Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
Hello Mattia, > Okay, done, tested, and pushed. I also pushed the new upstream tag > > now, forgot to do it before. > uploaded, enjoy! :) > I just did a couple of tiny (hopefully uncontroversial) changes > before > it. I hope that's fine. Thanks for the cleanup, With the URL's I saw the lintian info, and thought, okay, next time. As for the predantic lintian message, fine as well, I usually don't run these checks though. > For the next one, could you please have a look at enabling parallel > building it, and maybe enabling hardening? The parallel build are enabled, at least in the way I know (i.e. d/rules contains : %: dh $@ --parallel And when I run "gbp buildpackage -j7" it compiles in parallel. Hardening should also be enabled, at least I see the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 compile flag when compiling. I know that there are some lintian warnings that indicate otherwise, but in my experience the compiler sometimes just optimizee things away because it sees that the hardening code is not needed, and then lintian warns about it. Best, Gert
Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 07:46:00PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 17:36 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > > > > > > > > I'll ping you on the list when this is done. > > Thanks. > > > > Okay, done, tested, and pushed. I also pushed the new upstream tag > now, forgot to do it before. uploaded, enjoy! :) I just did a couple of tiny (hopefully uncontroversial) changes before it. I hope that's fine. For the next one, could you please have a look at enabling parallel building it, and maybe enabling hardening? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 17:36 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > > > > > I'll ping you on the list when this is done. > Thanks. > Okay, done, tested, and pushed. I also pushed the new upstream tag now, forgot to do it before. many thanks, Gert
Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
Am Sonntag, den 08.05.2016, 16:42 + schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > > > > - Because upstream set the so-version to 8 I also changed the > > library > > package version to libdcmtk8 (instead of 6). > > - d/copyright overhaul > What about dropping the manual -dbg in favour of the automatic ones? > Well, I'm a bit concerned about the proper upgrade path from these packages. It seems this is not really defined, and since debsym packages don't go into d/control, I also seems that there is no option to define a virtual package -dbg to get this automatically. On the other hand the -dbg popcorn count is very low (2), so maybe there is no real harm in dropping the -dbg package. I'll ping you on the list when this is done. Best, Gert
Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > - Because upstream set the so-version to 8 I also changed the library > package version to libdcmtk8 (instead of 6). > - d/copyright overhaul What about dropping the manual -dbg in favour of the automatic ones? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
I'll do it, hopefully in a bunch of hours. On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 05:31:07PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > I've prepared the latest version of dcmtk in the packaging git for > uploading. The version changes the SO-Name of the library, hence I'd > suggest to upload first to experimental so I can later check whether > all reveres dependencies build properly. this is not really a "suggestion", it's very very very recommended by the Release Team, and it's part of the transitions workflow. https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions Exceptions occour for very simple transitions involving a handful of rdeps, or stuff already ack'ed by the release team. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Request for sponsoring: dcmtk to experimental
Dear all, I've prepared the latest version of dcmtk in the packaging git for uploading. The version changes the SO-Name of the library, hence I'd suggest to upload first to experimental so I can later check whether all reveres dependencies build properly. Major changes: - Because upstream set the so-version to 8 I also changed the library package version to libdcmtk8 (instead of 6). - d/copyright overhaul Many thanks, Gert
