Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)
Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:38:43 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Good work. I will examine your package tonight (about 12 hours from now) and tell convey any further suggestions. Thank you, Meanwhile, could you explain the logic behind the version number 0.99-2+ds1. (I suppose one could also look up policy on this but I'm being lazy!) Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The +ds1 part means that it has been repackaged (Debian Source), and 1... well, I didn't like 0.99-2+ds ;) I've looked the Policy, but probably I missed it, and it doesn't explain what version number to use in case of a repackaged source. I've seen lots of versions (results taken from apt-cache dumpavail with some grepping): 0.5.2.1.ds-1.1 4.57~ds.1-1 2.3.0+ds1-1 I think I shouldn't use dfsg either, because it's not been repackaged because of non-free things or the like :) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: Some packages
On Feb 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: chmlib http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chmlib/chmlib_0.39-7.dsc Uploaded. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[done] RFS: NMU - gpgkeys
* Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 17:39]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gpgkeys/gpgkeys_0.3.1-4.1.dsc Has allready been sponsored by Marga. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: failmalloc
Hi On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:35:19 +0900 Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:11:25 +0900 Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Do you really need to include changed config.sub and config.guess in diff? (hint: delete them in clean) I re-create orig.tar.gz without config.sub and config.guess and add delete them in debian/rules. No you should not change orig.tar.gz, it should be exactly the same as upstream provides (unless you have good reason to do so). Just delete them in clean under same condition you use for copying them from /usr/share, this way the change won't be present in diff. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[done] RFS: log-analysis (QA - updated package)
* David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 16:19]: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.45-1 of log-analysis (this is a QA upload). [..] - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/log-analysis/log-analysis_0.45-1.dsc Uploaded. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[Done] RFS: QA Upload - klineakconfig
Hi! * Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 18:39]: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/klineakconfig/klineakconfig_0.9-7.dsc Uploading. Thank you, You are welcome. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: mirmon (again)
Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package mirmon. It is useful for minitoring mirror servers. For example, I'm using this for monitoring Debian mirrors. see http://test.mithril-linux.org/debian-mirror-check.html * Package name: mirmon ITP : 442381 Version : 1.38 Upstream Author : Henk Penning [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://people.cs.uu.nl/henkp/mirmon/ * License : MIT Section : web Language: perl Description : Mirmon helps administrators in keeping an eye on the mirror sites. In a concise graphic format, mirmon shows each site's status history of the last two weeks. It is easy to spot stale or dead mirrors. It builds this binary package: mirmon - monitor the state of mirrors The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mirmon - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mirmon/mirmon_1.38-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp pgpDeRODLhVqw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: failmalloc
Hi, Thank you for your review, Michal :-) On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:11:25 +0900 Michal Čihař [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Do you really need to include changed config.sub and config.guess in diff? (hint: delete them in clean) I re-create orig.tar.gz without config.sub and config.guess and add delete them in debian/rules. - The usual way is to make Debian packaging under same license as original code is. set as LGPL-2.1. - Please cleanup debian/rules, eg. Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper. and the version and major crap at the beginning which does not seem to be used at all. remove or comment out them. - I don't think that debian/libfailmalloc-dev.dirs is needed. unneeded debian/libfailmalloc-dev.dirs and libfailmalloc0.dirs are removed. And now, I upload it again. - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/failmalloc/failmalloc_1.0-1.dsc Can you check it? And if there is no problem in pacakge, please upload it. Thanks. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100, David Paleino wrote: Meanwhile, could you explain the logic behind the version number 0.99-2+ds1. (I suppose one could also look up policy on this but I'm being lazy!) Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The +ds1 part means that it has been repackaged (Debian Source), and 1... well, I didn't like 0.99-2+ds ;) If you look at the examples ... 0.5.2.1.ds-1.1 4.57~ds.1-1 2.3.0+ds1-1 ... you see that the [.+~]ds[1] is part of the upstream version and not of the Debian revision (before the - and not after it). So I suggest you use e.g. 0.99+ds-1 for your package. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-NP: Van Morrison signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)
Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The +ds1 part means that it has been repackaged (Debian Source), and 1... well, I didn't like 0.99-2+ds ;) ... 0.5.2.1.ds-1.1 4.57~ds.1-1 2.3.0+ds1-1 Now, after some reasoning, I believe that I should use something like 0.99+ds-1, (or 0.99~ds-1, but it results to be lesser than 0.99-1). Any suggestion on what versioning scheme to adopt? (obviously not 0.99~ds-1, since it wouldn't supersede the version in the archive) Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFC/RFS: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems
Le 8 févr. 08 à 16:20, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit : On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Description: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems Zerofree finds the unallocated, non-zeroed blocks in an ext2 or ext3 file-system and fills them with zeroes. This is useful if the device I'd add umounted or mounted read-only somewhere. It makes all the difference: one can use zerofree for them, and dd for filesystems mounted read-write. Good idea, done, last sentence of 1 §. Same version number, but date updated in changelog to today, 16:28. Regards, Thibaut.
