Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 02:28 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:

 - latest Standards-Version is 3.6.1.0,
Fixed
 - you should define man 'SECTION' to 1 in debian/gnome-ppp.sgml,
Fixed
 - you may ask upstream for some strange warnings while compiling like:
 gnome-ppp-wvdialconf.c: In function `on_wvdialconf_out':
Just mailed him
 - (ITP the package, so others will know it's being packaged).
Looks like there's an ITP in BTS, I added Closes: to my changelog

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: GNOME-PPP package is waiting for a sponsor to upload

[Dan Korostelev]

I made a package for gnome-ppp to fix #251472, and now looking for
someone who will upload the package in Debian. It's available on http://
mentors.debian.net, package name is gnome-ppp. Thanks.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

[James Stone]

More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!

still looking for a sponsor..

I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.

I have uploaded the packages to 

http://www.jmstone.dsl.pipex.com/rlplot

Any comments welcomed.

James Stone

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Peter Rockai (mornfall)]

On Monday 28 June 2004 05:43, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
 I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
  The package is available at:
 deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main

 Not Found
 The requested URL /debian was not found on this server.

 Apache/1.3.31 Server at www.kalyxo.org Port 80
Oh, sorry...
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian/ unstable main
I always foget about the funny apache config.

 Regards,

 Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 --
  .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C

 : :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia

 `. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
   `-  |

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Thomas Hood]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 01:59, Dan Korostelev wrote:
 Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
 net. I hope it works.

Here's an improved version of the manpage.   It still needs some work.
--
Thomas
!doctype refentry PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN [

!-- Process this file with docbook-to-man to generate an nroff manual
 page: `docbook-to-man manpage.sgml  manpage.1'.  You may view
 the manual page with: `docbook-to-man manpage.sgml | nroff -man |
 less'.  A typical entry in a Makefile or Makefile.am is:

manpage.1: manpage.sgml
	docbook-to-man $  $@


	The docbook-to-man binary is found in the docbook-to-man package.
	Please remember that if you create the nroff version in one of the
	debian/rules file targets (such as build), you will need to include
	docbook-to-man in your Build-Depends control field.

  --

  !-- Fill in your name for FIRSTNAME and SURNAME. --
  !ENTITY dhfirstname firstnameDan/firstname
  !ENTITY dhsurname   surnameKorostelev/surname
  !-- Please adjust the date whenever revising the manpage. --
  !ENTITY dhdate  date28 June 2004/date
  !-- SECTION should be 1-8, maybe w/ subsection other parameters are
   allowed: see man(7), man(1). --
  !ENTITY dhsection   manvolnum1/manvolnum
  !ENTITY dhemail email[EMAIL PROTECTED]/email
  !ENTITY dhusername  Dan Korostelev
  !ENTITY dhucpackage refentrytitleGNOME-PPP/refentrytitle
  !ENTITY dhpackage   gnome-ppp

  !ENTITY debian  productnameDebian/productname
  !ENTITY gnu acronymGNU/acronym
  !ENTITY gpl gnu; acronymGPL/acronym
]

refentry
  refentryinfo
address
  dhemail;
/address
author
  dhfirstname;
  dhsurname;
/author
copyright
  year2003/year
  holderdhusername;/holder
/copyright
dhdate;
  /refentryinfo
  refmeta
dhucpackage;

dhsection;
  /refmeta
  refnamediv
refnamedhpackage;/refname

refpurposea wvdial PPP account configurer for GNOME/refpurpose
  /refnamediv
  refsynopsisdiv
cmdsynopsis
  commanddhpackage;/command

/cmdsynopsis
  /refsynopsisdiv
  refsect1
titleDESCRIPTION/title

paracommanddhpackage;/command is a GNOME program for easily configuring wvdial PPP accounts. Currently it only supports one account per user./para

paraThis manual page describes the program only briefly.
  The program is more fully documented in the gnu;
  applicationInfo/application format./para

  /refsect1
  refsect1
titleOPTIONS/title

variablelist
  varlistentry
termoption-h/option
  option--help/option
/term
listitem
  paraShow summary of options./para
/listitem
  /varlistentry
  varlistentry
termoption-v/option
  option--version/option
/term
listitem
  paraShow version of program./para
/listitem
  /varlistentry
/variablelist
  /refsect1
  refsect1
titleSEE ALSO/title

parawvdial (1), wvdialconf (1)./para

  /refsect1
  refsect1
titleAUTHOR/title

paraThis manual page was written by dhusername; dhemail; for
  the debian; system (but may be used by others).  Permission is
  granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under
  the terms of the gnu; General Public License, Version 2 any 
	  later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
/para
	para
	  On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public
	  License can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.
	/para

  /refsect1
/refentry

!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
sgml-omittag:t
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
sgml-always-quote-attributes:t
sgml-indent-step:2
sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:nil
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:nil
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
--

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:

 Here's an improved version of the manpage.   It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
and show some details, much like KPPP. I'll write it there. Also it
doesn't have an Info page. Wait for new package with updated manpage.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Pierre HABOUZIT]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:43:28PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
 I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The 
 package is available at:
 deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
 
 Not Found
 The requested URL /debian was not found on this server.
the trailing slash is required :
http://www.kalyxo.org/debian/

cheers,
-- 
Pierre Habouzit
 
http://www.madism.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

[Rene Engelhard]

Hi,

Colin Watson wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
  Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
  Build-Depends even.
 
 /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
 build-essential. XML::Parser does need to be in the build-dependencies.

and perl even is build-essential, too since dpkg-dev is which depends on
perl :)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
  


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

mutiple binary package

[Arnaud FLORENT]

Hi

i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the 
same program.


everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.

i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot 
of documentation!


i can't share the installation scripts (postinst) like i share the 
directory creation.


i v' got a dirs file in the debian directory. The directory structure is 
created for both package. that's great


but my postinst file in the installation script is only created in the 
first package, not both!



so my questions are:
- is multiple binayr package the good way to do this?
- how cani share my installation scripts between package?

Thanks in advance,







--
__
Arnaud FLORENT
IRIS Technologies

phone:  (33) 03 20 65 85 80
fax:(33) 03 20 65 85 81

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:50AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
your debian/copyright file accordingly.

Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of the package on mentors.
debian.net

Run 'grep -ri copyright .' to list all the copyright lines in the
original package.

