Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Raul Miller wrote: Actually, there is a point related to what Bernhard is saying. At least in the U.S., only a small, small fraction of the laws are criminal laws. Could you please define what criminal laws are, and where you found such a word and defintion. Steve -- If Microsoft doesn't trust Windows(TM), why should you? http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q80/5/20.ASP
Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Joey Hess wrote: 1.Any action which is illegal under international or local law is forbidden by this licence. Any such action is the sole responsibility of the person committing the action. I jaywalked yesterday in CA, so did I now break the licence agreement? I jaywalked yesterday to use the software on the other side of the road, did I break the license? By my understanding of it, I did. Steve -- If Microsoft doesn't trust Windows(TM), why should you? http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q80/5/20.ASP
Re: Is the SYPP License DFSG-Compliant?
I haven't looked at the license in a while for Code Crusader, but doesn't it also have some type of restrictons on code changes also? Like make changes and redisribute them w/o telling the orginal authours? Steve ___ If Microsoft doesn't trust Windows(TM), why should you? http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q80/5/20.ASP
