Bug#705635: found 705635 in 3.2.41-2+deb7u2
Hi folks, this was hitting me quite hard with 3.2.41-2+deb7u2. I had four hang ups yesterday. lowriter 1:4.0.3-3 seemed to be the most reliable way to trigger the bug (under gnome-shell 3.4.2-7). So far 3.8-2-amd64 seems fine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530082530.ga21...@ubik.ncl.ac.uk
Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets
Le 26/05/2013 18:10, Ben Hutchings a écrit : OK, so the switch is indeed defective: it says it can handle pause frames, but it can't. The problem happened on (at least) two different switches from different manufacturers (Transtec and Netgear). FWIW, the problem just happened on another machine (with same hardware) this morning. It is running Ubuntu with kernel 3.5.0-31-generic. Could you check whether the switch is also sending pause frames back to the port that's generating them? How exactly do I do that? Is disconnecting the faulty computer and connecting my laptop in its place right? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a719fd.9020...@debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#710023: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Bug #710023 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working The source 'linux' and version 'linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as found in versions linux/linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 710023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710023 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13699136269439.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 11:21 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 26/05/2013 18:10, Ben Hutchings a écrit : OK, so the switch is indeed defective: it says it can handle pause frames, but it can't. The problem happened on (at least) two different switches from different manufacturers (Transtec and Netgear). FWIW, the problem just happened on another machine (with same hardware) this morning. It is running Ubuntu with kernel 3.5.0-31-generic. Could you check whether the switch is also sending pause frames back to the port that's generating them? How exactly do I do that? Is disconnecting the faulty computer and connecting my laptop in its place right? ethtool -S eth0 | grep flow_control Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#709616: floods the network with pause packets
Le 30/05/2013 14:58, Ben Hutchings a écrit : Could you check whether the switch is also sending pause frames back to the port that's generating them? How exactly do I do that? Is disconnecting the faulty computer and connecting my laptop in its place right? ethtool -S eth0 | grep flow_control rx_flow_control_xon: 318 rx_flow_control_xoff: 318 tx_flow_control_xon: 0 tx_flow_control_xoff: 0 -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a74f20.4000...@debian.org
Bug#709625: protected_hardlinks is too broad - make it per-filesystem instead?
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 03:31:03AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 15:30 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Alternatively, I'm pondering: if the main thrust of the hardlink protection is to prevent attacks against system files, then it might make more sense to change protected_hardlinks to be a per-filesystem mount option. By all means protect the root filesystem etc., but for a purely data-carrying filesystem it's a bit obstructive. What do you think? I can see that this could be a useful feature, but I don't think I can spare the time to work on it any time soon. If you have the time to implement this yourself, I would be happy to review the changes but you will need to submit them upstream. OK, understood. I'll see if I can find some tuits... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Is there anybody out there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530131829.ga15...@einval.com
Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Bug #710023 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working The source 'linux' and version 'linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64' do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in versions linux/linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 710023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710023 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13699207741107.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is notfound. Anyway I am attaching the .ko triggering this issue. This seems like a mis-compilation on /my/ setup. hello.ko.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is notfound. Anyway I am attaching the .ko triggering this issue. This seems like a mis-compilation on /my/ setup. I can reproduce that on other oldstable system: $ sudo apt-get install binutils-gold -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wusxw7k3smp-oemcvc9dtx2ydm12mscw3hr_b8bf0028...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is notfound. Because 'found' is for recording package versions, and that is just a package name. Ben. Anyway I am attaching the .ko triggering this issue. This seems like a mis-compilation on /my/ setup. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530165233.gq4...@decadent.org.uk
Processed: [bts-link] source package src:linux