The copyright file should look like so:

This Debian package was created by Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:37:34 +0400.

The original package was downloaded from http://www.gnome-ppp.org/

Upstream Author: Vladimir Djokic [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright:

Copyright (C) 2004 Vladimir Djokic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copyright (C) 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2002 Anders Carlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
   GNU General Public License for more details.

   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
   along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software
   Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
   02111-1307, USA.

On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgp5ZVNYMls9l.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:50:46PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.

You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpWFd9sG1YeO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

mails (was: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP)

[Nico Golde]

Hello Dan,
why i receive this mails two time?
regards nico
-- 
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69  C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!

I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The 
package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main

I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at [0].

Please fix the lintian/linda warning and errors found at the end of [0].

[0] http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/tmp/amarok_1.0.0-3.log.gz

Lintian:

W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok

Linda:

E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarok.
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarokapp.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but doesn't start with lib.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but is not in Section: libs or base.
E: amarok-xmms; No manual page for binary amarok_xmmswrapper.

The second and third lintian warnings are because the name and email
address in debian/changelog are different to those for the maintainer in
debian/control.

Here's the whereabouts of the package:
ITP bug: 236696 (owned by Alejandro Exojo, but i have his ok to take over)

There is no 'closes: #236696' in the debian/changelog file. Please fix
that as well.

Version: 1.0
Upstream: the amaroK team
Url: http://amarok.kde.org
Description: versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE
 amaroK tries to be a little different, providing a simple drag and drop
 interface  that really makes playlist handling easy.
 .
 Features include:
  - fresh playlist concept, very fast to use, with drag and drop
  - plays all formats supported by aRts, including mp3, ogg,
audio CDs, streams
  - audio effects, like reverb and compressor
  - compatible with the .m3u and .pls formats for playlists
  - nice GUI, integrates into the KDE look, but with a unique touch
 .
 Both aRts and GStreamer support is available in packages amarok-arts and
 amarok-gstreamer, respectively. NMM engine is not yet included.
 .
 The xmms visualisation support is available in package amarok-xmms.

Yours,
Peter

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpcx9S4FeNav.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: mails (was: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP)

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:

 why i receive this mails two time?
CC? (This mail you should recieve only once)

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Peter Rockai (mornfall)]

Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!

I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
The package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
 
 I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at [0].
 
 Please fix the lintian/linda warning and errors found at the end of [0].
 
 [0] http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/tmp/amarok_1.0.0-3.log.gz
 
 Lintian:
 
 W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
 W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
 W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
 W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
 E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
 E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
 E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
First, amarok-* do depend on amarok... no idea what to do about that;
override? I will fix maintainer and changelog, i wanted to make another
build anyway. Manpage will be included as well (not for amarokapp or
amarok_xmmswrapper tho). libamarokarts.so is not a shared library but a
loadable module, i know this is a problem but it's upstream. It's not
critical. Well, changing it is probably quite some work, error-prone and
means diverging from upstream. I will bug them about it tho.

 
 Linda:
 
 E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
 E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
 E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
 E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarok.
 E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarokapp.
 W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but doesn't start with lib.
 W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but is not in Section: libs or
 base. E: amarok-xmms; No manual page for binary amarok_xmmswrapper.
See above.
 
 The second and third lintian warnings are because the name and email
 address in debian/changelog are different to those for the maintainer in
 debian/control.
 
Here's the whereabouts of the package:
ITP bug: 236696 (owned by Alejandro Exojo, but i have his ok to take over)
 
 There is no 'closes: #236696' in the debian/changelog file. Please fix
 that as well.
Yea, in the next upload. This one wasn't meant for unstable upload anyway
(it wasn't done in pbuilder, for one). So i didn't close the ITP bug.

Anyway, does this mean you are willing to upload the package for me? Btw, my
AM (Madkiss) said that missing manpages are not reason to not ask for
sponsor... Nevertheless, i have the (only) relevant one ready now.
 
 Regards,
 
 Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 --
  .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
 : :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
 `. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
   `-  |

Yours,
Peter

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:09 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
 original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
Oh, okay, fixed. We'll be included in next package release.

Any other flaws? ;)

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Thanks for looking, Anibal.

Please see:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian

I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.

I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
file - I made no changes to the original script, although some might be
necessary in the future.

Regards,
Jack

--
Jack Wasey
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk

Quoting Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Please find my packaging of the wonderful 'ketchup' script here:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian/ketchup_0.7.0-1_all.deb

I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read

Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.

your debian/{copyright,changelog,rules} files.

Where are ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz?

Ditto.

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpZQ4TnQjpAH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:

Linda:

E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I had the same on a package oif mine. you are using debhelper.mk in
cdbs, but have an incorrect build-depend on debhelper. run linda with -i
to know better about it.

I already run both lintian and linda with the -i option. The output is
in the log file at [0] 

[0] http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/tmp/amarok_1.0.0-3.log.gz

Here is that ouput:

lintian -i /var/cache/pbuilder/result/amarok_1.0.0-3_i386.changes

W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
N:
N:   The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to
N:   get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore
N:   this warning, but please consider updating the package to current
N:   Policy.
N:
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
N:
N:   When you NMU a package, that fact should be mentioned on the first
N:   line in the changelog entry.
N:
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
N:
N:   A source NMU should have a Debian revision of '-x.x'. This is to
N:   prevent stealing version numbers from the maintainer (and the -x.x.x
N:   version numbers are reserved for binary-only NMU's).
N:
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
N:
N:   Package contains a CVS directory. It was most likely included by
N:   accident, since transient CVS data usually doesn't belong in packages.
N:   Export from CVS rather than use a checkout.
N:
E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
N:
N:   Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin, or /usr/games, must
N:   have a manual page.
N:
N:   Note, that though the `man' program has the capability to check for
N:   several program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs
N:   must have its own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate
N:   manual page is sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as
N:   xman or tkman don't support this.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.1 for details.
N:
E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
N:
N:   If the package installs a symbolic link /usr/share/doc/pkg1 -
N:   pkg2, then pkg1 has to depend on pkg2 with the same version as
N:   pkg1.
N:
N:   Note, that adding the Depends: entry just to fix this bug is not a
N:   good solution. It's suggested that you include a real
N:   /usr/share/doc/pkg1 directory within pkg1 and copy the copyright
N:   file into that directory.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.5 for details.
N:
E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
N:
N:   Although the package includes a shared library, the package does not
N:   have a shlibs control file. If this is intentional, please contact
N:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this so that this exception would be
N:   recognized in future versions of Lintian.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 8.6 for details.
N:
E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp


linda -i /var/cache/pbuilder/result/amarok_1.0.0-3_i386.changes

E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
 This package uses cdbs and includes debhelper.mk, but the version of
 debhelper the package Build-Depends on is too old.  To use
 debhelper.mk you currently must Build-Depend on at least debhelper (=
 4.1.0).
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarok.
 The binary displayed doesn't have a corresponding manual page, while
 Policy dictates that every binary in /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin,
 /usr/games and /usr/X11R6/bin requires a manual page, or at least a
 symlink to the undocumented manual page.
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarokapp.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but doesn't start with lib.
 The package contains one or more shared libraries (.so's), but the
 package name does not start with 'lib'.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but is not in Section: libs
or base.
 This package contains one or more shared libraries, but the package is
 not in Section: libs, or base.
E: amarok-xmms; No manual page for binary amarok_xmmswrapper.

cheers,
-- 
Pierre Habouzit
 
http://www.madism.org/

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpT5vlVYWeTI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: mutiple binary package

[Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
 Hi
Hello.
 
 i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the 
 same program.
 
 everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
 
 i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot 
 of documentation!

In my opinion documentation is quite good.
 
 i can't share the installation scripts (postinst) like i share the 
 directory creation.

Just name them package1.postinst and package2.postinst.
 
 i v' got a dirs file in the debian directory. The directory structure is 
 created for both package. that's great

dirs file could be splitted to. Just create package1.dirs and
package2.dirs.
 
 but my postinst file in the installation script is only created in the 
 first package, not both!

It would be easier if you could provide us some URL to your work. 
 
 so my questions are:
 - is multiple binayr package the good way to do this?

IMHO yes.

 - how cani share my installation scripts between package?

package1.anything and package2.anything ;)
 
 Thanks in advance,

No problem.

regards
fEnIo
-- 
  _  Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | 
IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0)  phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo  http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: mutiple binary package

[Matthew Palmer]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN

HTML in e-mail messages, especially those to Debian lists, is deeply frowned
upon.  Turn it off, and if you can't, switch to a mail program which will
allow you to.

- Matt

Packaging question

[Dan Korostelev]

Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
 ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
 
 Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.
 ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:

 BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
 Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is the one who filed the ITP in the
first place, and Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it. As
I see Dan already corrected it.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Brian Nelson]

Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
 W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
 W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
 W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
 E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
 E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
 E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 First, amarok-* do depend on amarok... no idea what to do about that;
 override? I will fix maintainer and changelog, i wanted to make another
 build anyway. Manpage will be included as well (not for amarokapp or
 amarok_xmmswrapper tho). libamarokarts.so is not a shared library but a
 loadable module, i know this is a problem but it's upstream. 

It can't go in /usr/lib then.  It would have to go in /usr/lib/amarok/
or something instead.


 It's not critical. Well, changing it is probably quite some work,
 error-prone and means diverging from upstream. I will bug them about
 it tho.

No, that doesn't sound like it would be the right thing to do...

-- 
You win again, gravity!

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 17:57 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:

 Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it.
He also said to me that he'll check the package tonight and upload it to
Debian if all will be okay.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mozilla locale packages

[Dan Korostelev]

Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Thomas Hood]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:35, Dan Korostelev wrote:
 On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
 
  Here's an improved version of the manpage.   It still needs some work.

 GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
 graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
 and show some details, much like KPPP. I'll write it there. Also it
 doesn't have an Info page. Wait for new package with updated manpage.


Your new manpage still contains superfluous material:

This manual page documents briefly the
 gnome-ppp command.

Superfluous.


   This  manual  page was written for the Debian
   distribution  because  the  original  program
   does not have a manual page.


Save this for the AUTHORS section.


  gnome-ppp is a GNOME program for easy config-
  uring and dialing  PPP  dialup  accounts.


... for configuration and control of PPP dialup accounts.


  It
  uses  wvdial as its dialing backend and stor-
  ing accound configuration in wvdial.conf for-
  mat,  that  can be used by plain wvdial.


gnome-ppp is a front end for wvdial.  Thus, PPP
accounts set up using gnome-ppp can be used if
you run wvdial from the command line.


  Cur-
  rently it only supports one account per user,
  but  multiple accounts configuring is planned
  for near future.


Don't document features that are only promised.  That is
useless information.  If the feature is added later then
you can add a description of the feature to the man page
at that time.


  GNOME   PPP   can   also   dock   into   your
  GNOME/XFCE4/others notification area and show
  connection detail while connected.  See  pro-
  gram's setup window.


In the setup dialog you can configure gnome-ppp
to provide connection information in the desktop
notification area.


  These  programs  follow the usual GNU command
  line syntax, with long options starting  with
  two  dashes  (`-').


Superfluous.


  A summary of options is included below.


Superfluous.


  For a complete  description, see the Info files.


These files are not included so they should not be mentioned.

--
Thomas Hood

Changes to copyright file upon package adoption

[Frederik Dannemare]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm 
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to 
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.

Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package 
was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to 
reflect new maintainership?

Thanks in advance.
- -- 
Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A  F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA4E/1LSX61ZxOtagRAm7dAJ9DRP1X4WqfZt9X2/Uapjw3dKWDrQCgjBn0
QBX2TVoXHgm0Q0go22eFF0o=
=kLxF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Changes to copyright file upon package adoption

[Adeodato Simó]

* Frederik Dannemare [Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:54 +0200]:
 Hi,

 I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm 
 currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to 
 reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.

 Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package 
 was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to 
 reflect new maintainership?

  read, e.g., /usr/share/doc/mutt/copyright (and many many others):

This package was originally debianized by Stephen Pitts 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:04:20 -0600.

The next debian maintainer was J.H.M. Dassen [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Current debian maintainer is Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] (since sept. 
1998).

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Raimundo Amador - Juan El Golosina
 
There is no man so good who, were he to submit all his thoughts to the
laws, would not deserve hanging ten times in his life
-- Michel de Montaigne

Re: Changes to copyright file upon package adoption

[Andreas Metzler]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:05:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
 I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm 
 currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to 
 reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.
 
 Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package 
 was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to 
 reflect new maintainership?

Policy 12.5 It should name the original authors of the package and
the Debian maintainer(s) who were involved with its creation.

