Bug#717005: firmware-iwlwifi: Missing iwlwifi-3160-6.ucode and iwlwifi-7260-6.ucode

2013-07-18 Thread Richard Hartmann
Great, thanks.

If you want me to test the new packages before uploading them, just
let me know. As WiFi is broken with a current kernel atm, it's trivial
to test.


Thanks,
Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gSdO1oCpp=nA_vX+UUkKzcL4Eh=sfx6ppceq5glcgh...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#717005: firmware-iwlwifi: Missing iwlwifi-3160-6.ucode and iwlwifi-7260-6.ucode

2013-07-18 Thread Richard Hartmann
WiFi does not work with the newest kernel package in unstable. I can
connect to a WPA2 secured networks, but I can't send anything out;
not even DHCP requests.

Thinkpad X1 Carbon; I can't look up the PCI ids atm, but can do so
later if that's of any use.


Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gQrRrTmM3NDNU7LOxjvyNvx1GJ-jMr22KXhCy31=j4...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#717005: firmware-iwlwifi: Missing iwlwifi-3160-6.ucode and iwlwifi-7260-6.ucode

2013-07-15 Thread Richard Hartmann
Package: firmware-iwlwifi
Version: 0.38
Severity: normal

Dear maintainers,

linux-image-3.9-1-amd64 (on a different machine) tells me I need to
install a package providing iwlwifi-3160-6.ucode and
iwlwifi-7260-6.ucode .

This package is the obvious candidate for carrying these files.


Thanks for your work,
Richard

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.9-1-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

firmware-iwlwifi depends on no packages.

firmware-iwlwifi recommends no packages.

Versions of packages firmware-iwlwifi suggests:
ii  initramfs-tools  0.113
ii  linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae [linux-image]3.2.41-2
ii  linux-image-3.7-trunk-686-pae [linux-image]  3.7.1-1~experimental.1
ii  linux-image-3.9-1-686-pae [linux-image]  3.9.8-1

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130715224618.17451.69624.reportbug@rockhopper.hartmann.local



Bug#641574: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#641574: nfs-common: Mounting a share from 127.0.0.1 does not work when no network interfaces are up)

2011-09-26 Thread Richard Hartmann
Agreed, this is a corner case. As long as it's fixed in the current
version, things are fine afaiac.


Thanks for the info,
Richard



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cad77+gqu5pd19jh54ubonoto7+heppwh0os8ux6sicdncvv...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#641574: nfs-common: Mounting a share from 127.0.0.1 does not work when no network interfaces are up

2011-09-14 Thread Richard Hartmann
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.2-4
Severity: normal

Basically, this is the same bug as in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541198

Confirmed in Debian 6.0.2.


Thanks,
Richard

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages nfs-common depends on:
ii  adduser 3.112+nmu2   add and remove users and groups
ii  initscripts 2.88dsf-13.1 scripts for initializing and shutt
ii  libc6   2.11.2-10Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcap2 1:2.19-3 support for getting/setting POSIX.
ii  libcomerr2  1.41.12-2common error description library
ii  libevent-1.4-2  1.4.13-stable-1  An asynchronous event notification
ii  libgssapi-krb5-21.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k
ii  libgssglue1 0.1-4mechanism-switch gssapi library
ii  libk5crypto31.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - C
ii  libkrb5-3   1.8.3+dfsg-4 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libnfsidmap20.23-2   An nfs idmapping library
ii  librpcsecgss3   0.19-2   allows secure rpc communication us
ii  libwrap07.6.q-19 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii  lsb-base3.2-23.2squeeze1 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii  netbase 4.45 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  portmap 6.0.0-2  RPC port mapper
ii  ucf 3.0025+nmu1  Update Configuration File: preserv

nfs-common recommends no packages.

nfs-common suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gSuJxAaKA+L5tS=+9TUQmPORNBbrwtoWRf7=nig6kh...@mail.gmail.com



Reasons for removal of several files from linux-libc-dev?

2008-07-08 Thread Richard Hartmann
Hi all,

I noticed that several files have been removed from linux-libc-dev, recently.
While, for example, /usr/include/linux/user.h can be replaced by the various
linux header packages, other include files have become rare.
/usr/include/asm/user.h is only available from libuclibc-dev now. Unless I
mis-understand the purpose of libuclibc-dev, embedded systems, this
might pose a problem. Point in case, the above makes cryopid FTBFS
in current sid.

I am wondering why those files, and others, have been removed and
wanted to ask if there are plans to provide a single (meta)package with
a stable name that could be used as build dep.


Thanks,
Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Reasons for removal of several files from linux-libc-dev?

2008-07-08 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 03:17, Richard Hartmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 /usr/include/asm/user.h is only available from libuclibc-dev now.

I just realized the various kernel header packages carry
asm-x86/user.h -- Still, I would be interested in the reasons for
the removal from linux-libc-dev.


Thanks,
Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#448458: linux-image-2.6-k7: Depends on linux-image-2.6.22-2-k7 on sid which is not in sid any more

2007-10-29 Thread Richard Hartmann
Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
Version: 2.6.22+9
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable


This makes an automagic {dist-,}upgrade of the kernel impossible, manual
interaction is required.


--- control 2007-10-29 09:11:57.081426888 +0100
+++ control22007-10-29 09:14:18.089462379 +0100
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
-Source: linux-latest-2.6 (10)
-Version: 2.6.22+10
+Source: linux-latest-2.6 (11)
+Version: 2.6.22+11
 Architecture: i386
 Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
 Installed-Size: 8
-Depends: linux-image-2.6.22-2-k7
-Provides: linux-latest-modules-2.6.22-2-k7
+Depends: linux-image-2.6.22-3-k7
+Provides: linux-latest-modules-2.6.22-3-k7
 Section: admin
 Priority: optional
 Description: Linux 2.6 image on AMD K7

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/zsh

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-k7 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6.22-1-k7   2.6.22-3   Linux 2.6.22 image on AMD K7

linux-image-2.6-k7 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#429064: linux-libc-devel: linux/types.h conflicts with sys/ustat.h

2007-08-13 Thread Richard Hartmann
Is there any progress on this bug? Is has been almost a month and,
at least to me as an outsider, the fix in the form of the patch from
July 18th seems to be doing the trick and to be rather trivial to
implement.


Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]