Bug#723761: Info received (irq 16: nobody cared errors for the mptsas driver)

2014-02-06 Thread Dániel L .
[0.446949] Fusion MPT SAS Host driver 3.04.20
[0.461810] mptbase: ioc0: Initiating bringup
[1.164034] ioc0: LSISAS1064E B1: Capabilities={Initiator}
[1.164071] mptsas :05:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
[1.280036] Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2133.408 MHz.
[1.280041] Switching to clocksource tsc
[6.944375] scsi0 : ioc0: LSISAS1064E B1, FwRev=0110h, Ports=1,
MaxQ=511, IRQ=16
[6.968667] mptsas: ioc0: attaching sata device: fw_channel 0, fw_id 5,
phy 0, sas_addr 0x3da8a999f1ba7995
[6.971490] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA  WD2502ABYS-23B7A
3B02 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[6.974862] mptsas: ioc0: attaching sata device: fw_channel 0, fw_id 1,
phy 1, sas_addr 0x3dbaa996ebba7994
[6.977688] scsi 0:0:1:0: Direct-Access ATA  WD2502ABYS-23B7A
3B04 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[6.981055] mptsas: ioc0: attaching raid volume, channel 1, id 0
[6.981890] scsi 0:1:0:0: Direct-Access LSILOGIC Logical Volume
3000 PQ: 0 ANSI: 2
[6.994397] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] 486326272 512-byte logical blocks: (248
GB/231 GiB)
[6.994635] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[6.994638] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 08
[6.994843] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Got wrong page
[6.994900] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[6.995920] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Got wrong page
[6.995975] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[7.016636]  sda: sda1 sda2
[7.017787] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Got wrong page
[7.017845] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[7.017903] sd 0:1:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk

*

[   10.386339] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the irqpoll option)
[   10.386454] Pid: 665, comm: pidof Not tainted 3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian
3.2.51-1
[   10.386457] Call Trace:
[   10.386460]  IRQ  [810928bd] ? __report_bad_irq+0x2c/0xb5
[   10.386473]  [81092c7a] ? note_interrupt+0x170/0x1f2
[   10.386478]  [8109102c] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x15f/0x17d
[   10.386483]  [8104c37d] ? __do_softirq+0x13e/0x177
[   10.386487]  [8109107e] ? handle_irq_event+0x34/0x52
[   10.386492]  [810933f1] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x7c/0xaf
[   10.386498]  [8100f88d] ? handle_irq+0x1d/0x21
[   10.386502]  [8100f5bd] ? do_IRQ+0x42/0x98
[   10.386507]  [8134f4ee] ? common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e
[   10.386510]  EOI  [81140a5d] ? task_dumpable+0x23/0x34
[   10.386519]  [8110a5bb] ? dput+0x1b/0xee
[   10.386523]  [8110252c] ? path_to_nameidata+0x19/0x3a
[   10.386528]  [81103353] ? walk_component+0x3bf/0x406
[   10.386533]  [811039e1] ? link_path_walk+0x174/0x421
[   10.386537]  [81105a3d] ? path_openat+0xac/0x33a
[   10.386542]  [81105d33] ? user_path_at_empty+0x53/0x7b
[   10.386546]  [81105d8d] ? do_filp_open+0x2a/0x6e
[   10.386551]  [8110eb13] ? alloc_fd+0x64/0x109
[   10.386556]  [810f9d59] ? do_sys_open+0x5e/0xe5
[   10.386561]  [81354212] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[   10.386564] handlers:
[   10.386615] [a0001d67] mpt_interrupt
[   10.386697] [a01e10cd] usb_hcd_irq
[   10.386780] Disabling IRQ #16



2014-01-21 Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org:

 Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
 this Bug report.

 This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
 has been received.

 Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
 interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

 Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
  Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org

 If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
 send it to 723...@bugs.debian.org.

 Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
 to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.