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). # remote status report for #684186 (http://bugs.debian.org/684186) # Bug title: Kernel doesn't produce any power related uevents on HP Folio 13-2000 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - CODE-FIX usertags 684186 - status-ASSIGNED Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED. Usertags are now: . usertags 684186 + status-RESOLVED resolution-CODE-FIX There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: resolution-CODE-FIX status-RESOLVED. # remote status report for #683777 (http://bugs.debian.org/683777) # Bug title: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: some multimedia/action keys don't work # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - CODE-FIX # * closed upstream tags 683777 + fixed-upstream Bug #683777 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: some multimedia/action keys don't work Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 683777 - status-ASSIGNED Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED. Usertags are now: . usertags 683777 + status-RESOLVED resolution-CODE-FIX There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: resolution-CODE-FIX status-RESOLVED. # remote status report for #697741 (http://bugs.debian.org/697741) # Bug title: i915: Black screen/no console with KMS # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 # * remote status changed: NEEDINFO - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 697741 + fixed-upstream Bug #697741 [src:linux] i915: Black screen/no console with KMS Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. usertags 697741 - status-NEEDINFO Usertags were: status-NEEDINFO. Usertags are now: . usertags 697741 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683777 697741: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697741 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136993545421981.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
[bts-link] source package src:linux
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:linux # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #684186 (http://bugs.debian.org/684186) # Bug title: Kernel doesn't produce any power related uevents on HP Folio 13-2000 # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - CODE-FIX usertags 684186 - status-ASSIGNED usertags 684186 + status-RESOLVED resolution-CODE-FIX # remote status report for #683777 (http://bugs.debian.org/683777) # Bug title: linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64: some multimedia/action keys don't work # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54621 # * remote status changed: ASSIGNED - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - CODE-FIX # * closed upstream tags 683777 + fixed-upstream usertags 683777 - status-ASSIGNED usertags 683777 + status-RESOLVED resolution-CODE-FIX # remote status report for #697741 (http://bugs.debian.org/697741) # Bug title: i915: Black screen/no console with KMS # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53926 # * remote status changed: NEEDINFO - RESOLVED # * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED # * closed upstream tags 697741 + fixed-upstream usertags 697741 - status-NEEDINFO usertags 697741 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530173700.20339.53533.btsl...@sonntag.debian.org
Bug#710430: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Version: 3.2.41-2+deb7u2 Upon completing the initial install of Wheezy, I rebooted and discovered that the kernel fails to boot. My video card is a Radeon 9250 PCI 256MB. After the grub menu, a few lines are printed, the last one being Waiting for /dev to be fully populated And then the screen goes black, or else shows columns of character-like marks, and the machine does not finish booting. If I add radeon.modeset=0 to the end of the command line in grub, then the machine does boot normally. So it seems that the problem has to do with booting the radeon card with KMS enabled. Using git I downloaded the kernel repository and discovered that this machine could boot fine with KMS enabled in 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, but not since then. Using git bisect pointed to this commit as the problematic one: commit 6b8b1786a8c29ce6e32298b93ac8d4a18a2b11c4 Author: Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com Date: Wed Apr 7 10:21:31 2010 + drm/radeon/kms: enable use of unmappable VRAM V2 I have submitted a bug report in the kernel bugzilla, and there are contained the output of dmesg and lspci. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981 Please let me know if there is any further information that would be helpful, or if there is anything else I can do to help solve this issue. Thank you, James Dietrich -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1369936776.24051.140661237747893.498be...@webmail.messagingengine.com
[bts-link] source package linux-2.6
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #572537 (http://bugs.debian.org/572537) # Bug title: udev spins on drm device # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27941 # * remote status changed: REOPENED - NEEDINFO usertags 572537 - status-REOPENED usertags 572537 + status-NEEDINFO thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530173700.20339.69207.btsl...@sonntag.debian.org
