linux-image-rt-amd64 not in testing anymore
Hello, as I understand there are some changes in distribution of linux kernel in debian. Will linux-image-rt-amd be still provided? Thank you m.
Bug#597897: Current status of alsa-firmware?
Unfortunately, some of the blobs in alsa-firmware are purportedly licensed
under the GPLv2,
but without source code available.
The same problem exists for some blobs that were moved out of the linux
tree, but since they were included in Linux tarballs for many years
without objection from the copyright holders it is probably safe for
kernel.org and other distributors to continue distributing them.
However I am not prepared to put anyone at legal risk by adding more of
these.
Clear.
I think we need someone to review the licence status of blobs in
alsa-firmware and determine which of them are clearly redistributable.
Then these can be added to linux-firmware.git and to Debian's
firmware-nonfree.
Who should be a person which can help with this? debian-legal?
Should we rise the severity to serious?
best regards
Jaromir
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/AMp.7S}5.Q{81hqqrvy.1l2...@seznam.cz
Bug#663379: linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64: X will not start with linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64
Od: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de Hi, apt-get builddep linux-2.6 wget http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.2.9.orig.tar.gz tar xzf linux-2.6_3.2.9.orig.tar.gz cd linux-2.6-3.2.9 svn co svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian debian/bin/gencontrol $ debian/bin/gencontrol bash: debian/bin/gencontrol: No such file or directory I tried debian/bin/gencontrol.py ... hope it is fine. make -j4 -f debian/rules.gen build_amd64_rt_amd64 DEBIAN_KERNEL_USE_CCACHE=1 $ make -j4 -f debian/rules.gen build_amd64_rt_amd64 DEBIAN_KERNEL_USE_CCACHE=1 make: *** No rule to make target `build_amd64_rt_amd64'. Stop. Here I get stack. How to get further? regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/196623.19635.28061-18458-1583985412-1331464...@seznam.cz
Bug#663379: Bugs#663379+663269: fix pending
Od: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de apt-get builddep linux-2.6 wget http://ftp.cz.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_3.2.9.orig.tar.gz tar xzf linux-2.6_3.2.9.orig.tar.gz cd linux-2.6-3.2.9 svn export svn://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/dists/trunk/linux-2.6/debian debian debian/rules debian/control make -j4 -f debian/rules.gen build_amd64_rt_amd64 DEBIAN_KERNEL_USE_CCACHE=1 fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_amd64_rt_amd64 $ debian/rules debian/control /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules debian/control-real make[1]: Entering directory `/home/mira/linux-2.6-3.2.9' chmod +x debian/bin/gencontrol.py debian/bin/gencontrol.py md5sum debian/bin/gencontrol.py debian/changelog debian/templates/control.headers.arch.in debian/templates/control.headers.featureset.in debian/templates/control.headers.in debian/templates/control.image-dbg.in debian/templates/control.image.type-plain.in debian/templates/control.image.type-standalone.in debian/templates/control.libc-dev.in debian/templates/control.main.in debian/templates/control.source.in debian/templates/control.xen-linux-system.in debian/templates/image-dbg.lintian-override.in debian/templates/patch.apply.in debian/config/defines debian/config/alpha/defines debian/config/amd64/defines debian/config/armel/defines debian/config/armhf/defines debian/config/featureset-rt/defines debian/config/hppa/defines debian/config/i386/defines debian/config/ia64/defines debian/config/m68k/defines debian/config/mips/defines debian/config/mipsel/defines debian/config/powerpc/defines debian/config/ppc64/defines debian/config/s390/defines debian/config/s390x/defines debian/config/sh4/defines debian/config/sparc64/defines debian/config/sparc/defines debian/config/amd64/none/defines debian/config/amd64/rt/defines debian/config/i386/none/defines debian/config/i386/rt/defines debian/installer/amd64/kernel-versions debian/installer/armel/kernel-versions debian/installer/armhf/kernel-versions debian/installer/hppa/kernel-versions debian/installer/i386/kernel-versions debian/installer/ia64/kernel-versions debian/installer/m68k/kernel-versions debian/installer/mipsel/kernel-versions debian/installer/mips/kernel-versions debian/installer/powerpc/kernel-versions debian/installer/s390/kernel-versions debian/installer/s390x/kernel-versions debian/installer/sh4/kernel-versions debian/installer/sparc64/kernel-versions debian/installer/sparc/kernel-versions debian/installer/amd64/package-list debian/installer/armel/package-list debian/installer/armhf/package-list debian/installer/hppa/package-list debian/installer/i386/package-list debian/installer/ia64/package-list debian/installer/m68k/package-list debian/installer/mipsel/package-list debian/installer/mips/package-list debian/installer/powerpc/package-list debian/installer/s390/package-list debian/installer/s390x/package-list debian/installer/sh4/package-list debian/installer/sparc64/package-list debian/installer/sparc/package-list debian/installer/package-list debian/control.md5sum This target is made to fail intentionally, to make sure that it is NEVER run during the automated build. Please ignore the following error, the debian/control file has been generated SUCCESSFULLY. exit 1 make[1]: *** [debian/control-real] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mira/linux-2.6-3.2.9' make: *** [debian/control] Error 2 $ make -j4 -f debian/rules.gen build_amd64_rt_amd64 DEBIAN_KERNEL_USE_CCACHE=1 make: *** No rule to make target `build_amd64_rt_amd64'. Stop. I still can't to build kernel to test. Also link you send to me to try your local build is broken: http://www.kleine-koenig.org/ukleinek-tmp/linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64_3.2.9-2_amd64.deb regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/196687.19577.27974-21067-782279000-1331499...@seznam.cz