 --
 723761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723761
 Debian Bug Tracking System
 Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Building a debian kernel - symlink from build to source?

2014-02-06 Thread Csanyi Pal
Hi,

I built many times debian kernels for myself, but now I have a
problem that I don't understand.

I'm following advices here:
http://forum.excito.net/viewtopic.php?f=9t=4744sid=d7c5dadbaac8d9955ad07db7dcea31a9

but I get not any help sofar out there.

On the abowe mentioned forum there is an advice for someone else, I
quote it here:

quote
Re: B2 Wireless AP setup: RTL8188CUS
Postby Gordon » 14 Dec 2013, 11:34
Are you compiling on the B2 itself? I had a similar issue with one of my
first projects. The modules directory should contain a symlink to the
kernel source ( build - ../../../usr/src/linux ). Obviously this means
you need to have the source and it needs to be prepared. There is a
second issue here as well and that is that the source as distributed by
Excito is meant to create a Debian package and adds additional symbols
during that build. The result is that if you use that source to create
external modules, the version stamping is off and the module won't
work. You need to change the Makefile so that the module version you're
creating matches `uname -r`: i.e. change the value for EXTRAVERSION from
.4 to .4-13, or whatever that last number says on your B2 (my B3 has
11).
/quote

I don't understand this abowe, because English isn't my first language.

So I did'nt make any symlink and didn't change the Makefile as adviced
abowe.

I built the kernel version linux_2.6.39.4-13 from the downloaded source
linux_2.6.39.4-13.dsc on the Debian Squeeze 64 bit guest op. system on
my Virtual Box emulator, where the host op. system is Debian SID.

I did the followings steps:
echo deb http://www.emdebian.org/debian/ squeeze main  \
 /etc/apt/sources.list.d/emdebian.list
apt-get update
apt-get install gcc-4.4-powerpc-linux-gnu
apt-get install build-essential devscripts
apt-get install device-tree-compiler uboot-mkimage
apt-get install libncurses5-dev

export ARCH=powerpc
export CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-gnu-

dget -xu \
http://b3.update.excito.org/pool/main/l/linux/linux_2.6.39.4-13.dsc

cd linux-2.6.39.4
make menuconfig
Load the default excito configuration: From the menu, select Load an
Alternate Configuration File and enter the following path: 
arch/powerpc/configs/bubbatwo_defconfig

Note: whenever you customize the kernel, the resulting configuration
must be placed in arch/arm/configs/bubba3_defconfig
(arch/powerpc/configs/bubbatwo_defconfig for the B2); only this file
will be used during the compilation phase to configure the kernel.

So I saved the resulting configuration into
arch/powerpc/configs/bubbatwo_defconfig .

dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b -apowerpc

sudo dpkg -i bubba3-kernel-headers-powerpc_2.6.39.4-13_powerpc.deb \
bubba3-kernel_2.6.39.4-13_powerpc.deb

The problem is when I installed this new kernel on my Bubba headless
power pc box, I can't find any modules in the 
/lib/modules/2.6.39.4-13/ directory.

So, I think that that I must to create the abowe mentioned symlink
build - ../../../usr/src/linux

but I don't know in which directory to do this?

Can one help me in this? Any advices will be appreciated!

-- 
Regards from Pal


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140206102457.GB5892@localhost



Bug#689942: Also here

2014-02-06 Thread ael
I am seeing the same bug here. I have yet to check fstab which is likely
to be odd ( a heritage machine). Was the patch incorporated?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140206104511.GA5662@exact.conquest



Bug#737023: marked as done (BCM5708 with bnx2 driver shows lots of errors on packets.)

2014-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:51:10 +0100
with message-id 20140206115110.ga3...@www.manty.net
and subject line Re: Bug#737023: BCM5708 with bnx2 driver shows lots of errors 
on packets.
has caused the Debian Bug report #737023,
regarding BCM5708 with bnx2 driver shows lots of errors on packets.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
737023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737023
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-latest
Severity: important
Tags: upstream

Hi!

