Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support
Hello, On Tue, 31 May 2016, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: > If you still want to publish the info in bits.debian.org, please review our > alternative proposal at https://pressblicity.titanpad.com/20 This proposal looks good, I just fixed a few details. Feel free to go ahead with this one. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support
On 31.05.2016 22:41, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote: [...] > > In bits and annoucements we prefer to be more verbose, so the message is > complete and understandable for the wider audience, even the ones not > familiarized with the topic. > > Given that this is a short news/update on former news, we think it's better if > you send it to the LTS-announce mailing list, and from the publicity team we > can microblog it and mention it in the next DPN. > > If you still want to publish the info in bits.debian.org, please review our > alternative proposal at https://pressblicity.titanpad.com/20 [...] Hi, I have no strong preference for publishing in bits.debian.org or on lts-announce again because I think it was even you who suggested to use bits.debian.org for this small news update in our IRC channel. The updated draft at https://pressblicity.titanpad.com/20 looks good to me but if you prefer an e-mail announcement to lts-announce I can do that as well of course and will send one shortly. Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support
Hi Markus, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:38:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 18.05.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Ana Guerrero Lopez: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> the LTS team would like to make a short announcement on bits.debian.org. > >> We think it is worth mentioning that armel and armhf are supported > >> architectures in Wheezy LTS. Please find our draft below. > > > > Thank you Markus! > > > > What doyou think about adding also a note about not needing to add any > > suite extra. > > A reword from this: > > > > "For Debian 7 Wheezy LTS there will be no requirement to add a separate > > wheezy-lts suite to your sources.list any more and your current setup will > > continue to work without further changes" > > Hi Ana, > > I thought let's keep it short because we already announced that on the > front page at debian.org. This is also mentioned on the wiki pages > LTS/Using and LTS/Wheezy. I guess we can just omit this information from > the announcement. In bits and annoucements we prefer to be more verbose, so the message is complete and understandable for the wider audience, even the ones not familiarized with the topic. Given that this is a short news/update on former news, we think it's better if you send it to the LTS-announce mailing list, and from the publicity team we can microblog it and mention it in the next DPN. If you still want to publish the info in bits.debian.org, please review our alternative proposal at https://pressblicity.titanpad.com/20 We realize that we in the Publicity team need to improve the documentation on how we approach the many different debian channels, and your email announcement has started an internal discussion about how to improve and make it known how the Publicity channels can best be used. We're sorry we were delaying to reply you because of this. Ana
Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support
Hi all, I haven't seen our Wheezy LTS post on bits.debian.org yet. Is there anything we can do? Regards, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hi folks, > > the LTS team would like to make a short announcement on bits.debian.org. > We think it is worth mentioning that armel and armhf are supported > architectures in Wheezy LTS. Please find our draft below. Thank you Markus! What doyou think about adding also a note about not needing to add any suite extra. A reword from this: "For Debian 7 Wheezy LTS there will be no requirement to add a separate wheezy-lts suite to your sources.list any more and your current setup will continue to work without further changes" > > Title: Wheezy LTS with armel and armhf support > Date: 2016-05-18 15:51 > Author: Markus Koschany > Tags: Wheezy, LTS > Status: draft > > > Wheezy's [LTS](https://wiki.debian.org/LTS) period started a few weeks > ago and more than thirty updates [have been > announced](https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/) so far. > > Thanks to our sponsors and to the help from Debian's buildd maintainers > and FTP Team we are excited to announce that two new architectures are > supported in Wheezy LTS. In addition to **i386** and **amd64** users of > **armel** and **armhf** will also receive two more years of extended > security support. > > More information about how to use Debian Long Term Support and other > important changes regarding Wheezy LTS are available at > [LTS/Using](https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Using) and > [LTS/Wheezy](https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Wheezy). > >
Re: bits.debian.org: Wheezy LTS post about armel and armhf support
Am 18.05.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Ana Guerrero Lopez: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> the LTS team would like to make a short announcement on bits.debian.org. >> We think it is worth mentioning that armel and armhf are supported >> architectures in Wheezy LTS. Please find our draft below. > > Thank you Markus! > > What doyou think about adding also a note about not needing to add any > suite extra. > A reword from this: > > "For Debian 7 Wheezy LTS there will be no requirement to add a separate > wheezy-lts suite to your sources.list any more and your current setup will > continue to work without further changes" Hi Ana, I thought let's keep it short because we already announced that on the front page at debian.org. This is also mentioned on the wiki pages LTS/Using and LTS/Wheezy. I guess we can just omit this information from the announcement. Cheers, Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
