Re: system hangs during shutdown...

2011-07-22 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:20:34PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
 On July 21, 2011 05:02:38 AM Ben Hutchings wrote:
  
  [...]
  
  This is not a bug.  NFS clients are supposed to keep on trying to reach
  the server, by default.  You should have unmounted the directory from
  the NFS client(s) before shutting down the server.
  
 
 Sounds like a desirable behaviour when the system is coming up, but having 
 the 
 client hang when *going down* because a server disappeared doesn't seem right.

The client is still the client with the expected behaviour when it is going 
down.

You should have unmounted the directory from the NFS client(s)
before shutting down the server.


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
 And is there a policy on top-posting vs. bottom-posting?
Yes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722062608.gf2...@gpm.stappers.nl



Re: [PATCH] Add 3.0-rc7-rt0 patch set

2011-07-22 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:32:52PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:25 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
   # initramfs-generators
   initramfs-fallback: linux-initramfs-tool
   initramfs-tools: initramfs-tools (= 0.99)
  diff --git a/config/featureset-rt/config b/config/featureset-rt/config
  new file mode 100644
  index 000..8136f16
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/config/featureset-rt/config
  @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
  +# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
  +CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y
  +CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER=y
  +CONFIG_MISSED_TIMER_OFFSETS_HIST=y
  +CONFIG_WAKEUP_LATENCY_HIST=y
 
 I notice that you leave Xen (and other pvops) support enabled.  I don't
 think this makes sense, as virtualisation will add back the latency and
 jitter that RT is trying to avoid.
hmm, it might not make much sense to run Xen on top of an rt kernel,
that's right. I'm not sure that disabling Xen (and others) is needed
though. There is no exact definition of rt in general, it always depends
on your use-case and then you have to verify/test if the machine you
want to use is capable to fulfill your requirements. So IMHO it's OK to
say: my machine is able to serve my rt requirements as long as it
doesn't run (as) a Xen guest. Don't do it then. Or only do it when
you're not recording audio.

I'm sure there are many things more that increase the maximal latency, I
don't want (and cannot) go through all of them and choose if they are
still OK or crossed the border.

I could still be conviced to disable these, but I don't find how to get
rid of the This kernel also runs on a Xen hypervisor.  It supports both
privileged (dom0) and unprivileged (domU) operation. in the
description. Hints welcome.
 
  diff --git a/config/featureset-rt/defines b/config/featureset-rt/defines
  new file mode 100644
  index 000..caf2baf
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/config/featureset-rt/defines
  @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
  +[abi]
  +ignore-changes: *
  +
  +[description]
  +part-long-rt: This kernel includes the PREEMPT_RT patch set
 
 This should be a whole sentence, ending in a full stop (period).
I guess just adding a period is good enough?
 
Thanks for your feedback
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722094244.ge16...@pengutronix.de



Bug#631945: HFSC warning issue

2011-07-22 Thread Michal Pokrywka
After bisecting 2.6.39.1 it turned out that the bug is caused independently by 
two patches:

commit  b262a5da755cc6ed0cb4fba230cd9bf4037e1096
sch_sfq: fix peek() implementation

and

commit  9df49f2bfe862573911a080c75a6d81113c5c81d
sch_sfq: avoid giving spurious NET_XMIT_CN signals

Reverting these patches makes HFSC work again.

From: 00bor...@gmail.com
 I had the same problem when I upgraded to 2.6.38 vanilla (and
 currently at 2.6.39.1), but I can't remember what the last successful
 version was (probably greater than 2.6.32). My syslog was full of the
 WARN_ON trace from sch_hfsc.c:1427.

