Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2010-02-22 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:

 On Jan 26, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
 
  so it it will be run early enough that it is present for
  /etc/initramfs-tools/modules and no one will need to do
  mknoding.
 I cannot do this without coordination with the initramfs-tool package
 because load_modules and init-premount/blacklist must be moved as well
 and run before udevadm trigger.
 Please advise.

changed blacklist to load at init-top stage in initramfs-tools git.
plan to upload this or next week.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010024017.gf12...@stro.at



Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2010-02-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 26, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:

 so it it will be run early enough that it is present for
 /etc/initramfs-tools/modules and no one will need to do
 mknoding.
I cannot do this without coordination with the initramfs-tool package
because load_modules and init-premount/blacklist must be moved as well
and run before udevadm trigger.
Please advise.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2010-01-26 Thread maximilian attems
 it has to be started earlier, that is clear.
 I haven't had the time to find out how early, aka at which state exactly.

init-top

so it it will be run early enough that it is present for
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules and no one will need to do
mknoding.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2010-01-26 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, maximilian attems wrote:

  it has to be started earlier, that is clear.
  I haven't had the time to find out how early, aka at which state exactly.
 
 init-top
 
 so it it will be run early enough that it is present for
 /etc/initramfs-tools/modules and no one will need to do
 mknoding.

hmm there is one subtle wish here,
please add a pre-requisite on all_generic_ide so that it gets
a chance to load bloody IDE device.

of course alternatively the udev init-top script could parse that
boot param on its own?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2009-12-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 30, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:

  Can we start udev earlier? I see that some of the standard scripts
  manually run mknod to work around this.
 i'll have a look but won't have time before next weekend.
 such a big change needs to be well thought.
Please let me know if you plan to work on this or if I should close the
bug.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2009-12-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:11:26PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
 On Aug 30, maximilian attems m...@stro.at wrote:
 
   Can we start udev earlier? I see that some of the standard scripts
   manually run mknod to work around this.
  i'll have a look but won't have time before next weekend.
  such a big change needs to be well thought.
 Please let me know if you plan to work on this or if I should close the
 bug.

it has to be started earlier, that is clear.
I haven't had the time to find out how early, aka at which state exactly.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2009-08-30 Thread maximilian attems
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:

 On Aug 26, Benoit Plessis ben...@plessis.info wrote:
 
  I was stopped by the bnx2 driver being unable to load it's firmware when 
  adding 'bnx2' in the 'modules' files,
 Why not letting udev load the driver by itself instead?
 
  Since udev is setup in init-premount, it's unavailable when loading modules 
  and so firmware loading fail,
  moving udev in init-top fixed the problem so i was wondering if there is a 
  reason for this current location
 I got the original scripts from somebody else and I do not know much
 about the design of initramfs-tools.
 Can we start udev earlier? I see that some of the standard scripts
 manually run mknod to work around this.

i'll have a look but won't have time before next weekend.
such a big change needs to be well thought.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2009-08-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
Please advise.

On Aug 27, Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it wrote:

 On Aug 26, Benoit Plessis ben...@plessis.info wrote:
 
  I was stopped by the bnx2 driver being unable to load it's firmware when 
  adding 'bnx2' in the 'modules' files,
 Why not letting udev load the driver by itself instead?
 
  Since udev is setup in init-premount, it's unavailable when loading modules 
  and so firmware loading fail,
  moving udev in init-top fixed the problem so i was wondering if there is a 
  reason for this current location
 I got the original scripts from somebody else and I do not know much
 about the design of initramfs-tools.
 Can we start udev earlier? I see that some of the standard scripts
 manually run mknod to work around this.
 
 -- 
 ciao,
 Marco



-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#543717: Initramfs firmware loading fail due to udev being started too late

2009-08-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 26, Benoit Plessis ben...@plessis.info wrote:

 I was stopped by the bnx2 driver being unable to load it's firmware when 
 adding 'bnx2' in the 'modules' files,
Why not letting udev load the driver by itself instead?

 Since udev is setup in init-premount, it's unavailable when loading modules 
 and so firmware loading fail,
 moving udev in init-top fixed the problem so i was wondering if there is a 
 reason for this current location
I got the original scripts from somebody else and I do not know much
about the design of initramfs-tools.
Can we start udev earlier? I see that some of the standard scripts
manually run mknod to work around this.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature