Bug#375283: marked as done (linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing important information)

2008-12-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 21 Dec 2008 11:27:15 +0100
with message-id 20081221102715.ga6...@galadriel.inutil.org
and subject line Re: linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages 
missing important information
has caused the Debian Bug report #375283,
regarding linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing 
important information
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
375283: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=375283
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-2.6.16
Version: 2.6.16-15
Severity: normal

Descriptions for binary packages linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686,
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-k7 and
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 are missing important
information.
There is obviously something wrong since
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 and
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 have identical descriptions. Also, I
don't have a clue about the rationale for these packages, but in
general, the descriptions do not give a clue what is the difference
between the modules included in, for example,
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686, and those in, in this example, 
linux-image-2.6.16-2-686.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 06:23:26PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
 Package: linux-2.6.16
 Version: 2.6.16-15
 Severity: normal
 
 Descriptions for binary packages linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686,
 linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-k7 and
 linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 are missing important
 information.
 There is obviously something wrong since
 linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 and
 linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 have identical descriptions. Also, I
 don't have a clue about the rationale for these packages, but in
 general, the descriptions do not give a clue what is the difference
 between the modules included in, for example,
 linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686, and those in, in this example, 
 linux-image-2.6.16-2-686.

The descriptions in the Lenny seem fine. If you're missing specific information,
please mention is specifically.

Cheers,
Moritz

---End Message---


Bug#375283: marked as done (linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing important information)

2007-07-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:38:20 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line linux-2.6.16: descriptions for linux-modules packages missing 
important information
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: linux-2.6.16
Version: 2.6.16-15
Severity: normal

Descriptions for binary packages linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686,
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-k7 and
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 are missing important
information.
There is obviously something wrong since
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-vserver-686 and
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686 have identical descriptions. Also, I
don't have a clue about the rationale for these packages, but in
general, the descriptions do not give a clue what is the difference
between the modules included in, for example,
linux-modules-2.6.16-2-xen-686, and those in, in this example, 
linux-image-2.6.16-2-686.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
dup of #360763
thus closing in this round of linux-2.6 bug cleanup.

-- 
maks
---End Message---