Re: Rhide package
I am developing with DJGPP since 12 years and use RHIDE (on a P2/333 with 128MB) and HAVE HAD the RHIDE under Linux as self-made Debian Package. Unfortunatly my HDD was crashed and I have lost the sourcecode of the Linux version of RHIDE including its Web-Location. I have alre4ady asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nobody know, where I can get the to linux ported version... Please can you provide me with a Link? http://www.rhide.com/download/main.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The GIMP plugins for refocussing blurred images
Heya, actually I'm looking more for somebody who has an actual use-case for those plugins and is willing to test them with a recent version of gimp, I didn't even think about finishing the packages yet. The code is unmaintained for years, and the refocus under gimp 2 is more or less a hack... I don't want to spend time on finishing the package if it doesn't make a sense, especially since upstream seems to be dead. The math used in the plugins is nothing I could fix, otherwise I would just finish the packages, find a sponsor and just wait for bug-reports. Cheers, Bernd Matthias Julius wrote: This question is better placed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] So, I am crossposting it there Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, since I'm not only a geek but also a photographer and GIMP user I've decided to have a look at wnpp bug #398765 [1] and package the plugin [2]. While packaging gimp-refocus I came across the refocus-it plugin, which uses a different algorithm and also supports to refocus motion blur, so I've decided to package it, too [3]. It seems to be much slower, though - but it provides a command-line version which works totally independent of The GIMP, it only depends on libc6. I've commented and described the issues of both plugins at the given urls, testing and comments would be very appreciated. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=398765 [2] http://bzed.de/debian/packages/gimp-refocus [3] http://bzed.de/debian/packages/gimp-refocus-it Thanks a lot, Bernd Zeimetz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: gnu-smalltalk (updated package)
Hello, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3.3-1 of my package gnu-smalltalk. This upload would close the ITA #375649. It builds these binary packages: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk virtual machine gnu-smalltalk-common - GNU Smalltalk class library gnu-smalltalk-doc - GNU Smalltalk info documentation gnu-smalltalk-el - GNU Smalltalk Emacs front-end The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 233365, 255416, 297113, 301573, 306045, 307238, 356043, 375649, 398571 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk_2.3.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thanks, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The GIMP plugins for refocussing blurred images
This question is better placed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] So, I am crossposting it there Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, since I'm not only a geek but also a photographer and GIMP user I've decided to have a look at wnpp bug #398765 [1] and package the plugin [2]. While packaging gimp-refocus I came across the refocus-it plugin, which uses a different algorithm and also supports to refocus motion blur, so I've decided to package it, too [3]. It seems to be much slower, though - but it provides a command-line version which works totally independent of The GIMP, it only depends on libc6. I've commented and described the issues of both plugins at the given urls, testing and comments would be very appreciated. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=398765 [2] http://bzed.de/debian/packages/gimp-refocus [3] http://bzed.de/debian/packages/gimp-refocus-it Thanks a lot, Bernd Zeimetz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: gpodder
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gpodder. gPodder is a podcast receiver/catcher. You can subscribe to RSS feeds (Podcasts) and download audio/video content from different channels. You can then playback content on your desktop or synchronize to your iPod or portable MP3 player. Simultaneous downloads and automatic downloads of new episodes are also supported. * Package name: gpodder Version : 0.9.0-2 Upstream Author : Thomas Perl [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://gpodder.berlios.de/ * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds these binary packages: gpodder- A GTK+ Media aggregator and Podcast catcher The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpodder - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpodder/gpodder_0.9.0-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Thomas Perl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released yesterday)
The NetCDF 3.6.2 library was just released yesterday. I have created packages at [1]. They are lintian clean and apt-gettable. Please review them. Considering this is a stable NetCDF release, I am also looking for a sponsor. BTW, if you have installed my previous packages, you will probably have to manually remove them if you use apt to install the new ones. [1]http://www.penguintechs.org/~wt/debian/netcdf/ Thanks, wt -- Warren Turkal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: packages for netcdf 3.6.2 (released today)
Warren Turkal wrote:
The NetCDF 3.6.2 library was just released today. I have created packages at
[1]. They are lintian clean and apt-gettable. Please review them. Considering
this is a stable NetCDF release, I am also looking for a sponsor.
[1]http://www.penguintechs.org/~wt/debian/netcdf/
Hi Warren,
as promised earlier, I will be happy to sponsor these packages.
There are some things I think should first be fixed or at least looked at:
debian/README.Debian:
* nothing substantive in here so probably this file should be deleted.
debian/changelog:
* Please close the ITA bug (#321336) in your changelog entry.
* Please merge in the changelog entries from Debian package versions
3.6.1-0.2 and 3.6.1-1. (I'd suggest merging everything from your
earlier unofficial packages into one changelog entry for 3.6.2-1.)
* Also, I'd strongly recommend uploading to experimental for the moment
(i.e. change the target distribution in the first line of the changelog)
so as not to complicate getting any fixes that may be needed for netcdf3
into Etch.
* I'm not sure the BTS is smart enough to close #278739 that appears
with a newline between it and closes:. (If I'm wrong, someone please
correct me.)
debian/control:
* netcdfg-dev should be in section oldlibs since it's an empty
transition package
* libnetcdf-dev should be in section libdevel rather than devel
* It's generally a good idea to have the lib*-dev package depend on the
exact same version of the lib package, e.g.
Depends: libnetcdf4 (= ${binary:Version})
* The documentation in /usr/share/doc/libnetcdf-dev comes to 3.2 MB,
probably large enough to consider creating a separate netcdf-doc package
for it.
On second look I see you have an ITA for netcdf-doc -- is this the
same as the documents now in your packages in
/usr/share/doc/libnetcdf-dev? If so, your changelog should also close
the ITA for #321337. If not, maybe the existing netcdf-doc package
would better be renamed something like netcdf-users-guide, based on its
description.
debian/copyright:
* In the first line of the first ALL-CAPS clause you have provided by
the Regents and Contributors - this looks like you may have missed
substituting your own name for the Regents ? Also you may want to
give the year(s) of your copyright on the Debian packaging.
* I'm not sure whether you may want to acknowledge the previous
maintainer(s) of netcdf even though you don't use their work. I seem to
recall this was discussed on debian-mentors before but I don't remember
the consensus.
debian/docs:
* This file causes README to be installed into the first .deb package
named in the control file, namely the dummy package netcdfg-dev. Do you
actually want it there? (It also gets installed also to the other three
packages where it makes more sense.)
debian/libnetcdf-dev.docs:
* I think you should omit the info files from here since they also get
installed to a more sensible place by the presence of the
libnetcdf-dev.info file.
debian/rules:
* A number of files in the source tree are autogenerated, for instance
the PS and PDF files. If one runs a build and then runs debian/rules
clean, these files no longer exist, making the process not idempotent.
To make sure these files get built properly from scratch, I'd recommend
adding the following commands in the clean target of debian/rules:
for file in netcdf-c netcdf-cxx netcdf-f77 netcdf-f90 \
netcdf-install netcdf-tutorial netcdf ; do \
rm -f man/$file.ps man/$file.pdf \
man/$file.html man/$file.dvi ; \
done
rm -f ncdump/ctest.c ncdump/ctest64.c
and also adding texlive-latex-base | tetex-bin to Build-Depends in
debian/control.
(note: they would instead be in Build-Depends-Indep if you create an
arch: all netcdf-doc package *and* can work out how to get CDBS to
generate the docs only in the binary-indep target.)
One last thing: please install RELEASE_NOTES as the upstream changelog
(changelog.gz) in all the binary .debs.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
