Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: get rid of spi_get_device_id

2014-10-17 Thread Brian Norris
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:47:53AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
 This simplifies the way we use spi_nor framework and will allow us to
 drop spi_nor_match_id.
 
 Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com

Applied to l2-mtd.git/master.

Brian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141017163023.GH22169@norris-Latitude-E6410



Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: get rid of spi_get_device_id

2014-10-01 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:47:53AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
 This simplifies the way we use spi_nor framework and will allow us to
 drop spi_nor_match_id.

Please don't CC linux-spi on spi-nor patches that don't have SPI level
changes, it just clogs up patchwork.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: m25p80: get rid of spi_get_device_id

2014-10-01 Thread Brian Norris
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:20:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:47:53AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
  This simplifies the way we use spi_nor framework and will allow us to
  drop spi_nor_match_id.
 
 Please don't CC linux-spi on spi-nor patches that don't have SPI level
 changes, it just clogs up patchwork.

+1 from me. I appreciate the converse, as I don't need unrelated noise
on linux-mtd.

(I feel sorry for people over at linux-arm-kernel and devicetree, since
they get CC'd on a large variety of unrelated things, it seems. I'm sure
the firehose gets to be almost as bad as LKML sometimes.)

Brian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141001184303.GX1193@ld-irv-0074