Bug#774131: Missing kernel modules (mini.iso / Jessie / amd64)
Package: Installer (mini.iso) Version: 02-Oct-2014 09:01 (Jessie) Severity: important When I try to install a Debian testing version using http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso I always get an error message about missing kernel modules as shown at http://beilagen.dreael.ch/Diverses/Details_Debian_8_Jessie_29141229/Jessie_mini_iso_Fehler_Kernelversion.png When I try to continue without kernel modules then the setup process cannot continued on the installation target selection: http://beilagen.dreael.ch/Diverses/Details_Debian_8_Jessie_29141229/Jessie_mini_iso_Folgefehler_keine_HD.png This error still appears when using a primary mirror as installation source. I believe there was done a kernel version change in the meantime without updating mini.iso accordingly so simply recompose mini.iso would fix this issue. Note: uname -a reports 3.16-2-amd64 as kernel version. Andreas -- meile.biz IT solutions, Hauptstrasse 63, CH-8242 Hofen SH PC/Netzwerk-Support, Web-Entwicklung und -Hosting Tel. +41 52 640 04 72 * Fax +41 52 640 04 73 * Mobile +41 79 334 05 67 Postfach 169, CH-8240 Thayngen * i...@meile.biz * http://www.meile.biz smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Processed: reassign 774131 to src:linux
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 774131 src:linux Bug #774131 [installer (mini.iso)] Missing kernel modules (mini.iso / Jessie / amd64) Warning: Unknown package 'installer' Warning: Unknown package 'mini.iso' Bug reassigned from package 'installer (mini.iso)' to 'src:linux'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #774131 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #774131 to the same values previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 774131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774131 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14198477943398.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#774131: marked as done (Missing kernel modules (mini.iso / Jessie / amd64))
Your message dated Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:32:14 +0100 with message-id 1419852734.5686.6.ca...@decadent.org.uk and subject line Re: Processed: reassign 774131 to src:linux has caused the Debian Bug report #774131, regarding Missing kernel modules (mini.iso / Jessie / amd64) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 774131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774131 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: Installer (mini.iso) Version: 02-Oct-2014 09:01 (Jessie) Severity: important When I try to install a Debian testing version using http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/mini.iso I always get an error message about missing kernel modules as shown at http://beilagen.dreael.ch/Diverses/Details_Debian_8_Jessie_29141229/Jessie_mini_iso_Fehler_Kernelversion.png When I try to continue without kernel modules then the setup process cannot continued on the installation target selection: http://beilagen.dreael.ch/Diverses/Details_Debian_8_Jessie_29141229/Jessie_mini_iso_Folgefehler_keine_HD.png This error still appears when using a primary mirror as installation source. I believe there was done a kernel version change in the meantime without updating mini.iso accordingly so simply recompose mini.iso would fix this issue. Note: uname -a reports 3.16-2-amd64 as kernel version. Andreas -- meile.biz IT solutions, Hauptstrasse 63, CH-8242 Hofen SH PC/Netzwerk-Support, Web-Entwicklung und -Hosting Tel. +41 52 640 04 72 * Fax +41 52 640 04 73 * Mobile +41 79 334 05 67 Postfach 169, CH-8240 Thayngen * i...@meile.biz * http://www.meile.biz smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Note: uname -a reports 3.16-2-amd64 as kernel version. You're using an old netboot image and this failure is expected. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Anthony's Law of Force: Don't force it, get a larger hammer. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message---
xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
(Cc-ing debian-kernel, note I am not subscribed to this list, please Cc me on replies) Hi, after updating linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64 from 3.16.7-2 to the latest 3.16.7-ckt2-1 networking on my rumprun-xen [1] domUs stopped working. Here is an excerpt of the failure during Mini-OS boot: net TX ring size 256 net RX ring size 256 netfront: node=device/vif/0 backend=/local/domain/0/backend/vif/21/0 netfront: MAC b2:11:11:11:11:11 backend not avalable, state=5 creating xenif0 failed: 22 It looks like the changes made in the fix for #767261, as mentioned in the Debian changelog are the likely culprit: [ Ian Campbell ] * [xen] Backport various netback fixes (Closes: #767261). However, I can't find a full