Bug#663379: Bugs#663379+663269: fix pending
Od: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de Alternatively you can test my test build: http://www.kleine-koenig.org/ukleinek-tmp/linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64_3.2.9-2_amd64.deb I now found your build and booted to this kernel successfully, X started normally. regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/196695.19571.27969-27408-737818875-1331500...@seznam.cz
Bug#663379: linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64: X will not start with linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 3.2.9-1 Severity: normal Hello, X will not start when I am booting to linux-image-3.2.0-2-rt-amd64, screen get frozen before log-in screen. I have same behavior on my both machines. linux-image-3.2.0-1-rt-amd64 and linux-image-3.2.0-2-amd64 works normally. Let me know if you need some additional info/test. best regards mira -- Package-specific info: ** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached ** Model information sys_vendor: product_name: product_version: chassis_vendor: chassis_version: bios_vendor: Intel Corp. bios_version: SGP4510H.86A.0125.2010.0121.1927 board_vendor: Intel Corporation board_name: DP45SG board_version: AAE27733-403 ** PCI devices: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset DRAM Controller [8086:2e20] (rev 02) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:5001] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Capabilities: access denied 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 4 Series Chipset PCI Express Root Port [8086:2e21] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: e000-efff Memory behind bridge: d000-e00f Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- BridgeCtl: Parity- SERR- NoISA- VGA+ MAbort- Reset- FastB2B- PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn- Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: pcieport 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corporation 82567LF-2 Gigabit Network Connection [8086:10cd] Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:5001] Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 41 Region 0: Memory at e020 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Region 1: Memory at e0224000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Region 2: I/O ports at f0e0 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: e1000e 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #4 [8086:3a37] (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:5001] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 16 Region 4: I/O ports at f0c0 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.1 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #5 [8086:3a38] (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:5001] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 21 Region 4: I/O ports at f0a0 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.2 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB UHCI Controller #6 [8086:3a39] (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:5001] Control: I/O+ Mem- BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 18 Region 4: I/O ports at f080 [size=32] Capabilities: access denied Kernel driver in use: uhci_hcd 00:1a.7 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 82801JI (ICH10 Family) USB2 EHCI Controller #2 [8086:3a3c] (prog-if 20 [EHCI]) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device [8086:5001] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- INTx- Latency: 0 Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 18 Region 0: Memory
Bug#597897: [Pkg-alsa-devel] alsa-firmware - bug #597897
Od: Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de Hi Gents of the firmware linux-team, coluld you please distribute the alsa-firmware [10] within firmware-linux-nonfree? [10] ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/firmware/alsa-firmware-1.0.24.1.tar.bz2 Hello firmware linux-team, new upstream release of alsa-firmware is here [11] ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/firmware/alsa-firmware-1.0.25.tar.bz2 And because the freeze of Wheezy is due in June [12] I think it is right time to ask if there is a plan to include missing alsa firmwares to linux-firmware-nonfree for Wheezy? [12] http://www.debian-news.net/2012/01/26/bits-from-the-release-team-2/ Or some obstacles exist? Best Regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/194351.22057.6-10515-1589867952-1327834...@seznam.cz
Re: [Pkg-alsa-devel] alsa-firmware - bug #597897
Od: Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de * Ben Hutchings [111007 15:23 +0100]: On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:26 +0200, Simone Rossetto wrote: Hello. The Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/597897 is a RFP for alsa-firmwares. I read every email related to this package on the debian-kernel mailing-list [1], but I cannot understand the reason why those firmwares are not yet part of firmware-nonfree package. [...] I think the ALSA developers should talk to the maintainers of the linux-firmware repository about adding the firmware blobs to that. Why do post this to pkg-alsa-devel? To contact ALSA developers please consider to add alsa-de...@alsa-project.org. What should Debian pkg-alsa-devel do to kick off this process? The latter maintainers are David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org and myself. So what? Elimar Hello Elimar, Jordi I am original submitter of this bug [1] and I contact you as admins of pkg-alsa-devel To be confused by your answer here, I would like to ask what is your attitude to the process of including missing alsa-firmwares to linux-firmware-non-free package? I think it was quite natural that alsa-devel has been asked for opinion and help or am I wrong? Sadly this process seems to be stuck now :( Best regards mira [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627153 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/192308.24278.38415-31184-1573443486-1323998...@seznam.cz