I'd suggest to use something like

Current Maintainer: you

Originally packaged by: somebody else.
  cu andreas

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Пнд, 2004-06-28 at 18:41 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:

 This manual page documents briefly the
  gnome-ppp command.
 Superfluous.
Removed.

This  manual  page was written for the Debian
distribution  because  the  original  program
does not have a manual page.
 Save this for the AUTHORS section.
Removed.

   gnome-ppp is a GNOME program for easy config-
   uring and dialing  PPP  dialup  accounts.
 ... for configuration and control of PPP dialup accounts.
Fixed.

   It uses  wvdial as its dialing backend and stor-
 gnome-ppp is a front end for wvdial.  Thus, PPP
 accounts set up using gnome-ppp can be used if
 you run wvdial from the command line.
Fixed with some corrections.

   Currently it only supports one account per user,
 Don't document features that are only promised.
Removed.

   GNOME   PPP   can   also   dock   into   your
 In the setup dialog you can configure gnome-ppp
 to provide connection information in the desktop
 notification area.
Fixed with some addition.

   These  programs  follow the usual GNU command
 Superfluous.
Removed

   A summary of options is included below.
 Superfluous.
Removed all, excepting --version, that's reckognized by gnome-ppp and
shows its current version.

   For a complete  description, see the Info files.
 These files are not included so they should not be mentioned.
Oh, yep, removed.

Changes will be available in next package revision (I don't think it's
good thing to upgrade the package just because of manpage upgrade, I
have 5 package revisions already, so I won't update it now)

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mozilla locale packages

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:

 Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
 Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
 package.
 See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the next mirror pulse (~ 23h CET). Ofcourse you are right, they are
almost similar to each other. Please notify Aurelien Jarno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] when your package is ready and in the pool, so he
can add autochoose support for it.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS

RFS: yaffa-0.11 -- secure ftp client - new upstream release

[Mark Wilson]

Greetings,

i am still looking a sponsor for package yaffa.

Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.

Package name   : yaffa

Version: 0.10-1
Upstream Authors   : Anton Persson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

URL: http://moyaffa.sourceforge.net



Licence: GNU General Public License

Copyright  : YAFFA/MoYAFFA is (c) 2003 by Anton Persson  [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]

Description: FTP Client supporting secure transfers via ssh protocol

YAFFA, is a filemanager and FTP client with support for secure FTP.

It includes a GTK front end and console mode.

Includes an editable scriptlist, configurable button grid (gui).

With Yaffa it is possible to call, for example, less or cat or any other 
program you wish to run directly
from within Yaffa

The development is on-going, version 1.0 will be released sometime this 
summer.


Anybody interested in sponsoring this package?

Package available from: http://members.aon.at/wilswilson

Regards

   Wils

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

[Brian Nelson]

Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
  Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
 a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

Maybe kernel-package?

-- 
You win again, gravity!

Watch file question.

[Dan Korostelev]

I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: disk full on m.d.o?

[Christoph Haas]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
 Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
 answer yet.

Sorry for the delay. I still didn't find time to reply to the ticket.
Shame on me. :)

We are currently investigating. But our disks have enough empty space
left. Perhaps an issue with our backup software.

Thanks for telling us.

 Christoph

-- 
~
~
.signature [Modified] 3 lines --100%--3,41 All

Re: Watch file question.

[Lucas Wall]

Dan Korostelev wrote, On 06/28/2004 06:17 PM:

I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.


It is...

K.

--
Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buenos Aires, Argentina
http://www.kadath.com.ar
PGP  1024D/84FB46D6  5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356A  4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6
version=2
http://www.gnome-ppp.org/download.php \
download/[\d\.]+/gnome-ppp-([\d\.]+).tar.bz2 debian


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 W: gnome-ppp: manpage-section-mismatch usr/share/man/man1/gnome-ppp.1.gz:54 1 != 
 SECTION
Fixed

 There is no closes: #251472 in your debian/changelog file to close the
 ITP.
Fixed

 BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
Dunno ;)

 Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
 your debian/copyright file accordingly.
Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of the package on mentors.
debian.net

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: GNOME-PPP package is waiting for a sponsor to upload

[Dan Korostelev]

I made a package for gnome-ppp to fix #251472, and now looking for
someone who will upload the package in Debian. It's available on http://
mentors.debian.net, package name is gnome-ppp. Thanks.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: rlplot - generate publication quality graphs

[James Stone]

More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!

still looking for a sponsor..

I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.

I have uploaded the packages to 

http://www.jmstone.dsl.pipex.com/rlplot

Any comments welcomed.

James Stone



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Thomas Hood]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 01:59, Dan Korostelev wrote:
 Now you can download the test package of GNOME PPP from mentors.debian.
 net. I hope it works.

Here's an improved version of the manpage.   It still needs some work.
--
Thomas
!doctype refentry PUBLIC -//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN [

!-- Process this file with docbook-to-man to generate an nroff manual
 page: `docbook-to-man manpage.sgml  manpage.1'.  You may view
 the manual page with: `docbook-to-man manpage.sgml | nroff -man |
 less'.  A typical entry in a Makefile or Makefile.am is:

manpage.1: manpage.sgml
	docbook-to-man $  $@


	The docbook-to-man binary is found in the docbook-to-man package.
	Please remember that if you create the nroff version in one of the
	debian/rules file targets (such as build), you will need to include
	docbook-to-man in your Build-Depends control field.

  --

  !-- Fill in your name for FIRSTNAME and SURNAME. --
  !ENTITY dhfirstname firstnameDan/firstname
  !ENTITY dhsurname   surnameKorostelev/surname
  !-- Please adjust the date whenever revising the manpage. --
  !ENTITY dhdate  date28 June 2004/date
  !-- SECTION should be 1-8, maybe w/ subsection other parameters are
   allowed: see man(7), man(1). --
  !ENTITY dhsection   manvolnum1/manvolnum
  !ENTITY dhemail email[EMAIL PROTECTED]/email
  !ENTITY dhusername  Dan Korostelev
  !ENTITY dhucpackage refentrytitleGNOME-PPP/refentrytitle
  !ENTITY dhpackage   gnome-ppp

