Bug#500158: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-486: Upgrade from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny may cause a kernel halt)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:04:08 + with message-id 1300946648.26693.541.camel@localhost and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486: Upgrade from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny may cause a kernel halt has caused the Debian Bug report #500158, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-486: Upgrade from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny may cause a kernel halt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 500158: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500158 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-486 Version: 2.6.26-5 Severity: important As Debian is upgraded from Debian Etch to Debian Lenny, the kernel may halt with an error as the system is restarted: Booting the Kernel. BUG Int 6: CR2 EDI c0363f8c ESI 4000 EBP c0363f88 ESP c036f44 EBX EDX 0006 ECX EAX 4000 err EIP c0112b6f CS c0370060 flg 00010092 Stack: c0363f90 c0363f8c c0363f88 c0363f94 c0363f90 c0363f8c c0363f88 c037294f c0363f94 c0375293 03bef000 c03fea40 4000 005a29b7 c000 0009f000 03bef000 00d0 c03ba410 This was observed on an IBM compatible computer using a traditional Intel Pentium compatible processor. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.26-1-486 (Debian 2.6.26-4) (wa...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23)) #1 Thu Aug 28 11:14:57 UTC 2008 ** Command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=305 ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: No kernel log provided. A different machine is being used to report the error. linux-image-2.6.26-1-486 recommends no packages. Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.26-1-486 suggests: ii lilo 1:22.8-6 LInux LOader - The Classic OS load -- debconf information excluded ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- I'm closing this bug due to lack of response. However, I think this is the same bug as #515982, which was fixed in version 2.6.26-20 in 'lenny'. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
Processed: forcibly merging 483781 502486
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 483781 502486 Bug#483781: FAT: utf8 is not a recommended IO charset for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be case sensitive! Bug#502486: mount: mounts VFAT filesystem with buggy iocharset=utf8 ! Forcibly Merged 483781 502486. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 502486: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=502486 483781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483781 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130094678714374.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
reopen 506419 found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-10 found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-11 found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.27 tags 506419 + upstream owner 506419 ! quit Ben Hutchings wrote: I'm closing this because I think a year is more than enough time to test a new version. I'll take ownership then. I used to have a forcedeth and while I don't anymore, I'm interested in the driver being reliable. Martin, ping? Of course if you've lost interest (e.g., if you've lost the hardware) then closing the bug again is probably the right thing to do. Thanks, both. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324062817.GA27426@elie
Processed: Re: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 506419
Bug #506419 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [linux-2.6] high
volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-10
Bug #506419 [linux-2.6] high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.26-10.
found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-11
Bug #506419 [linux-2.6] high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.26-11.
found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.27
Bug #506419 [linux-2.6] high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
The source linux-2.6 and version 2.6.27 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.27.
tags 506419 + upstream
Bug #506419 [linux-2.6] high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Added tag(s) upstream.
owner 506419 !
Bug #506419 [linux-2.6] high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Owner recorded as Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
506419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506419
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130094811718050.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 506419 + moreinfo Bug #506419 [linux-2.6] high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip Added tag(s) moreinfo. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 506419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506419 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130094817018112.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
also sprach Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com [2011.03.24.0728 +0100]: I'm closing this because I think a year is more than enough time to test a new version. I'll take ownership then. I used to have a forcedeth and while I don't anymore, I'm interested in the driver being reliable. Martin, ping? Of course if you've lost interest (e.g., if you've lost the hardware) then closing the bug again is probably the right thing to do. I still have the hardware, but it's on a production machine. It is onboard and I added a separate NIC, so it's unused, but I cannot really run kernel-level experiments. However, the machine has KVM, and as soon as KVM supports PCI passthrough, that might be useful. There are two cards connected to each other (I expected debugging), and with two KVM instances, this could be interesting. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems never try to explain computers to a layman. it's easier to explain sex to a virgin. -- robert heinlein (note, however, that virgins tend to know a lot about computers.) digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
