Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-05 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
package linux-2.6
retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at 
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
thanks

Gregg gkn...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
 [1393760.788377] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: 
 Invalid block bitmap - block_group = 1229, block = 40271874
 [1393760.788779] [ cut here ]
 [1393760.788835] kernel BUG at 
 /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-28~bpo50+1-i386-VgAojN/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156!

Sounds like an ext3 bug. Either ext3 corrupted its data structures or
something else (HDD, RAM) did and ext3 didn't cope with it.

Googling for BUG jbd/transaction.c:1156 finds other cases:

I installed Debian Squeeze from a net install to a raid 1 array. I
have been having a lot of troubles related to being able to write to
one or more of the mounted drives - even touch gives me errors.  The
most interesting line from dmesg is: [15174.549931] kernel BUG at
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156!
Here is the full output from dmesg:

-- http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5t=56527

1) Are you using aacraid on this dm-5 device too?

2) Can you make the bug occur again?

3) If yes, can you temporarily try it without raid at all? (Just make
backups before test)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8462u5jfpm@sauna.l.org



Processed: Re: Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 package linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6'

 retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at 
 fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
Bug #608858 [linux-2.6] copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at 
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
Ignoring request to change the title of bug#608858 to the same title
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
608858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.129422069928810.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-04 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
package linux-2.6
retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at 
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
thanks

[resending via smtp.academica.fi since smtp.netsonic.fi does not seem
to be delivering my emails any time soon...]

Gregg gkn...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
 [1393760.788377] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: 
 Invalid block bitmap - block_group = 1229, block = 40271874
 [1393760.788779] [ cut here ]
 [1393760.788835] kernel BUG at 
 /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-28~bpo50+1-i386-VgAojN/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156!

Sounds like an ext3 bug. Either ext3 corrupted its data structures or
something else (HDD, RAM) did and ext3 didn't cope with it.

Googling for BUG jbd/transaction.c:1156 finds other cases:

I installed Debian Squeeze from a net install to a raid 1 array. I
have been having a lot of troubles related to being able to write to
one or more of the mounted drives - even touch gives me errors.  The
most interesting line from dmesg is: [15174.549931] kernel BUG at
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156!
Here is the full output from dmesg:

-- http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5t=56527

1) Are you using aacraid on this dm-5 device too?

2) Can you make the bug occur again?

3) If yes, can you temporarily try it without raid at all? (Just make
backups before test)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8462u4ibfp@sauna.l.org



Processed: Re: Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 package linux-2.6
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'linux-2.6'
Limit currently set to 'package':'linux-2.6'

 retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at 
 fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
Bug #608858 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying 
large file
Changed Bug title to 'copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at 
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156' from 'linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel 
bug copying large file'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
608858: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608858
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.12941794501239.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-04 Thread Gregg Kniss
I have not experienced a single bit of trouble until upgrading to this
kernel. I will try writing a large file to other file systems as well, but I
do know that I can write smaller, 1-300mb, files to other file systems
without an issue.

Yes I'm using aacraid. I'm using an Adaptec 2820 card with 4 500gb drives in
raid 10.

This is actually the second time it has happened performing the same action.
Copying a large file from a Windows box via the Samba share.

I will have to find a spare drive to connect and test.

-Original Message-
From: Timo Juhani Lindfors [mailto:timo.lindf...@iki.fi] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 2:22 AM
To: Gregg
Cc: 608...@bugs.debian.org; cont...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug
copying large file

package linux-2.6
retitle 608858 copying large file with smbd on raid causes BUG at
fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156
thanks

[resending via smtp.academica.fi since smtp.netsonic.fi does not seem
to be delivering my emails any time soon...]

Gregg gkn...@tampabay.rr.com writes:
 [1393760.788377] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap:
Invalid block bitmap - block_group = 1229, block = 40271874
 [1393760.788779] [ cut here ]
 [1393760.788835] kernel BUG at
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-28~bpo50+1-i386-VgAojN/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debia
n/build/source_i386_none/fs/jbd/transaction.c:1156!

Sounds like an ext3 bug. Either ext3 corrupted its data structures or
something else (HDD, RAM) did and ext3 didn't cope with it.