I have wheezy installed on several servers wich have a BCM5708 based NIC,
which uses the bnx2 driver and I'm seeing a lot of errors on the network RX
packets, this happens wether the machine runs current 3.2 stable kernel or
3.12 unstable one, and with firmware-bnx2 coming from stable and unstable.

Searching on google didn't show any solution on this, but I found a couple
of discussions showing the same kind of errors:

http://slashzeroconf.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/broadcom-netxtreme-ii-bcm5708-bnx2-ip-checksum-error/
http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/Networking/bnx2-ip-checksum-error/td-p/4119430

These are posts from 2008, however I'm still seeing this right now with
current kernels and firmware.

I've tried to run these commands:
ethtool -K eth0 rx off
ethtool -K eth0 tx off
ethtool -K eth0 tso off
but that didn't make any change on the behaviour.

For my tests I'm running a ping which is loosing packets ranging from 12% to
60% (I suppose that this depends on how busy the NIC is).

On the setups I did right now I'm using VLAN tagging, I don't know if that
makes any difference, I'll try to run more tests with and without this.

The systems run Debian 7.3 and the kernels I tried were:
linux-image-3.11-2-amd64  3.11.8-1
linux-image-3.12-1-amd64  3.12.8-1
linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 3.2.51-1


Don't know what else to add, if you feel I'm missing something just let me
know. I removed the system information at the end as I'm not writing from
the servers having the problem.

Regards.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi!

Sorry Ben for making you loose time with this, I thought the hardware was
broken from the beginning, but having several servers with the same problem
and the bugs that I had found on google drove me to think it could be the
driver and that's why I sent the bug.

In the end it seems all the problems were caused by the Pass-Thru (I had
asked a local hp technician about it and he told me that this part could not
be causing the problems). I managed to get my hands on a new Pass-Thru and
changed the old one with the new one and I'm seeing http transfers of 108
MB/s and above without a single error.

Thanks for your help and interest and sorry again for the disturbance.
-- 
Manty/BestiaTester - http://manty.net---End Message---


Bug#737701: marked as done (ext4 silently ignores acl mount option)

2014-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 06 Feb 2014 10:23:48 -0500
with message-id 52f3a904.4060...@ubuntu.com
and subject line Re: Processed: Re: Bug#737701: mount: When I execute 'mount -o 
remount,acl /' . This command dont work.
has caused the Debian Bug report #737701,
regarding ext4 silently ignores acl mount option
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
737701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: mount
Version: 2.20.1-5.3
Severity: normal

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.3
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages mount depends on:
ii  libblkid12.20.1-5.3
ii  libc62.13-38
ii  libmount12.20.1-5.3
ii  libselinux1  2.1.9-5
ii  libsepol12.1.4-3

mount recommends no packages.

Versions of packages mount suggests:
ii  nfs-common  1:1.2.6-4

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

After asking about it on the upstream ext4 mailing list, it turns out
this is not a bug.  The acl option is enabled by default on ext4, so
it only indicates if you disable it with the noacl option.


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS86kEAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrw6FkH/0sJC8+bJb0j/+jLC+3CsZX8
VnBssZhp2OeMb0WD5hew73NtCIHUZESFRb2681AeGdlLpM1zsdEA4WgnhtGHotEC
8tq04Yg9JiFsPMPLs+bgF5aUeGIV0jQULgBMRSnSOo6L9MY3LTVQ4KtLEPSafsZM
4bg1Vk7Zg45QNrpjaHKMH1PimfFm6WhcslC5FCF03gJcwoo55XND9n79i97ivoCq
PJPBpED3fW4R7E7LrX00Fv0Uw5TWeHqfigS/zboMDgPp8B5Yw1bAxiIRwZKWmZsn
2y1wZCrG2cuOP269QDtl9p38Vq8JUENwRTf6Vzkr+h4FmHs4Zs6FzqJ/+kxxjTc=
=W5yo
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#737938: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 000008000000001c