martin f krafft wrote: I still have the hardware, but it's on a production machine. It is onboard and I added a separate NIC, so it's unused, but I cannot really run kernel-level experiments. However, the machine has KVM, and as soon as KVM supports PCI passthrough, that might be useful. There are two cards connected to each other (I expected debugging), and with two KVM instances, this could be interesting. Thanks for the update; I'm happy to wait. I'm leaving the bug tagged moreinfo for now, as in wouldn't it be nice if someone with similar hardware could try to reproduce this. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324065903.GA27507@elie
Bug#619433: linux-image-2.6.38-1-686: early crash with ACPI (regression)
- Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk a écrit : Please report this upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org, under product 'ACPI', component 'ACPICA-Core'. Let us know the bug URL so we can track it. You should link *directly* to the video, if possible, because it took me some time to work out where the link was on the 'getfile.pl' page. Also you should provide the most important lines as text, which appear to be: do_page_fault+0x0/0x35d error_code+0x67/0x6c __kmalloc+0x??/0x10b acpi_ns_internalize_name+0x2e/0x61 acpi_ns_search_one_scope+0x12/0x31 I was going to ask you to use the 'boot_delay' kernel parameter to slow down log output, but now I realise this isn't enabled in the Debian kernel packages. If you can build a custom kernel with CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY=y and test it with boot_delay=1000 then you should be able to get still pictures of the whole of the 'oops' message. But the above lines may be enough of a clue to the ACPI developers. Thanks a lot for your prompt answer. I will report upstream once I have rebuild a custom kernel with the CONFIG_BOOT_PRINTK_DELAY option and will let you know. Sorry for the video, I did not realize about the indirect link. I will try to give a more direct link or find another site for hosting the new video. Regards Pascal Dormeau Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/893490614.13537841300950269146.javamail.r...@spooler6-g27.priv.proxad.net
Bug#423562: arm debian linux kernel - XFS
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2011-03-24 05:49]: For the first of these, we would need confirmation from upstream that it is suitable for backporting. Please decide whether you want to do this; if not then we should disable XFS on armel and hppa in squeeze. I'm not planning to backport them. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324081834.gz31...@jirafa.cyrius.com
Processed: Re: Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 619371 linux-2.6 Bug #619371 [base] base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625) Bug reassigned from package 'base' to 'linux-2.6'. # i'm pretty sure its not the wakeonlan package, if so, # apologies and please reassign tags 619371 + moreinfo Bug #619371 [linux-2.6] base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625) Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619371 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130095657118997.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?
Since this bug seems to affect a lot of people (looking at the number of other bug reports on the same issue), it would be nice to make the old kernel version linux-image-2.6.32-30 available online again. One or two days after *.31 went 'stable' one could still acquire the old kernel from packages.debian.org by selecting the new kernel and manually changing the download URL, but it looks like the old version has now been removed from the mirrors (at least each mirror I tried). Maybe someone could make the old kernel version available somewhere (if indeed no such page exists anymore) and post a link to where one can still find the old version on this bug report? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1300958717.1550.8.camel@dai019
Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?
Hi Tobias, Tobias Küster wrote: Since this bug seems to affect a lot of people (looking at the number of other bug reports on the same issue), it would be nice to make the old kernel version linux-image-2.6.32-30 available online again. You might like http://snapshot.debian.org/. :) Kind regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324093504.GB32092@elie
Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?
Since this bug seems to affect a lot of people (looking at the number of other bug reports on the same issue), it would be nice to make the old kernel version linux-image-2.6.32-30 available online again. You might like http://snapshot.debian.org/. :) Whoops, must have missed that one... thanks! :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1300959757.1550.10.camel@dai019
Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)
Holger Levsen schrieb: reassign 619371 linux-2.6 # i'm pretty sure its not the wakeonlan package, if so, # apologies and please reassign tags 619371 + moreinfo thanks Hi Christian, thanks for your bug report. We need more information from you, can you please followup to this bug by running reportbug -N 619371?! Thanks. (If you havent installed reportbug, please apt-get install it.) Hmm - I'm not really sure what you want. I've installed reportbug (The bug-report was created using reportbug ;-) but I can't find a '-N' switch. To the remark above: I'm also pretty sure this is not a problem of the wakeonlan package. The installed package on this machine is never used to wake this machine. The magic packets were sent from a machine which as - in the moment - lenny. And the esprimo machine has ethtools installed and the wol is enabled and set to g (magic packets) I'm not sure but as far as I know, there is no action during the boot process to set/enabe the wol for the ethernet device. So I assume, the settings are permanent to on. cheers, Holger Cheers, Christian -- Name: Christian Andretzky | Address: TU Chemnitz, Fakultaet fuer | Phone: ++49 +371 531 32130 | Elektrotechnik/Informationstechnik | FAX: ++49 +371 531 832130 | Reichenhainer Str. 70| mail: christian.andret...@mb.tu-chemnitz.de | D-09107 Chemnitz| PGP: public key available via public key server | In a world without walls and fences, there is no need for windows and gates | The Box said 'Windows 95 or better'. - So I installed Linux. | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b1acd.7010...@mb.tu-chemnitz.de
Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and irq timeout unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed
