Re: Done: Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 01:11:55PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > Corrected, tested, and uploaded. Cool. I owe you a $drink! (at DebConf 17?) Thanks a lot Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Done: Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Corrected, tested, and uploaded. Best, Gert
Re: Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 10:30 +0100 schrieb Gert Wollny: > Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 10:10 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > > > Hi Gert, > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:55:27AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly > > > > ignore > > > > the test failure by adding > > > > > > > > override_dh_auto_test: > > > > dh_auto_test || true > > > > > > > > and upload the package after testing that the binary will > > > > start. > > > > > > I would take a look, but there is no pristine-tar branch ... > > > > Hmmm, it seems it is not automatically pushed if created later. I > > did now a `giti push --all`. > > Okay, > > now I get > > dh_auto_install -- \ > --install-lib=usr/share/openmolar/ > usage: pybuild [ACTION] [BUILD SYSTEM ARGS] [DIRECTORIES] [OPTIONS] > pybuild: error: unrecognized arguments: > --install-lib=usr/share/openmolar/ With --install-dir building the package works, but the dependencies are borked because python3-qscintilla2 doesn't exist, but there seems to be python3-pyqt5.qsci (Python 3 bindings for QScintilla 2 with Qt 5) Get back to you later, Gert
Re: Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 10:10 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Gert, > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:55:27AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > > > > > > > > It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly > > > ignore > > > the test failure by adding > > > > > > override_dh_auto_test: > > > dh_auto_test || true > > > > > > and upload the package after testing that the binary will start. > > > > I would take a look, but there is no pristine-tar branch ... > > Hmmm, it seems it is not automatically pushed if created later. I > did now a `giti push --all`. Okay, now I get dh_auto_install -- \ --install-lib=usr/share/openmolar/ usage: pybuild [ACTION] [BUILD SYSTEM ARGS] [DIRECTORIES] [OPTIONS] pybuild: error: unrecognized arguments: --install-lib=usr/share/openmolar/ > Thanks for your attempt to join anyway and may be you (and others!) > could join via IRC and we include others remotely. That should be possible, at least for some time. Best, Gert
Re: Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Hi Gert, On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:55:27AM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote: > > It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly ignore > > the test failure by adding > > > > override_dh_auto_test: > > dh_auto_test || true > > > > and upload the package after testing that the binary will start. > > I would take a look, but there is no pristine-tar branch ... Hmmm, it seems it is not automatically pushed if created later. I did now a `giti push --all`. > BTW: The good news is that I got DD status now :), the bad news that > once again I won't make it to the sprint :( Thanks for your attempt to join anyway and may be you (and others!) could join via IRC and we include others remotely. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly ignore > the test failure by adding > > override_dh_auto_test: > dh_auto_test || true > > and upload the package after testing that the binary will start. I would take a look, but there is no pristine-tar branch ... BTW: The good news is that I got DD status now :), the bad news that once again I won't make it to the sprint :( Best, Gert
Please help: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Hi, I have a *really* strange problem building openmolar which I described on Debian Python list[1]. Since nobody else can reproduce it chances are good that you can build the current status of packaging[2]. It would be *really* cool if somebody could step in, possibly ignore the test failure by adding override_dh_auto_test: dh_auto_test || true and upload the package after testing that the binary will start. Thanks a lot for any help Andreas. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2016/12/msg00050.html [2] https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-med/openmolar.git - Forwarded message from Debian testing autoremoval watch- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 04:39:05 + From: Debian testing autoremoval watch To: openmo...@packages.debian.org Subject: openmolar is marked for autoremoval from testing openmolar 0.6.2-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-01-31 It is affected by these RC bugs: 849958: openmolar: Does not start; missing QtWebkit ___ Debian-med-packaging mailing list debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging - End forwarded message - -- http://fam-tille.de