  !ENTITY debian  productnameDebian/productname
  !ENTITY gnu acronymGNU/acronym
  !ENTITY gpl gnu; acronymGPL/acronym
]

refentry
  refentryinfo
address
  dhemail;
/address
author
  dhfirstname;
  dhsurname;
/author
copyright
  year2003/year
  holderdhusername;/holder
/copyright
dhdate;
  /refentryinfo
  refmeta
dhucpackage;

dhsection;
  /refmeta
  refnamediv
refnamedhpackage;/refname

refpurposea wvdial PPP account configurer for GNOME/refpurpose
  /refnamediv
  refsynopsisdiv
cmdsynopsis
  commanddhpackage;/command

/cmdsynopsis
  /refsynopsisdiv
  refsect1
titleDESCRIPTION/title

paracommanddhpackage;/command is a GNOME program for easily configuring wvdial PPP accounts. Currently it only supports one account per user./para

paraThis manual page describes the program only briefly.
  The program is more fully documented in the gnu;
  applicationInfo/application format./para

  /refsect1
  refsect1
titleOPTIONS/title

variablelist
  varlistentry
termoption-h/option
  option--help/option
/term
listitem
  paraShow summary of options./para
/listitem
  /varlistentry
  varlistentry
termoption-v/option
  option--version/option
/term
listitem
  paraShow version of program./para
/listitem
  /varlistentry
/variablelist
  /refsect1
  refsect1
titleSEE ALSO/title

parawvdial (1), wvdialconf (1)./para

  /refsect1
  refsect1
titleAUTHOR/title

paraThis manual page was written by dhusername; dhemail; for
  the debian; system (but may be used by others).  Permission is
  granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under
  the terms of the gnu; General Public License, Version 2 any 
	  later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
/para
	para
	  On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public
	  License can be found in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.
	/para

  /refsect1
/refentry

!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
sgml-omittag:t
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
sgml-always-quote-attributes:t
sgml-indent-step:2
sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-parent-document:nil
sgml-default-dtd-file:nil
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
sgml-local-catalogs:nil
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
End:
--

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:

 Here's an improved version of the manpage.   It still needs some work.
GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
and show some details, much like KPPP. I'll write it there. Also it
doesn't have an Info page. Wait for new package with updated manpage.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Pierre HABOUZIT]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:43:28PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
 I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The 
 package is available at:
 deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
 
 Not Found
 The requested URL /debian was not found on this server.
the trailing slash is required :
http://www.kalyxo.org/debian/

cheers,
-- 
Pierre Habouzit
 
http://www.madism.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

[Rene Engelhard]

Hi,

Colin Watson wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
  Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
  Build-Depends even.
 
 /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
 build-essential. XML::Parser does need to be in the build-dependencies.

and perl even is build-essential, too since dpkg-dev is which depends on
perl :)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
  


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

mutiple binary package

[Arnaud FLORENT]

Hi
i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the 
same program.

everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot 
of documentation!

i can't share the installation scripts (postinst) like i share the 
directory creation.

i v' got a dirs file in the debian directory. The directory structure is 
created for both package. that's great

but my postinst file in the installation script is only created in the 
first package, not both!

so my questions are:
- is multiple binayr package the good way to do this?
- how cani share my installation scripts between package?
Thanks in advance,



--
__
Arnaud FLORENT
IRIS Technologies
phone:  (33) 03 20 65 85 80
fax:(33) 03 20 65 85 81
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:01:50AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 13:30 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Your debian/copyright file is broken. Please read [0] and [1] and change
your debian/copyright file accordingly.

Somehow fixed, please check the revision 3 of the package on mentors.
debian.net

Run 'grep -ri copyright .' to list all the copyright lines in the
original package.

The copyright file should look like so:

This Debian package was created by Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:37:34 +0400.

The original package was downloaded from http://www.gnome-ppp.org/

Upstream Author: Vladimir Djokic [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright:

Copyright (C) 2004 Vladimir Djokic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copyright (C) 2003 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Copyright (C) 2002 Anders Carlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
   GNU General Public License for more details.

   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
   along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software
   Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA
   02111-1307, USA.

On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpWAsHzsGzb8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:50:46PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Okay, new (-4) package uploaded with new manpage and copyright file.

You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpMMAqexf0sy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

mails (was: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP)

[Nico Golde]

Hello Dan,
why i receive this mails two time?
regards nico
-- 
Nico Golde - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.ngolde.de
GPG: FF46 E565 5CC1 E2E5 3F69  C739 1D87 E549 7364 7CFF
Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!

I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application. The 
package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main

I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at [0].

Please fix the lintian/linda warning and errors found at the end of [0].

[0] http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/tmp/amarok_1.0.0-3.log.gz

Lintian:

W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok

Linda:

E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarok.
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarokapp.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but doesn't start with lib.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but is not in Section: libs or base.
E: amarok-xmms; No manual page for binary amarok_xmmswrapper.

The second and third lintian warnings are because the name and email
address in debian/changelog are different to those for the maintainer in
debian/control.

Here's the whereabouts of the package:
ITP bug: 236696 (owned by Alejandro Exojo, but i have his ok to take over)

There is no 'closes: #236696' in the debian/changelog file. Please fix
that as well.

Version: 1.0
Upstream: the amaroK team
Url: http://amarok.kde.org
Description: versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE
 amaroK tries to be a little different, providing a simple drag and drop
 interface  that really makes playlist handling easy.
 .
 Features include:
  - fresh playlist concept, very fast to use, with drag and drop
  - plays all formats supported by aRts, including mp3, ogg,
audio CDs, streams
  - audio effects, like reverb and compressor
  - compatible with the .m3u and .pls formats for playlists
  - nice GUI, integrates into the KDE look, but with a unique touch
 .
 Both aRts and GStreamer support is available in packages amarok-arts and
 amarok-gstreamer, respectively. NMM engine is not yet included.
 .
 The xmms visualisation support is available in package amarok-xmms.

Yours,
Peter

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgp267YosUvjF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: mails (was: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP)

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 12:28 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:

 why i receive this mails two time?
CC? (This mail you should recieve only once)

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Peter Rockai (mornfall)]

Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:23:52PM +0200, Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
Hello!

I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
The package is available at:
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
 
 I run pbuilder on the source debian package. The output is at [0].
 
 Please fix the lintian/linda warning and errors found at the end of [0].
 
