Re: emboss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.net.ssl removal
Hi Peter, Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 08:18:42PM + schrieb Peter Rice: > I can take a look. What's the problem? The problem is described in the bug report[1]. May be one of the people who responded here will find a patch. > Still working through getting EMBOSS moved to github with all the past > releases. Nearly there. Then I play a lot of testing and updates for > anything that has run into problems. That's really great to know. Kind regards Andras. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/982036 > On 13/12/2021 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just asked for help on bug #982036 but no response so far. I think > > it is time to care if we want to keep emboss for the next stable > > release. > > > > Kind regards > > > >Andreas. > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > > -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: emboss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.net.ssl removal
Le lun. 13 déc. 2021 à 21:18, Peter Rice a écrit : > Hi Andreas, > > I can take a look. What's the problem? > Com.sun.net.ssl has been removed from java base package. Its (long time) replacement javax.net.ssl should be used instead > Still working through getting EMBOSS moved to github with all the past > releases. Nearly there. Then I play a lot of testing and updates for > anything that has run into problems. > > regards, > > Peter Rice > > > On 13/12/2021 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've just asked for help on bug #982036 but no response so far. I think > > it is time to care if we want to keep emboss for the next stable > > release. > > > > Kind regards > > > >Andreas. > > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > >
Re: emboss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.net.ssl removal
Hi Andreas, I can take a look. What's the problem? Still working through getting EMBOSS moved to github with all the past releases. Nearly there. Then I play a lot of testing and updates for anything that has run into problems. regards, Peter Rice On 13/12/2021 17:55, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I've just asked for help on bug #982036 but no response so far. I think it is time to care if we want to keep emboss for the next stable release. Kind regards Andreas. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
Re: emboss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.net.ssl removal
Le lun. 13 déc. 2021 à 18:55, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi, > > I've just asked for help on bug #982036 but no response so far. I think > it is time to care if we want to keep emboss for the next stable > release. > Hummm, if not called in too many places, i expect ssl stuff should be quite easy to update/replace. I won t have time this week, but i could have a look next week. Olivier > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de >
Re: emboss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.net.ssl removal
Hi, On 2021-12-13 19:55, Andreas Tille wrote: > I've just asked for help on bug #982036 but no response so far. I think > it is time to care if we want to keep emboss for the next stable > release. I am very much for retaining emboss, thus I may give it a look. The code using com.sun.net.ssl seems to be used to establish HTTPS connection for Java Network Launch Protocol. I wonder if that worked in the previous stable release, though. Best, Andrius
Re: emboss: FTBFS with OpenJDK 17 due to com.sun.net.ssl removal
Hi, I've just asked for help on bug #982036 but no response so far. I think it is time to care if we want to keep emboss for the next stable release. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