Did you tested 2.6.38 or 2.6.38.8? Because mentioned patches was included in 
2.6.38.8.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/40cb21d3.13a4e2d8.4e2949de.1e...@o2.pl



Re: [PATCH] Add 3.0-rc7-rt0 patch set

2011-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 11:42 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
 Hello,
 
 On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:32:52PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:25 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
# initramfs-generators
initramfs-fallback: linux-initramfs-tool
initramfs-tools: initramfs-tools (= 0.99)
   diff --git a/config/featureset-rt/config b/config/featureset-rt/config
   new file mode 100644
   index 000..8136f16
   --- /dev/null
   +++ b/config/featureset-rt/config
   @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
   +# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
   +CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y
   +CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER=y
   +CONFIG_MISSED_TIMER_OFFSETS_HIST=y
   +CONFIG_WAKEUP_LATENCY_HIST=y
  
  I notice that you leave Xen (and other pvops) support enabled.  I don't
  think this makes sense, as virtualisation will add back the latency and
  jitter that RT is trying to avoid.
 hmm, it might not make much sense to run Xen on top of an rt kernel,
 that's right. I'm not sure that disabling Xen (and others) is needed
 though. There is no exact definition of rt in general, it always depends
 on your use-case and then you have to verify/test if the machine you
 want to use is capable to fulfill your requirements. So IMHO it's OK to
 say: my machine is able to serve my rt requirements as long as it
 doesn't run (as) a Xen guest. Don't do it then. Or only do it when
 you're not recording audio.
 
 I'm sure there are many things more that increase the maximal latency, I
 don't want (and cannot) go through all of them and choose if they are
 still OK or crossed the border.

True.

 I could still be conviced to disable these, but I don't find how to get
 rid of the This kernel also runs on a Xen hypervisor.  It supports both
 privileged (dom0) and unprivileged (domU) operation. in the
 description. Hints welcome.

I think you would need to add a 'amd64_description' section in
debian/config/amd64/rt/defines, overriding the one in
debian/config/amd64/defines.  Not sure.

   diff --git a/config/featureset-rt/defines b/config/featureset-rt/defines
   new file mode 100644
   index 000..caf2baf
   --- /dev/null
   +++ b/config/featureset-rt/defines
   @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
   +[abi]
   +ignore-changes: *
   +
   +[description]
   +part-long-rt: This kernel includes the PREEMPT_RT patch set
  
  This should be a whole sentence, ending in a full stop (period).
 I guess just adding a period is good enough?

Yes.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#634181: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: br_netfilter nat pagefault

2011-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 05:24 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
 On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:51:14 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
  This fault now also occured with version 2.6.39-3 of the
  linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64 package.
 
 On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:19:33 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  I think this bug was fixed in 2.6.39-3 along with bug #629932.  Let us
  know if it occurs again.
 
 As I see it (upper quote), this bug also occurs in the 2.6.39-3 version.

Sorry, I missed your second message.  I'll reopen.

 It do however lack understanding of the package naming and versioning
 here - the package has the name linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64, however its
 version is 2.6.39-3, an aptitude update  search also does not show a
 package with name 2.6.39-3 here.

See http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-versions.html.

Ben.

 Attached, there is a dump of the complete kernel log on 2.6.39-3, I hope
 this makes it into the bugtracker. :/

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: found 634181 in 2.6.39-3

2011-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 634181 2.6.39-3
Bug #634181 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk} [linux-2.6] 
linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: br_netfilter nat pagefault
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.39-3' with 
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '2.6.39-3'
Bug Marked as found in versions 2.6.39-3; no longer marked as fixed in versions 
2.6.39-3 and reopened.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
634181: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634181
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131133189031171.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Problem with slip connections after kernel upgrade on squeeze

2011-07-22 Thread SUPORTE - Kernel Informática
I had a debian squeeze with 3 slips connection, sl0, sl1 and sl2 on
working VPND solution. Its using the kernel version
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-31_amd64 so I upgrade it to
linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-35_amd64 and the slip interface dont
fork to sl1 any more! example: When I start the first connection its
works well with sl0 interface so when i start second and third
connections its bind interface sl0 too chasing the first one! they dont
fork to sl1 and sl2 any more! 
Maybe this is a BUG on this patch?

When I found this problem I stop to upgrade my others squeeze solution
using VPND with slip interface!


Sorry about my english

tks for any help

Cesar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311334233.1882.35.camel@seronni



Bug#633942: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: occasional freeze after resume

2011-07-22 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2011-07-15 11:23:29 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6
 Version: 2.6.39-3
 Severity: important
 
 My laptop (DELL Latitude E6400) sometimes freezes after resume: I can
 hear the fan, but the screen remains off and I cannot suspend the
 laptop again (with Fn+F1). This happened twice in the last 24 hours.
 I had to switch it off without a clean shutdown.

