Re: unsourced pdf in tarball; src available from ftp site;

2011-04-30 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 29 mars 2011 à 07:25 +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : 
> .doc files are usually binary so you won't be able to include it as a
> patch. Instead I think you can use dpkg-source v3 and include a second
> orig.tar.gz named orig-docsrc.tar.gz (check the dpkg-source manual
> page for info on that). You can then use the upstream pristine
> tarball.

With dpkg-source v3 you can also include binaries in the debian/
directory. Just mention them in debian/source/include-binaries.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: unsourced pdf in tarball; src available from ftp site;

2011-03-29 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi!

Am 29.03.2011 01:25, schrieb Paul Wise:
> .doc files are usually binary so you won't be able to include it as a
> patch. Instead I think you can use dpkg-source v3 and include a second
> orig.tar.gz named orig-docsrc.tar.gz (check the dpkg-source manual
> page for info on that). You can then use the upstream pristine
> tarball.
> 
> The course of action you mentioned is perfect otherwise.

Sorry for being a legal nitpick, but it's only perfect, if you can be
100% sure, that the .doc is really the source.  If there's a doubt (e.g.
the pdf created with OOo looks different) it can be rejected.

Also one should point out how the source is shipped in the copyright
file, or the ftp-team might reject the package, as it could find the
source in the orig tarball.


Best regards,
  Alexander


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d9189a2.6050...@schmehl.info



Re: unsourced pdf in tarball; src available from ftp site;

2011-03-28 Thread Ben Finney
Paul Wise  writes:

> The course of action you mentioned is perfect otherwise.

Agreed; the main improvement to that course would be to encourage and
work with upstream to include the source document in the source tarball.

Thank you, Paul Elliott, for conscientious attention to the freedom of
package recipients.

-- 
 \  “Better not take a dog on the space shuttle, because if he |
  `\   sticks his head out when you're coming home his face might burn |
_o__)up.” —Jack Handey |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y63ypyij@benfinney.id.au



Re: unsourced pdf in tarball; src available from ftp site;

2011-03-28 Thread Paul Wise
.doc files are usually binary so you won't be able to include it as a
patch. Instead I think you can use dpkg-source v3 and include a second
orig.tar.gz named orig-docsrc.tar.gz (check the dpkg-source manual
page for info on that). You can then use the upstream pristine
tarball.

The course of action you mentioned is perfect otherwise.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=bP=v6i0gfjkhawqvt2coo7aynpru4mlqku...@mail.gmail.com



unsourced pdf in tarball; src available from ftp site;

2011-03-28 Thread Paul Elliott

I am looking to package the Swiss Ephemeris:
http://www.astro.com/faq/fq_swe_prog_e.htm

Unfortunately, there are unsourced pdfs in the doc directory of the tarball.
doc/swisseph.pdf 
doc/swephprg.pdf
http://www.astro.com/ftp/swisseph/swe_unix_src_1.77.00.tar.gz
However, the source (a .doc file) is on the ftp site in a directory that should 
be covered by the LICENSE file which is also on the ftp site.
http://www.astro.com/ftp/swisseph/doc/swephprg.doc
http://www.astro.com/ftp/swisseph/src/LICENSE

I plan to get an email from the upstream, stating that the .doc files are also
covered by the LICENSE, which I will add to debian copyright.

If I add the .doc file as a patch, can I still use the original pristine source 
tarball?

I plan to create a make file that will rebuild the .pdf from its source using 
openoffice.

I have already requested that the upstream include the source to pdfs in 
future releases.

-- 
Paul Elliott   1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com   PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/   Austin TX 78758-3117


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.