Bug#826564: i686 memory hotplug
Source: linux Version: 4.5.5-1 the i686 kernels as compiled don't support memory hotplug, which is quite dissatisfying for us. please compile i686 kernel with options for memory hotpluging anfd unplugging. CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL=y MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y MEMORY_HOTREMOVE=y -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Where do you want to go to die?" [Microsoft]
Bug#535331: possible reason
Looking at differencies, there seems to be key differente between etch's 2.6.18 and 2.6.24 kernels' postinst scripts. the variable $loader gets initialized to lilo in 2.6.18, and to empty value in 2.6.24. I don't see any way to (preferrably) autodetect or configure this variable according to current system configuration. It would be nice if we could configure the loader manually and the postinst script could autodetect which loaders are installed, call the loader if needed (lilo does need, grub may not) and optionally comply if it finds more than one and none is configured (possible mistake) I think I am able to code this in perl, if anyone helps me with it... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#535331: lilo not run after install/upgrade
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686 Version: 2.6.26-17 Hello, after installing linux image the lilo is not being called, which results into system not being bootable after upgrade. I've tried without kernel-img.conf also with it, containing do_bootloader = Yes, nothing helped. If lilo isn't supported (oh, please, no), it should be mentioned somewhere... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Save the whales. Collect the whole set. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Mounting UFS under Linux with R/W
On 04.11.06 09:51, Alien wrote: I did not seem to find this topic in this list - I hope it is the right place to discuss that. The problem isnbsp; -nbsp; mounting UFS under Linux and to provide both - R and W options. npsb? Where did you edit this mail? So far I have found that R is easily implemented but Write option is quite dangerous - it harms the filesystem. Isnbsp; there yet a correctsolution on any new Kernel? man mount, see 'ufs' section. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#369773: Acknowledgement (Very low write speed to USB 2.0 memory stick)
/dev/sdb1 on /media/usb0 type vfat (rw,noexec,nodev,sync,noatime,gid=46,dmask=0007,fmask=0117) this gives me 128KB/s. When I unmount it, mount it manualy (no sync), copy 15MB of data and issue if you copy data using windows and then click on eject device (or whatever is the correct name), how much does it take? Maybe 128KB/s is the real write speed and higher speeds are get only by write-caching -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#336183: linux-source-2.6.12: Partitions not detected on Software RAID
On 28.10 13:20, Timothy Baldwin wrote: From: Timothy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:20:28 +0100 Subject: Bug#336183: linux-source-2.6.12: Partitions not detected on Software RAID To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Starting 2 (or 1) single device RAID arrays with following script does not result in the partitions being detected, and therefore they do not appear in sysfs or /dev. losetup /dev/loop6 gpt.img losetup /dev/loop7 mbr.img mdadm -A -a /dev/md_d0 /dev/loop6 mdadm -A -a /dev/md_d1 /dev/loop7 Since when are RAID or loop devices supposed to have partitions? (did I miss something?) Using the w command in fdisk causes the partitions to be detected. This is probably caused by fdisk which forces kernel to search for them, and it does it even if the device shouldn't contain partitions. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: config.gz files
On 06.05 10:42, Nico Golde wrote: why the debian kernel-packages don't provide the config file via /proc? For 2.4 kernels, it requires patch that is not in debian distribution. Also, as some people already mentioned it, debian kernels come with /boot/config-version, so you do not need to have this (even if you loose the file, you may extract it from the package, and it doesn't make your kernel bigger. If you compile kernel package by yourself, you may include this. Please CC me, I am not on this list. It seems that you are using mutt. Please set up 'lists' and 'subscribe' properly for debian mailing lists. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
