Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:28:41AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. I'm cool w/ that. -dann The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in general (d-d-a) and to Greg Kroah-Hartman in his capacity as organiser of stable/longterm series. If we go with 3.2 then we will also want to work closely with the Ubuntu kernel maintainers. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120123160440.gc10...@dannf.org
Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb: --=-F52UMDY0vyvxMmwyXMtI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in general (d-d-a) and to Greg Kroah-Hartman in his capacity as organiser of stable/longterm series. If we go with 3.2 then we will also want to work closely with the Ubuntu kernel maintainers. Despite my initial preference to go with 3.3/3.4 I think that's the best option. There's nothing mouth-watering in 3.3 and the time frame between the release of 3.2 and the Wheezy release will be similar to the interval between 2.6.32 and Squeeze. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjho3rp.3oo@inutil.org
Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy
On Sun, 2012-01-22 at 14:30 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk schrieb: --=-F52UMDY0vyvxMmwyXMtI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in general (d-d-a) and to Greg Kroah-Hartman in his capacity as organiser of stable/longterm series. If we go with 3.2 then we will also want to work closely with the Ubuntu kernel maintainers. Despite my initial preference to go with 3.3/3.4 I think that's the best option. There's nothing mouth-watering in 3.3 and the time frame between the release of 3.2 and the Wheezy release will be similar to the interval between 2.6.32 and Squeeze. Probably a little shorter, in fact: Linux 2.6.32 release: 2009-12-03 Debian 6.0 release: 2011-02-06 (14 months) Linux 3.2 release:2012-01-05 Debian 7.0 release: est. 2012-12 or 2013-01 (~12 months) Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Knowledge is power. France is bacon. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Linux kernel version for wheezy
If I don't hear any objections from the kernel team in the next week, I'm going to assume that everyone is happy to go with Linux 3.2. The decision needs to be communicated to Debian developers in general (d-d-a) and to Greg Kroah-Hartman in his capacity as organiser of stable/longterm series. If we go with 3.2 then we will also want to work closely with the Ubuntu kernel maintainers. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Knowledge is power. France is bacon. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