Bug#710430: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981 On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:59:36PM -0400, James Dietrich wrote: [...] Using git I downloaded the kernel repository and discovered that this machine could boot fine with KMS enabled in 2.6.33 and 2.6.34, but not since then. Using git bisect pointed to this commit as the problematic one: commit 6b8b1786a8c29ce6e32298b93ac8d4a18a2b11c4 Author: Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com Date: Wed Apr 7 10:21:31 2010 + drm/radeon/kms: enable use of unmappable VRAM V2 Thanks for doing this investigation yourself. I have submitted a bug report in the kernel bugzilla, and there are contained the output of dmesg and lspci. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981 Please let me know if there is any further information that would be helpful, or if there is anything else I can do to help solve this issue. No, we'll just track the upstream bug report for now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130530185255.gr4...@decadent.org.uk
Processed: Re: Bug#710430: kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI
Processing control commands: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981 Bug #710430 [linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64] kernel fails to boot with Radeon 9250 PCI Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58981'. -- 710430: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710430 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b710430.136993998131369.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#709647: linux-source-3.2: USB 1.1 no longer works
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:47:54PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:48:52PM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Control: tag -1 moreinfo Does enabling CONFIG_ACPI fix it? No. The computer does not support ACPI (nor APM) for the kernel. The kernel does not find usable hardware for ACPI: ACPI Error: A valid RSDP was not found (20110623/tbxfroot-219) ... ACPI: Interpreter disabled. ... pci :00:01.3: [8086:7113] type 0 class 0x000680 * Found PM-Timer Bug on the chipset. Due to workarounds for a bug, * this clock source is slow. Consider trying other clock sources pci :00:01.3: quirk: [io 0x1000-0x103f] claimed by PIIX4 ACPI pci :00:01.3: quirk: [io 0x1400-0x140f] claimed by PIIX4 SMB ... pnp: PnP ACPI: disabled The linux source file /drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c says bug in the PIIX4 chips for a timer. Can you send a full boot log for the kernel with CONFIG_ACPI enabled, please? imklog 5.8.11, log source = /proc/kmsg started. [0.00] Linux version 3.2.41-rt60-47 (b...@jeti.jeti.is) (gcc version 4.7.2 (Debian 4.7.2-5) ) #3 Mon May 27 17:01:09 GMT 2013 [0.00] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: [0.00] BIOS-e801: - 0009f000 (usable) [0.00] BIOS-e801: 0010 - 0a00 (usable) [0.00] Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection missing in CPU! [0.00] SMBIOS 2.2 present. [0.00] DMI: MiTAC 5033/5033, BIOS Version R3.03 08/10/99 [0.00] e820 update range: - 0001 (usable) == (reserved) [0.00] e820 remove range: 000a - 0010 (usable) [0.00] last_pfn = 0xa000 max_arch_pfn = 0x10 [0.00] initial memory mapped : 0 - 0180 [0.00] Base memory trampoline at [c009e000] 9e000 size 4096 [0.00] init_memory_mapping: -0a00 [0.00] 00 - 40 page 4k [0.00] 40 - 000a00 page 2M [0.00] kernel direct mapping tables up to a00 @ 17fb000-180 [0.00] ACPI Error: A valid RSDP was not found (20110623/tbxfroot-219) [0.00] 160MB LOWMEM available. [0.00] mapped low ram: 0 - 0a00 [0.00] low ram: 0 - 0a00 [0.00] Zone PFN ranges: [0.00] DMA 0x0010 - 0x1000 [0.00] Normal 0x1000 - 0xa000 [0.00] Movable zone start PFN for each node [0.00] early_node_map[2] active PFN ranges [0.00] 0: 0x0010 - 0x009f [0.00] 0: 0x0100 - 0xa000 [0.00] On node 0 totalpages: 40847 [0.00] free_area_init_node: node 0, pgdat c13b6900, node_mem_map c9ec0200 [0.00] DMA zone: 32 pages used for memmap [0.00] DMA zone: 0 pages reserved [0.00] DMA zone: 3951 pages, LIFO batch:0 [0.00] Normal zone: 288 pages used for memmap [0.00] Normal zone: 36576 pages, LIFO batch:7 [0.00] Allocating PCI resources starting at a00 (gap: a00:f600) [0.00] pcpu-alloc: s0 r0 d32768 u32768 alloc=1*32768 [0.00] pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 [0.00] Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 40527 [0.00] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=3.2.41-acpi ro root=803 [0.00] PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) [0.00] Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) [0.00] Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) [0.00] Initializing CPU#0 [0.00] Memory: 157504k/163840k available (2855k kernel code, 5884k reserved, 962k data, 280k init, 0k highmem) [0.00] virtual kernel memory layout: [0.00] fixmap : 0xfffe4000 - 0xf000 ( 108 kB) [0.00] vmalloc : 0xca80 - 0xfffe2000 ( 855 MB) [0.00] lowmem : 0xc000 - 0xca00 ( 160 MB) [0.00] .init : 0xc13bb000 - 0xc1401000 ( 280 kB) [0.00] .data : 0xc12c9f30 - 0xc13baac0 ( 962 kB) [0.00] .text : 0xc100 - 0xc12c9f30 (2855 kB) [0.00] Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode...Ok. [0.00] SLUB: Genslabs=15, HWalign=32, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=1, Nodes=1 [0.00] NR_IRQS:16 nr_irqs:16 16 [0.00] CPU 0 irqstacks, hard=c9806000 soft=c9808000 [0.00] Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 [0.00] console [tty0] enabled [0.00] Fast TSC calibration using PIT [0.00] Detected 331.624 MHz processor. [0.010014] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 663.24 BogoMIPS (lpj=3316240) [0.010319] pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301 [0.010800] Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 [0.020365] CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor stepping 0c [