 [0] http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/tmp/amarok_1.0.0-3.log.gz
 
 Lintian:
 
 W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
 W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
 W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
 W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
 E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
 E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
 E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
First, amarok-* do depend on amarok... no idea what to do about that;
override? I will fix maintainer and changelog, i wanted to make another
build anyway. Manpage will be included as well (not for amarokapp or
amarok_xmmswrapper tho). libamarokarts.so is not a shared library but a
loadable module, i know this is a problem but it's upstream. It's not
critical. Well, changing it is probably quite some work, error-prone and
means diverging from upstream. I will bug them about it tho.

 
 Linda:
 
 E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
 E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
 E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
 E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarok.
 E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarokapp.
 W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but doesn't start with lib.
 W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but is not in Section: libs or
 base. E: amarok-xmms; No manual page for binary amarok_xmmswrapper.
See above.
 
 The second and third lintian warnings are because the name and email
 address in debian/changelog are different to those for the maintainer in
 debian/control.
 
Here's the whereabouts of the package:
ITP bug: 236696 (owned by Alejandro Exojo, but i have his ok to take over)
 
 There is no 'closes: #236696' in the debian/changelog file. Please fix
 that as well.
Yea, in the next upload. This one wasn't meant for unstable upload anyway
(it wasn't done in pbuilder, for one). So i didn't close the ITP bug.

Anyway, does this mean you are willing to upload the package for me? Btw, my
AM (Madkiss) said that missing manpages are not reason to not ask for
sponsor... Nevertheless, i have the (only) relevant one ready now.
 
 Regards,
 
 Anibal Monsalve Salazar
 --
  .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
 : :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
 `. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
   `-  |

Yours,
Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mutiple binary package

[Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
 Hi
Hello.
 
 i want to build 2 packages that install two different versions of the 
 same program.
 
 everything is shared between the 2 packages except the binary files.
 
 i try to use the dh_make in multiple binary mode, but there is not a lot 
 of documentation!

In my opinion documentation is quite good.
 
 i can't share the installation scripts (postinst) like i share the 
 directory creation.

Just name them package1.postinst and package2.postinst.
 
 i v' got a dirs file in the debian directory. The directory structure is 
 created for both package. that's great

dirs file could be splitted to. Just create package1.dirs and
package2.dirs.
 
 but my postinst file in the installation script is only created in the 
 first package, not both!

It would be easier if you could provide us some URL to your work. 
 
 so my questions are:
 - is multiple binayr package the good way to do this?

IMHO yes.

 - how cani share my installation scripts between package?

package1.anything and package2.anything ;)
 
 Thanks in advance,

No problem.

regards
fEnIo
-- 
  _  Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0)  phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo  http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Pierre HABOUZIT]

  
  Linda:
  
  E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
  E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
  E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
 Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I had the same on a package oif mine. you are using debhelper.mk in
cdbs, but have an incorrect build-depend on debhelper. run linda with -i
to know better about it.

cheers,
-- 
Pierre Habouzit
 
http://www.madism.org/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: mutiple binary package

[Arnaud FLORENT]

Thanks

i'va found a solution
i made link from files dirs postinst ... to package1.dirs
package1.postinst package2.dirs package2.postinst
that works but i thought there would exist a better solution.



Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo a crit:

  On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 11:11:41AM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
  
   
  
  
i can't share the installation scripts (postinst) like i share the 
directory creation.

  
  
Just name them package1.postinst and package2.postinst.
 
  
  
i v' got a dirs file in the debian directory. The directory structure is 
created for both package. that's great

  
  
dirs file could be splitted to. Just create package1.dirs and
package2.dirs.
 
  
  
but my postinst file in the installation script is only created in the 
first package, not both!

  
  
It would be easier if you could provide us some URL to your work. 
 
  
  
so my questions are:
- is multiple binayr package the good way to do this?

  
  
IMHO yes.

  
  
- how cani share my installation scripts between package?

  
  
package1.anything and package2.anything ;)
 
  
  
Thanks in advance,

  
  
No problem.

regards
fEnIo
  


-- 
__
 Arnaud FLORENT
 IRIS Technologies

 phone:	(33) 03 20 65 85 80
 fax:	(33) 03 20 65 85 81

 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 20:09 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 You didn't put your name, your email address and web site (from where the
 original package was downloaded) in the copyright file.
Oh, okay, fixed. We'll be included in next package release.

Any other flaws? ;)

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 08:41:22AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Thanks for looking, Anibal.

Please see:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian

I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.

I've added the requested files and an index page. N.b. I do not have a diff.gz
file - I made no changes to the original script, although some might be
necessary in the future.

Regards,
Jack

--
Jack Wasey
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk

Quoting Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Jack Wasey wrote:
Please find my packaging of the wonderful 'ketchup' script here:
http://www.jackwasey.co.uk/debian/ketchup_0.7.0-1_all.deb

I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read

Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.

your debian/{copyright,changelog,rules} files.

Where are ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz?

Ditto.

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpaH4dMFV8Np.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Anibal Monsalve Salazar]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:03:52PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:

Linda:

E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp
E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
Hmm, what should i do here? Tighten up the version on cdbs build-dep?
I had the same on a package oif mine. you are using debhelper.mk in
cdbs, but have an incorrect build-depend on debhelper. run linda with -i
to know better about it.

I already run both lintian and linda with the -i option. The output is
in the log file at [0] 

[0] http://www-personal.monash.edu.au/~anibal/tmp/amarok_1.0.0-3.log.gz

Here is that ouput:

lintian -i /var/cache/pbuilder/result/amarok_1.0.0-3_i386.changes

W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
N:
N:   The source package refers to a 'Standards-Version' that is starting to
N:   get out of date, compared to current Policy. You can safely ignore
N:   this warning, but please consider updating the package to current
N:   Policy.
N:
W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
N:
N:   When you NMU a package, that fact should be mentioned on the first
N:   line in the changelog entry.
N:
W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
N:
N:   A source NMU should have a Debian revision of '-x.x'. This is to
N:   prevent stealing version numbers from the maintainer (and the -x.x.x
N:   version numbers are reserved for binary-only NMU's).
N:
W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
N:
N:   Package contains a CVS directory. It was most likely included by
N:   accident, since transient CVS data usually doesn't belong in packages.
N:   Export from CVS rather than use a checkout.
N:
E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
N:
N:   Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin, or /usr/games, must
N:   have a manual page.
N:
N:   Note, that though the `man' program has the capability to check for
N:   several program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs
N:   must have its own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate
N:   manual page is sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as
N:   xman or tkman don't support this.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.1 for details.
N:
E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
N:
N:   If the package installs a symbolic link /usr/share/doc/pkg1 -
N:   pkg2, then pkg1 has to depend on pkg2 with the same version as
N:   pkg1.
N:
N:   Note, that adding the Depends: entry just to fix this bug is not a
N:   good solution. It's suggested that you include a real
N:   /usr/share/doc/pkg1 directory within pkg1 and copy the copyright
N:   file into that directory.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 12.5 for details.
N:
E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
N:
N:   Although the package includes a shared library, the package does not
N:   have a shlibs control file. If this is intentional, please contact
N:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this so that this exception would be
N:   recognized in future versions of Lintian.
N:
N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 8.6 for details.
N:
E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarok
E: amarok: binary-without-manpage amarokapp