final list of which fixes were backported. Given that the last traffic on #767261 was on November 9th, I suspect at least this upstream change from December 18 did NOT make it into the new linux-image package: xen-netback: support frontends without feature-rx-notify again 26c0e102585d5a4d311f5d6eb7f524d288e7f6b7 [2] I can't verify this 100% as I don't know where in the archive I can find the original 3.16.7-2 linux-image to downgrade to/compare the Debian diffs. Should I reopen #767261 or file a new bug for this? Thanks, Martin [1] http://repo.rumpkernel.org/rumprun-xen [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=26c0e102585d5a4d311f5d6eb7f524d288e7f6b7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141229124252.gb14...@nodbug.moloch.sk
Re: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 13:42 +0100, Martin Lucina wrote: However, I can't find a full final list of which fixes were backported. FWIW they are in the source package in debian/patches/series. Given that the last traffic on #767261 was on November 9th, I suspect at least this upstream change from December 18 did NOT make it into the new linux-image package: xen-netback: support frontends without feature-rx-notify again 26c0e102585d5a4d311f5d6eb7f524d288e7f6b7 [2] Yes, I very much suspect this is needed too and will fix your problem. I'll look into it shortly. I can't verify this 100% as I don't know where in the archive I can find the original 3.16.7-2 linux-image to downgrade to/compare the Debian diffs. snapshot.debian.org has all historical versions of all packages. Should I reopen #767261 or file a new bug for this? A new bug would be best please. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419857788.13595.49.ca...@hellion.org.uk
Bug#772953: Enable several Kconfigs to support OMAP5432 uEVM devboard
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 10:17 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: On Dec 28, 2014, at 17:08, Ian Campbell i...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, 2014-12-26 at 18:43 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: With the attached patch applied, debian installer (tested with network-console) can support OMAP5's ethernet driver and external MicroSD card. Note that I added related regulator phy entries to files that mainly writes the modules which use them, since there is no file dedicated to those modules. Do you know if phy-ti-pipe3 is used exclusively by USB or just only within the set of things used in the d-i context? Likewise the two regulators added to mmc? So far as I can tell from DTS, there are two types of modules use phy-ti-pipe3, which are ‘usb3’ and ‘sata’. But I am not quite sure how the hardware modules are connected. And pbias seems be only meaningful to mmc, and palmas relates to many other devices of the board. Thanks. I think palmas is a candidate to be built in then. I'll do that. I'm not entirely sure what to do about phy-ti-pipe3, you've added it to usb-modules but I suppose SATA won't necessarily work if we do that. I think I'd be inclined to build it in for now rather than make drastic changes to the udebs for Jessie. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419857938.13595.52.ca...@debian.org
Bug#774036: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Untainted Kernel shows similar issue
Hello Rainer, The below procedure would give more information: Add the following line to the top of the file /usr/lib/pm-utils/pm-functions. export PM_DEBUG=true Then suspend with: echo 1 /sys/power/pm_trace echo mem /sys/power/state Post dmesg and the contents of /var/log/pm-suspend.log. Have you tried disabling the mac80211 module? Best regards, Emil Goode -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141229130255.GA3410@lianli
Bug#767261: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 12:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote: Should I reopen #767261 or file a new bug for this? A new bug would be best please. Actually, no need for this, I've applied the fixes locally and am just building them before pushing. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419866144.13595.122.ca...@debian.org
Bug#772953: Enable several Kconfigs to support OMAP5432 uEVM devboard