Hi, Jonathan Nieder wrote: When I boot the HURD without passing -no-kvm-irqchip on the command line, the system usually will print hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 hd2: unexpected_intr: status=0x58 [and so on] Fix (for the KVM host) merged to linus's master as part of kvm-updates/2.6.39, as a commit named 7049467b (KVM: remove isr_ack logic from PIC, 2011-02-09). So v2.6.39 will fix this. Hope that helps, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324104034.GA1154@elie
Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and irq timeout unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed
Hello, Jonathan Nieder, le Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:40:34 -0500, a écrit : Jonathan Nieder wrote: When I boot the HURD without passing -no-kvm-irqchip on the command line, the system usually will print hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 hd2: irq timeout: status=0x50 hd2: unexpected_intr: status=0x58 [and so on] Fix (for the KVM host) merged to linus's master as part of kvm-updates/2.6.39, as a commit named 7049467b (KVM: remove isr_ack logic from PIC, 2011-02-09). So v2.6.39 will fix this. Great! Thanks for the notice! Do you happen to know which version the bug was introduced it? Hope that helps, Sure! Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324105538.gm5...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr
Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and irq timeout unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed
Samuel Thibault wrote: Jonathan Nieder, le Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:40:34 -0500, a écrit : So v2.6.39 will fix this. Great! Thanks for the notice! Do you happen to know which version the bug was introduced it? Yes, it bisects to v2.6.37-rc1~142^2~39 (KVM: Check for pending events before attempting injection, 2010-07-27). The thread starting at [1] has details. Regards, Jonathan [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/58669/focus=67483 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324105816.GA1394@elie
Bug#619381: linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: usb mass storage error causes kernel panic
forwarded 619381 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31802 thanks Excerpts from Ben Hutchings's message of Thu Mar 24 06:38:05 +0100 2011: On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 13:35 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.38-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss To reproduce: 1) Attach a SATA drive to a SATA/USB bridge. 2) dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sdf bs=4k 3) detach the drive drom the bridge Not a very good idea... The SATA connectors aren't secured in any way so that's what happens in practice. Results in kernel panic. but that shouldn't happen. Please report this upstream at https://bugzilla.kernel.org, under product 'IO/Storage', component 'Block Layer'. Picture attached. I think a lower resolution would be sufficient! I had issues capturing a readable picture at lower resolution. Thanks Michal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1300967422-sup-6...@virtual.ruk.cuni.cz
Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: usb mass storage error causes kernel panic
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 619381 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31802 Bug #619381 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.38-1-amd64: usb mass storage error causes kernel panic Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31802'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619381 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130096759124752.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#612105: qemu-kvm: hangs and irq timeout unless -no-kvm-irqchip passed
Jonathan Nieder, le Thu 24 Mar 2011 05:58:47 -0500, a écrit : [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/58669/focus=67483 Cool! Thanks for having handled this. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324121547.gp5...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr
Bug#614515: Same crash on two different laptop systems after resume with 2.6.37 from unstable
I think this bug is fixed in 2.6.38 but I'm not sure. Have anybody tested it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b3bb2.6040...@um.es
Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)
Hi, On Donnerstag, 24. März 2011, Christian Andretzky wrote: Hmm - I'm not really sure what you want. I've installed reportbug (The bug-report was created using reportbug ;-) but I can't find a '-N' switch. reportbug from lenny doesnt have this switch, versions from squeeze and above do :) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#618665: Online-Source for linux-image-2.6.32-30?
As a time saver for whom ever, here are the steps I did to downgrade the kernel: Edited /etc/apt/sources.list to enable a single line: deb http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110314T221327Z squeeze main Then called: apt-get update apt-get install linux-image-2.6.32-5-686=2.6.32-30 Added the following apt_preferences file: /etc/apt/preferences.d/linux-image And added there the following lines: Explanation: Do not install a version of the kernel which disappears the cursor. Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 Pin: version 2.6.32-31 Pin-priority: -1 Then edit /etc/apt/sources.list back to the original and update: apt-get update -- Troy Korjuslommi Tksoft Inc. +358-40-570-9900
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 01:28 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: reopen 506419 found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-10 found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.26-11 found 506419 linux-2.6/2.6.27 tags 506419 + upstream owner 506419 ! quit Ben Hutchings wrote: I'm closing this because I think a year is more than enough time to test a new version. I'll take ownership then. I used to have a forcedeth and while I don't anymore, I'm interested in the driver being reliable. [...] If you can't test it, what good does it to reopen the bug? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Hi, This module provides a power off sequence for the Iris machines from Eurobraille, a french manufacturer of braille devices. The module is small and won't do anything unless it is called with its force parameter set to 1. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324134610.GA7235@pema
