Bug#1035880: radeon: radeon driver only partial support of pipelines/ #keypoint isuggest shifting rv530 into the acceptance/features sampling/s applying  of r600‎ including the agp to pcie translator

2024-02-23 Thread christianpeterkiss
Hello,

i suspect itis precisely R300 vs R600 features precisely of the driver s 3d 
part.


if it consists of 2d with its exa emphasis

and glamor part emphasis on 3dfunctions in 2d


and one the api .. ithinkitwas... .. dri ?

#keypoint
thenthe relevant part is the R300 driver part 3d part vs its features likely in 
R600


#keypoint
 isuggest shifting rv530 into the acceptance/features sampling/ applying  of 
r600‎ including the agp to pcie translator chip 




allthebest
Christian KISS




  Original Message  
From: Diederik de Haas
Sent: Freitag, 23. Februar 2024 16:48
To: Christian Kiss; 1035...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1035880: radeon: radeon driver only partial support of 
pipelines

Control: reassign -1 src:linux 5.10.178-1

On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 15:41:44 CET Christian Kiss wrote:
> Package: firmware-amd-graphics
> Version: 20210315-3
> 
> kernel.log reports that radeon: 1 quad pipes, 2 z pipes initialized.
> the gpu an rv530 has atleast double to 4 of these each.
> 
> the rudimentary partial support of the hardware features includes oddity
> clock at 85.5Mhz instead 500 / 1100ram
> 
> while the bit width 128seems to becorrect
> 
> additionally to this the realtime kernel scheduling seems to break the gpu/
> non optimised coordination cpu gpu scheduling of cpucycles

This seems to be a kernel issue, reassigning accordingly.



Processed: Re: Bug#1035880: radeon: radeon driver only partial support of pipelines

2024-02-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign  -1 src:linux 5.10.178-1
Bug #1035880 [firmware-amd-graphics] radeon: radeon driver only partial support 
of pipelines
Bug reassigned from package 'firmware-amd-graphics' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions firmware-nonfree/20210315-3.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1035880 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #1035880 [src:linux] radeon: radeon driver only partial support of pipelines
Marked as found in versions linux/5.10.178-1.

-- 
1035880: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035880
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1035880: radeon: radeon driver only partial support of pipelines

2024-02-23 Thread Diederik de Haas
Control: reassign  -1 src:linux 5.10.178-1

On Wednesday, 10 May 2023 15:41:44 CET Christian Kiss wrote:
> Package: firmware-amd-graphics
> Version: 20210315-3
> 
> kernel.log reports that radeon: 1 quad pipes, 2 z pipes initialized.
> the gpu an rv530 has atleast double to 4 of these each.
> 
> the rudimentary partial support of the hardware features includes oddity
> clock at 85.5Mhz  instead 500 / 1100ram
> 
> while the bit width 128seems to becorrect
> 
> additionally to this the realtime kernel scheduling seems to break the gpu/
> non optimised coordination cpu gpu scheduling of cpucycles

This seems to be a kernel issue, reassigning accordingly.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#1035880: radeon: radeon driver only partial support of pipelines

2023-05-10 Thread Christian Kiss
Package: firmware-amd-graphics
Version: 20210315-3
Severity: normal
File: radeon
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: christianpeterk...@yahoo.com

Dear Maintainer,


kernel.log reports that radeon: 1 quad pipes, 2 z pipes initialized.
the gpu an rv530 has atleast double to 4 of these each.

the rudimentary partial support of the hardware features includes oddity clock
at
85.5Mhz

instead 500 / 1100ram

while the bit width 128seems to becorrect


additionally to this the realtime kernel scheduling seems to break the gpu/ non
optimised coordination cpu gpu scheduling of cpucycles


allthebest
Christian Kiss




*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.7
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500,
'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-22-rt-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU thread; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not
set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

firmware-amd-graphics depends on no packages.

firmware-amd-graphics recommends no packages.

Versions of packages firmware-amd-graphics suggests:
ii  initramfs-tools  0.140