Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 01:31 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: [...] I'm afraid this is absolutely not happening, this machine is a webserver and I've just spent enough time bringing it back to life... Besides squeeze is not shipping with 2.6.35, right? I'm hoping you plan on releasing a working kernel for the upcoming stable release? Right, but if the bug is fixed in 2.6.35 then I can look for a fix in between, and if it is not then you can report the bug to upstream. One thing I don't get is why the need to break a perfectly working kernel (2.6.32-9)? Can't the specific change that introduced this bug be simply reverted? If you could point out that change, perhaps. There have been a few thousand since then. Also note that 2.6.32-9 was released long before the freeze and there were some major changes in the next 2 revisions. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
Le 12 sept. 10 à 18:49, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 01:31 +0200, Thibaut VARÈNE wrote: [...] I'm afraid this is absolutely not happening, this machine is a webserver and I've just spent enough time bringing it back to life... Besides squeeze is not shipping with 2.6.35, right? I'm hoping you plan on releasing a working kernel for the upcoming stable release? Right, but if the bug is fixed in 2.6.35 then I can look for a fix in between, and if it is not then you can report the bug to upstream. I have a different ia64 machine on which I could try kernel on, although not very easily. I'll see if I can first reproduce the bug on it, and then if it happens with 2.6.35, but that may take some time... HTH -- Thibaut VARÈNE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f2d88448-77b4-43d5-add4-57e983245...@debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#595502 closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 595502
Bug #595502 {Done: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk}
[linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley] linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while
loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
595502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12837732339948.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
Thibaut VARENE vare...@debian.org writes: Please find attached the dmesg pertaining to this wonderful disaster. What it doesn't show is the fact that I also saw the endless /sys/devices enumeration during this boot. That's probably an unrelated bug in mdadm: http://bugs.debian.org/594418 Fixed in mdadm/3.1.4-1 Bjørn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/877hizf5mc@nemi.mork.no
Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:40 +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: reopen 595502 thanks Version: 2.6.32-21 Please, explain to me how changing a Panic into a Warning without effectively fixing the root cause of the bug fixes anything? And, oh, if by graceful failure you mean: it will blow up your raid devices and kill your filesystems, then yes, the failure has been very graceful for me, thankyouverymuch. I could have lived with a little less gracefulness, though ;-/ [...] There's no need to take your frustration out on me. I know nothing about IA64 and have to assume that upstream developers know what they are doing. Please test Linux 2.6.35 as packaged in experimental. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#595502: closed by Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (Re: Bug#595502: linux-image-2.6.32-5-mckinley: panics while loading INIT, IOMMU out of mapping resources)
Le 7 sept. 10 à 01:18, Ben Hutchings a écrit : On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:40 +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: reopen 595502 thanks Version: 2.6.32-21 Please, explain to me how changing a Panic into a Warning without effectively fixing the root cause of the bug fixes anything? And, oh, if by graceful failure you mean: it will blow up your raid devices and kill your filesystems, then yes, the failure has been very graceful for me, thankyouverymuch. I could have lived with a little less gracefulness, though ;-/ [...] There's no need to take your frustration out on me. I know nothing I don't think I've taken out my frustration on you, I would have been a lot less ironic and a lot more postal if I had been to take the frustration resulting from the pain this caused me on anyone... I must say tho I'm quite frustrated that incremental kernel upgrades to the now frozen next stable release introduce *regressions*... about IA64 and have to assume that upstream developers know what they are doing. That remains an open question ;P Please test Linux 2.6.35 as packaged in experimental. I'm afraid this is absolutely not happening, this machine is a webserver and I've just spent enough time bringing it back to life... Besides squeeze is not shipping with 2.6.35, right? I'm hoping you plan on releasing a working kernel for the upcoming stable release? One thing I don't get is why the need to break a perfectly working kernel (2.6.32-9)? Can't the specific change that introduced this bug be simply reverted? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f4598a54-3601-4127-a645-434ade77d...@debian.org