Processed: tagging 423562
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 423562 + pending Bug #423562 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6-ixp4xx: XFS-filesystem crashes Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 423562: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=423562 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130097679226915.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#619371: base: wake on lan does not work with some special type of machines (Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo P5625)
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:47 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Donnerstag, 24. März 2011, Christian Andretzky wrote: Hmm - I'm not really sure what you want. I've installed reportbug (The bug-report was created using reportbug ;-) but I can't find a '-N' switch. reportbug from lenny doesnt have this switch, versions from squeeze and above do :) 'reportbug -N' is useless - it uses the package name from the original report, not the package the bug is currently assigned to. It's doubly useless for the kernel because we reassign bugs to 'linux-2.6' which isn't a binary package and doesn't have any bug scripts (though I might fix this by adding them to linux-base). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 14:46 +0100, Sebastien Hinderer wrote: Package: linux-2.6 Severity: wishlist Hi, This module provides a power off sequence for the Iris machines from Eurobraille, a french manufacturer of braille devices. The module is small and won't do anything unless it is called with its force parameter set to 1. Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module
Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 14:40 +): Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? Sure ! It's attached. Thanks for your prompt response ! Sébastien. processor : 0 vendor_id : CyrixInstead cpu family : 5 model : 9 model name : Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi stepping: 2 cpu MHz : 267.288 cache size : 16 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu tsc msr cx8 cmov mmx cxmmx bogomips: 543.02
Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module
On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:50 +0100, Sebastien Hinderer wrote: Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 14:40 +): Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? Sure ! It's attached. Thanks for your prompt response ! OK, I'll enable this for the 486 flavour only. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 619493
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 tags 619493 + pending Bug #619493 [linux-2.6] linux-2.6: Please include the iris module Added tag(s) pending. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619493 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13009791984069.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#619504: linux-image-2.6.32-5-686: Thermal trip points insanely low Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-31 Severity: important
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-31 Severity: important On boot, thermal trip points are set to the following: cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/TZ1/trip_points critical (S5): 105 C passive: 16 C: tc1=1 tc2=2 tsp=100 devices=CPU0 CPU1 active[0]: 16 C: devices=C39B active[1]: 16 C: devices=C39C active[2]: 16 C: devices=C39D active[3]: 16 C: devices=C39E This causes the CPU to constantly clock down to 800MHz, making the system unusably slow. I have encountered this problem in previous kernels until 2 or 3 years ago, at which point it was fixed (I believe by adding this laptop model to some sort of ACPI black list). Recent upgrade re-introduced the bug. Laptop model is HP Compaq 6715s. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.32-5-686 (Debian 2.6.32-31) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Tue Mar 8 21:36:00 UTC 2011 ** Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 root=/dev/mapper/twisted-root ro quiet ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: [ 73.304899] input: HDA Digital PCBeep as /devices/pci:00/:00:14.2/input/input7 [ 73.462294] Bluetooth: Generic Bluetooth USB driver ver 0.6 [ 73.462948] usbcore: registered new interface driver btusb [ 74.640155] EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal [ 75.027200] loop: module loaded [ 75.756848] Adding 1765368k swap on /dev/mapper/twisted-swap_1. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1765368k [ 76.517349] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds [ 76.520286] EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal [ 76.520295] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. [ 77.815115] fuse init (API version 7.13) [ 79.167033] vboxdrv: Found 2 processor cores. [ 79.167618] vboxdrv: fAsync=1 offMin=0x5f86c offMax=0x5f86c [ 79.168156] vboxdrv: TSC mode is 'asynchronous', kernel timer mode is 'normal'. [ 79.168160] vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 4.0.2_OSE (interface 0x0016). [ 79.637978] input: ACPI Virtual Keyboard Device as /devices/virtual/input/input8 [ 82.022423] tg3 :10:00.0: irq 27 for MSI/MSI-X [ 82.068430] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready [ 82.128078] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/ucode13.fw [ 82.217695] b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/b0g0initvals13.fw [ 82.424072] b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 410.2160 (2007-05-26 15:32:10) [ 82.528761] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 84.149898] apm: BIOS not found. [ 85.259613] Bluetooth: L2CAP ver 2.14 [ 85.259617] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized [ 85.280744] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized [ 85.280758] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized [ 85.280766] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11 [ 85.592041] Bluetooth: BNEP (Ethernet Emulation) ver 1.3 [ 85.592045] Bluetooth: BNEP filters: protocol multicast [ 85.604129] Bluetooth: SCO (Voice Link) ver 0.6 [ 85.604132] Bluetooth: SCO socket layer initialized [ 86.339563] pci :01:05.0: PCI INT B - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 86.602441] lp: driver loaded but no devices found [ 86.680568] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [ 86.682366] ppdev: user-space parallel port driver [ 