Re: Incomplete licence - what to do?

2003-05-29 Thread Adam Warner
Hi Artur R. Czechowski,

 Hello
 
 I would like to package a php4-rrdtool from wnpp[1]. I noticed that this
 software has IMO incomplete licence. Full README file is available at:
 http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/pub/contrib/php4-rrdtool-1.03.txt
 
 Interesting part about copyright below.
 
 You are free to redistribute the source provided my name is kept at
 the top of the source files as credit for the original author.  I
 make no warranties to the usability of this software, nor I am
 responsible if your machine explodes (although it shouldn't).
 
 I think that the author's intention was to place this code in any open
 source licence but the cited paragraph is not in compliance with DFSG:
 there is no information on redistribution of modified sources and/or
 binaries.

It's clear that he intends the GPL from his website:
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/license.html

You may wish to clarify that the form of credit discussed is merely a
request. The request interpretation is reinforced by this page which links
to the licence: http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/rrdtool/

The link to the licence states You like RRDtool? There is a simple way to
show your appreciation.

Regards,
Adam



Re: Incomplete licence - what to do?

2003-05-29 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 19:26, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:

 I will contact upstream to fix this licence but first I would like to know
 your opinion: what should I propose to the author as the new licence?

MIT/X11: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
(new) BSD: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part