This seems to be specific to 2.6.39. I reverted to:

Linux xvii 2.6.38-2-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 8 13:51:57 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux

(linux-image-2.6.38-2-amd64 2.6.38-5), and did many suspend/resume
for several days, and I didn't have a single freeze.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: http://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: http://www.vinc17.net/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722133223.ga22...@prunille.vinc17.org



Re: Symbolic links to kernel image files and initial RAM file system image files

2011-07-22 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 01:56, Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote:
...
 o  Eliminate symbolic links entirely and require boot loader hook
 scripts to edit their configuration files
...

This seems to be the best alternative for me however IIRC there still
arches that depends on those links so I think we could do it case by
base (arch specificly) by now.

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854              http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKodxB0xNO=U+vzn3-rPXND_kQSU+s2FT=rEf=j7yna...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#631945: HFSC warning issue

2011-07-22 Thread 00bormoj
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Michal Pokrywka wolfm...@o2.pl wrote:
 I had the same problem when I upgraded to 2.6.38 vanilla (and
 currently at 2.6.39.1), but I can't remember what the last successful
 version was (probably greater than 2.6.32). My syslog was full of the
 WARN_ON trace from sch_hfsc.c:1427.

 Did you tested 2.6.38 or 2.6.38.8? Because mentioned patches was included in 
 2.6.38.8.

Sorry, I don't remember for sure. I am only 100% sure that I currently
have the issue on 2.6.39.1; anything else I may have remembered
incorrectly.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAAJ8s-QSoQFhd44KpCoY3wPNkPVh=3QzUM9B-Jbz-grF=v8...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#632734: Strange

2011-07-22 Thread Frank McCormick

On 21/07/11 08:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 Please always cc the bug address when replying to bug-related mails.

 On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 09:54 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
 On 11/07/11 12:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 17:29 -0400, Frank wrote:
 On 05/07/11 04:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Frank M wrote:
 I find it strange that the PAE kernel is the ONLY one which gives me
 any trouble.
 I guess it could be hardware related, but 2.6.38-1 and 2.6.38-2 
have both been

 booting fine for months.
 Is there something about the PAE series that would uncover 
hardware faults which

 may have existed for a long time ?

 Have you tried booting those earlier versions recently?


  Yes I've been booting them everyday for the past month or so 
- the

 PAE series is the first time in years, literally, that I have had
 problems like this.

 We have provided kernel packages using PAE for a long time, previously
 labelled as '686-bigmem'.  You can test linux-image-2.6.38-2-686-bigmem
 to check whether this bug is related to use of PAE.  However, I 
think it

 is probably due to a change between Linux 2.6.38 and 2.6.39.

  Well I **think** the bigmem kernel now is actually the PAE 
kernel. I

 installed the bigmem kernel and it turned out to be the troublesome PAE
 version.

 Right.  It has been renamed because it is now the only '686' flavour,
 but has different hardware requirements from the old '686' flavour.  I
 believe the processor in your computer should support this, but could
 you confirm what model you have (look at the file /proc/cpuinfo)?

 processor  : 0
 vendor_id  : GenuineIntel
 cpu family : 15
 model  : 2
 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
 stepping   : 9
 cpu MHz: 2593.138
 cache size : 512 KB
 physical id: 0
 siblings   : 2
 core id: 0
 cpu cores  : 1
 apicid : 0
 initial apicid : 0
 fdiv_bug   : no
 hlt_bug: no
 f00f_bug   : no
 coma_bug   : no
 fpu: yes
 fpu_exception  : yes
 cpuid level: 2
 wp : yes
 flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pebs bts 
cid xtpr

 bogomips   : 5186.27
 clflush size   : 64
 cache_alignment: 128
 address sizes  : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
 power management:

 processor  : 1
 vendor_id  : GenuineIntel
 cpu family : 15
 model  : 2
 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.60GHz
 stepping   : 9
 cpu MHz: 2593.138
 cache size : 512 KB
 physical id: 0
 siblings   : 2
 core id: 0
 cpu cores  : 1
 apicid : 1
 initial apicid : 1
 fdiv_bug   : no
 hlt_bug: no
 f00f_bug   : no
 coma_bug   : no
 fpu: yes
 fpu_exception  : yes
 cpuid level: 2
 wp : yes
 flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca 
cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe pebs bts 
cid xtpr

 bogomips   : 5187.60
 clflush size   : 64
 cache_alignment: 128
 address sizes  : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
 power management:

That's it...it alledgedly supports PAE





 This sounds like there is some sort of hardware fault, but I can't see
 why it would only occur when using PAE.  It is just possible that the
 circuitry for PAE is faulty, but I think that is only a very small part
 of the chip.

 Please do consider the suggestions inhttp://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/.

  Will do.


--
Cheers
Frank




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e29bba9.8070...@videotron.ca



Re: Problem with slip connections after kernel upgrade on squeeze

2011-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 08:30 -0300, SUPORTE - Kernel Informática wrote:
 I had a debian squeeze with 3 slips connection, sl0, sl1 and sl2 on
 working VPND solution. Its using the kernel version
 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-31_amd64 so I upgrade it to
 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-35_amd64 and the slip interface dont
 fork to sl1 any more! example: When I start the first connection its
 works well with sl0 interface so when i start second and third
 connections its bind interface sl0 too chasing the first one! they dont
 fork to sl1 and sl2 any more! 
 Maybe this is a BUG on this patch?
 
 When I found this problem I stop to upgrade my others squeeze solution
 using VPND with slip interface!

vpnd (source: http://vpnd.linuxsys.com/archive/vpnd-1.1.4.tar.gz)
expects to get the SLIP unit number when setting SLIP line discipline:

/* set line discipline to SLIP, react to errors */

#ifdef LINUX
i=N_SLIP;
if((anchor-proxy=ioctl(anchor-tty,TIOCSETD,i))0)
JUMP(ioctl(TIOCSETD),err3);
#elif defined(FreeBSD) || defined(OSNetBSD) || defined(OSOpenBSD)
...
/* create interface name */

memset(ifr,0,sizeof(ifr));
sprintf(ifr.ifr_name,sl%u,anchor-proxy);

But in commit 057bef938896e6266ae24ec4266d24792d27c29a the behaviour of
slip_open() and hence ioctl TIOCSETD was changed so that the unit number
is no longer returned.

It looks like applications are supposed to use the ioctl SIOCGIFNAME to
find the net device name.  But clearly the driver was previously
returning the unit number and applications did depend on this.  So I
think this change has to be reverted and the TTY layer will have to
accept positive return values from ldisc open().

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Problem with slip connections after kernel upgrade on squeeze

2011-07-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 08:30 -0300, SUPORTE - Kernel Informática wrote:
 I had a debian squeeze with 3 slips connection, sl0, sl1 and sl2 on
 working VPND solution. Its using the kernel version
 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-31_amd64 so I upgrade it to
 linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64_2.6.32-35_amd64 and the slip interface dont
 fork to sl1 any more! example: When I start the first connection its
 works well with sl0 interface so when i start second and third
 connections its bind interface sl0 too chasing the first one! they dont
 fork to sl1 and sl2 any more! 
 Maybe this is a BUG on this patch?
 
 When I found this problem I stop to upgrade my others squeeze solution
 using VPND with slip interface!

vpnd (source: http://vpnd.linuxsys.com/archive/vpnd-1.1.4.tar.gz)
expects to get the SLIP unit number when setting SLIP line discipline:

/* set line discipline to SLIP, react to errors */

#ifdef LINUX
i=N_SLIP;
if((anchor-proxy=ioctl(anchor-tty,TIOCSETD,i))0)
JUMP(ioctl(TIOCSETD),err3);
#elif defined(FreeBSD) || defined(OSNetBSD) || defined(OSOpenBSD)
...
/* create interface name */

memset(ifr,0,sizeof(ifr));
sprintf(ifr.ifr_name,sl%u,anchor-proxy);

But in commit 057bef938896e6266ae24ec4266d24792d27c29a the behaviour of
slip_open() and hence ioctl TIOCSETD was changed so that the unit number
is no longer returned.

It looks like applications are supposed to use the ioctl SIOCGIFNAME to
find the net device name.  But clearly the driver was previously
returning the unit number and applications did depend on this.  So I
think this change has to be reverted and the TTY layer will have to
accept positive return values from ldisc open().

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 doesn´t boot without monitor

2011-07-22 Thread Michael
Hello Ben,

xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.13.0-6) is installed on my system.

I removed  /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf, but as you already suspected, that 
didn´t change a bit - the system freezes at the same point if no monitor is 
attached.

Michael

- Ursprüngliche Message -

 This is probably related to configuring video output in the kernel video
 drivers (KMS) instead of in X video drivers.
 
 KMS is disabled by default in the 'squeeze' kernel versions, for
 compatibility with older versions of the X video drivers.  The new
 version of the X video driver (xserver-xorg-video-intel) works with KMS
 and installs a configuration file that enables it.
 
 You can try disabling it by removing the file
 /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf, but I don't think the X video driver will
 work.
 
 Which version of xserver-xorg-video-intel did you install?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1311362179.54165.yahoomail...@web24615.mail.ird.yahoo.com



[PATCH v2] Add 3.0-rc7-rt0 patch set

2011-07-22 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello,

changes since the first submission:
 - updated patches with some fixes by Thomas Gleixer (you don't see that
   though, as I skipped the patches again)
 - add a simple gen-patch script
 - drop arm/versatile, so it's only amd64/amd64 for now
 - fix some more things noted by Ben

Best regards
Uwe

-8-
It's currently enabled and build tested for amd64/amd64.

The rt patches applied as provided by Thomas Gleixner with just one
exception: linux-3.0-rc7.patch. That contains the diff of Linus Torvald's
tree at the time of the rt release since the v3.0-rc7 tag. Two changes were
already in the debian tree, namely

bugfix/arm/ixp4xx-build-breakage.patch
bugfix/mips/mips-i8259-use-struct-syscore_ops-instead-of-sysdevs.patch