linda -i /var/cache/pbuilder/result/amarok_1.0.0-3_i386.changes

E: amarok; Uses cdbs and debhelper.mk, but the version is too old.
 This package uses cdbs and includes debhelper.mk, but the version of
 debhelper the package Build-Depends on is too old.  To use
 debhelper.mk you currently must Build-Depend on at least debhelper (=
 4.1.0).
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarok.
 The binary displayed doesn't have a corresponding manual page, while
 Policy dictates that every binary in /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin,
 /usr/games and /usr/X11R6/bin requires a manual page, or at least a
 symlink to the undocumented manual page.
E: amarok; No manual page for binary amarokapp.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but doesn't start with lib.
 The package contains one or more shared libraries (.so's), but the
 package name does not start with 'lib'.
W: amarok-arts; Contains shared libraries, but is not in Section: libs
or base.
 This package contains one or more shared libraries, but the package is
 not in Section: libs, or base.
E: amarok-xmms; No manual page for binary amarok_xmmswrapper.

cheers,
-- 
Pierre Habouzit
 
http://www.madism.org/

Regards,

Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
 .''`.  Debian GNU/Linux  | Building 28C
: :' :  Free Operating System | Monash University VIC 3800, Australia
`. `'   http://debian.org/| http://www-personal.monash.edu/~anibal/
  `-  |


pgpzwJtyb4awB.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: mutiple binary package

[Matthew Palmer]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 02:11:31PM +0200, Arnaud FLORENT wrote:
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN

HTML in e-mail messages, especially those to Debian lists, is deeply frowned
upon.  Turn it off, and if you can't, switch to a mail program which will
allow you to.

- Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Packaging question

[Dan Korostelev]

Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
from deb package???

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packaging question

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 19:41:27 +0400]:

 Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
 from deb package???
 Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the 'make
install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
the idea.

Hope this helps,
Laszlo/GCS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
 Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

 I would like to get hold of your ketchup_0.7.0-1.{dsc,diff.gz} and
 ketchup_orig_0.7.0.tar.gz files. I want to run pbuilder on them and read
 
 Wrong filename. ketchup_0.7.0_orig.tar.gz is the right filename.
 ketchup_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz is the correct one.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Looking for a sponsor to upload GNOME PPP

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

Hi Colin, Rene,

* Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 10:29:32 +0200]:

 Colin Watson wrote:
  On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:15:58AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
   Anyway I think as perl is not build-essential, itself should show up in
   Build-Depends even.
  
  /usr/bin/perl is in perl-base, which is Essential and therefore
  build-essential. XML::Parser does need to be in the build-dependencies.
 
 and perl even is build-essential, too since dpkg-dev is which depends on
 perl :)
 Both are you correct. I stand corrected. Thanks.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 13:30:28 +1000]:

 BTW, why http://bugs.debian.org/251472 has Goedson Teixeira Paixao
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] as owner of the ITP?
 Goedson made a mistake, he wants to sponsor the upload, but he wrongly
put himself as the owner. But Dan is the one who filed the ITP in the
first place, and Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it. As
I see Dan already corrected it.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

[Brian Nelson]

Peter Rockai (mornfall) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:

 W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0
 W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
 W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3
 W: amarok source: source-contains-CVS-dir debian/CVS
 E: amarok-xmms: binary-without-manpage amarok_xmmswrapper
 E: amarok-xmms: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-gstreamer: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 E: amarok-arts: no-shlibs-control-file usr/lib/libamarokarts.so
 E: amarok-arts: usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency amarok
 First, amarok-* do depend on amarok... no idea what to do about that;
 override? I will fix maintainer and changelog, i wanted to make another
 build anyway. Manpage will be included as well (not for amarokapp or
 amarok_xmmswrapper tho). libamarokarts.so is not a shared library but a
 loadable module, i know this is a problem but it's upstream. 

It can't go in /usr/lib then.  It would have to go in /usr/lib/amarok/
or something instead.


 It's not critical. Well, changing it is probably quite some work,
 error-prone and means diverging from upstream. I will bug them about
 it tho.

No, that doesn't sound like it would be the right thing to do...

-- 
You win again, gravity!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packaging question

[Andreas Metzler]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:41:27PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
 Is it possible to make some files installed by 'make install' excluded
 from deb package???

Sure.
rm debian/package/blah/fasel
in debian/rules after make install.
cu andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packaging question

[Dan Korostelev]

On , 2004-06-28 at 17:48 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:

  Delete them after 'make install' from debian/rules . You may tamper
 with the Makefile as well, but be it as a last resort, only if the 'make
 install' create big files/files after a long calculation etc, you got
 the idea.
Okay understood. I didn't want to alter Makefiles, because my package
installs empty docs files in /usr/doc, but It looks like it's impossible
to build a deb package w/o total Makefile.am  configure.in fixing,
because crappy build environment, generated by some old buggy version
Anjuta. The software is UrlGfe (http://urlget.sf.net). I'm stuck.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: netdump -- Dump kernel crash information over the network

[Chirag Kantharia]

[Second attempt for seeking a sponsor]

Hi!

I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for
a sponsor for this package.

The netdump client sets up the kernel to send crash dumps and/or
console messages as syslog packets to a remote system.

The netdump server listens to the network for crashed kernels to
contact it and then writes the oops log and a memory dump to
/var/crash before asking the crashed machine to reboot.

Netdump relies on CONFIG_NETCONSOLE=m set in the kernel configuration,
which is not present in 2.4 series Debian kernels, but is present in
2.6 series Debian kernels. So the package will not work with 2.4
Debian kernels.

More information about netdump can be got from:
http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/netdump/

I have got permission from netdump's current maintainer Jeff Moyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to include it in the Debian, and who is happy to
see its inclusion.

Regards,

-- 
Chirag Kantharia, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgpJUpmDvn5ea.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Dan Korostelev]

On , 2004-06-28 at 17:57 +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:

 Goedson does not want to package, _only sponsor_ it.
He also said to me that he'll check the package tonight and upload it to
Debian if all will be okay.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Mozilla locale packages

[Dan Korostelev]

Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
package.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNOME PPP uploaded to mentors.debian.net

[Thomas Hood]

On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:35, Dan Korostelev wrote:
 On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 09:17 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
 
  Here's an improved version of the manpage.   It still needs some work.

 GNOME PPP is not only a accound configurer like wvdialconf. It is a
 graphical frontend, a graphical dialer. It can dial, show status icon
 and show some details, much like KPPP. I'll write it there. Also it
 doesn't have an Info page. Wait for new package with updated manpage.


Your new manpage still contains superfluous material:

This manual page documents briefly the
 gnome-ppp command.

Superfluous.


   This  manual  page was written for the Debian
   distribution  because  the  original  program
   does not have a manual page.


Save this for the AUTHORS section.


  gnome-ppp is a GNOME program for easy config-
  uring and dialing  PPP  dialup  accounts.


... for configuration and control of PPP dialup accounts.


  It
  uses  wvdial as its dialing backend and stor-
  ing accound configuration in wvdial.conf for-
  mat,  that  can be used by plain wvdial.


gnome-ppp is a front end for wvdial.  Thus, PPP
accounts set up using gnome-ppp can be used if
you run wvdial from the command line.


  Cur-
  rently it only supports one account per user,
  but  multiple accounts configuring is planned
  for near future.


Don't document features that are only promised.  That is
useless information.  If the feature is added later then
you can add a description of the feature to the man page
at that time.


  GNOME   PPP   can   also   dock   into   your
  GNOME/XFCE4/others notification area and show
  connection detail while connected.  See  pro-
  gram's setup window.


In the setup dialog you can configure gnome-ppp
to provide connection information in the desktop
notification area.


  These  programs  follow the usual GNU command
  line syntax, with long options starting  with
  two  dashes  (`-').


Superfluous.


  A summary of options is included below.


Superfluous.


  For a complete  description, see the Info files.


These files are not included so they should not be mentioned.

--
Thomas Hood



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Changes to copyright file upon package adoption

[Frederik Dannemare]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm 
currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to 
reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.

Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package 
was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to 
reflect new maintainership?

Thanks in advance.
- -- 
Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A  F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA4E/1LSX61ZxOtagRAm7dAJ9DRP1X4WqfZt9X2/Uapjw3dKWDrQCgjBn0
QBX2TVoXHgm0Q0go22eFF0o=
=kLxF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: Changes to copyright file upon package adoption

[Adeodato Simó]

* Frederik Dannemare [Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:05:54 +0200]:
 Hi,

 I'm in the process of adopting the package 'motion' (Bug#254336). I'm 
 currently reviewing the package files and updating them accordingly to 
 reflect new maintainership, plus various small fixes.

 Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package 
 was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to 
 reflect new maintainership?

  read, e.g., /usr/share/doc/mutt/copyright (and many many others):

This package was originally debianized by Stephen Pitts 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:04:20 -0600.

The next debian maintainer was J.H.M. Dassen [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Current debian maintainer is Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] (since sept. 1998).

-- 
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Raimundo Amador - Juan El Golosina
 
There is no man so good who, were he to submit all his thoughts to the
laws, would not deserve hanging ten times in his life
-- Michel de Montaigne


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mozilla locale packages

[Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi]

* Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 20:39:41 +0400]:

 Is there an easy and automated way to create a mozilla locale package?
 Looks like they're all similar. Debian lacks russian mozilla locale
 package.
 See my mozilla-locale-hu package, will be available from the pool, after
the next mirror pulse (~ 23h CET). Ofcourse you are right, they are
almost similar to each other. Please notify Aurelien Jarno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] when your package is ready and in the pool, so he
can add autochoose support for it.

Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: yaffa-0.11 -- secure ftp client - new upstream release

[Mark Wilson]

Greetings,
i am still looking a sponsor for package yaffa.
Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
Package name   : yaffa
Version: 0.10-1
Upstream Authors   : Anton Persson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://moyaffa.sourceforge.net

Licence: GNU General Public License
Copyright  : YAFFA/MoYAFFA is (c) 2003 by Anton Persson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: FTP Client supporting secure transfers via ssh protocol
YAFFA, is a filemanager and FTP client with support for secure FTP.
It includes a GTK front end and console mode.
Includes an editable scriptlist, configurable button grid (gui).
With Yaffa it is possible to call, for example, less or cat or any other program you 
wish to run directly
from within Yaffa
The development is on-going, version 1.0 will be released sometime this 
summer.

Anybody interested in sponsoring this package?
Package available from: http://members.aon.at/wilswilson
Regards
   Wils
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

[Brian Nelson]

Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 * Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]:

 I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO.
  Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding
 a backage which would include ketchup sounds a better idea.

Maybe kernel-package?

-- 
You win again, gravity!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Watch file question.

[Dan Korostelev]

I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.

-- 
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: disk full on m.d.o?

[Christoph Haas]

On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 01:53:11AM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
 Then who can be reached? I have sent a mail to that address back then, no
 answer yet.

Sorry for the delay. I still didn't find time to reply to the ticket.
Shame on me. :)

We are currently investigating. But our disks have enough empty space
left. Perhaps an issue with our backup software.

Thanks for telling us.

 Christoph

-- 
~
~
.signature [Modified] 3 lines --100%--3,41 All


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Watch file question.

[Lucas Wall]

Dan Korostelev wrote, On 06/28/2004 06:17 PM:
I'm again about GNOME PPP. Please, someone who knows, look at
www.gnome-ppp.org and tell me if it's possible to write a debian watch
file for it. I guess no, but maybe.
It is...
K.
--
Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buenos Aires, Argentina
http://www.kadath.com.ar
PGP  1024D/84FB46D6  5D25 528A 83AB 489B 356A  4087 BC9B 4733 84FB 46D6
version=2
http://www.gnome-ppp.org/download.php \
download/[\d\.]+/gnome-ppp-([\d\.]+).tar.bz2 debian


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature