Re: item for kernel meeting -- NX emulation

2010-11-02 Thread maximilian attems
hello Kees,

On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Kees Cook wrote:

 Thanks for adding this to the agenda! I've added details about both
 AppArmor and the nx-emulation bits to the wiki page. Let me know if
 you've got any questions.
 
Do you know if newly split out 32bit-mmap-exec-randomization
has a chance in going upstream or has already been submitted?


thanks

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101102150413.ga...@stro.at



Re: item for kernel meeting -- NX emulation

2010-11-02 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 04:04:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
 hello Kees,
 
 On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Kees Cook wrote:
 
  Thanks for adding this to the agenda! I've added details about both
  AppArmor and the nx-emulation bits to the wiki page. Let me know if
  you've got any questions.
  
 Do you know if newly split out 32bit-mmap-exec-randomization
 has a chance in going upstream or has already been submitted?

I would fight it going upstream as it has terrible entropy. I feel it only
has value when combined with the nx-emu patch, which would have 0 entropy
for the relocated executable regions if left as-is.

The goal discussed on the Fedora kernel list was to somehow get rewrites of
the existing upstream ASLR so that it could be used with the nx-emu patch
and then the 32bit-mmap-exec-randomization could be eliminated.

The feature 32bit-mmap-exec-randomization is trying to implement is ASCII
armor (leading 0 byte on addresses), but it's greedy-fit method creates a
nearly deterministic layout for each given ELF. So if a way to do ASCII
armor with the upstream ASLR can be created, it can be dropped.

There has been no progress on this, though.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101102154757.gj5...@outflux.net



item for kernel meeting -- NX emulation

2010-10-29 Thread dann frazier
hey,
 Kees poked me to see if Debian would consider including the NX
emulation patch that Ubuntu and Fedora are currently shipping. I won't
be able to make Paris this weekend, but I'd like to request that this
get added to the agenda.

Kees, can you provide a reference for the changes?

[CC'ing the security team as well for possible feedback]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101029135004.gb17...@dannf.org



Re: item for kernel meeting -- NX emulation

2010-10-29 Thread maximilian attems
hello dann!

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:50:04AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
  Kees poked me to see if Debian would consider including the NX
 emulation patch that Ubuntu and Fedora are currently shipping. I won't
 be able to make Paris this weekend, but I'd like to request that this
 get added to the agenda.
 
 Kees, can you provide a reference for the changes?
 
 [CC'ing the security team as well for possible feedback]

items are to be found here, please just edit:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings

thanks

-- 
maks


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101029141313.ga32...@vostochny.stro.at



Re: item for kernel meeting -- NX emulation

2010-10-29 Thread dann frazier
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:13:14PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
 hello dann!
 
 On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:50:04AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
   Kees poked me to see if Debian would consider including the NX
  emulation patch that Ubuntu and Fedora are currently shipping. I won't
  be able to make Paris this weekend, but I'd like to request that this
  get added to the agenda.
  
  Kees, can you provide a reference for the changes?
  
  [CC'ing the security team as well for possible feedback]
 
 items are to be found here, please just edit:
 http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings

appended.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101029144312.gc17...@dannf.org



Re: item for kernel meeting -- NX emulation

2010-10-29 Thread Kees Cook
Hi,

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:43:12AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
 On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:13:14PM +, maximilian attems wrote:
  On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:50:04AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Kees poked me to see if Debian would consider including the NX
   emulation patch that Ubuntu and Fedora are currently shipping. I won't
   be able to make Paris this weekend, but I'd like to request that this
   get added to the agenda.
   
   Kees, can you provide a reference for the changes?
   
   [CC'ing the security team as well for possible feedback]
  
  items are to be found here, please just edit:
  http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings
 
 appended.

Thanks for adding this to the agenda! I've added details about both
AppArmor and the nx-emulation bits to the wiki page. Let me know if
you've got any questions.

As far as AppArmor is concerned, I'll be uploading the userspace tools
to experimental soon, since 2.6.36 is landing there now.

Thanks,

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101029155057.gb5...@outflux.net