On Fri, 2014-12-26 at 18:43 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Ian Campbell i...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 16:27 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote: I have a glance at the kernel’s installer configs and tried the netboot without any modification. Some work should be done to make debian-installer support OMAP5 uEVM (e.g., ethernet driver etc). Right, those should be listed in e.g. debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/nic-modules. By waiting the kernel building with some initial attempted configs added, just one question to ask. I looked through the debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/, but it looks like none of files is about regulator modules. However, according to my previous experience, missing regulator driver modules is the main reason that the old debian kernel doesn’t support OMAP5 uEVM. How does debian-installer deal with this situation (if it does need extra regulator drivers included?) Long term its a bit of an open question what we do wrt modules such as regulators, clocks, pinctrl etc. So far we have been a bit lucky: either such things are so central to the platform that it is acceptable (at least for now) to just build them into the main kernel binary by making them =y (e.g. CONFIG_I2C_S3C2410 which is for the main power controller on arndale) or they are closely associated with some particular device and it makes sense to put them in that udeb (e.g. phy-exynos5250-sata in sata-modules, or phy-sun4i-usb in usb-modules). Eventually I expect that we will end up creating separate udebs for these things, but I'm hoping that we can defer that until at least Stretch to avoid needing to mess around with any more new packages for Jessie. If uEVM has some module which either shouldn't be built in or isn't obviously associated with a particular device let us know what it is and we can have a think about how best to approach it. One thing I've played with, and I'm not sure if this is acceptable or not, is to put core drivers which aren't =y into the kernel-image udeb itself. I'm not really sure if that's a good idea, we don't currently do this for anything AFAIK, but it's perhaps an option. With the attached patch applied, debian installer (tested with network-console) can support OMAP5's ethernet driver and external MicroSD card. Note that I added related regulator phy entries to files that mainly writes the modules which use them, since there is no file dedicated to those modules. Here is what I went with (am build testing now, will push to svn once done): commit e05093889458a806352d3e281b2f20db098925fb Author: Ian Campbell i...@debian.org Date: Mon Dec 29 14:36:47 2014 + Updates to udebs for OMAP5432 uEVM support. Based on a patch from Chen Baozi. Added pbias-regulator to mmc-modules and ohci-omap3, ehci-omap and phy-omap-usb2 to usb-modules (dwc3-omap was already present). Enabled CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS and CONFIG_TI_PIPE3 as builtin since they are used by multiple subsystems. diff --git a/debian/config/armhf/config.armmp b/debian/config/armhf/config.armmp index 8781e59..62e512f 100644 --- a/debian/config/armhf/config.armmp +++ b/debian/config/armhf/config.armmp @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ CONFIG_PCI_MVEBU=y ## CONFIG_OMAP_CONTROL_PHY=m CONFIG_OMAP_USB2=m -CONFIG_TI_PIPE3=m +CONFIG_TI_PIPE3=y CONFIG_TWL4030_USB=m CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_SATA=m CONFIG_PHY_SUN4I_USB=m @@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ CONFIG_REGULATOR_TWL4030=y CONFIG_REGULATOR_VEXPRESS=m CONFIG_REGULATOR_PBIAS=m CONFIG_REGULATOR_TI_ABB=m -CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS=m +CONFIG_REGULATOR_PALMAS=y ## ## file: drivers/rtc/Kconfig diff --git a/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules b/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules index 5718bd2..6ebd458 100644 --- a/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules +++ b/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ mmci omap_hsmmc sunxi-mmc dw_mmc-exynos +pbias-regulator diff --git a/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/usb-modules b/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/usb-modules index 0828c55..f00b24f 100644 --- a/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/usb-modules +++ b/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/usb-modules @@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ phy-sun4i-usb dwc3-exynos dwc3-omap ohci-exynos +ohci-omap3 ehci-exynos +ehci-omap phy-exynos-usb2 +phy-omap-usb2 ci_hdrc_imx phy-mxs-usb Baozi. --- diff -Nru linux-3.16.7/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules linux-3.16.7-ckt2/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules --- linux-3.16.7/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules 2014-09-21 20:04:21.0 + +++ linux-3.16.7-ckt2/debian/installer/armhf/modules/armhf-armmp/mmc-modules 2014-12-26 03:16:02.0 + @@ -4,3 +4,5 @@ omap_hsmmc sunxi-mmc dw_mmc-exynos +pbias-regulator
Re: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
i...@debian.org said: On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 12:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote: Should I reopen #767261 or file a new bug for this? A new bug would be best please. Actually, no need for this, I've applied the fixes locally and am just building them before pushing. Thanks. I can test the packages once they're ready. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141229155629.gc14...@nodbug.moloch.sk