Re: alsa-firmware - bug #597897
Od: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Hi Ben and others, first thank you for taking care about this issue. I think the ALSA developers should talk to the maintainers of the linux-firmware repository about adding the firmware blobs to that. The latter maintainers are David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org and myself. You can get latest tarball of alsa-firmware from here: ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/firmware/alsa-firmware-1.0.24.1.tar.bz2 ./cofigure make will build *.bin files in hdsploader dir. Files digiface_firmware.bin, digiface_firmware_rev11.bin, multiface_firmware.bin, multiface_firmware_rev11.bin and rpm_firmware.bin should be placed to /lib/firmware/hdsploader/ directory. At least I have them installed there and it works fine for me and I think hdsploader search for firmware there. Maybe somebody from pkg-alsa-devel can comment on this? If you need get contact with upstream this should be right address: alsa-de...@alsa-project.org best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/189509.26761.44355-2994-293995016-1318259...@seznam.cz
Re: alsa-firmware in firmware-linux-non-free package
From: David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com Actually, a closer look shows that this in fact did not make it into Maverick (10.10), but the actual work has been done and it seems like it will show up in Natty (11.04). Sorry for the confusion. Hello there, I just noticed that Natty (11.04) Alpha 2 was released and that remind me this issue. I've checked linux-firmware_1.46_all.deb from Natty repo and it still not contain missing firmware from alsa-firmware package. Is anything new with this in Ubuntu/Debian? Kind regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/183347.11819.8677-24283-817975218-1296846...@seznam.cz
Re: alsa-firmware in firmware-linux-non-free package
Od: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:43 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: The question is, Should be alsa-firmware shipped in same way in Debian? Debian's firmware-linux-nonfree is specifically for firmware images that used to be embedded in drivers in our kernel image packages. We generate a number of other binary packages from its source package, firmware-nonfree, and could add one or more containing the sound card firmware. However I think these firmware images should be added to the linux-firmware.git repository first, as that is the 'upstream' used as a base for most distributions that provide firmware packages. Hi Ben, thank you for your answer. Can I take it as it is on your TODO list now? Or is there something more what should be done? Please let me know I am ready to get involved if needed. best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/142721.25958.43751-16459-1852634492-1287480...@seznam.cz
alsa-firmware in firmware-linux-non-free package
Hi, I recently started discussion on pkg-alsa-devel mailing list that it would be nice have alsa-firmware package in Debian like other distro have (Ubuntu, 64Studio, Fedora, Arch linux). ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/firmware/alsa-firmware-1.0.23.tar.bz2 This package bringing bunch of firmware for professional sound cards like RME's multiface and digiface and many others. (emu, digigram, echoaudio etc.) These firmwares are loaded by programs like hdsploader, vxloader and others which are part of alsa-firmware-loaders package, which is already in debian. In discussion was noted that the upcoming Ubuntu 10.10 has merged alsa-firmware into linux-firmware. The question is, Should be alsa-firmware shipped in same way in Debian? http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=cndougla/linux-firmware.git;a=log;h=maverick Thank you for your comments/suggestions best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/142656.26240.44559-22943-339078535-1287437...@seznam.cz
alsa-firmware in firmware-linux-non-free package
Sorry for double posting I forgot CC pkg-alsa-devel mailing list Hi, I recently started discussion on pkg-alsa-devel mailing list that it would be nice have alsa-firmware package in Debian like other distro have (Ubuntu, 64Studio, Fedora, Arch linux). ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/firmware/alsa-firmware-1.0.23.tar.bz2 This package bringing bunch of firmware for professional sound cards like RME's multiface and digiface and many others. (emu, digigram, echoaudio etc.) These firmwares are loaded by programs like hdsploader, vxloader and others which are part of alsa-firmware-loaders package, which is already in debian. In discussion was noted that the upcoming Ubuntu 10.10 has merged alsa-firmware into linux-firmware. The question is, Should be alsa-firmware shipped in same way in Debian? http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=cndougla/linux-firmware.git;a=log;h=maverick Thank you for your comments/suggestions best regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/142667.26193.44500-26898-1408037604-1287438...@seznam.cz
