Bug#890601: firmware-free: Source Package Doesn't Contain Source

2024-02-19 Thread Bastian Germann

On Tue, 5 Sep 2023 17:30:44 +0200 Bastian Germann  wrote:

Can you please drop carl9170-1.fw and the associated things from the package?
The carl9170fw package should be ready with revision 1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1.1.
The only missing thing is a Breaks/Replaces which I would like to fill in as
soon as you have decided on the firmware-free revision that drops it.


Ping. There have been two firmware-free uploads since my request.
Would you please comment on this? I would like to get this into trixie.



Bug#890601: firmware-free: Source Package Doesn't Contain Source

2023-09-05 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: block -1 by 1050989

On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 11:08:21 +0200 Bastian Germann  wrote:

carl9170fw just got into experimental so it can soon be replaced.


Can you please drop carl9170-1.fw and the associated things from the package?
The carl9170fw package should be ready with revision 1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1.1.
The only missing thing is a Breaks/Replaces which I would like to fill in as
soon as you have decided on the firmware-free revision that drops it.



Bug#890601: firmware-free: Source Package Doesn't Contain Source

2023-09-01 Thread Bastian Germann

carl9170fw just got into experimental so it can soon be replaced.

Besides this, I have created a MR which builds other firmware from source:
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/firmware-free/-/merge_requests/4

The only things left to build are the cis/* and keyspan_pda/* files which
need tools that are not packaged (ihex2fw from the kernel source and pack_cis).



Re: Review of the initial packaging of the carl9170 firmware

2023-08-13 Thread Bastian Germann

Thanks John. The package looks good to me now, so I have uploaded it.



Bug#1032582: linux: Enable CAN_MCP251XFD

2023-03-13 Thread Bastian Germann

Am 09.03.23 um 15:31 schrieb Diederik de Haas:

Can you describe*why*  this would a useful addition?


The chip is in several industrial PCs but the most popular device should be the
Waveshare 2-Channel Isolated CAN FD Expansion HAT for Raspberry Pi.



Bug#1032582: linux: Enable CAN_MCP251XFD

2023-03-09 Thread Bastian Germann

Source: linux
Version: 6.1.15-1
Severity: wishlist

The driver CAN_MCP251X is already enabled on all platforms.
Please enable CAN_MCP251XFD as module as well. Thank you!



Bug#980746: remove ath9k_htc, provided by libre package firmware-ath9k-htc

2022-07-07 Thread Bastian Germann

On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:49:09 -0500 John Scott  wrote:

Here's a patch for the removal from non-free firmware-atheros.

In the firmware-ath9k-htc package the files are named differently:

/lib/firmware/ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.dev.0.fw
/lib/firmware/ath9k_htc/htc_9271-1.dev.0.fw

Does the kernel know about those as well or will we need links?



Bug#998009: ethtool: Import new upstream version

2021-10-28 Thread Bastian Germann

Source: ethtool
Version: 1:5.9-1

ethtool version is lacking behind the latest upstream release 5.14 by several 
versions.
Please import the latest upstream release.



Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support

2021-04-30 Thread Bastian Germann

Am 29.04.21 um 20:13 schrieb Vincent Blut:

Running 'xrandr --verbose' from Xorg should give you the supported
HDCP Content Type. If that reports "HDCP Type1" then support for HDCP 2.2 is
enabled.


Works as expected. Enabling the two configs is sufficient.



Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support

2021-04-29 Thread Bastian Germann

Am 21.04.21 um 07:24 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:

Were you able to verify that enabling those two as modules make it
work?


I honestly do not know how to check from userspace. xrandr has a Content Protection flag that is 
responsible for enabling/indicating HDCP usage. It works but I cannot verify it to be HDCP v2.2 
(v1.4 works without those configs). libhdcpsdk has a HDCPSetProtectionLevel but I do not have the 
time right now to write a test program.



The time for changes for bullseye is thight, so would like to hear a
confirmation, the needed changed could be tested and confirmed to
work.




Bug#987281: linux-image-amd64: Enable i915 HDCP 2.2 support

2021-04-20 Thread Bastian Germann

Package: linux-image-amd64
Severity: wishlist

Since Linux 5.6, CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP is available which allows to use HDCP 2.2 with i915 graphics. 
The HDCP support for AMD GPUs is already enabled (CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_HDCP=y).


Having this available in the kernel config would improve support for various video streaming 
services and enable full use of package intel-hdcp. Its README claims CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE must be 
available as well, which might be an outdated information.


Please enable both CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_HDCP and CONFIG_INTEL_MEI_TXE as modules.



Bug#980539: ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: fill ASoC card owner

2021-04-01 Thread Bastian Germann

Control: tag - moreinfo

A patch addressing this was upstreamed: 
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2021-April/183120.html




Bug#946551: Enable TI PHY for 5.x kernels

2019-12-26 Thread Bastian Germann
I do not install any modules on that device intentionally. If you
think that this is not supported by Debian, please close the bug.



Bug#946551: Enable TI PHY for 5.x kernels

2019-12-10 Thread Bastian Germann
Package: linux
Version: 5.3.9-3
Severity: normal

The armmp Linux configuration had CONFIG_TI_CPSW_PHY_SEL enabled to be
built in the kernel up to including the buster kernel version. As this
config was deprecated with 5.1, it was removed from Debian's
configuration. With the 5.x versions comes the successor
CONFIG_PHY_TI_GMII_SEL enabled as a module. This just hit me updating
a BeagleBone Black (that does not load any modules) from buster to
testing.

I have created a merge request with CONFIG_PHY_TI_GMII_SEL=y for
armmp: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/merge_requests/194



Bug#935894: linux: buster-backports version

2019-08-27 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: linux
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainers,

would it be possible to get the bullseye kernel into buster-backports?
I would very much appreciate that.

Regards,
Bastian



Bug#929968: Add missing C_CAN module

2019-06-30 Thread Bastian Germann
Package: linux
Tags: patch

I have merge requested a fix for this issu.
https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/merge_requests/153



Bug#929968: linux: Missing C_CAN module

2019-06-04 Thread Bastian Germann
Source: linux
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

All Debian kernel configurations are missing the C_CAN drivers. This
device is available on TI am335x chips, which run, e.g., BeagleBone
Black. It would be great to have at least the armmp flavour set the
following configuration options:

CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN=m
CONFIG_CAN_C_CAN_PLATFORM=m