87.062425] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled. [ 87.065394] [drm] radeon: Initializing kernel modesetting. [ 87.065506] [drm] register mmio base: 0xD020 [ 87.065509] [drm] register mmio size: 65536 [ 87.065652] ATOM BIOS: ATI [ 87.065872] [drm] GPU reset succeed (RBBM_STATUS=0x1140) [ 87.065896] [drm] radeon: VRAM 128M [ 87.065898] [drm] radeon: VRAM from 0x3800 to 0x3FFF [ 87.065900] [drm] radeon: GTT 512M [ 87.065902] [drm] radeon: GTT from 0x4000 to 0x5FFF [ 87.065957] [drm] radeon: irq initialized. [ 87.066161] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BAR=128M [ 87.066173] [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR [ 87.066306] [TTM] Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 446066 kiB. [ 87.066311] [TTM] Zone highmem: Available graphics memory: 452054 kiB. [ 87.066339] [drm] radeon: 128M of VRAM memory ready [ 87.066342] [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. [ 87.066367] [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072, num gpu pages 131072 [ 87.070819] [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 z pipes initialized. [ 87.070841] [drm] radeon: cp idle (0x1C03) [ 87.070902] [drm] Loading RS690/RS740 Microcode [ 87.070905] platform radeon_cp.0: firmware: requesting radeon/RS690_cp.bin [ 87.114807] [drm] radeon: ring at 0x4000 [ 87.114828] [drm] ring test succeeded in 1 usecs [ 87.115007] [drm] radeon: ib pool ready. [ 87.115099] [drm] ib test succeeded in 0 usecs [ 87.115294] [drm] Default TV standard: NTSC [ 87.115333] [drm] Radeon Display Connectors [ 87.115336] [drm] Connector 0: [ 87.115338] [drm] VGA [ 87.115341] [drm] DDC: 0x7e50 0x7e40 0x7e54 0x7e44 0x7e58 0x7e48 0x7e5c 0x7e4c [ 87.115343] [drm] Encoders: [ 87.115346] [drm] CRT1: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_DAC1 [ 87.115348]
Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
2011/3/14 Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com: 2011/3/13 Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com: On 11.03.2011 12:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote: Hello, I see Brad has a similar problem on the official Debian linux kernel. I have just managed to compile the current vanilla 2.6.38+ version and installed it on my laptop. I will report about the results, either way they turn out. If necessary, I might do a bisect, but I hope someone with more expertise than myself will help us reduce the search area for the cause of the issue. I don't seem to experience the problem anymore with the vanilla 2.6.38 kernel (HEAD is git version 35d34df7). Spoke too soon. I've seen the problem after the 3rd or 4th hibernate-resume cycle (no reboot). I have payed more attention and the problem with the new kernel is restricted only to the background issue, while there are no observed glyph issues. Please tell me if I should try a bisect. Maybe I should try an older kernel... -- Regards, EddyP = Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein -- Regards, EddyP = Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin6mmaz1usgvqltvv5oqt7s5wa-_6+zm2bms...@mail.gmail.com
[bts-link] source package linux-2.6
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #618847 (http://bugs.debian.org/618847) # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35502 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW usertags 618847 + status-NEW thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324163528.20339.39385.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.37-2 Severity: normal On my DELL Latitude E6400 laptop, the Ethernet cable, though plugged in before booting, isn't always detected at boot time (at least when /etc/init.d/networking is run). More precisely, at home it is always detected, but I'm currently connected in a hotel, and here it is never detected (at boot time only). I need to run /etc/init.d/networking restart manually, and everything is OK. Since after the boot, the Ethernet cable detection works, it seems to be a software problem. But I don't know where. FYI, here's my configuration... /etc/network/interfaces contains: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # One should not use auto eth0 because an Ethernet cable is not # necessarily plugged in. Then one needs an allow-hotplug eth0 # line so that ifup and ifdown can work on eth0. But eth0 is not # automatically brought up by /etc/init.d/networking start # (Debian bug 550014); ifplugd is not a solution either because # it doesn't work at boot time (bug 550019), but also it is run # too late (bugs 204499, 407349 and 432612). auto lo eth0 #allow-hotplug eth0 # The loopback network interface iface lo inet loopback mapping eth0 script guessnet-wrapper map default: eth0-dhcp map debug: true map timeout: 2 iface eth0-dhcp inet dhcp iface eth0-home inet static address 192.168.0.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.1 test peer address 192.168.0.1 mac 00:00:c5:b4:98:74 The guessnet-wrapper script is: #!/bin/sh # Since a DHCP client process could have modified /etc/resolv.conf, we # reset it to the default value in case a static address will be used. echo nameserver 127.0.0.1 /etc/resolv.conf ifconfig $1 up sleep 2 ethtool $1 | grep -q 'Link detected: yes' exec guessnet -i $@ echo No link detected. 2 printf %s-none\n $1 # $Id: guessnet-wrapper 37977 2010-07-16 17:35:50Z vinc17/xvii $ ethtool and guessnet are provided by the Debian packages. The /var/log/boot file is attached. It contains in particular: Thu Mar 24 17:36:57 2011: Running mapping script guessnet-wrapper on eth0 Thu Mar 24 17:37:00 2011: No link detected. Thu Mar 24 17:37:00 2011: Ignoring unknown interface eth0=eth0-none. