Bug#644198: linux-2.6: Tell reportbug to use src:linux-2.6

2012-03-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
 severity 644198 wishlist
 found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
 tags 644198 + moreinfo
 quit
 
 Hi,
 
 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 
  Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
  Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
  instead of the current:
  Submit-As: linux-2.6
 
 What would be the benefit?


That it's filed against an existing package, something the BTS
actually knows about?

 Any downsides?

Not that I know.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120317085522.ga17...@roeckx.be



Bug#644198: linux-2.6: Tell reportbug to use src:linux-2.6

2012-03-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
 Kurt Roeckx wrote:

 Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
 Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
 instead of the current:
 Submit-As: linux-2.6

 What would be the benefit?

 That it's filed against an existing package, something the BTS
 actually knows about?

To avoid confusion when people misfile bugs about a source package,
it seems that the BTS invents a fake package binary package for any
source package package.  That's why

  http://bugs.debian.org/src:linux-2.6

lists kernel bugs filed against the linux-2.6 binary package, too,
even though there is no actual linux-2.6 binary package in Debian.

So if that's the reason behind this proposal, I'm tempted to just
close it.  The change would involve taking a risk with no upside to
balance it.

There wouldn't have to be a huge upside to balance a small risk, but
there has to be something.  I could easily be missing something.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120317104055.GA2298@burratino



Bug#644198: linux-2.6: Tell reportbug to use src:linux-2.6

2012-03-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
  On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:27:00PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
  Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 
  Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
  Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
  instead of the current:
  Submit-As: linux-2.6
 
  What would be the benefit?
 
  That it's filed against an existing package, something the BTS
  actually knows about?
 
 To avoid confusion when people misfile bugs about a source package,
 it seems that the BTS invents a fake package binary package for any
 source package package.

From where do you get that that is actually supported?   Are you sure
it's not just a bug somewhere in the BTS that it seems to work?

Maybe you should talk to Don about this?

 That's why
 
   http://bugs.debian.org/src:linux-2.6
 
 lists kernel bugs filed against the linux-2.6 binary package, too,
 even though there is no actual linux-2.6 binary package in Debian.
 
 So if that's the reason behind this proposal, I'm tempted to just
 close it.  The change would involve taking a risk with no upside to
 balance it.

What risk?

Would it be more clear that reportbug sends:
Source: linux-2.6
instead of:
Package: src:linux-2.6

(I don't know if it supports it, the BTS does for ages.)



Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120317110231.ga9...@roeckx.be



Bug#644198: linux-2.6: Tell reportbug to use src:linux-2.6

2012-03-17 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 05:40:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:

 To avoid confusion when people misfile bugs about a source package,
 it seems that the BTS invents a fake package binary package for any
 source package package.

 From where do you get that that is actually supported?

Don has mentioned it is supported.  Unfortunately I don't have a
link at hand to back that up.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120317112817.GA2829@burratino



Bug#644198: linux-2.6: Tell reportbug to use src:linux-2.6

2012-03-16 Thread Jonathan Nieder
severity 644198 wishlist
found 644198 linux-2.6/3.2.10-1
tags 644198 + moreinfo
quit

Hi,

Kurt Roeckx wrote:

 Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
 Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
 instead of the current:
 Submit-As: linux-2.6

What would be the benefit?  Any downsides?

Curious,
Jonathan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120317002700.GA524@burratino



Bug#644198: linux-2.6: Tell reportbug to use src:linux-2.6

2011-10-03 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: src:linux-2.6

Hi,

Can you please chang the bug control file to use:
Submit-As: src:linux-2.6
instead of the current:
Submit-As: linux-2.6

That way the BTS will properly know this is a bug against a source
package and not a binary package.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111003201212.ga28...@roeckx.be