Hi Moritz,
On Tue, 06.07.2010 at 01:16:18 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org
wrote:
tags 579125 moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:38:16PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-4-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-11~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm not quite sure that this is the right package to report against.
Please reassign as you see fit.
[...]
This renders the card unusable.
This seems to have been fixed in 2.6.32.12, which we pulled in
upload 2.6.32-12:
commit 3def5de896ab77232d1cb35fa63dbf627d1db328
Author: Kashyap, Desai kashyap.de...@lsi.com
Date: Wed Oct 7 11:27:40 2009 +0530
mptspi: Fix for incorrect data underrun errata
Could you try this kernel and see verify it's fixed there?
I've now booted
ii linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 2.6.32-15~bpo50+1Linux
2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs
and get this in my /var/log/dmesg:
[ 23.172818] [ cut here ]
[ 23.172871] WARNING: at
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_amd64_none/mm/page_alloc.c:1806
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x167/0x5d0()
[ 23.172930] Hardware name: System Product Name
[ 23.172972] Modules linked in: pata_amd sata_nv usbhid hid mptspi mptscsih
mptbase scsi_transport_spi e1000e forcedeth firewire_ohci ata_generic
firewire_core crc_itu_t ohci_hcd ehci_hcd libata usbcore nls_base scsi_mod
thermal fan thermal_sys
[ 23.173797] Pid: 760, comm: scsi_scan_9 Not tainted 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 #1
[ 23.173842] Call Trace:
[ 23.173886] [810b97cb] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x167/0x5d0
[ 23.173932] [810b97cb] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x167/0x5d0
[ 23.173979] [8104dc40] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x77/0xa3
[ 23.174025] [810b97cb] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x167/0x5d0
[ 23.174074] [81015af6] ? dma_generic_alloc_coherent+0x9a/0x120
[ 23.174124] [a010a3e5] ? mptspi_write_spi_device_pg1+0xa1/0x1ce
[mptspi]
[ 23.174179] [811965b6] ? __bitmap_weight+0x3a/0x7e
[ 23.174227] [a010a576] ? mptspi_write_width+0x64/0x69 [mptspi]
[ 23.174275] [a010adb5] ? mptspi_target_alloc+0x18c/0x1a1 [mptspi]
[ 23.174327] [a001fd47] ? scsi_alloc_target+0x1e5/0x260 [scsi_mod]
[ 23.174376] [a0020fa5] ? __scsi_scan_target+0x5a/0x593 [scsi_mod]
[ 23.174423] [8100f5e7] ? __switch_to+0xd0/0x297
[ 23.174471] [a002152b] ? scsi_scan_channel+0x4d/0x78 [scsi_mod]
[ 23.174520] [a0021633] ? scsi_scan_host_selected+0xdd/0x11d
[scsi_mod]
[ 23.174577] [a00216e4] ? do_scan_async+0x0/0x13a [scsi_mod]
[ 23.174625] [a00216fa] ? do_scan_async+0x16/0x13a [scsi_mod]
[ 23.174674] [a00216e4] ? do_scan_async+0x0/0x13a [scsi_mod]
[ 23.174720] [81064819] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
[ 23.174765] [81011baa] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[ 23.174810] [810647a0] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
[ 23.174854] [81011ba0] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
[ 23.174898] ---[ end trace 131c10636b3743aa ]---
This doesn't look comforting.
I'm also under the impression that the bug should be assigned to
linux-image instead of linux-headers... right?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100718181804.14495.qm...@oak.oeko.net
