Bug#651215: Kernel fails to boot on NSLU2

2011-12-13 Thread Rtp
Hi,

I've uploaded a 3.1.5-1 with a patch which should fix the boot failure
at http://www.rtp-net.org/misc/deb/. Can you please test it ?

Thanks,
Arnaud



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcpkvqwa@lebrac.rtp-net.org



Processed: Xen dom0 VGA console fixed in 3.1.0-rc1

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 fixed 630326 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
Bug #630326 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: Please add patch for 
vgaconsole in xen hypervisor 4.X + 2.6.3[89]/3.0rcX kernels
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version 
'3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1' with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1'
Bug Marked as fixed in versions 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
630326: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630326
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132376443620605.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#630326: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: Please add patch for vgaconsole in xen hypervisor 4.X + 2.6.3[89]/3.0rcX kernels)

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:20:17 +
with message-id 1323764417.20936.76.ca...@dagon.hellion.org.uk
and subject line Xen dom0 VGA console fixed in 3.1.0-rc1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630326,
regarding linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64: Please add patch for vgaconsole in xen 
hypervisor 4.X + 2.6.3[89]/3.0rcX kernels
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
630326: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630326
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch upstream

Patches make vga console work in dom0. Without applying, hypervisor 4.x dom0 +
recent kernels (2.6.3[89] and 3.x) boot correctly but screen got blank at once.
Threads about this issue [1].
Patches rebased on 2.6.39 [2] and on 3.x [3].  

[1] http://deb.li/30EkC http://deb.li/dESU http://deb.li/31AXF
[2] http://deb.li/3ZQ5h
[3] http://deb.li/B6b2


Thanks.



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
fixed 630326 3.1.0~rc4-1~experimental.1
thanks

This was fixed in 3.1.0-rc1 which first entered Debian when rc4 was
packaged.

Thanks,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell


Finding out what goes on in the C.I.A. is like performing acupuncture
on a rock.
-- New York Times, Jan. 20, 1981


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
---End Message---


Bug#649033: Backtrace

2011-12-13 Thread Jurij Smakov
The hang is in the initialization code of tpm_tis module. Simply 
running

sudo modprobe -b acpi:SMO1200:PNP0C31:
sudo modrpobe -r tpm_tis

a dozen times in a loop was sufficient to trigger it. Here's the 
backtrace, courtesy of show-blocked-tasks magic SysRq key command:

[ 1801.675853] SysRq : Show Blocked State
[ 1801.675866]   taskPC stack   pid father
[ 1801.675951] modprobeD 88021e252f40 0  3809   3808 0x
[ 1801.675963]  880212080930 0086  
8802155760c0
[ 1801.675973]  00012f40 88021375ffd8 88021375ffd8 
880212080930
[ 1801.675983]  0286 00010286 88021d81ec80 
00010005bc31
[ 1801.675993] Call Trace:
[ 1801.676010]  [8132c99d] ? schedule_timeout+0xa3/0xdb
[ 1801.676021]  [810510b3] ? usleep_range+0x3e/0x3e
[ 1801.676029]  [81051bf0] ? msleep+0x14/0x1c
[ 1801.676041]  [a01e3215] ? tpm_transmit+0x102/0x177 [tpm]
[ 1801.676051]  [a01e367b] ? transmit_cmd.isra.3+0xc/0x24 [tpm]
[ 1801.676059]  [a01e3b2a] ? tpm_get_timeouts+0x5d/0x210 [tpm]
[ 1801.676072]  [a026f171] ? tpm_tis_status+0x1e/0x20 [tpm_tis]
[ 1801.676082]  [a026f4e9] ? wait_for_stat+0x1f/0x18b [tpm_tis]
[ 1801.676093]  [a026f171] ? tpm_tis_status+0x1e/0x20 [tpm_tis]
[ 1801.676102]  [a026f825] ? tpm_tis_send_data+0x131/0x16d [tpm_tis]
[ 1801.676112]  [a026fc2d] ? tpm_tis_init+0x233/0x583 [tpm_tis]
[ 1801.676122]  [a026ff7d] ? tpm_tis_init+0x583/0x583 [tpm_tis]
[ 1801.676133]  [811fcc62] ? pnp_device_probe+0x70/0x9c
[ 1801.676142]  [8123dae2] ? pm_runtime_barrier+0x6e/0x76
[ 1801.676151]  [81236f09] ? driver_probe_device+0xa8/0x138
[ 1801.676158]  [81236fe8] ? __driver_attach+0x4f/0x6f
[ 1801.676165]  [81236f99] ? driver_probe_device+0x138/0x138
[ 1801.676175]  [81236239] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x44/0x78
[ 1801.676184]  [812368a1] ? bus_add_driver+0xa2/0x1f2
[ 1801.676216]  [a0345000] ? 0xa0344fff
[ 1801.676223]  [8123740d] ? driver_register+0x8d/0xf5
[ 1801.676233]  [a0345000] ? 0xa0344fff
[ 1801.676241]  [81002086] ? do_one_initcall+0x76/0x12c
[ 1801.676250]  [a0345000] ? 0xa0344fff
[ 1801.676259]  [81074921] ? sys_init_module+0x10c/0x25b
[ 1801.676269]  [81332792] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Best regards,
-- 
Jurij Smakov   ju...@wooyd.org
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/  KeyID: C99E03CC