Googling for BUG jbd/transaction.c:1156 finds other cases:

I installed Debian Squeeze from a net install to a raid 1 array. I
have been having a lot of troubles related to being able to write to
one or more of the mounted drives - even touch gives me errors.  The
most interesting line from dmesg is: [15174.549931] kernel BUG at
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/jbd/transactio
n.c:1156!
Here is the full output from dmesg:

-- http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5t=56527

1) Are you using aacraid on this dm-5 device too?

2) Can you make the bug occur again?

3) If yes, can you temporarily try it without raid at all? (Just make
backups before test)




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/000c01cbac7f$81f4f6d0$85dee4...@rr.com



Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-04 Thread Gregg Kniss
After forcefully rebooting I have removed VMware from running at boot and will 
test again. I wanted to make sure nothing was left loaded after just removing 
the modules. I'm quite experienced in Windows, but don't know the in's and 
out's of Linux to the extent that I do of Windows.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:b...@decadent.org.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 12:03 AM
To: Gregg; 608...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug 
copying large file

Can you reproduce this without VMware modules loaded?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/000d01cbac7f$83601f90$8a205e...@rr.com



Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-03 Thread Gregg
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-29~bpo50+1
Severity: important



-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1) 
(norb...@tretkowski.de) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Debian 4.3.2-1.1) ) #1 SMP Wed Dec 
1 21:46:07 UTC 2010

** Command line:
root=UUID=62ff30d3-77c3-4eef-bbd1-231819cb87bb ro 

** Tainted: D (128)
 * Kernel has oopsed before.

** Kernel log:
[   51.333039] /dev/vmnet: port on hub 8 successfully opened
[   51.356845] /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 3306 (vmnet-natd)
[   51.356864] /dev/vmnet: port on hub 8 successfully opened
[   53.700902] cx25840 1-0044: loaded v4l-cx25840.fw firmware (16382 bytes)
[   58.492883] /dev/vmmon[3807]: PTSC: initialized at 1994246000 Hz using TSC
[   58.498766] /dev/vmmon[3807]: Vmx86_InitNUMAInfo : numaNumMemRanges=4 and 
numaNumNodes=2
[   59.221035] /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 3810 (vmware-vmx)
[   59.221060] device eth1 entered promiscuous mode
[   59.221190] bridge-eth1: enabled promiscuous mode
[   59.221302] /dev/vmnet: port on hub 0 successfully opened
[   60.718876] /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 3813 (vmnet-netifup)
[   60.718898] /dev/vmnet: port on hub 1 successfully opened
[   61.237004] /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 3831 (vmnet-netifup)
[   61.237027] /dev/vmnet: port on hub 8 successfully opened
[1224233.234497] /dev/vmnet: open called by PID 27897 (vmware-vmx)
[1224233.234537] /dev/vmnet: port on hub 0 successfully opened
[1387784.950567] vmmon: Had to deallocate locked 97788 pages from vm driver 
88013f151400
[1387784.957115] vmmon: Had to deallocate AWE 7092 pages from vm driver 
88013f151400
[1393758.348153] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1211, block = 39682050
[1393758.348639] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39682055, length 1
[1393758.358189] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1212, block = 39714818
[1393758.358564] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39714822, length 1
[1393760.652245] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1213, block = 39747584
[1393760.652848] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39747584, length 1
[1393760.699782] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1215, block = 39813122
[1393760.700244] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39813123, length 1
[1393760.706494] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1217, block = 39878658
[1393760.706889] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39878749, length 1
[1393760.714641] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1218, block = 39911426
[1393760.715014] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39911613, length 1
[1393760.720552] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1220, block = 39976961
[1393760.720931] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 39976976, length 1
[1393760.729925] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1222, block = 40042498
[1393760.730315] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 40042600, length 1
[1393760.735353] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1223, block = 40075266
[1393760.735726] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 40075267, length 1
[1393760.745867] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1224, block = 40108033
[1393760.746255] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 40108048, length 1
[1393760.754616] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1225, block = 40140802
[1393760.755004] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 40140802, length 1
[1393760.761827] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1226, block = 40173570
[1393760.762284] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 40173672, length 1
[1393760.770746] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_valid_block_bitmap: Invalid 
block bitmap - block_group = 1227, block = 40206338
[1393760.77] EXT3-fs error (device dm-5): ext3_new_block: Allocating block 
in system zone - blocks from 

Bug#608858: linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64: smbd kernel bug copying large file

2011-01-03 Thread Ben Hutchings
Can you reproduce this without VMware modules loaded?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part