The patches also include a first set of fixups posted by Thomas.
---
 changelog  |3 +
 config/amd64/defines   |2 +
 config/amd64/rt/defines|3 +
 config/armel/rt/defines|3 +
 config/defines |4 +
 config/featureset-rt/config|5 +
 config/featureset-rt/defines   |7 +
 .../features/all/rt/acpi-convert-c3lock-raw.patch  |   54 +
 .../features/all/rt/acpi-use-local-irq-nort.patch  |   27 +
 .../all/rt/arch-use-pagefault-disabled.patch   |  332 ++
 .../features/all/rt/arm-allow-irq-threading.patch  |   21 +
 ...t-remove-irq-handler-when-clock-is-unused.patch |   67 +
 ...-at91-tclib-default-to-tclib-timer-for-rt.patch |   34 +
 .../all/rt/arm-disable-highmem-on-rt.patch |   22 +
 .../rt/arm-enable-interrupts-in-signal-code.patch  |   23 +
 .../all/rt/arm-mark-pmu-interupt-no-thread.patch   |   24 +
 .../features/all/rt/arm-raw_lock-conversions.patch |  786 
 .../all/rt/ata-disable-interrupts-if-non-rt.patch  |   66 +
 .../block-shorten-interrupt-disabled-regions.patch |  120 +
 .../all/rt/bug-rt-dependend-variants.patch |   45 +
 ...clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch |  163 +
 .../all/rt/cond-resched-lock-rt-tweak.patch|   22 +
 .../features/all/rt/cond-resched-softirq-rt.patch  |   51 +
 .../features/all/rt/console-make-rt-friendly.patch |   84 +
 patches/features/all/rt/cpu-rt-variants.patch  |   28 +
 patches/features/all/rt/debugobjects-rt.patch  |   36 +
 .../features/all/rt/dmar-make-qi-lock-raw.patch|   70 +
 .../all/rt/dmar-make-register-lock-raw.patch   |  387 ++
 .../all/rt/dmar-mark-dmar-irq-no-thread.patch  |   22 +
 .../rt/drivers-dca-convert-dcalock-to-raw.patch|  239 ++
 .../all/rt/drivers-floppy-use-timer-del-sync.patch |   70 +
 .../all/rt/drivers-ide-fix-irq-flags-madness.patch |   27 +
 .../rt/drivers-net-8139-disable-irq-nosync.patch   |   31 +
 ...ers-net-at91-make-mdio-protection-rt-safe.patch |   54 +
 .../drivers-net-ehea-mark-rx-irq-no-thread.patch   |   53 +
 .../all/rt/drivers-net-fix-livelock-issues.patch   |  141 +
 .../all/rt/drivers-net-gianfar-make-rt-aware.patch |   57 +
 ...drivers-net-tulip-add-missing-pci-disable.patch |   25 +
 .../rt/drivers-net-vortex-fix-locking-issues.patch |   50 +
 ...ers-random-reduce-preempt-disabled-region.patch |   40 +
 ...ial-call-flush_to_ldisc-when-the-irq-is-t.patch |   49 +
 .../rt/drivers-serial-cleanup-locking-for-rt.patch |   44 +
 .../features/all/rt/drm-more-moronic-crap.patch|   32 +
 patches/features/all/rt/drm-sigh.patch |   32 +
 .../features/all/rt/epoll-use-get-cpu-light.patch  |   28 +
 patches/features/all/rt/filemap-fix-up.patch   |   22 +
 patches/features/all/rt/fixups.patch   |  111 +
 .../all/rt/fs-add-missing-rcu-protection.patch |   42 +
 patches/features/all/rt/fs-block-rt-support.patch  |   44 +
 ...s-btrfs-locking-workaround-for-preempt-rt.patch |   37 +
 .../all/rt/fs-convert-i-alloc-sem-to-rw-anon.patch |  270 ++
 .../all/rt/fs-jbd-replace-bh_state-lock.patch  |  102 +
 .../all/rt/fs-namespace-preemption-fix.patch   |   45 +
 .../all/rt/fs-ntfs-disable-interrupt-non-rt.patch  |   69 +
 .../rt/fs-replace-bh_uptodate_lock-for-rt.patch|  167 +
 patches/features/all/rt/ftrace-hash-fix.patch  |  126 +
 .../all/rt/ftrace-migrate-disable-tracing.patch|   81 +
 patches/features/all/rt/gen-patch  |9 +
 .../all/rt/generic-cmpxchg-use-raw-local-irq.patch |   49 +
 .../all/rt/genirq-disable-irqpoll-on-rt.patch  |   41 +
 .../genirq-disable-random-call-on-preempt-rt.patch |   29 +
 .../features/all/rt/genirq-force-threading.patch   |   50 +
 patches/features/all/rt/genirq-nodebug-shirq.patch |   22 +
 .../rt/highmem-explicitly-disable-preemption.patch |  319 ++
 .../all/rt/hotplug-light-get-online-cpus.patch |  213 +
 .../all/rt/hotplug-use-migrate-disable.patch   |   38 +
 ...up-hrtimer-callback-changes-for-preempt-r.patch |  415 ++
 

Re: squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 doesn´t boot without monitor

2011-07-22 Thread Michael
Hello Ben,


After my last post I had a look at i814-kms,conf - after changing it to


options i915 modeset=0


the system booted without attached monitor.

Thanks you very much

Michael



- Ursprüngliche Message -
 Von: Michael postbote2009-deb...@yahoo.com
 An: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
 Cc: Debian kernel maintainers debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
 Gesendet: 21:16 Freitag, 22.Juli 2011 
 Betreff: Re: squeeze 2.6.32-5-686 doesn´t boot without monitor
 
 Hello Ben,
 
 xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.13.0-6) is installed on my system.
 
 I removed  /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf, but as you already suspected, that 
 didn´t change a bit - the system freezes at the same point if no monitor is 
 attached.
 
 Michael
 
 - Ursprüngliche Message -
 
  This is probably related to configuring video output in the kernel video
  drivers (KMS) instead of in X video drivers.
 
  KMS is disabled by default in the 'squeeze' kernel versions, for
  compatibility with older versions of the X video drivers.  The new
  version of the X video driver (xserver-xorg-video-intel) works with KMS
  and installs a configuration file that enables it.
 
  You can try disabling it by removing the file
  /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf, but I don't think the X video driver 
 will
  work.
 
  Which version of xserver-xorg-video-intel did you install?
 