Bug#709647: linux-source-3.2: USB 1.1 no longer works
Now I see this is a rather old computer (BIOS dated 1999), so I'm not so surprised that ACPI is not supported! Does the kernel in linux-image-3.2.0-4-486 work? Can you send a boot log and output of 'lspci -s :01.2' from a working kernel (old or new)? Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
Control: reassign -1 binutils-gold 2.20.1-16 Control: fixed -1 2.22-8 Control: affects -1 linux On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 16:38 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 710023 linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 Hum...this is not clear why this is notfound. Anyway I am attaching the .ko triggering this issue. This seems like a mis-compilation on /my/ setup. I can reproduce that on other oldstable system: $ sudo apt-get install binutils-gold I don't see this with the current version, though. I'm reassigning accordingly. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#710023: Processed: notfound 710023 in linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
Processing control commands: reassign -1 binutils-gold 2.20.1-16 Bug #710023 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working Bug reassigned from package 'src:linux' to 'binutils-gold'. No longer marked as found in versions linux/3.2.41-2+deb7u2~bpo60+1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #710023 to the same values previously set Bug #710023 [binutils-gold] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working Marked as found in versions binutils/2.20.1-16. fixed -1 2.22-8 Bug #710023 [binutils-gold] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working Marked as fixed in versions binutils/2.22-8. affects -1 linux Bug #710023 [binutils-gold] linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: pr_err() does not seems to be working Added indication that 710023 affects linux -- 710023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710023 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b710023.13699664929401.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 14:03 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:09 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:03:42AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: There can be no more uploads to unstable for wheezy, so I propose to rename sid - wheezy for each package that currently has a sid branch. Okay. Linux 3.9 is now out, so we have a choice between 3.8.10 and 3.9 as the first upload for jessie. Maybe we could start with 3.8.10 for unstable and 3.9 for experimental? I think we should do a 3.8 upload to unstable. Lets see if I got some time to do some cleanups for 3.9. There is also the armmp introduction to do. [...] The 3.8.y branch is over, so I think we have to move to 3.9, ready or not. I merged the work in progress from trunk to sid and am going through the config changes at the moment. I'm rather disappointed that nothing at all has been committed by ARM porters to either branch in the last month. Anyway, I'm planning to upload 3.9.4-1 tomorrow (Saturday). Let me know if there are any imminent changes I should wait for. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: tagging 704750
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 704750 + pending Bug #704750 [src:linux] src:linux: Please enable Yama LSM Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704750: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704750 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136997388529220.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 708336
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708336 + pending Bug #708336 [src:linux] linux: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to missing module tms380tr Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708336: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13699748283821.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 708662
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708662 + pending Bug #708662 [src:linux] linux: FTBFS on powerpcspe due to duplicate module llc at kernel-wedge Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #708662 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708662 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13699748363862.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 704129
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 704129 + pending Bug #704129 [src:linux] linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64: please add support for AX88179 USB 3.0 ethernet adapters Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704129: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704129 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13699756849792.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 708348
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 708348 + pending Bug #708348 [linux] linux: Please enable CONFIG_RTL8723AE=m Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708348 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136997569410014.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 701777
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 701777 + pending Bug #701777 [src:linux] please enable AR5523 for kernel = 3.8 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 701777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701777 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13699756899973.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
