Re: Sending LTS changes to debian-lts-changes
On Mon, 02 May 2016, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > Send them first only to debian-lts-changes@ as it might be that the > > tracker gets them that way too. > > Now I already set both mail addresses. Should I change that to only > debian-lts-changes@? > Note that security.d.o doesn't sent mail to @packages.qa.d.o. Let's see how it behaves first. After further thinking, I believe it should be good. The new tracker does not follow debian-lts-changes AFAIK, only the old one does for the news feed displayed on the package page. > > (That said dak needs a general cleanup to send mail to the new tracker > > directly and stop relying on @packages.qa.debian.org, as nobody did > > anything in response to > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg1.html) > > Should I just add dispatch@tracker.d.o to all suites where we sent out > announcement mails for? > > And in that case stop sending mail to @packages.qa.d.o? > > And it looks like we also sometimes send mail to > @packages.d.o. So many different choices :) Yes, I would like to simplify all this... and to some extent, I already put the required infrastructure in place for it. The package tracker needs a single copy of the mail arriving to dispatch@ but that copy can come from: - a mail to @packages.d.o - a direct mail to dispatch@tracker.d.o - a mail to @packages.qa.debian.org (kept working for now until all services migrated) So basically the rules are: when you send a mail to @packages.d.o, you don't need to send a copy to dispatch@tracker.d.o. For all other (public) mails, you should send a copy to dispatch@tracker.d.o. And you should no longer send anything to @packages.qa.d.o. Ideally, we would always use @packages.d.o as the single contact point. (Except that it does not work very well for new packages as the list of alias on that service is static. So in the long term I would like the tracker to handle that email service directly.) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Re: Sending LTS changes to debian-lts-changes
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 08:57:40PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Raphael Hertzog writes: > > On Mon, 02 May 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> thank you for fixing the mirror bug. Moritz Mühlenhoff informed us on > >> IRC that accepted mails for LTS uploads are still sent to dak AT > >> security.debian.org. Can you filter those mails so that they are sent to > >> debian-lts-changes instead and if possible also to > >> dispatch _AT_ tracker.debian.org as Raphael had suggested? [1] > > > > Send them first only to debian-lts-changes@ as it might be that the > > tracker gets them that way too. > > Now I already set both mail addresses. Should I change that to only > debian-lts-changes@? > > Note that security.d.o doesn't sent mail to @packages.qa.d.o. For wheezy-lts we don't need the changes mails send to d...@security.debian.org, anyone in the security team interested in those can simply subscribe to debian-lts-changes Cheers, Moritz
Re: Sending LTS changes to debian-lts-changes
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Mon, 02 May 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: >> thank you for fixing the mirror bug. Moritz Mühlenhoff informed us on >> IRC that accepted mails for LTS uploads are still sent to dak AT >> security.debian.org. Can you filter those mails so that they are sent to >> debian-lts-changes instead and if possible also to >> dispatch _AT_ tracker.debian.org as Raphael had suggested? [1] > > Send them first only to debian-lts-changes@ as it might be that the > tracker gets them that way too. Now I already set both mail addresses. Should I change that to only debian-lts-changes@? Note that security.d.o doesn't sent mail to @packages.qa.d.o. > (That said dak needs a general cleanup to send mail to the new tracker > directly and stop relying on @packages.qa.debian.org, as nobody did > anything in response to > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg1.html) Should I just add dispatch@tracker.d.o to all suites where we sent out announcement mails for? And in that case stop sending mail to @packages.qa.d.o? And it looks like we also sometimes send mail to @packages.d.o. So many different choices :) Ansgar
Re: Sending LTS changes to debian-lts-changes
Hi, On Mon, 02 May 2016, Markus Koschany wrote: > thank you for fixing the mirror bug. Moritz Mühlenhoff informed us on > IRC that accepted mails for LTS uploads are still sent to dak AT > security.debian.org. Can you filter those mails so that they are sent to > debian-lts-changes instead and if possible also to > dispatch _AT_ tracker.debian.org as Raphael had suggested? [1] Send them first only to debian-lts-changes@ as it might be that the tracker gets them that way too. (That said dak needs a general cleanup to send mail to the new tracker directly and stop relying on @packages.qa.debian.org, as nobody did anything in response to https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/12/msg1.html) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Sending LTS changes to debian-lts-changes
Hi Ansgar, thank you for fixing the mirror bug. Moritz Mühlenhoff informed us on IRC that accepted mails for LTS uploads are still sent to dak AT security.debian.org. Can you filter those mails so that they are sent to debian-lts-changes instead and if possible also to dispatch _AT_ tracker.debian.org as Raphael had suggested? [1] Cheers, Markus [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/04/msg00140.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