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.37-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.37-2) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-12) ) #1 SMP Sun Feb 27 10:12:22 UTC 2011 ** Command line: root=/dev/mapper/xvii-root ro quiet ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: [ 12.258209] iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2010 Intel Corporation [ 12.258275] iwlagn :0c:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17 [ 12.258283] iwlagn :0c:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 12.258323] iwlagn :0c:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300 AGN, REV=0x24 [ 12.277517] iwlagn :0c:00.0: device EEPROM VER=0x120, CALIB=0x4 [ 12.278359] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [ 12.278464] iwlagn :0c:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 24 802.11a channels [ 12.278626] iwlagn :0c:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [ 12.278641] input: HDA Intel Mic at Sep Left Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input9 [ 12.278723] input: HDA Intel Mic at Ext Right Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input10 [ 12.278787] input: HDA Intel Line Out at Sep Left Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input11 [ 12.278853] input: HDA Intel HP Out at Ext Right Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input12 [ 12.339293] input: DualPoint Stick as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input13 [ 12.355941] input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS DualPoint TouchPad as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input14 [ 12.517449] iwlagn :0c:00.0: loaded firmware version 8.24.2.12 [ 12.602290] nouveau :01:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 [ 12.602304] nouveau :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 12.605342] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Detected an NV50 generation card (0x298580a2) [ 12.608676] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Attempting to load BIOS image from PRAMIN [ 12.712639] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: ... appears to be valid [ 12.712643] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: BIT BIOS found [ 12.712646] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Bios version 62.98.3c.00 [ 12.712649] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: TMDS table version 2.0 [ 12.712652] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Found Display Configuration Block version 4.0 [ 12.712655] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Raw DCB entry 0: 01000323 00010034 [ 12.712657] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: Raw DCB entry 1: 02011300 0028 [
Bug#615642: nfs-kernel-server: Looks lite this problem also exists in 2.6.32-5-kirkwood armv5tel
Package: nfs-kernel-server Version: 1:1.2.2-4 Severity: normal I seem to have this problem on squeeze Kirkwood arm5tel as well /Joel -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-kirkwood Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages nfs-kernel-server depends on: ii libblkid1 2.17.2-9 block device id library ii libc6 2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libcomerr2 1.41.12-2common error description library ii libgssapi-krb5-21.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k ii libgssglue1 0.1-4mechanism-switch gssapi library ii libk5crypto31.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - C ii libkrb5-3 1.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libnfsidmap20.23-2 An nfs idmapping library ii librpcsecgss3 0.19-2 allows secure rpc communication us ii libwrap07.6.q-19 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra ii lsb-base3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii nfs-common 1:1.2.2-4NFS support files common to client ii ucf 3.0025+nmu1 Update Configuration File: preserv nfs-kernel-server recommends no packages. nfs-kernel-server suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324180311.14685.69087.reportbug@localhost
Processed (with 1 errors): problem still exist in current squeeze kernel
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 552088 ! Bug #552088 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6-686: ath5k phy1: noise floor calibration timeout Bug 552088 is not marked as done; doing nothing. Version: 2.6.32-30 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 552088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130099207518942.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#552088: bump
Guys, whats the current status on this bug? I'm having the same problem as the bug author. Using the old madwifi driver eliminates this problem but i want to stick to the ath5k driver. Ideas? Stefan -- Stefan Bauer - PGP: 36D1 1570 DCAD B767 EABE F60D 6BCA 7AD4 79EB C4EC plzk.de - Linux - because it works -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b91c9.6050...@cubewerk.de
Bug#552088: bump
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 07:47:37PM +0100, Stefan Bauer wrote: Guys, whats the current status on this bug? I'm having the same problem as the bug author. Using the old madwifi driver eliminates this problem but i want to stick to the ath5k driver. Ideas? Does ath5k in 2.6.38 (now in sid) work for you? If so, we can look at backporting it (but this may not be easy). Otherwise, I have no answer for you. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324190351.gl2...@decadent.org.uk
Bug#619493: linux-2.6: Please include the iris module
Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 15:06 +): On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 15:50 +0100, Sebastien Hinderer wrote: Ben Hutchings (2011/03/24 14:40 +): Can you provide the contents of /proc/cpuinfo from one of these machines, so I can work out which flavour(s) should have this? Sure ! It's attached. Thanks for your prompt response ! OK, I'll enable this for the 486 flavour only. Excellent, thank you ! Sébastien. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324190825.GA12432@pema
Bug#619472: X.org with i915 produces garbage sometimes being run on Linux 2.6.38
On 24/03/2011 11:30, Andrew O. Shadoura wrote: After upgrading the kernel, X.org produces garbage in random screen areas. That garbage persists in the windows in which it appears (I'm able to take a screenshot of it). I would suggest you to give a look at this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619472 Here the problem seems to be in xserver-xorg-driver-intel, not in the kernel. But you have a rather new i945, so this can be unrelated. Hope to help. Cesare. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d8b99c8.50...@gmail.com
Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected
retitle 619520 eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection severity 619520 wishlist thanks After some tests, it appears that the 2-second delay before running ethtool was too short here. Though increasing the delay works (I now test the link each second, and it is detected after 3 seconds), it's a bit annoying, and I think the kernel should do something about it early in the boot sequence. Indeed there are more than 3 seconds between the beginning of the boot and the network[*] is started (just after which the ifconfig eth0 up is performed). [*] /etc/init.d/networking -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324184907.ga3...@xvii.vinc17.org