Re: RFC/RFS: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Description: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems Zerofree finds the unallocated, non-zeroed blocks in an ext2 or ext3 file-system and fills them with zeroes. This is useful if the device I'd add umounted or mounted read-only somewhere. It makes all the difference: one can use zerofree for them, and dd for filesystems mounted read-write. -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFC/RFS: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems
Début du message réexpédié : De : Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date : 6 février 2008 17:25:15 HNEC Objet : RFC/RFS: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package zerofree. Hi, I just updated the package: * removed the Dm-Upload-Allowed field; * corrected a typo in the manpage. Same location, same version number. Regards, Thibaut. Note that I have set the Dm-Upload-Allowed field. This package is unrelated to the work I usually do with my sponsor Christoph Haas, which is why I prefer to ask here rather than to him. * Package name: zerofree Version : 1.0.1 Upstream Author : Ron Yorston * URL : http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/uml/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C ITP : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi? bug=462091 Section : admin Description: zerofree - zero free blocks from ext2/3 file-systems Zerofree finds the unallocated, non-zeroed blocks in an ext2 or ext3 file-system and fills them with zeroes. This is useful if the device on which this file-system resides is a disk image. In this case, depending on the type of disk image, a secondary utility may be able to reduce the size of the disk image after zerofree has been run. . The usual way to achieve the same result (zeroing the unallocated blocks) is to run dd do create a file full of zeroes that takes up the entire free space on the drive, and then delete this file. This has many disadvantages, which zerofree alleviates: * it is slow; * it makes the disk image (temporarily) grow to its maximal extent; * it (temporarily) uses all free space on the disk, so other concurrent write actions may fail. . Zerofree has been written to be run from GNU/Linux systems installed as guest OSes inside a virtual machine. If this is not your case, you almost certainly don't need this package. The package appears to be lintian and linda clean. The upload would fix this bugs: 462091 (ITP) The package can be found on my personal repository: - URL: http://www.lesia.obspm.fr/~paumard/debian/pool/main/z/zerofree/ - Source repository: deb-src http://www.lesia.obspm.fr/~paumard/ debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://www.lesia.obspm.fr/~paumard/debian/pool/main/z/ zerofree/zerofree_1.0.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Thibaut Paumard PGP.sig Description: Ceci est une signature électronique PGP
Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)
Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:44:23 +0100 gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: ... So I suggest you use e.g. 0.99+ds-1 for your package. Thank you. A new package is available on m.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libx86/libx86_0.99+ds-1.dsc Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
RFS: gnomad2 (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.9.1-1 of my package gnomad2. It builds these binary packages: gnomad2- Manage a Creative Labs Nomad Jukebox The upload would fix these bugs: 446812 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomad2 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomad2/gnomad2_2.9.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Manuel Garcia -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)
Hello, Sorry for the delay in responding. I had less free time than I thought. gregor herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: So I suggest you use e.g. 0.99+ds-1 for your package. On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: Now, after some reasoning, I believe that I should use something like 0.99+ds-1, (or 0.99~ds-1, but it results to be lesser than 0.99-1). I understand the ds part. Is there some reason why 0.99.ds1-2 was left out of the choices? This seems to be the practice for packages like sysvinit for example. The .tar.gz would then be named libx86_0.99.ds1.orig.tar.gz which is fine since it is the source which is being re-packaged by Debian. I have not yet done the rest of my review so you may want to wait a while before uploading a new version to mentors. Regards, Kapil. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: python-twitter
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-twitter. * Package name: python-twitter Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : DeWitt Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://code.google.com/p/python-twitter/ * License : Apache-2 Section : python It builds these binary packages: python-twitter - Twitter API wrapper for Python The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 463724 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-twitter - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-twitter/python-twitter_0.5-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Mauro Lizaur -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: QA Upload -- quiteinsane
Hi, Here is another QA upload. Closes 1 bug and does some package clean-up / standards update. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/quiteinsane/quiteinsane_0.10-14.dsc Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFS: QA Upload -- vipec
Hi, Here is another QA upload. Fixes two bugs and standards updates if someone has time to review/upload. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vipec/vipec_3.2.0-5.dsc Thank you, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)
Hello, On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: I have not yet done the rest of my review so you may want to wait a while before uploading a new version to mentors. Since you are adding quilt, it is probably a good idea to modify/add the Makefile in a quilt patch. Once you take a decision on this and the name change please upload your file to mentors and I will upload it. Regards, Kapil. -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
