutting down in qemu took almost three minutes, in my usual setting it takes around ten seconds. I did not experience the system hang in this one single qemu test run (I also do not run into the system hangup on real hardware all the time) but I fail to see the value in retrying with quemu as it is slow beyond repair. We better test with real hardware and real scenarios. Best regards Ronny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201012291527.12792.ronny.stand...@gmx.net
Processed: tagging 608185, severity of 608185 is serious, found 608185 in 2.6.32-29 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 608185 + security Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root Added tag(s) security. severity 608185 serious Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' found 608185 2.6.32-29 Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-29' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-29' Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-29. found 608185 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1 Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1' Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.37~rc7-1~experimental.1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608185: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608185 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12936335925530.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#608185: btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 21:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Package: btrfs-tools Version: 0.19+20100601-3, 0.19+20101101-1 Severity: serious Balance tree action of btrfs command should be limited to only root user, because it may cause data corrupt Why would it cause corruption? and usually result in an uninterruptible process which is causing a heavy I/O load (the process may keep runing for a long time because the action is not a easy deal). [...] I agree with this. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#608250: To Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 15:13 +0100, Timothée GROS wrote: Even in dom0 ? Yes - dom0 has access to most physical devices but *not* physical CPUs. How could i control my CPU speed then ? That would have to be done in the Xen hypervisor, not the dom0 kernel. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#608185: [PATCH] btrfs: Require CAP_SYS_ADMIN for filesystem rebalance
Filesystem rebalancing (BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE) affects the entire filesystem and may run uninterruptibly for a long time. This does not seem to be something that an unprivileged user should be able to do. Reported-by: Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index cc04dc1..2313e8b 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #include linux/blkdev.h #include linux/random.h #include linux/iocontext.h +#include linux/capability.h #include asm/div64.h #include compat.h #include ctree.h @@ -1905,6 +1906,9 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root) if (dev_root-fs_info-sb-s_flags MS_RDONLY) return -EROFS; + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + return -EPERM; + mutex_lock(dev_root-fs_info-volume_mutex); dev_root = dev_root-fs_info-dev_root; -- 1.7.2.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1293634503.2928.132.ca...@localhost
Processed: tagging 608185
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 608185 + patch Bug #608185 [linux-2.6] btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608185: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608185 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12936345829739.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#608185: btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:49, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 21:53 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Balance tree action of btrfs command should be limited to only root user, because it may cause data corrupt Why would it cause corruption? It shouldn't cause corruption if it always works as expected. But any disk maintenance action may cause problem regarding the stored data if there is something unexpected (software bug, known issues at specific situation, etc), especially at the point btrfs is still under heavy development. A common software failure might be bearable in some ways, but as for a filesystem it isn't. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinsz43-6w+8xc8oxh7qkxd81rmk+_z6m=s_y...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#608185: Bug #608185: btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root
2010/12/29 Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de: Hello Aron, On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:31:41PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: I think a workaround (geteuid test) is needed to be settled in btrfs-tools, but not just wait for a kernel change. if you want to stop people doing bad things by accident, OK, but a geteuid test won't stop people that want to do harm on purpose. So the kernel solution is the only sensible IMHO. Best regards Uwe Yes, I know only kernel change will solve the problem so that we can stop people doing bad things deliberately. As you have said, we can prevent people doing it by accident by adding a geteuid test in btrfs-tools. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinyj85gbtvrsupj2jazhhwzpgodkjtsjmtyf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#608185: Bug #608185: btrfs-tools: balance tree action should be only triggered by root
Hello Aron, On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 01:31:41PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: I think a workaround (geteuid test) is needed to be settled in btrfs-tools, but not just wait for a kernel change. if you want to stop people doing bad things by accident, OK, but a geteuid test won't stop people that want to do harm on purpose. So the kernel solution is the only sensible IMHO. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101229145723.gg14...@pengutronix.de
Bug#587014: screen brightness can't be modified on some Panasonic laptops
I also received a message reportin for this bug on a Panasonic CF-52. Can I in any way help this bug get more attention? Just in case, I am at 27C3 now, with my laptop, so if anyone there wants to directly investigate the issue just let me know. -- Nicolas LIMARE http://nicolas.limare.net/ pgp:0xFA423F4F signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#608278: linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Random general protection faults at boot
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-29 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system The system randomly (say, 2 times every 3 boots) shows General Protection Fault errors at boot time. I don't get to multiuser init levels. When those errors occur, I can't do anything, the system seems unresponsive. When I press NumLock, the system shows a message like BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10100 And then hangs up completely. The info displayed in the logs, however, change from time to time. I did a memtest, and the RAM is OK. Reverting to 2.6.32-3-amd64 fixed the problem. -- Package-specific info: ** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached I can't get the exact error messages, as the system can't boot and I don't have a digital camera at hand. I found in /var/log/syslog.0 a similar trace, but I don't know if it's the same problem. Here it is: Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.816204] [ cut here ] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.817009] kernel BUG at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-28-amd64-EUJiNq/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_amd64_none/mm/slub.c:2969! Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.817895] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.818786] last sysfs file: /sys/module/processor/initstate Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.819697] CPU 0 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] Modules linked in: acpi_cpufreq cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_stats fuse loop firewire_sbp2 snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm arc4 snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq ecb snd_timer radeon snd_seq_device rtl8187 ttm drm_kms_helper mac80211 led_class cfg80211 drm i2c_algo_bit snd rfkill i2c_i801 soundcore eeprom_93cx6 i2c_core button snd_page_alloc evdev pcspkr asus_atk0110 processor serio_raw ext3 jbd mbcache usbhid hid sg sd_mod crc_t10dif sr_mod cdrom ata_generic pata_jmicron uhci_hcd ahci ata_piix ehci_hcd thermal firewire_ohci firewire_core crc_itu_t sky2 floppy libata scsi_mod thermal_sys usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] Pid: 9, comm: events/0 Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 P5K-E Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] RIP: 0010:[810e6e5f] [810e6e5f] kfree+0x55/0xcb Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] RSP: 0018:88007fb9bd00 EFLAGS: 00010246 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] RAX: RBX: 0001 RCX: 8118fda5 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] RDX: 0001 RSI: 880001811d10 RDI: ea00 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] RBP: 8800 R08: 88007fb9a000 R09: 81452c20 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] R10: 880001812ba0 R11: dead00200200 R12: a000f6b8 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] R13: 0001 R14: 88007ca3f7c0 R15: ff91 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] FS: () GS:88000180() knlGS: Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 8005003b Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] CR2: 7f873667f000 CR3: 379d8000 CR4: 06f0 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] DR0: DR1: DR2: Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] Process events/0 (pid: 9, threadinfo 88007fb9a000, task 88007fba) Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] Stack: Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] 0001 8800 0008 a000f6b8 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] 0 0001 82800581 88007c8ca000 8104800d Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] 0 000100015780 88007ca3f1a0 880001818180 ff91 Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] Call Trace: Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [a000f6b8] ? usb_control_msg+0x124/0x135 [usbcore] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [8104800d] ? finish_task_switch+0x3a/0xaf Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [a031bd2e] ? rtl818x_ioread8+0x61/0x7e [rtl8187] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [a031bd6f] ? rtl8187_is_radio_enabled+0x24/0xc0 [rtl8187] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [a031be30] ? rtl8187_rfkill_poll+0x25/0x78 [rtl8187] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [a023be5d] ? rfkill_poll+0x1b/0x31 [rfkill] Dec 28 11:33:38 beriserv kernel: [ 20.820173] [810615c3] ?
Bug#607163: Hello Greeting from Francisca
Hello Greeting from Francisca My Name is Francisca I fill like to know you Because journey of thousand Miles started with a step Also true love and likeness Is just like a magic. And only but a day people use to know each others. My Father’s name is Johnson and my Mother’s is Name how ever Rose. But I like feeling happy all of my days, So tell me some details about yourself including your picture, And I will also tell you more about myself in my next mail with my picture. This is My Email Address Yours sincerely Francisca,
Bug#607163: Hello Greeting from Francisca
Hello Greeting from Francisca My Name is Francisca I fill like to know you Because journey of thousand Miles started with a step Also true love and likeness Is just like a magic. And only but a day people use to know each others. My Father’s name is Johnson and my Mother’s is Name how ever Rose. But I like feeling happy all of my days, So tell me some details about yourself including your picture, And I will also tell you more about myself in my next mail with my picture. This is My Email Address Yours sincerely Francisca,
Bug#607879: System hangs up with mmap.c:873!
Ronny Standtke ronny.stand...@gmx.net writes: I just tested it. Booting the DVD ISO in qemu took more than 20 minutes to get How much RAM did you assign to the virtualized machine? I think the default is 128MB. I did not experience the system hang in this one single qemu test run (I also do not run into the system hangup on real hardware all the time) but I fail to see the value in retrying with quemu as it is slow beyond repair. We better test with real hardware and real scenarios. Sure, I was just asking if there would be something I could easily test here. I don't have a machine with cdrom drive easily accessible (my work machine is a geode, my laptop does not have cdrom and my home machine is in a closet to make it more quiet...) -Timo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84ipycqwo5@sauna.l.org
Bug#596468: linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-amd64: Keyspan USA-49WG USB-Serial 4th Port Doesn't Work
On 12/29/2010 09:10 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 03:55 -0500, Steaphan Greene wrote: On 12/26/2010 06:46 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Could you try to reproduce this with a current 2.6.37-rcX kernel from experimental? The kernel is available from packages.debian.org. If the error can still be reproduced, we should report it upstream. Unfortunately, 2.6.37-rc7-amd64 has an even greater problem, which prevents me from testing it. The error I am now encountering seems to be the one discussed here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23012 [...] That was fixed in 2.6.37-rc5. ...then it has been re-introduced, or a new bug which causes the same behavior for at least my keyspan device has cropped up in -rc7. All access attempts to all of the 4 ports of my device with 2.6.37-rc7 failed with a Resource Temporarily Unavailable error. Thanks. -- Steaphan Greene sgre...@cs.binghamton.edu Lecturer, Computer Science, Binghamton University GPG public key: http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~sgreene/gpg.key.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1b8678.2030...@cs.binghamton.edu
Bug#608138: initramfs-tools: NMI error on boot only in recovery mode
On 12/27/2010 09:36 PM, Cesare Leonardi wrote: Grub command lines are identical except that lapic hpet=force in normal boot is substituted by single in recovery mode. I've found that if i remove lapic from the command line, then the NMI error appears. And in fact that paramter it's not present in recovery mode. In my laptop, lapic has to be used (as told in kernel logs) because it is disabled by BIOS. Googling around i've learned that NMI watchdog needs a local APIC and that explain the error message. Even if the exact meaning of that message is obscure to me yet. Feel free to mark this bug as a duplicate of #599368 and close it. Then add +1 to what Michael Biebl already asked: why that message should be showed? Cesare. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d1b9b71.8050...@gmail.com
Processed: severity of 608278 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 608278 important Bug #608278 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64: Random general protection faults at boot Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608278 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129365847015879.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
