Re: default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-20 Thread Francesco Poli
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:15:31 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote:

 On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:32:22 +
 jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  I wouldn't, because there are versions and localizations of the 
  CC-BY-SA-NC license that are incompatible with other versions of the 
  CC-BY-SA-NC license. More to the point, because of that incompatibility, 
  my position is that if neither the specific localization, nor specific 
  version of the CC-BY-SA-NC license are given, the the work is to be 
  treated as if it was _All Rights Reserved_.
 
   Didn't know about localizations but was aware of the versions (hence my
   attempt to find a way to fallback to something DFSG-compatible ;-)
   Unfortunately this makes things even worse and therefore such theme shall
   not enter main.

Since the license is some version of some localized CC-by-sa-nc,
I would say that this theme has no chance to enter main: as far as I
know, the non-commercial (nc) license element makes it non-free (even
from the not so strict point of view of the FTP Masters...).


-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
 New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE


pgpvJ3Jrij7Iu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-19 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 03:32:22 +
jonathon jonathon.bl...@gmail.com wrote:

 I wouldn't, because there are versions and localizations of the 
 CC-BY-SA-NC license that are incompatible with other versions of the 
 CC-BY-SA-NC license. More to the point, because of that incompatibility, 
 my position is that if neither the specific localization, nor specific 
 version of the CC-BY-SA-NC license are given, the the work is to be 
 treated as if it was _All Rights Reserved_.

  Didn't know about localizations but was aware of the versions (hence my
  attempt to find a way to fallback to something DFSG-compatible ;-)
  Unfortunately this makes things even worse and therefore such theme shall
  not enter main.

  thanks all for your answers,
-- 
 Ricardo Mones
 http://people.debian.org/~mones
 «Another good night not to sleep in a eucalyptus tree.»


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-18 Thread Ricardo Mones

  Hi legal,

  I've found a theme which states it's licensed 'Creative Commons by-nc-sa'.
  My question is whether is possible assume the version of the license or
  not (note that my first reaction to this is this is not a valid license,
  but I'm not sure if my feelings are right).

  regards,
-- 
 Ricardo Mones
 http://people.debian.org/~mones
 «You will be advanced socially, without any special effort on your 
 part.»


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-18 Thread MJ Ray
Ricardo Mones asked:
   I've found a theme which states it's licensed 'Creative Commons by-nc-sa'.
   My question is whether is possible assume the version of the license or
   not (note that my first reaction to this is this is not a valid license,
   but I'm not sure if my feelings are right).

I think it would be reasonable to assume it's under the latest version
on the date of publication, but I don't know if that's good enough for
ftpmasters.  It would be better to clarify, of course.

Hope that helps,
-- 
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110118101806.4997cf7...@nail.towers.org.uk



Re: default CC license version number is always latest?

2011-01-18 Thread jonathon



On 01/18/2011 08:40 AM, Ricardo Mones wrote:


   I've found a theme which states it's licensed 'Creative Commons by-nc-sa'.
   My question is whether is possible assume the version of the license or



I wouldn't, because there are versions and localizations of the 
CC-BY-SA-NC license that are incompatible with other versions of the 
CC-BY-SA-NC license. More to the point, because of that incompatibility, 
my position is that if neither the specific localization, nor specific 
version of the CC-BY-SA-NC license are given, the the work is to be 
treated as if it was _All Rights Reserved_.


jonathon


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d365b46.9040...@gmail.com