Processed: Re: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 619520 eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection Bug #619520 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected Changed Bug title to 'eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection' from 'linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected' severity 619520 wishlist Bug #619520 [linux-2.6] eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130099520728631.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#619520: marked as done (eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection)
Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:13:57 + with message-id 20110324211357.gm2...@decadent.org.uk and subject line Re: Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected has caused the Debian Bug report #619520, regarding eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 619520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.37-2 Severity: normal On my DELL Latitude E6400 laptop, the Ethernet cable, though plugged in before booting, isn't always detected at boot time (at least when /etc/init.d/networking is run). More precisely, at home it is always detected, but I'm currently connected in a hotel, and here it is never detected (at boot time only). I need to run /etc/init.d/networking restart manually, and everything is OK. Since after the boot, the Ethernet cable detection works, it seems to be a software problem. But I don't know where. FYI, here's my configuration... /etc/network/interfaces contains: # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5). # One should not use auto eth0 because an Ethernet cable is not # necessarily plugged in. Then one needs an allow-hotplug eth0 # line so that ifup and ifdown can work on eth0. But eth0 is not # automatically brought up by /etc/init.d/networking start # (Debian bug 550014); ifplugd is not a solution either because # it doesn't work at boot time (bug 550019), but also it is run # too late (bugs 204499, 407349 and 432612). auto lo eth0 #allow-hotplug eth0 # The loopback network interface iface lo inet loopback mapping eth0 script guessnet-wrapper map default: eth0-dhcp map debug: true map timeout: 2 iface eth0-dhcp inet dhcp iface eth0-home inet static address 192.168.0.8 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 gateway 192.168.0.1 test peer address 192.168.0.1 mac 00:00:c5:b4:98:74 The guessnet-wrapper script is: #!/bin/sh # Since a DHCP client process could have modified /etc/resolv.conf, we # reset it to the default value in case a static address will be used. echo nameserver 127.0.0.1 /etc/resolv.conf ifconfig $1 up sleep 2 ethtool $1 | grep -q 'Link detected: yes' exec guessnet -i $@ echo No link detected. 2 printf %s-none\n $1 # $Id: guessnet-wrapper 37977 2010-07-16 17:35:50Z vinc17/xvii $ ethtool and guessnet are provided by the Debian packages. The /var/log/boot file is attached. It contains in particular: Thu Mar 24 17:36:57 2011: Running mapping script guessnet-wrapper on eth0 Thu Mar 24 17:37:00 2011: No link detected. Thu Mar 24 17:37:00 2011: Ignoring unknown interface eth0=eth0-none. -- Package-specific info: ** Version: Linux version 2.6.37-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.37-2) (b...@decadent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-12) ) #1 SMP Sun Feb 27 10:12:22 UTC 2011 ** Command line: root=/dev/mapper/xvii-root ro quiet ** Not tainted ** Kernel log: [ 12.258209] iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2010 Intel Corporation [ 12.258275] iwlagn :0c:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17 [ 12.258283] iwlagn :0c:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 12.258323] iwlagn :0c:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300 AGN, REV=0x24 [ 12.277517] iwlagn :0c:00.0: device EEPROM VER=0x120, CALIB=0x4 [ 12.278359] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810 [ 12.278464] iwlagn :0c:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 24 802.11a channels [ 12.278626] iwlagn :0c:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [ 12.278641] input: HDA Intel Mic at Sep Left Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input9 [ 12.278723] input: HDA Intel Mic at Ext Right Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input10 [ 12.278787] input: HDA Intel Line Out at Sep Left Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input11 [ 12.278853] input: HDA Intel HP Out at Ext Right Jack as /devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/sound/card0/input12 [ 12.339293] input: DualPoint Stick as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input13 [ 12.355941] input: AlpsPS/2 ALPS DualPoint TouchPad as
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Ben Hutchings wrote: If you can't test it, what good does it to reopen the bug? It is a real bug and I have no reason to believe it was fixed. Meanwhile the submitter has said that as soon as circumstances allow, he'll test it. Is the bug doing harm by sitting open? Perhaps someone should lower the severity to wishlist to keep it off your radar? I just want the bug to be fixed and believe the bug tracking system is a useful way to track work towards bringing that about. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324211841.GA3151@elie
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:18:41PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Ben Hutchings wrote: If you can't test it, what good does it to reopen the bug? It is a real bug and I have no reason to believe it was fixed. It *was* a real bug and you have no reason to believe it is not fixed. Meanwhile the submitter has said that as soon as circumstances allow, he'll test it. Is the bug doing harm by sitting open? New submitters are expected to look through existing bug reports. The BTS can take over a minute to generate a summary of all reports in linux-2.6. Yes, stale bug reports do harm. Perhaps someone should lower the severity to wishlist to keep it off your radar? If it is a real, live bug then it is important. If not, it should be closed. Changing the severity is just silly. Ben. I just want the bug to be fixed and believe the bug tracking system is a useful way to track work towards bringing that about. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324224510.go2...@decadent.org.uk
Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip
Ben Hutchings wrote: It *was* a real bug and you have no reason to believe it is not fixed. Sure, it is possible that 6c2da9c or eb10a781 fixes this. But I really do suspect that it's not fixed. I'd take at least 1:1 odds. New submitters are expected to look through existing bug reports. The BTS can take over a minute to generate a summary of all reports in linux-2.6. Yes, that is a problem. Maybe linux-2.6 bugs could be split using usertags (for networking, dri, etc) to lessen it? Or maybe it's possible to serve snapshots of the bug list as static HTML somewhere, or to add some caching to debbugs to alleviate the underlying problem? If it is a real, live bug then it is important. If not, it should be closed. Changing the severity is just silly. Ok, that makes sense to me. Unfortunately, hardware-dependent bugs are hard to debug. I trust this particular bug submitter a great deal, which is part of why I don't consider it a lost cause. Anyway, you've done enough work on linux-2.6 that you should feel free to do whatever you want. Hopefully the above explanations make my actions clearer, but if you want to close the bug again, I won't stop you. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110324230634.GD3151@elie
Bug#607548: The screen is still black
This bug was closed (I think) because the problem was fixed according to some information that I can no longer recover. That is however not true. When starting Debian squeeze or Debian sid I still often get a black screen on my Compaq 6510b. When this happens, I type (blindly) user (root) password(***) and startx. That will give a working system with X11. I can then exit from X11 to enter terminal mode which then works fine. I have updated to the latest version regularly, but the problem is still there. I boot into squeeze like this: title sda8: Debian squeeze (2.6.32-5) root(hd0,7) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-5-686 root=/dev/sda8 ro quiet noresume initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-686 savedefault boot This is with the old style GRUB menu.lst because I have many partitions and want to set things myself. The automated new GRUB is beyond what I can understand with a reasonable effort. Regards Leif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110325011048.df5866d8.l...@sm5bsz.com
Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected
reopen 619520 thanks On 2011-03-24 21:13:57 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: Network drivers are not expected to start the hardware until the network interface is brought up (by ifup). This is poorly designed. There should be a way to bring up the network interface early in the boot sequence (alternatively the driver could do something equivalent, so that the Ethernet link is detected when one tests its status). It is your responsibility to set an appropriate time limit for guessnet. This doesn't solve the problem: it makes the boot longer. By bringing up the interface earlier, the time needed by guessnet could be spent while other things are done in parallel. -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/ 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/ Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110325001554.ga10...@xvii.vinc17.org
Processed: Re: Bug#619520: linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64: some Ethernet cables are not detected
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 619520
Bug #619520 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [linux-2.6] eth0 is
not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
619520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619520
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130101338725710.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: reassign 619520 to general
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # not a kernel bug reassign 619520 general Bug #619520 [linux-2.6] eth0 is not activated early enough, causing a delay in the Ethernet detection Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'general'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 2.6.37-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619520 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13010175275175.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#607548: The screen is still black
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 01:10 +0100, Leif Asbrink wrote: This bug was closed (I think) because the problem was fixed according to some information that I can no longer recover. [...] This bug was never closed; I don't know why you think that. Can you test whether this is fixed in a more recent kernel version, such as 2.6.38 which is now available in 'sid'? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: closing 506419
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # sigh close 506419 Bug#506419: high volumes of traffic kill forcedeth chip 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 506419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506419 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13010176115375.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: found 607548 in 2.6.32-29
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 607548 2.6.32-29 Bug #607548 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32: Black screen when i915 is loaded on Compaq 6510b There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.32-29' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.32-29' Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.32-29. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 607548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607548 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13010177125745.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 615035
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 615035 + pending
Bug #615035 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [linux-2.6] FIEMAP
wrongly reports holes for delayed-allocation extents
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #615035 to the same tags previously set
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
615035: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130102302020303.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
