Bug#336471: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.14.1-686: broken framebuffer console)

2005-11-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:19:30 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336450: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 14:38:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 06:38:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.110] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWEK1-0002Xp-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:38:09 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([209.226.98.141])
  by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:38:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jean-Marc Ranger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux-image-2.6.14.1-686:  broken framebuffer console
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:38:15 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal

kernel argument vga is no longer useable - I get a blank screen when
using it.  Working in linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 rev 2.6.12-10, working in
homemade 2.6.14 kernel with CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y (I don't use
initrd in my homebrew kernels).

Missing module in the inirtd image ?

Corresponding grub entry is:
title   Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.14-1-686
root(hd0,1)
kernel  /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-1-686 root=/dev/hda2 vga=791 ro
initrd  /boot/initrd.img-2.6.14-1-686
savedefault
boot

Just ask if anything is missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-686 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6.14-1-686  2.6.14-1   Linux kernel 2.6.14 image on PPro/

linux-image-2.6-686 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 336450-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2005 19:23:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 11:23:04 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EbjrW-0007hl-HH; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:19:30 -0800
From: Norbert Tretkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#336450: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.14-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:19:30 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

Source: linux-2.6
Source-Version: 2.6.14-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
linux-2.6, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-386_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686-smp_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-686_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-k7-smp_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/kernel-image-2.6-k7_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
linux-2.6_2.6.14-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.14-3.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.14-3.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.14-3.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.14_2.6.14-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.14_2.6.14-3_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6-386_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6-386_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
linux-headers-2.6-686-smp_2.6.14-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/l

2.6.14.1

2005-11-09 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks

2.6.14.1 is released. It changes the ABI of procfs.

Bastian

-- 
... The prejudices people feel about each other disappear when they get
to know each other.
-- Kirk, Elaan of Troyius, stardate 4372.5


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: 2.6.14.1

2005-11-09 Thread Horms
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: utf-8, 11 lines --]
 
 Hi folks
 
 2.6.14.1 is released. It changes the ABI of procfs.

Thanks, I'll work on getting the change into 2.6.8 and 2.4.27 as
neccessary. There is already an entry for this in dannf's patchdir

I assume someone has bumped the ABI for 2.6.14.

Now, who will be the first to tell us that about CVE-2005-2709 that
we already know about?

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



2.6.14-3 Release [includes 2.6.14.1/CVE-2005-2709]

2005-11-09 Thread Horms
Hi,

I'd like to get people's opinion on releasing 2.6.14-3.

Here are some factors:

* There are a number of changes in SVN, including 2.6.14.1/CVE-2005-2709

* The zero length udp problem has not been solved in 2.6.14.1, 
  and this might mean that 2.6.14.2 comes out soon. Or we could
  just crab the patch, IIRC its a one or two-liner.

  http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/346872

* Jurij tells me there are some sparc problems he is working on,
  but they should be sorted shortly.

* Manoj is keen to get kernel-package 10.00X (X probably = 9) into
  unstable. Right now 9.008.4, which we have used before is there.
  If we are going to release in the next few days, I'd rather
  Manoj hold off. But if its going to be longer, then we probably
  have enoughy scope to debug any 10.00X and get kernel-package
  re-released before we make our relese.

Comments, please.

-- 
Horms


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 2.6.14-3 Release [includes 2.6.14.1/CVE-2005-2709]

2005-11-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:49:06AM +, Horms wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'd like to get people's opinion on releasing 2.6.14-3.
 
 Here are some factors:
 
 * There are a number of changes in SVN, including 2.6.14.1/CVE-2005-2709
 
 * The zero length udp problem has not been solved in 2.6.14.1, 
   and this might mean that 2.6.14.2 comes out soon. Or we could
   just crab the patch, IIRC its a one or two-liner.
 
   http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/346872
 
 * Jurij tells me there are some sparc problems he is working on,
   but they should be sorted shortly.
 
 * Manoj is keen to get kernel-package 10.00X (X probably = 9) into
   unstable. Right now 9.008.4, which we have used before is there.
   If we are going to release in the next few days, I'd rather
   Manoj hold off. But if its going to be longer, then we probably
   have enoughy scope to debug any 10.00X and get kernel-package
   re-released before we make our relese.

  * 2.6.14-3 will work on m68k again, and thus closing the loop of all 10
supported arches.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#336471: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.14.1-686: broken framebuffer console)

2005-11-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:02:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336450: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Oct 2005 14:38:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 30 06:38:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.110] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EWEK1-0002Xp-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 06:38:09 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([209.226.98.141])
  by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:38:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jean-Marc Ranger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux-image-2.6.14.1-686:  broken framebuffer console
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 10:38:15 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal

kernel argument vga is no longer useable - I get a blank screen when
using it.  Working in linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 rev 2.6.12-10, working in
homemade 2.6.14 kernel with CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y (I don't use
initrd in my homebrew kernels).

Missing module in the inirtd image ?

Corresponding grub entry is:
title   Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.14-1-686
root(hd0,1)
kernel  /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-1-686 root=/dev/hda2 vga=791 ro
initrd  /boot/initrd.img-2.6.14-1-686
savedefault
boot

Just ask if anything is missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-686 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6.14-1-686  2.6.14-1   Linux kernel 2.6.14 image on PPro/

linux-image-2.6-686 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 336450-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Nov 2005 04:06:29 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 02 20:06:29 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EXWIj-9O-00; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:02:09 -0800
From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#336450: fixed in yaird 0.0.11-11
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:02:09 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: yaird
Source-Version: 0.0.11-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
yaird, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

yaird_0.0.11-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-11.diff.gz
yaird_0.0.11-11.dsc
  to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-11.dsc
yaird_0.0.11-11_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/y/yaird/yaird_0.0.11-11_powerpc.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated yaird package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2005 05:09:45 +0100
Source: yaird
Binary: yaird
Architecture: source powerpc

Bug#336471: linux-image-2.6.14.1-686: broken framebuffer console

2005-10-30 Thread Jean-Marc Ranger
Package: linux-image-2.6-686
Version: 2.6.14-1
Severity: normal

kernel argument vga is no longer useable - I get a blank screen when
using it.  Working in linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 rev 2.6.12-10, working in
homemade 2.6.14 kernel with CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y (I don't use
initrd in my homebrew kernels).

Missing module in the inirtd image ?

Corresponding grub entry is:
title   Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.14-1-686
root(hd0,1)
kernel  /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.14-1-686 root=/dev/hda2 vga=791 ro
initrd  /boot/initrd.img-2.6.14-1-686
savedefault
boot

Just ask if anything is missing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-686 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6.14-1-686  2.6.14-1   Linux kernel 2.6.14 image on PPro/

linux-image-2.6-686 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]