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111213093304.ga3...@wooyd.org



Bug#651532: System crashes (kernel oops) when loading ATI firmware

2011-12-13 Thread Camaleón
El 2011-12-12 a las 13:07 -0600, Jonathan Nieder escribió:

 I haven't had good luck with nomodeset generally.  But really, if you
 can do anything (like removing the firmware package) to the radeon
 module to make the problem go away, that will be enough to put the
 ball in their court, and I will be happy.

The user reports that kernel 3.2-rc4 works fine when package firmware-
linux-nonfree is not installed.

-- 
Camaleón 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111213125208.ga9...@stt008.linux.site



Bug#633526: vserver kernel breaks ssh public_key authentication on NFS

2011-12-13 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:03:45AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:52 +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
 tags 633526 + patch
 retitle 633526 NFS client uid/gid cache broken on VServer kernels
 thanks

 Herbert Poetzl wrote:

 we now understand the problem, and it was fixed for 
 3.0.4 with the following patch: 

 http://vserver.13thfloor.at/ExperimentalT/delta-nfs-fix02.diff

 I can confirm that this patch is fixing the issue. I have
 tested the patch on top of linux-2.6 2.6.32-37 on a production
 server and we no longer experience the NFS uid/gid issue.

 The issue can easily be tested by doing ls -l $file on a NFS
 mount. The values will show up correctly. After cat $file 
 /dev/null; ls -l $file it will suddenly show wrong uid/gid
 values of: 4294967294/4294967294 (-2/-2) Waiting for about 20
 seconds ls -l $file will show again correct values. So the
 client cached values are clearly the problem.

 I strongly recommend to include the patch into the next stable
 point release as this is major NFS regression from Debian
 Lenny.

 I'll update to vs2.6.32.48-vs2.3.0.36.29.8 which includes the
 above and one other NFS fix
 http://vserver.13thfloor.at/ExperimentalT/delta-nfs-fix01.diff.

 Herbert, if you could briefly explain what the two changes are 
 doing that would be helpful.

well, the first one fixes a long outstanding bug, which
was caused by using the wrong macros INOTAG_* instead
of TAGINO_*, which, depending on the tagging and actual
uid/gid/tag will result in funny numbers ...

the second one doesn't fix any real issue, but it is a
more defensive solution for the potentially possible
case where NFS_ATTR_FATTR_OWNER is set but the group
nfs attribute is not (or the other way round)

HTH,
Herbert

 Ben.

 -- 
 Ben Hutchings
 Computers are not intelligent.They only think they are.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111213180419.ga8...@mail.13thfloor.at



Bug#651532: System crashes (kernel oops) when loading ATI firmware

2011-12-13 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Camaleón wrote:

 The user reports that kernel 3.2-rc4 works fine when package firmware-
 linux-nonfree is not installed.

Excellent.  The next step is indeed to report this upstream.

Be sure to mention:

 - steps to reproduce the problem
 - symptoms and how they differ from the expected result (that should
   be simple enough in this case :))
 - which other versions you tried and the result for each
 - a link to http://bugs.debian.org/651532 for the full story
 - any other hints or weird observations

Attach:

 - full dmesg output and Xorg.0.log from booting and reproducing the
   problem with 3.2-rc4, with the firmware available
 - full dmesg output and Xorg.0.log from booting 3.2-rc4 without the
   firmware available, for contrast

And please let us know the bug number so we can track it.

Thanks very much,
Jonathan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111213195213.ga2...@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net



taskstats capability check in stable

2011-12-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
This change is likely to be included in 2.6.32.y and, by default, in our
next stable point release.  As Linus says, this means that unprivileged
accounts won't be able to run iotop, but this is probably correct
behaviour.