Bug#766920: initramfs-tools: update-initramfs makes system unbootable due to missing rootfs
Same issue still persists after using the root=UUID= syntax with grub (which is the default). Kernel line in grub command line: linux /boot/vmlinuz-3.16-2-amd64 root=UUID=11bb4d9d-8451-4632-9985-1bd9b155dba8 ro quiet Booting ends up with the following screen (with input disabled): Decompressing Linux... Parsing ELF... done. Booting the kernel. Loading, please wait... Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems: [--] ALERT! /dev/disk/by-uuid/11bb4d9d-8451-4632-9985-1bd9b155dba8 does not exist. Dropping to a shell! modprobe: module ehci-orion not found in modules.dep modprobe: module uhci-hcd not found in modules.dep modprobe: module ohci-hcd not found in modules.dep modprobe: module usbhid not found in modules.dep BusyBox v1.22.1 (Debian 1:1.22.0-9+b1) built-in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. /bin/sh: can't access tty; job control turned off Terminal output during the update: [..] processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.116) ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.16-2-amd64 /dev/sdg1: No such file or directory [--] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/ca+jdxoomfjahwtd+cs6eezjtfducjn7wpcr7bmxjdr1am+z...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#774155: [linux] Remote crash of kernel via batman-adv module
Package: linux Version: 3.16.7-ckt2-1 Severity: normal Tags: security X-Debbugs-CC: secure-testing-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org The current linux kernel version in Jessie can be crashed from remote when it uses the batman-adv module. More information can be found at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/343494 --- System information. --- Architecture: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 Debian Release: 8.0 500 testing http.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/trinity-78e286ea-6328-477c-b7bb-b7fed7efcb54-1419871556024@3capp-webde-bs43
Bug#774131: Missing kernel modules (mini.iso / Jessie / amd64)
Hello Ben You're using an old netboot image and this failure is expected. Thanks for your reply. I exactly supposed the same issue (obsoleted mini.iso). The actual problem is not a developement issue, it's an issue that some folders on the official FTP sources are not updated. For example the folder http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ (same on any other mirror) still contains the obsolete mini.iso Note: Two years ago when Squeeze was the current stable release and Wheezy was the testing release, I always found an updated mini.iso so probably something is wrong in the FTP server update process concerning the testing release. Current temporary workaround by myself: https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ points to the larger netinst files which seem to work correctly. Thanks for forwarding this to those guys who manage the FTP repository. Andreas -- meile.biz IT solutions, Hauptstrasse 63, CH-8242 Hofen SH PC/Netzwerk-Support, Web-Entwicklung und -Hosting Tel. +41 52 640 04 72 * Fax +41 52 640 04 73 * Mobile +41 79 334 05 67 Postfach 169, CH-8240 Thayngen * i...@meile.biz * http://www.meile.biz smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Processed: severity of 774155 is important
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 774155 important Bug #774155 [linux] [linux] Remote crash of kernel via batman-adv module Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 774155: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774155 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14198770953054.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#774131: Missing kernel modules (mini.iso / Jessie / amd64)
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 18:23 +0100, Andreas Meile wrote: Hello Ben You're using an old netboot image and this failure is expected. Thanks for your reply. I exactly supposed the same issue (obsoleted mini.iso). The actual problem is not a developement issue, it's an issue that some folders on the official FTP sources are not updated. For example the folder http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/netboot/ (same on any other mirror) still contains the obsolete mini.iso This is, for better or worse, expected behaviour when using the installer from the testing suite. When a new kernel ABI propagates to testing then the installer is invalidated until the next installer release, which may not follow for some time depending on schedules etc. The workaround during such periods is to use the daily installer builds from http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ . Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419878735.13595.150.ca...@debian.org
