Processed: Re: Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes

2008-01-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 clone 462586 -1
Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for 
source-only .changes
Bug 462586 cloned as bug 462589.

 reassign -1 debian-policy
Bug#462589: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for 
source-only .changes
Bug reassigned from package `lintian' to `debian-policy'.

 retitle -1 Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) 
 for source-only *.changes files
Bug#462589: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for 
source-only .changes
Changed Bug title to `Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer 
generates it) for source-only *.changes files' from `lintian: Please don't 
no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes'.

 severity -1 normal
Bug#462589: Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) 
for source-only *.changes files
Severity set to `normal' from `wishlist'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes

2008-01-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

since dpkg-dev is moving quite quickly these days, I postponed its
upgrade, and only hit today the following:
| E: graphviz_2.16.1-1_source.changes: no-description-in-changes-file

Since dpkg/1.14.16, we have:
| * Some code refactoring on dpkg-genchanges and bug fixes in the generation
|   of the Description: field. As a result, source only uploads will no more
|   have Description fields.

I presume it'dbe safe to turn off this check when checking a source-only
upload (if you don't detect source-only uploads yet, I guess that the
/_source.changes$/ pattern should do the job.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#462586: lintian: Please don't no-description-in-changes-file for source-only .changes

2008-01-25 Thread Russ Allbery
clone 462586 -1
reassign -1 debian-policy
retitle -1 Description doesn't make sense (and dpkg no longer generates it) for 
source-only *.changes files
severity -1 normal
thanks

Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Package: lintian
 Version: 1.23.42
 Severity: wishlist

 since dpkg-dev is moving quite quickly these days, I postponed its
 upgrade, and only hit today the following:
 | E: graphviz_2.16.1-1_source.changes: no-description-in-changes-file

 Since dpkg/1.14.16, we have:
 | * Some code refactoring on dpkg-genchanges and bug fixes in the generation
 |   of the Description: field. As a result, source only uploads will no more
 |   have Description fields.

 I presume it'dbe safe to turn off this check when checking a source-only
 upload (if you don't detect source-only uploads yet, I guess that the
 /_source.changes$/ pattern should do the job.

Policy 5.5 says that Description is mandatory for all *.changes files,
which is why the lintian tag.  However, I agree that Description doesn't
make much sense for source-only uploads, since there are no individual
package descriptions in that case to lift into it.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])   http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]