It appears that older versions of iotop do not report this error in a
helpful way (#644616).  So I think that if we apply this change to the
kernel then iotop should also be updated in stable.

Ben.

 Forwarded Message 
From: gre...@suse.de
To: torva...@linux-foundation.org, bsinghar...@gmail.com, gre...@suse.de, 
j...@inutil.org, johannes.b...@intel.com, seg...@openwall.com
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org, stable-comm...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch Make TASKSTATS require root access has been added to the 
2.6.32-longterm tree
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:10:52 -0800

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

Make TASKSTATS require root access

to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
 make-taskstats-require-root-access.patch
and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm 
tree,
please let sta...@vger.kernel.org know about it.


From 1a51410abe7d0ee4b1d112780f46df87d3621043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:04:37 -0700
Subject: Make TASKSTATS require root access

From: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org

commit 1a51410abe7d0ee4b1d112780f46df87d3621043 upstream.

Ok, this isn't optimal, since it means that 'iotop' needs admin
capabilities, and we may have to work on this some more.  But at the
same time it is very much not acceptable to let anybody just read
anybody elses IO statistics quite at this level.

Use of the GENL_ADMIN_PERM suggested by Johannes Berg as an alternative
to checking the capabilities by hand.

Reported-by: Vasiliy Kulikov seg...@openwall.com
Cc: Johannes Berg johannes.b...@intel.com
Acked-by: Balbir Singh bsinghar...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Moritz Mhlenhoff j...@inutil.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@suse.de

---
 kernel/taskstats.c |1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/kernel/taskstats.c
+++ b/kernel/taskstats.c
@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ static struct genl_ops taskstats_ops = {
.cmd= TASKSTATS_CMD_GET,
.doit   = taskstats_user_cmd,
.policy = taskstats_cmd_get_policy,
+   .flags  = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
 };
 
 static struct genl_ops cgroupstats_ops = {


Patches currently in longterm-queue-2.6.32 which might be from 
torva...@linux-foundation.org are

/home/gregkh/linux/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32/queue-2.6.32/linux-log2.h-fix-rounddown_pow_of_two-1.patch
/home/gregkh/linux/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32/queue-2.6.32/hfs-fix-hfs_find_init-sb-ext_tree-null-ptr-oops.patch
/home/gregkh/linux/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32/queue-2.6.32/make-taskstats-require-root-access.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe stable in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent.  They only think they are.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: tagging 651215

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 651215 + pending
Bug #651215 [linux-image-3.1.0-1-ixp4xx] Kernel fails to boot on NSLU2
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
651215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132382925116679.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: taskstats capability check in stable

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 02:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:

 This change is likely to be included in 2.6.32.y and, by default, in our
 next stable point release.  As Linus says, this means that unprivileged
 accounts won't be able to run iotop, but this is probably correct
 behaviour.

Thanks for the heads up.

 It appears that older versions of iotop do not report this error in a
 helpful way (#644616).  So I think that if we apply this change to the
 kernel then iotop should also be updated in stable.

It appears the iotop patch applies to the stable version with no
changes. Should I prepare an update and propose it to the release team?

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: taskstats capability check in stable

2011-12-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 11:11 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
 On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 02:12 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 
  This change is likely to be included in 2.6.32.y and, by default, in our
  next stable point release.  As Linus says, this means that unprivileged
  accounts won't be able to run iotop, but this is probably correct
  behaviour.
 
 Thanks for the heads up.
 
  It appears that older versions of iotop do not report this error in a
  helpful way (#644616).  So I think that if we apply this change to the
  kernel then iotop should also be updated in stable.
 
 It appears the iotop patch applies to the stable version with no
 changes. Should I prepare an update and propose it to the release team?

Please do.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent.  They only think they are.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#652014: Linux 3.2: Enable Hyper-V kernel modules

2011-12-13 Thread Mathieu Simon
Package: linux-image-amd64
Severity: wishlist


Dear Maintainers

With the release of the 3.2 kernel (yet to happen), some of the 
modules improving the glue for Linux VMs running on a MS Hyper-V 
hypervisor have left the staging area (drivers/hv).

Could this be taken as an opportunity to enable them in the default
kernel image in experimental (i386, amd64) allowing testing with Debian? 
Currently they are not unloadable, if that is a problem, I know there is 
a patch floating in the upstream.

What would they enable?
- add virtual SMP support for VMs
- time provider support from the hypervisor

Best regards
Mathieu



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20111214061021.17898.26204.reportbug@cassini.gymnasium.koeniz



Processed: reassign 652014 to src:linux-2.6

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 652014 src:linux-2.6 3.1.5-1
Bug #652014 [linux-image-amd64] Linux 3.2: Enable Hyper-V kernel modules
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-image-amd64' to 'src:linux-2.6'.
Bug #652014 [src:linux-2.6] Linux 3.2: Enable Hyper-V kernel modules
Bug Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/3.1.5-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
652014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652014
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132384492321750.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: tagging 651215

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 651215 + pending
Bug #651215 [linux-image-3.1.0-1-ixp4xx] Kernel fails to boot on NSLU2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #651215 to the same tags previously set
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
651215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132384516223319.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#652015: pu: package iotop/0.4-2

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Wise
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org

iotop bug #644616 needs to be fixed in stable because the elevant change
in Linux has been added to the 2.6.32 longterm tree, which the Debian
Linux kernel team intends[1] to add to the next Debian stable point
release. The change in Linux addresses a security issue (CVE-2011-2494)
by removing access to the taskstats interface for non-root users.
Unfortunately iotop relies on this file and therefore it can only run as
root. With the debdiff below iotop will output a friendly message
instead of crashing with a Python traceback.

 1. http://lists.debian.org/1323828773.2825.166.camel@deadeye

--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+iotop (0.4-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * Backport patch to give a helpful error instead of crashing when Linux
+denies permission to read the taskstats files (Closes: #644616)
+
+ -- Paul Wise p...@debian.org  Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:33:20 +0800
+
 iotop (0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Correct bug number in the changelog for previous version.
--- a/debian/patches/0001-Explain-that-iotop-now-requires-root.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/0001-Explain-that-iotop-now-requires-root.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From: Guillaume Chazarain guic...@gmail.com
+Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 18:39:32 +0200
+Origin: upstream, 
http://repo.or.cz/w/iotop.git/commitdiff/635b5838e95ed85767434207e463173fd91b6040
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/644616
+Subject: Explain that iotop now requires root.
+ https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/1/170
+ 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=1a51410abe7d0ee4b1d112780f46df87d3621043
+--- a/iotop/ui.py
 b/iotop/ui.py
+@@ -446,10 +446,19 @@
+ ui.run()
+ 
+ def run_iotop(options):
+-if options.batch:
+-return run_iotop_window(None, options)
+-else:
+-return curses.wrapper(run_iotop_window, options)
++try:
++if options.batch:
++return run_iotop_window(None, options)
++else:
++return curses.wrapper(run_iotop_window, options)
++except OSError, e:
++if e.errno == errno.EPERM:
++print  sys.stderr, e
++print  sys.stderr, ('iotop requires root or the NET_ADMIN '
++  'capability.')
++sys.exit(1)
++else:
++raise
+ 
+ #
+ # Profiling
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
 0001-Do-not-report-requirements-that-are-available.patch
 0002-Document-the-requirement-for-CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTER.patch
+0001-Explain-that-iotop-now-requires-root.patch
 
-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#652014: Linux 3.2: Enable Hyper-V kernel modules

2011-12-13 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:10 +0100, Mathieu Simon wrote:
 Package: linux-image-amd64
 Severity: wishlist
 
 
 Dear Maintainers
 
 With the release of the 3.2 kernel (yet to happen), some of the 
 modules improving the glue for Linux VMs running on a MS Hyper-V 
 hypervisor have left the staging area (drivers/hv).

There is no need to wait for drivers to leave staging, in general.

I think there was some problem with them earlier that meant we didn't
enable them (possibly limitations on building as modules?).  Also, MS
abandoned them for a while.  But it seems that they are being properly
maintained now.

 Could this be taken as an opportunity to enable them in the default
 kernel image in experimental (i386, amd64) allowing testing with Debian? 
 Currently they are not unloadable, if that is a problem, I know there is 
 a patch floating in the upstream.

Do you have a reference for that?  (Commit hash, message ID, URL...)

 What would they enable?
 - add virtual SMP support for VMs
 - time provider support from the hypervisor

Yes, all this paravirt stuff is useful.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent.  They only think they are.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Processed: tagging 652014

2011-12-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 652014 + pending
Bug #652014 [src:linux-2.6] Linux 3.2: Enable Hyper-V kernel modules
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
652014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652014
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.132384570224882.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: taskstats capability check in stable

2011-12-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 04:32 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:

 Please do.

Proposed in #652015

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part