Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

2013-06-28 Thread David Power
Generally speaking, our requirements for equipment to be used as
buildd/porter
 machines are as follows:

 * reliability - The stable release manager requires that we operate
   three machines for each port: two buildd machines in different
   locations and one porter machine.  These machines must be reliable.

We already got ipa.debian.net, if David can give more nodes to Debian,
then I think the requirement can be fulfilled.

That we can do! Will I arrange this offline with someone in particular?


 * out of band management - We require the ability to manage the machines
   independently of their primary network interface: serial console or
   better, remotely-controllable power.

David, could you also allow Debian admins into IPMI interface?

Yup, shouldn¹t be a problem.


 * supportability - We require that the machines be commercialy available
   (within financial constraints) and that they be supportable through a
   warranty or post-warranty support or are otherwise easy to replace.

Those machines are selling commercially now.

 * stability - We require that the machine's architecture have an
   actively-maintained stable kernel in the archive.

Currently, there is an effort on going, as I explained above, but it
is not yet finished, just starting:
  http://packages.debian.org/unstable/linux-image-3.9-1-armmp 

 * environment - We require that packages critical for DSA operations be
   available: puppet, samhain, syslog-ng, ferm/pf, etc.

The armhf port already contains those.

 We would prefer to house such equipment in one of the data centres
where we
 have an existing presence (grnet (Greece), man-da (Germany), ubcece
(Canada))
 but we are amenable to a discussion regarding having a business host the
 equipment on our behalf as long as the above requirements are met.

These will need to remotely accessed - we have a 24 node system that we
use for customer to benchmark/test remotely. I can allocate one or two
nodes on this but unfortunately couldn't provide a full chassis.

In response to some of the other threads, I'll give some of the
suggestions a try (kernel 3.9.1) and report back.

Thanks,
Dave


 Please let me know how you'd like to proceed.

 And thank you for your offer.  It is *only* through the generous
donation of
 time, equipment and/or funds from businesses and/or individuals such as
 yourself that volunteers are able to make the operating system known as
Debian.

 Thanks again,

 Luca

 Debian System Administration Team
 Debian Hardware Donations Team

 --
 Luca Filipozzi
 http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian

Regards,
--
 Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-.

  Debian ARM porter
  Debian ARM buildd admin






DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this email is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and access by anyone else 
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our customers, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to our standard terms and 
conditions. The views in this email may not necessarily reflect the views of 
the company. Please note that Boston uses the services of credit insurance 
agencies and cheque guarantee companies, therefore, customer details may be 
divulged as required by such companies. This information will be stored in 
their databases and may be exchanged with other credit reference agencies.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cdf33e0d.60309%david.po...@boston.co.uk



Re: Donation of a Calxeda Highbank node

2013-06-27 Thread David Power
 My main concern is that having a single node as buildd without another
 for development purposes means that we don't have easy means to keep
 testing for example kernel upgrades.


Hey Guys, I stumbled upon this thread while trying to investigate if
debian would work on the calxeda platform. We're one of calxedas partners
and have specific customers who would really love to see debian working on
ours/calxedas platform.

Can I ask how far your efforts in porting have gone? Is there a wheezy
release for highbank that we could test out internally?

I would be more than happy to make some hardware available remotely for
you to use as a second build/test server. We have genuine demand for
debian on our platform. I'd also be happy to get involved in any way I can
to help out.

Thanks!
Dave

[please excuse the junk inserted by our mail server]





DISCLAIMER:
The information contained in this email is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and access by anyone else 
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on 
it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our customers, any 
information contained in this e-mail is subject to our standard terms and 
conditions. The views in this email may not necessarily reflect the views of 
the company. Please note that Boston uses the services of credit insurance 
agencies and cheque guarantee companies, therefore, customer details may be 
divulged as required by such companies. This information will be stored in 
their databases and may be exchanged with other credit reference agencies.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cdf0a78e.5fbe1%david.po...@boston.co.uk