Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 03 January 2010, dann frazier wrote: Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To verify, can you test this kernel which drops only those fixes? zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26et ch1+nocve20090029_s390.deb s/headers/image/ :-) Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+nocve20090029) [...] mordor login: Just an fyi, I've installed a hercules setup and can reproduce this. I'll use that to try find a fix. This fixes the issue for me, can you verify? zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-27~562525.testfix.1_s390.deb -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Tuesday 19 January 2010, dann frazier wrote: This fixes the issue for me, can you verify? zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-27~562 525.testfix.1_s390.deb Works for me too. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:12:56AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 03 January 2010, dann frazier wrote: Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To verify, can you test this kernel which drops only those fixes? zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26et ch1+nocve20090029_s390.deb s/headers/image/ :-) Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+nocve20090029) [...] mordor login: Just an fyi, I've installed a hercules setup and can reproduce this. I'll use that to try find a fix. -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:19:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Saturday 02 January 2010, you wrote: Can you try: zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch 1+div64_s390.deb Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+div64) [...] Failed to execute /init Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. If that *doesn't* work, can you then try: zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24+cve 20090029_s390.deb Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24+cve20090029) Failed to execute /init Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To verify, can you test this kernel which drops only those fixes? zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+nocve20090029_s390.deb -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Sunday 03 January 2010, dann frazier wrote: Thanks. This suggests that the fixes for CVE-2009-0029 are causal. To verify, can you test this kernel which drops only those fixes? zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-headers-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26et ch1+nocve20090029_s390.deb s/headers/image/ :-) Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+nocve20090029) [...] mordor login: Works! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:04:00AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 29 December 2009, dann frazier wrote: I don't see an obvious cause for the failure. Can you try booting 24etch1 in an effort to bisect the failure? In case you can't find the deb (I couldn't) I've built one that you can find in my home directory on zelenka.debian.org. Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1) (da...@debian.org) [...] [...] Freeing unused kernel memory: 100k freed Failed to execute /init Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. There's a suspicious similarity to [1] maybe? I won't be able to compile any kernels myself on this one, but I can test what you build. Appreciated. Can you try: zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+div64_s390.deb If that *doesn't* work, can you then try: zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24+cve20090029_s390.deb -- dann frazier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Saturday 02 January 2010, you wrote: Can you try: zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch 1+div64_s390.deb Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1+div64) [...] Failed to execute /init Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. If that *doesn't* work, can you then try: zelenka.debian.org:~dannf/linux-image-2.6.18-6-s390_2.6.18.dfsg.1-24+cve 20090029_s390.deb Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24+cve20090029) Failed to execute /init Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 14:44:01 -0700, dann frazier wrote: Can you try booting 24etch1 in an effort to bisect the failure? In case you can't find the deb (I couldn't) I've built one that you can find in my home directory on zelenka.debian.org. http://stabile.debian.org:5001/package/linux-2.6/2.6.18.dfsg.1-24etch1/ seems to have those debs. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562525: linux-2.6: [s390] Etch proposed-updates kernel boot failure
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: serious Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1 Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-CC: da...@debian-org While testing the update for oldstable of debian-installer on my Hercules s390 emulator, I found that the new kernel fails to boot. It fails to execute init after loading the initramfs. The current oldstable version (2.6.18.dfsg.1-24) boots fine. And the current oldstable D-I (which has 2.6.18.dfsg.1-18) also boots fine. Attached a diff between the boot messages. This diff is for an installed system, but I get the exact same Failed to execute /init error when booting D-I which suggests that the problem is not in the initrd but in the kernel. The diff for the lines bringing up CPUs is mostly due to two messages getting mixed up. Probably not significant. --- s390_etch.cur 2009-12-25 13:37:55.0 +0100 +++ s390_etch.new 2009-12-25 13:53:15.0 +0100 @@ -1,57 +1,55 @@ -Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-24) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 SMP Sat Dec 27 08:51:06 UTC 2008 +Linux version 2.6.18-6-s390 (Debian 2.6.18.dfsg.1-26etch1) (da...@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #1 SMP Thu Nov 5 21:15:26 UTC 2009 We are running native (31 bit mode) This machine has an IEEE fpu Detected 2 CPU's -Boot cpu address 0 +Boot cpu address 1 Built 1 zonelists. Total pages: 65536 Kernel command line: root=/dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.0122-part1 BOOT_IMAGE=0 PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes) Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) -Memory: 252928k/262144k available (2195k kernel code, 0k reserved, 789k data, 100k init) +Memory: 252928k/262144k available (2195k kernel code, 0k reserved, 792k data, 100k init) Write protected kernel read-only data: 0x227000 - 0x29afff Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized SELinux: Disabled at boot. Capability LSM initialized Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 -cpu 0 phys_idx=0 vers=00 ident=002623 machine=3090 unused= +cpu 0 phys_idx=1 vers=00 ident=102623 machine=3090 unused= +cpu 1 phys_idx=0 vers=00 ident=002623 machine=3090 unused= Brought up 2 CPUs -migration_cost=cpu 1 phys_idx=1 vers=00 ident=102623 machine=3090 unused=1000 +migration_cost=1000 checking if image is initramfs... it is Freeing initrd memory: 3005k freed NET: Registered protocol family 16 debug: Initialization complete cio: Was not able to determine available CHSCs. NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP route cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) TCP established hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 98304 bytes) TCP bind hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) TCP: Hash tables configured (established 8192 bind 4096) TCP reno registered hypfs: diag 204 not working.3hypfs: Initialization failed with rc = -61. audit: initializing netlink socket (disabled) -audit(1261744119.616:1): initialized +audit(1261745535.320:1): initialized VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1 Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes) Initializing Cryptographic API io scheduler noop registered io scheduler anticipatory registered io scheduler deadline registered io scheduler cfq registered (default) RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 24576K size 1024 blocksize Channel measurement facility using basic format (autodetected) qdio: loading QDIO base support version 2 qdio : Not all CHSCs supported. Continuing. TCP bic registered NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET: Registered protocol family 10 lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver NET: Registered protocol family 17 Freeing unused kernel memory: 100k freed -Loading, please wait... -Begin: Loading essential drivers... ... -Done. -Begin: Running /scripts/init-premount ... -[...] +Failed to execute /init +Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