Re: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
i...@debian.org said: On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 12:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote: Should I reopen #767261 or file a new bug for this? A new bug would be best please. Actually, no need for this, I've applied the fixes locally and am just building them before pushing. Note that I'm not 100% sure that fix is the only change we need. I can't safely test fixes locally at the moment as I don't have remote console access to the dom0 and don't want to break the box while I'm away for NYE. Will be able to test fully next week. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141229195609.gb18...@nodbug.moloch.sk
Bug#767261: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 16:56 +0100, Martin Lucina wrote: i...@debian.org said: On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 12:56 +, Ian Campbell wrote: Should I reopen #767261 or file a new bug for this? A new bug would be best please. Actually, no need for this, I've applied the fixes locally and am just building them before pushing. Thanks. I can test the packages once they're ready. They are being uploaded to https://people.debian.org/~ijc/tmp/linux/3.16.7-ckt2-2~xen0/ right now. I've not booted them myself. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1419888604.13595.151.ca...@debian.org
Bug#774036: Re: Bug#774036: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: Untainted Kernel shows similar issue
Hi Emil, Am Montag 29 Dezember 2014, 14:02:55 schrieb Emil Goode: Hello Rainer, The below procedure would give more information: Add the following line to the top of the file /usr/lib/pm-utils/pm-functions. export PM_DEBUG=true Then suspend with: echo 1 /sys/power/pm_trace echo mem /sys/power/state HmmI do not have a pm_trace root@Silberkiste:~# ls -l /sys/power/ insgesamt 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 29 23:19 disk -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 image_size -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 pm_async -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 pm_freeze_timeout -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 pm_print_times -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 pm_test -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 reserved_size -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 29 23:19 resume -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 29 23:19 state -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dez 30 00:04 wakeup_count root@Silberkiste:~# There is a similar bug report already for an older kernel, but that seems to be fixed (?) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638264 Post dmesg and the contents of /var/log/pm-suspend.log. Have you tried disabling the mac80211 module? Can you tell how I unload a module for suspend or if http://superuser.com/questions/620201/how-to-force-ubuntu-debian-mint-to-unload-modules-at-suspend-to-disk also applies to systemd? Thanks, Rainer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1904133.PosVhOpTgo@silberkiste
Bug#774199: linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4-amd64: most cpufreq governors newly unavailable
Package: src:linux Version: 3.16.0-0.bpo.4 On my other system, which is a laptop, with linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 cpufrequtils starts correctly out of the box, and the contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors is: powersave userspace conservative ondemand performance But with linux-image-3.16.0-0.bpo.4 booted on the same machine, I get the dreaded message Setting ondemand CPUFreq governor...disabled, governor not available and indeed, scaling_available_governors contains just powersave performance So this looks on the face as a kernel regression, although many other suspects come to mind as well. The machine is a Dell XPS with a 4-way Intel Core i7-3571U. Let me know if I can provide any more useful information. -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court. Local Variables: mode:claws-external End: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141229215958.7f79b168@buug.org
Bug#767261: xen-netback changes in #767261 break Mini-OS netfront
Hi Ian! Thank you so much for building this kernel! I just had this problem with a Windows 2012 R2 domu with GPLPV drivers from http://www.ejbdigital.com.au/1-0-1105/. dom0 has the message: [ 324.272925] vif vif-5-0: 22 feature-rx-notify is mandatory domu obviously has nothing helpful to say ;-) With your newly built kernel, everything seems to be fine. Cheers! Gedalya -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54a24b4a.1040...@gedalya.net