2014-02-06 Thread Stephen Powell
Package: linux
Version: 3.11.10-1

[38587.355263] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 081c
[38587.355328] IP: [8110b149] find_get_page+0x29/0x90
[38587.355382] PGD 0
[38587.355401] Oops:  [#1] SMP
[38587.355430] Modules linked in: tun bnep rfcomm bluetooth rfkill parport_pc 
ppdev lp parport nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc 
fuse loop usb_storage ata_generic snd_hda_codec_realtek kvm crc32c_intel 
ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel aes_x86_64 ablk_helper cryptd lrw gf128mul 
glue_helper evdev edac_mce_amd psmouse edac_core pcspkr radeon serio_raw 
fam15h_power k10temp sp5100_tco ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit wmi button 
snd_hda_intel sg snd_hda_codec acpi_cpufreq snd_hwdep mperf snd_pcm processor 
snd_page_alloc snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_timer sr_mod ohci_pci cdrom ohci_hcd 
snd pata_atiixp i2c_piix4 ehci_pci ehci_hcd i2c_core usbcore alx thermal_sys 
shpchp usb_common soundcore
mdio ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod crc_t10dif ahci libahci libata scsi_mod 
microcode
[38587.356087] CPU: 2 PID: 4050 Comm: hercules Not tainted 3.11-2-amd64 #1 
Debian 3.11.10-1
[38587.356151] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. 
GA-78LMT-S2P/GA-78LMT-S2P, BIOS F3 10/18/2012
[38587.356223] task: 8801f42b1140 ti: 8801f436c000 task.ti: 
8801f436c000
[38587.356281] RIP: 0010:[8110b149]  [8110b149] 
find_get_page+0x29/0x90
[38587.356348] RSP: 0018:8801f436dd80  EFLAGS: 00010246
[38587.356390] RAX: 880101caf718 RBX: 8801e06379f8 RCX: fffa
[38587.356445] RDX: 0800 RSI: 000444c4 RDI: 
[38587.356499] RBP: 000444c4 R08: 0800 R09: 880101caf718
[38587.356554] R10: 0006 R11: 0293 R12: 000e
[38587.356608] R13: eac3b920 R14:  R15: 8801f4233580
[38587.356664] FS:  7f2c70237700() GS:88020fc8() 
knlGS:
[38587.356726] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 80050033
[38587.356770] CR2: 081c CR3: 0001f434c000 CR4: 000407e0
[38587.356825] Stack:
[38587.356842]  8801e06379f0 000444c4 8110c720 
8801e06378a0
[38587.356904]   8801f42335f8 000444d2 
810abac2
[38587.356965]  000444c3 000444c4  
8801f436de68
[38587.357027] Call Trace:
[38587.357053]  [8110c720] ? generic_file_aio_read+0x250/0x6f0
[38587.357108]  [81169527] ? do_sync_read+0x67/0x90
[38587.357154]  [81169ab4] ? vfs_read+0x94/0x160
[38587.357199]  [8116a5a3] ? SyS_read+0x43/0xa0
[38587.357244]  [81481469] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[38587.357291] Code: 00 00 55 48 89 f5 53 48 8d 5f 08 48 89 ee 48 89 df e8 ac 
e5 14 00 48 85 c0 49 89 c1 74 34 48 8b 10 48 85 d2 74 26 f6 c2 03 75 45 8b 4a 
1c 85 c9 74 d9 8d 71 01 48 8d 7a 1c 89 c8 f0 0f b1 72 1c
[38587.357502] RIP  [8110b149] find_get_page+0x29/0x90
[38587.357551]  RSP 8801f436dd80
[38587.360506] CR2: 081c
[38587.363626] ---[ end trace a69c5e0ca2716703 ]---

-- 
  .''`. Stephen Powell
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2027073877.834564.1391741777992.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com