Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 01:27:06PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote: > > maybe Mechthildes impulse to just build an deb file out of projects was > > right. > > I want all required software to be available as Debian packages. This is > IMO the base to start a blend. This is how all Blends started and what to my experience made perfectly sense. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
Hello Am 11.10.19 um 12:58 schrieb Michael Guck: > Hello Jens, > > maybe Mechthildes impulse to just build an deb file out of projects was > right. I want all required software to be available as Debian packages. This is IMO the base to start a blend. > It will not bring "debian lex" alife but gets something done by using > debian as publishing platform regadless of the circumstances. @ Michael G.: do you find all software you use as packages in Debian? Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
Hello Jens, maybe Mechthildes impulse to just build an deb file out of projects was right. It will not bring "debian lex" alife but gets something done by using debian as publishing platform regadless of the circumstances. I am out here for now. Maybe I will join again. best wishes Michael Guck Am 11.10.19 um 11:32 schrieb i...@j-lawyer.org: I feel (kind of) irritated and sorry. Sorry mainly because my project is the subject / trigger for this debate. Not so much sorry because I did not offend anyone. I did not insist my project be a part of a potential blend. All I did was raising awareness that there is some case management software that is working on Linux that could give users a choice. At the end of the day, that is the only reason I am subscribed here - I like the idea of having such a blend that actually provides a value to end users. Contributors running apart over the slightest technical debate is something that I have not seen in a community so far. Having differing opinions is actually something very valuable - getting out of your own bubbles and understanding other peoples points and ideas. Aside from that, I actually agree with Michaels take on getting the basics right and then evolve from this. Baffled, Jens Am 11.10.2019 11:09, schrieb Michael Guck: OK I just found it https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe good luck anyway Michael Guck Am 11.10.19 um 11:03 schrieb Michael Guck: Hi Andreas, how can I get out of this list? Thank you! Michael Guck Am 11.10.19 um 10:53 schrieb Andreas Tille: Hi, On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Michael Guck wrote: Hi Mechthilde, so we come to no conclusion this time I don't understand it this way: Mechthilde has drawn the conclusion to do something (which I'm applauding). She is following her point of view. You are free to not contribute but that magical "we" that is not able to find a conclusion does not seem to exist. I still think that its a good idea to start with the basics and later on everybody can unsecure his system/blend as he wishes. If you think its a good idea just *do* what you consider a good idea. Expecting others to consider your idea good is not very fruitful. Kind regards Andreas.
Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
Hi Michael, hi all, I would like to set up a GDPR compliant install of a system with some common sofortware like email and so on for debian lex. Thats much more work at basic stuff for a system then many people would expect. It cant be done by one person. I never published my system. That takes me in position to think over and be free for a clear view. I can not use j-lawer so this might be a step forward for someone, not for me. I am Lawyer and developer (C++/PHP) and want to get things done properly. I dont want again java, I really tried hard to avoid this but it still remains in minds of people as usefull. I better go with C++. Best Greetings Michael Guck Am 11.10.19 um 09:45 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: Hello, yes, j-lawyer is Free Software, so everybody can use, studx, share and improve it. But it still has to be packed as a debian package. That is a manageable task (IMO) and a good next thing to do (IMO). Kind regards Michael
Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
Hello, yes, j-lawyer is Free Software, so everybody can use, studx, share and improve it. But it still has to be packed as a debian package. That is a manageable task (IMO) and a good next thing to do (IMO). Kind regards Michael
Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
Hi all, i wont use j-lawyer but its free software, anybody who wishes can. Best Greetings Michael Guck Am 10.10.19 um 21:14 schrieb Jens Kutschke, j-lawyer.org: "later on everybody can unsecure his system/blend as he wishes" Way too much emotion in that discussion. Btw, in Germany every lawyer needs to have Java installed due to the fact that accessing his lawyers mailbox is not possible without it. Cheers, Jens Am 10.10.19 um 21:00 schrieb Michael Guck: Hi Mechthilde, so we come to no conclusion this time I still think that its a good idea to start with the basics and later on everybody can unsecure his system/blend as he wishes. Best Greetings Michael Guck Am 10.10.19 um 20:00 schrieb Mechtilde: Hello, Am 10.10.19 um 18:49 schrieb Michael Guck: Hi Mechtilde, it would be helpfull if we could discuss first how to initialise a "debian lex" project. I prefer to take the software we have. I try to package it for the Debian Repo. Then it is easier to hold them up-to-date. I'm not a code developer. The project has a long history. Many software came and went. I know only two free solutions: libreoffice-cazeley-client, j-lawyer Kind regards
Re: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend
"later on everybody can unsecure his system/blend as he wishes" Way too much emotion in that discussion. Btw, in Germany every lawyer needs to have Java installed due to the fact that accessing his lawyers mailbox is not possible without it. Cheers, Jens Am 10.10.19 um 21:00 schrieb Michael Guck: > Hi Mechthilde, > > so we come to no conclusion this time > > I still think that its a good idea to start with the basics and later > on everybody can unsecure his system/blend as he wishes. > > Best Greetings > > Michael Guck > > > > > Am 10.10.19 um 20:00 schrieb Mechtilde: >> Hello, >> >> >> Am 10.10.19 um 18:49 schrieb Michael Guck: >>> Hi Mechtilde, >>> >>> it would be helpfull if we could discuss first how to initialise a >>> "debian lex" project. >> I prefer to take the software we have. I try to package it for the >> Debian Repo. Then it is easier to hold them up-to-date. >> >> I'm not a code developer. >> >> The project has a long history. Many software came and went. >> >> I know only two free solutions: libreoffice-cazeley-client, j-lawyer >> >> Kind regards >