Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess

2005-01-20 Thread Bozhan Boiadzhiev
Package: initrd-tools
Version: 0.1.76
Severity: wishlist


If someone ever tried initrd tools for debian and red hat
you'l find a little difference .
With red hat tools you can do whatever you want and to customize 
initrd image the way you want very easy.
IN other way the dabian mkinitrd is very bad documented, can't do
most of the things for more complex operation or isn't documented how to 
do this operations. 
So my suggestion is ... get red hat initrd-tools and make them work in
debian and drop current initrd-tools OR make this thing works as it works 
in Red Hat .
This my opinion is based on my battle for crating initrd image for
booting strange raid controler  ITE8212f and complains from my friend
that he can't make initrd image to boot from USB Ffash memory with
debian but there isn't ANY problems with redhat.
And wow there are so many bug about initrd-tools.
I think debian kernel development team have to take this things very
seriosly.

Sorry for bad english and this is only my opinion.
It is possible that i am wrong:)

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages initrd-tools depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2The GNU core utilities
ii  cpio  2.5-1.1GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii  cramfsprogs   1.1-6  Tools for CramFs (Compressed ROM F
ii  dash  0.5.1-3The Debian Almquist Shell
ii  fileutils 5.2.1-2The GNU file management utilities 
ii  util-linux2.12-10Miscellaneous system utilities

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess

2005-01-20 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
| Complete agreement here.  We're still looking for a volunteer, though
| ;-)
|
|
Come on! I had offered to take over initrd-tools several
months ago. I am sure that there would be several other
volunteers.
But a big part of the mess about initrd-tools is a lack of
documentation. It can do a lot, if you make use of the
scripts directory, for example.
If you want to replace initrd-tools by something else,
then I would suggest to switch to the new initramfs
procedure (see Gentoo).
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB7/eRUTlbRTxpHjcRAvKLAJ0a2LZritHwCj6mR0JOmVKmg1uS9wCfa0tI
jBGiG1sEe3z5HDJiDe8hNd0=
=WlFn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#291375: initrd-tools for Debian are one big mess

2005-01-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 07:25:21PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
 | Complete agreement here.  We're still looking for a volunteer, though
 | ;-)
 |
 |
 
 Come on! I had offered to take over initrd-tools several
 months ago. I am sure that there would be several other
 volunteers.

Hey, it's not up to me to decide, I'm not even a DD.
But I'd be happy to see initrd-tools properly maintained
by you.

 If you want to replace initrd-tools by something else,
 then I would suggest to switch to the new initramfs
 procedure (see Gentoo).

Dito for Red Hat/Fedora


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]