Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-18 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:

> On Dec 18, Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No.  It's a driver for an ipw 2100; it has an ipw2100 and can't drive
>> it.  It's not functional -- it failed to power on the adapter.  In the
> No: it's reporting that the card did activate correctly, but it's not
> the driver's fault. The driver is complete and does not lack anything
> needed to operate the device.

...except the firmware?


-- 
Brian Sniffen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-18 Thread Brian Thomas Sniffen
Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> It doesn't matter if the manufacturer includes the CD.  If I buy the
>> card on eBay, the original owner may not have a license to
>> redistribute the firmware to me.
>
> That's a purely hypothetical situation.  Show me a case where someone
> has been convicted for selling used hardware, and including the driver
> CD.

Um.  It's not a crime, at least not where I live.

But show me a case where somebody has paid a penalty for distributing
GPL'd software without source, or lost a court case over it?  Oh, but
Debian follows the license there... why?  Because Debian is dedicated
to free software.

Similarly, we respect the licenses on non-free software.

If the firmware were free, Debian could ship it *and* the
driver.  Since it's not, we can't assume end users have it.  To do so,
we must require them to accede to provisions of third parties'
licenses in order to make use of Debian software.

-Brian

-- 
Brian Sniffen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-18 Thread Måns Rullgård
Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> It doesn't matter if the manufacturer includes the CD.  If I buy the
> card on eBay, the original owner may not have a license to
> redistribute the firmware to me.

That's a purely hypothetical situation.  Show me a case where someone
has been convicted for selling used hardware, and including the driver
CD.

>> Yes, I'm deliberately being a little extreme here, but I see no
>> fundamental difference between requiring the user to possess some data
>> and requiring the user to possess a physical object.
>
> One is software, which Debian could ship, and the other is hardware,
> which Debian cannot ship.  Software has no inherent limitation on its
> duplication and distribution -- copying bits and shipping them about
> is essentially free.  Duplicating and distributing objects is hard
> enough to be the basis of our economy.
>
> Free software, free data, are inherently different and useful concepts
> without needing to free all hardware.

As I said, lots of software requires any potential user to have some
knowledge about something (I previously mentioned signal processing as
an example).  To my knowledge, Debian does not distribute any free
books on signal processing, even though it could, if such literature
existed.  Does this prevent signal processing toolkits from going into
main?  I see gnucap (GNU Circuit Analysis package) is in main.  This
is useless for anyone without some knowledge of electronic circuits,
and Debian does not include any books on that subject, so the gnucap
package depends on non-free "data".  Does this mean that gnucap must
be moved to "contrib"?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 18, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No, because (as has been said already) the existance of cases where you need
> non-free stuff isn't the issue; the issue is whether there exist cases where
> you don't.  If nobody can use the software without needing non-free data, the
> software is (at best) contrib.  If some people can use it without that data,
Just about every driver "needs" some software stored in flash EEPROM
chips in your computer.

> > Suppose some piece of hardware had a Compact Flash reader, and came
> > with a Compact Flash card containing firmware necessary for the
> > hardware to run.  Would this also be non-free?
> I believe software that only works with this reader would go in contrib,
> if that's what you mean, unless the data on that card was Free itself.
> It's a dependency on non-free software.  (It's not the same as having
> the firmware stored in flash memory on a device, since removable devices
> are expected to be removed, overwritten, or lost; where I'd call a device
> with a hosed flash "broken".  (The former I'd sell on eBay as "drive
Let's suppose that this compact flash card were soldered to a PCI
compact flash adapter. Would this still be software and an element of
the debian dependecy chain?

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [9901 riFoIPUHY2X7A]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: LCC and blobs

2004-12-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 18, Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No.  It's a driver for an ipw 2100; it has an ipw2100 and can't drive
> it.  It's not functional -- it failed to power on the adapter.  In the
No: it's reporting that the card did activate correctly, but it's not
the driver's fault. The driver is complete and does not lack anything
needed to operate the device.

> This certainly doesn't make Debian uninstallable.  All the drivers in
> question can move to contrib.  It just ensures that Debian ships only
> free software in Debian main.
Packages in contrib are not part of debian.
It's funny that after some people tried hard to remove any trace of
non-free software from the debian archive now there is the concrete risk
that using contrib and non-free will be mandatory for many users.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [9900 stMOs23QwadkU]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


ACCOUNT DEACTIVATED

2004-12-18 Thread at sunset.backbone.olemiss.edu
This account is no longer active.  Thus, your
mail regarding "[PMX:VIRUS] Re:" will not be received.



Bu'y Cia"lis softtabs Online For Less

2004-12-18 Thread Wilfredo Beasley

New ClALlS softtabs = lNSTANT R0CKHARD ERECTl0NS
Simply disolve HALF A PlLL under your tongue 10min before action,
for results that last all weekend.
Normal retail is $19/PlLL
0rder from us today at the price of $3.67

not interested(0pt-0ut)




CNEL推出广告服务大优惠 14:2:22:727

2004-12-18 Thread 中国工业电器网




  
  

  通栏广告 
  

  


  

   

  
  
标题广告 
  

  
  
  


  
预知详情:http://www.cnelc.com/ad/3.htm
中国工业电器网广告投放报价单
  
  


  
服务内容

  
制作效果
  
大小尺寸
  
广告投放时间及报价(元)
  
申 
请

  
1个月
  
3个月
  
6个月
  
1年

  
首页
  
通栏广告
  
平面
  
768×35
  
5000
  
14000
  
26000
  
5
  
申 请

  
标题广告
  
平面
  
100×40
  
1000
  
2800
  
5200
  
1
  
申 请

  
栏目首页
  
通栏广告
  
平面、动画
  
768×35
  
1000
  
2800
  
5200
  
1
  
申 请

  
标题广告
  
平面、动画
  
100×40
  
300
  
800
  
1700
  
3200
  
申 请

  
区域市场栏目
  
通栏广告
  
平面
  
768×35
  
800
  
2200
  
4000
  
7500
  
申 请

  
标题广告
  
平面、动画
  
100×40
  
300
  
800
  
1700
  
3200
  
申 请

  

专业市场栏目
  
通栏广告
  
平面、动画
  
768×35
  
800
  
2200
  
4000
  
7500
  
申 请

  
标题广告
  
平面、动画
  
100×40
  
300
  
800
  
1700
  
3200
  
申 请
  联系方式:
  中国工业电器网地址:上海市天目中路538号北苑大厦13楼 
  电话:021-33031114技术中心:021-33036114 传真:021-63532355 邮编:200070网址:www.cnelc.com 销售部 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]联系人:陈波
  浙江温州地区业务联系:地址:浙江省乐清市北白象镇开创路130号电话:0577-62999758 
  手机:13506777309联系人:郑成光
  公司汇款资料:公司全称:上海易电网络科技有限公司开户行:农行闸北支天目所帐号: 
  033623-08016162886