 
 
 --
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact 
 listmas...@lists.debian.org
 Archive: 
 http://lists.debian.org/1311362179.54165.yahoomail...@web24615.mail.ird.yahoo.com



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1311363591.15762.yahoomail...@web24605.mail.ird.yahoo.com



Re: [PATCH v2] Add 3.0-rc7-rt0 patch set

2011-07-22 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:37:26PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/config/armel/rt/defines

I thought this was dropped.

 +[description]
 +part-long-rt: This kernel includes the PREEMPT_RT patch set.
 +part-short-rt: PREEMPT_RT

This does not tell the user why he wants this.

 ++ features/all/rt/linus-3.0-rc7.patch featureset=rt
 ++ features/all/rt/ftrace-hash-fix.patch featureset=rt

Please merge the patches.

Bastian

-- 
All your people must learn before you can reach for the stars.
-- Kirk, The Gamesters of Triskelion, stardate 3259.2


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722204956.ga2...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org



Bug#631166: python2.6-minimal: Package fails to install

2011-07-22 Thread Sergio Vernis
En Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:51:33 +0200
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk escribió:

 I can't reproduce this.
 
 Please run 'debsums -c linux-support-2.6.26-1'.


Debian:/# debsums -c linux-support-2.6.26-1
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/rules.real.include (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/gencontrol.py 
(from linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/rules.defs (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/rules.include 
(from linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file /usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/config.defines.dump (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/utils.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/kconfig.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/patches.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/config.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/debian.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/__init__.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)
debsums: missing file 
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/abi.py (from 
linux-support-2.6.26-1 package)

Regards.

Sergio
-- 
   Yo uso software libre - I use freedom-based software
--
Linux user since 973047600



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110722213958.4c64d18e.sver...@gmail.com



Bug#631166: marked as done (python2.6-minimal: Package fails to install)

2011-07-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:39:52 +0200
with message-id 1311385192.3268.24.camel@localhost
and subject line Re: python2.6-minimal: Package fails to install
has caused the Debian Bug report #631166,
regarding python2.6-minimal: Package fails to install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
631166: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631166
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: python2.6-minimal
Version: 2.6.6-8+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


Problem upgrading from lenny to squeeze.

I check that files that does not exist but this files exists.

I can not upgrade to squeeze, I must fall back to a backup.

Configurando python2.6-minimal (2.6.6-8+b1) ...
Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python2.6...
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/web/microdom.py:157:
SyntaxWarning: assertion is always true, perhaps remove parentheses?
  assert (oldChild.parentNode is self,
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/__init__.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/abi.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/config.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/debian.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/kconfig.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/patches.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/utils.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/gencontrol.py
Errors were ignored.
Configurando libsqlite3-0 (3.7.3-1) ...
Configurando python2.6 (2.6.6-8+b1) ...
Configurando python-minimal (2.6.6-3+squeeze6) ...
Configurando python (2.6.6-3+squeeze6) ...
Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python2.6...
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/__init__.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/abi.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/config.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/debian.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/kconfig.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/patches.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/utils.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/gencontrol.py
Errors were ignored.
running python rtupdate hooks for python2.6...
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/__init__.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/abi.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/config.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/debian.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/gencontrol.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/kconfig.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/patches.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/lib/python/debian_linux/utils.py
file does not exist:
/usr/src/linux-support-2.6.26-1/modules/gencontrol.py
pycentral: pycentral updatedefault: error byte-compiling files (9)
pycentral updatedefault: error byte-compiling files (9)
error running python rtupdate hook pycentral
Updating *.pc symlinks for python-gtk2-dev...
dpkg: error al procesar python (--configure):
 el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el
código de salida de error 4
dpkg: problemas de dependencias impiden la configuración de
python-lxml:
 python-lxml depende de python (= 1.6.5-11~); sin embargo:
 El paquete `python' no está configurado todavía.
 python-lxml depende de python ( 2.7); sin embargo:
 El paquete `python' no está configurado todavía.
dpkg: error al procesar python-lxml (--configure):
 problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
dpkg: problemas de dependencias impiden la configuración de
isoquery:
 isoquery depende de python; sin embargo:
 El paquete `python' no está configurado todavía.
 isoquery depende de python-lxml; sin embargo: